HOME > Chowhound > Wine >

Champagne Krug takes on Austrian producer over Krug name

z
zin1953 Feb 10, 2014 07:23 AM

http://www.decanter.com/news/wine-new...

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. z
    zin1953 RE: zin1953 Feb 11, 2014 07:10 AM

    The other side: "Krug wanted 'total submission', says Austrian producer" -- http://www.decanter.com/news/wine-new...

    1. ChefJune RE: zin1953 Feb 11, 2014 09:29 AM

      I'm guessing they could solve this problem if the Austrian winemaker would add his (her?) first name to the bottle.

      Krug isn't suing Charles Krug in Napa...

      3 Replies
      1. re: ChefJune
        z
        zin1953 RE: ChefJune Feb 11, 2014 10:30 AM

        "Isn't" doesn't mean "didn't." Joseph Krug founded the Champagne house in 1843; Charles Krug founded his winery in 1861. I wonder if, being from Mainz originally, Joseph was concerned about taking on the Prussian Charles.

        More likely, however, is that Charles Krug came first in terms of getting their product to American consumers . . .

        Then again., Krug has operated continuously since 1843, whereas Charles Krug all but ceased operations with Prohibition, and was reopened in 1941 when purchased by Cesare Mondavi. Champagne Krug, being in France, may not have noticed right away . . . something to do with the war, I'm sure.

        1. re: zin1953
          ChefJune RE: zin1953 Feb 11, 2014 10:32 AM

          ya think???

          Then again, Krug no longer owns Krug. so the complaints are being made, I'm guessing, by LVMH.

          1. re: ChefJune
            z
            zin1953 RE: ChefJune Feb 11, 2014 10:53 AM

            Vigorous enforcement of trademarks is the law -- that or lose the trademark.

            That's why McDonald's went after a vegetarian "fast food " restaurant in Santa Cruz, CA in the late-1970s names "McDharma's"

      Show Hidden Posts