HOME > Chowhound > Home Cooking >


Anthony Bourdain's "Les Halles Cookbook"

I'm not sure this is the right board to post this, but hey, Mods, feel free to relocate me! '-)

After a whole lot of hassles, Anthony Bourdain's Les Halles cook book FINALLY arrived a week or so ago. Now the question is, is that an indicator that it is selling like hot cakes (or crepes) or is it simply an indication of my typical luck in ordering things? I'm the one who had to have three shippings of a new desktop computer before one arrived in working condition! It took two full months and one cancellation and one new order before I finally got my copy of this cookbook!

I ordered it for two reasons. First of all, I've used a couple of AB's soup recipes I got on line, most notably his mushroom soup which for me is pure and simple "the joy of mushrooms" in a bowl, so I figured a bit more joy in my life couldn't hurt. Secondly, I bought it because I wanted to find out for myself whether it really is true that overall, he is an excellent teacher, and whether less accomplished cooks can learn a great deal from him about cooking, organization, and how to be a better cook over all. Turns out they can! He takes his time, he cheers you with his wry humor, and if you don't understand the basics before reading him, it will be sheer obtuseness on your part if you don't understand after reading this book. Example: If you don't understand the logic and necessity of "mise en place" in the cooking process (or simply "meez," as he puts it) before reading his discourse on it, you will be clear and dedicated to the idea after reading Chef Bourdain! Mise en place is what you do before you apply first heat to the bottom of your pan. It's the engine of smooth sailing in the kitchen. It's what keeps me sane when I cook. It can do the same for you.

I take his word that these recipes are exactly what he says they are: The same recipes he followed religiously as the executive (or whatever) chef at Les Halles bistro in New York City, and NOT true "haute cuisine" recipes as he would present them for the purpose of giving classic "Michelin Four Star" recipes that one would expect from the title of some of the dishes he includes here. Keep in mind that restaurant food, by definition, requires that a chef cook the exact same dish the exact same way night after night in order to "keep the customer sarisfied."

A prime example of this being the (presumably) Les Halles recipe for Tournedos Rossini. In the classic dish, as either Careme or Escoffier invented it (there is ongoing argument about which chef gets the credit), it is a tornedo steak (cut from the large end of a beef tenderloin) done medium rare and served atop a well browned-in-butter "crouton" (a slice of excellent bread cut to the size and shape to match exactly the size and shape of the steak. The crouton is centered on the plate, the steak is centered on the crouton, then a quickly pan-browned slice of foie gras the diameter of the steak is set atop it, then a slice of a good sized black Perigord truffle as close to the size of the steak as possible (which translates into BIG BUCKS in ANY language!) is set atop the foie gras, and the whole bundle is delicately napped with a spoonful or two of well truffled Sauce Perigordine. When prepared with premium ingredients by deft hands, this is a dish that fills the soul with rapture. It is simply divine! BUT.... the Les Halles and/or Anthony Bourdain recipe calls for plopping the steak and garnishments SANS crouton atop a blob of mashed potatoes... <gasp> I cringed! I'm a staunch believer in "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" In this they didn't fix it, they broke it. Brought a shiver to my soul!

He and/or Les Halles do a similar thing with a couple of other classic classic classic French traditional recipes such as Boeuf Bourguignon, but hey, if you've never ever had the original recipes of any of these classic dishes, I'm sure the Les Halles recipes taste good and you'll enjoy them.

In short, I do highly recommend this cook book. Lots of excellent recipes in it, and even better, tons of great information about how the professionals cook, which works just as well (if not better) for home cooks. If you enjoy good food and the satisfaction of making great food on your own, this is a very "user friendly" guide in that direction! But.... If you're into classic recipes and have a thing for authenticity, don't throw away your copy of Larousse Gastronomique either! '-)

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. Agreed. Good recipes and very good instruction.

    1. I've owned this book for a number of years and agree with you. Plus he's just funny as hell :)

      1. What departures does the cookbook make from traditional boeuf bourguignon? I had never thought of that dish as having a single authoritative original recipe, but I admit I've never looked into it either.

        1. A classic boeuf Bourguignon is never served with any physical evidence of carrots or chopped onions in the sauce. While these are standard ingredients in the braising of the beef, they are traditionally strained from the beef and gravy prior to presentation and at that time the prepared pearl onions and quartered and sauteed mushrooms are added before the dish is garnished with a scattering of fresh chopped parsley and served "family style." When the carrots and cooking onions are left in for serving, then it is simply "beef stew." Here's a link to Julia Child's classic "Mastering The Art of French Cooking" version:
          This is also the method I was taught by my chef/mentor in the 1950s a few years before MTAOFC was published. In "upscale" haute cuisine restaurants of the 50s and 60s, it was often served with one or two artfully fluted mushrooms on top or on the side, but never ever was a carrot visible in the final presentation!

          As I wrote in my first post, I have to assume AB is absolutely aware of this, but as advertised, is accurately presenting the Les Halles "bistro" version of these dishes.

          2 Replies
          1. re: Caroline1

            I too have had the book for many years. I decide to make every recipe in the book. Haven't made more than half so far.
            The 'frites' were very good but I use the ATK method now. Much easier and better IMO.
            IMO JC's 'BB' is still the best recipe.
            Agree that most of the recipes are 'dumbed down' bistro versions to make them easier to prepare dozens of times a day at Les Halles.
            I'd like to have checked out how the cooks at LH dealt with needing eight gallons + of cassoulet a week 'back in the day' when LH was 'the place to be seen' by the graziers.
            Now it's just one stop on the 'pilgrimage' for any Foodie visiting NYC.

