HOME > Chowhound > Los Angeles Area >

Discussion

Zo or Q which would you go too ????? