Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Wine >
Apr 2, 2014 10:06 AM

What is plonk, really?

I got to thinking about this while reading the $5 wine thread.

Is plonk BAD wine, i.e., defective, thin, unbalanced? Or is it simply good sound wine that is not particularly distinctive?

I think the $5 Spanish and Portuguese wines I've been buying (for example) are sound and creditable, but not fascinating. Good everyday wine. There's no reason to denigrate such wine. You'd probably be served such wine at an average restaurant in those countries; would you reject it as plonk?

Is life really too short to drink such wine? Hardly, I think.

I'm just trying to get clarity on a definition here.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. Plonk was originally a mispronunciation of (vin) blanc. I don't think it connotates bad wine necessarily just cheap and cheerful wine with no distinctive features

    2 Replies
    1. re: kagemusha49

      Plonk is never cheerful (unless your are an underaged teen drinker high on white zin).


      1. re: Maximilien

        I was being optimistic about the cheerful part

    2. For the most part I think plonk is a pretty subjective term. There is probably some wine that is just so unsatisfying that nobody can stomach it, but there is likely a pleased customer for just about all of it. My go-to statistic refers to what I'm sure I've read is around 18 million cases of Charles Shaw sold each year by Trader Joe's. If it's plonk, it has a huge following.

      1. My understanding is Plonk is as Rumploe would say, "vin ordinaire". Not terrible but nothing you would remember the name of or recommend. I think of Art Exhibit wine.

        1 Reply
        1. My take on plonk is that it's the house wine they serve
          in carafes in French bistros. Usually it's rather mediocre,
          but from time to time you get lucky and hit a decent Cotes
          du Rhone.

          1 Reply
          1. re: bclevy

            Actually, I've ALWAYS had great success with "un pichet de vin rouge" in French bistros, and never found them mediocre at all . . . IF one is actually in a wine producing region.

            In Paris, it's strictly bottled stuff for me . . .

          2. First of all, life really is too short for bad wine. That is one of the principles by which I live. The other comes from St. Augustine: "The world is a book. Those who do not travel read only one page."

            Plonk is uninteressting wine that is practically tasteless or worse. It is a beverage that does not encourage you to relift your glass. We still have lots of it down here in Roussillon where there still are too many young Carignan vines. Nevertheless I am happy to report after 12 years here that I now have a list of worthy addresses far too long for me to visit even in three afternoons.

            1 Reply
            1. re: collioure

              "Those who do not travel read only one page."

              This affords my corrolary to bclevy's earlier comment on French bistros: no one who visits only Paris will learn much of French food or wine.

              Back when he wrote an excellent popular US introductory wine book 50 years ago, Franco-American journalist Blake Ozias mentioned that his usual practice circa Lyon was to order "un petit pichet de Beaujolais" and that this was how much of the basic Beaujolais, including the transient en-primeur and "nouveau" variants, was then consumed -- from bulk. (That was before the French Ag Ministry got behind promoting Beaujolais Nouveau annually to foreigners, many of whom today know Beaujolais wines solely in that offshoot form.)