            1. re: Puffin3

              I've never eaten at Les Halles. I went there once with my family...we were seated next to the meat counter. The stench was so awful that we asked to be moved...but even at the new spot, we could not escape the "memory" of that smell...we walked out and went someplace else. Too bad..I always wanted to try it, but that experience was just too much for me.

          2. I've owned the book since it first came out and one of my favorite recipes in the book is the beef tartare...it comes out perfectly

            1. I got a my copy autographed from Les Halles on Park Avenue maybe 10 years ago- he was not the big deal he is today and we liked the restaurant and neighborhood and had someone's birthday there. Anyway the best tip I got was in his recipe for Boeuf Bourguignon where he says if you're lucky enough to have some some demi glace use several spoons so ever since I have kept a jar in the freezer. I get it for Christmas from Williams Sonoma. Talk about a secret ingredient!

              1. I have never before heard of Tournedos Rossini, but after reading your description I want one, NOW. Where does one find such a dish in 2014???

                8 Replies
                1. re: davis_sq_pro

                  I don't know where you'll find it but there are a ton of recipes available.

                  1. re: c oliver

                    Yes, I'm sure I could attempt it myself were I so inclined. But that's a great example of the kind of dish I'd much rather leave to an expert. IMO a luxury dish with such expensive ingredients is hardly worthwhile if even one component is screwed up, and there is plenty of room for error in that list...

                    1. re: davis_sq_pro


                      This recipe couldn't be easier. Quite straightforward. There's actually little room for error. But if you don't want to make it, you can find some sources by Googling.

                      1. re: c oliver

                        My major quibble with that recipe is that "tournedos Rossini" is, as the name of the dish indicates, made with a tournedo steak which is an entirely different cut of a tenderloin of beef than a "filet mignon." A whole beef tenderloin is a tapering mussel with one end smaller in diameter than the other. Filet mignons are cut from the lesser diameter end, tournedos from the large end, and the chateubriand is at least a triple thick cut from the center section of the whole tenderloin. If I went to an upscale restaurant and they made my tournedos Rossini with a filet mignon I'd be having a serious chat with my captain or the maitre d' hotel!!! Sometimes choice of words is critical!

                        1. re: Caroline1


                          If you look at their menu, you'll see it described as a "filet." They chose the correct word for what they are serving. So if you order it anyway, then there's no reason for a "chat."

                          1. re: c oliver

                            Wrong on both counts, as in the New York Times recipe and the description of the dish on the Les Halles menu. When it comes to the whole or any part of the tenderloin muscle in beef, a "filet" or "filet mignon" is NOT the same thing as a "tournedo," nor are these terms interchangeable any more than "top round" and "bottom round", but the price of filets and tournedos will far exceed the price of top or bottom round. A tournedo is a TENDERLOIN STEAK. It is not a FILET!

                            As I said, if I was ever served a filet mignon instead of a tournedo when I ordered a tournedo Rossini, I would insist on being served what I had ordered or I would not pay the price quoted for a tournedo. Period. Plain and simple, it has to do with portion size. If I order a quarter pounder at McDonalds but receive a Happy Meal sized burger, I'll have a discussion with someone about that too. Language and descriptions count! If you choose to accept misrepresentation that is your choice.

                            Hope this helps.

                            1. re: Caroline1

                              The menu stated what the steak was. If that doesn't suit you, then you should order something else. The restaurant, not the customer, gets to cook what they want...and call it what they want. The customer gets to choose.

                              Hope this helps YOU in your future dining decisions.

                              1. re: Caroline1

                                "Plain and simple, it has to do with portion size. If I order a quarter pounder at McDonalds but receive a Happy Meal sized burger..."
                                You actually believe there is a set, accepted weight used universally for a portion of tournedo of beef? Really?
                                That's seriously nuts.

                  2. I was curious to hear what you thought of the book. Not everyone will enjoy his "wry" sense of humor. Glad you are liking it.

                    I had the book for several years and when my SO first saw it he stole it from me. He has cooked a few things, but the absolute favorite is the Potatoes Dauphinois (which we now just call Bourdain potatoes). Simple, but delicious and incredibly rich, we make them for Christmas.

                    I think the recipes are not classic, to the letter, but reflect the way that they cook in contemporary NYC. I had the good fortune to have dinner at Les Halles on a business trip a few years ago and thoroughly enjoyed it. The restaurant is not fancy or pretentious in any way. The food is very straight forward and actually pretty reasonably priced, by Manhattan standards.

                    1. I love this cookbook, particularly the section filled with recipes for mussels (I think I've tried them all. I eat a lot of mussels). I also really dig his insistence on using good, homemade stock. Everything I've tried has turned out pretty well, and I've even convinced a dinner guest to buy the book after making her the basque chicken.

                      We ate at Les Halles last year: it was wonderfully unpretentious brasserie fare (just like the book).

                      7 Replies
                      1. re: caseyjo

                        There are two. We ate at the one downtown.

                        1. re: c oliver

                          http://leshalles.net/locations They do have separate names. Les Halles Downtown is the name!

                          1. re: coll

                            And the other is Les Halles Park Avenue. One website, two locations. Not particularly unusual.

                            1. re: c oliver

                              Just trying to point out the one you referring to, so caseyjo knows for the future. Website seemed like a good way to do that.

                              1. re: coll

                                Yep. That's why I posted it upthread.

                                1. re: c oliver

                                  I know, just not by the actual name. So now we're all on the same page. It's downtown, and it's named Les Halles Downtown.

                                  1. re: coll

                                    Yep. That's why I said downtown.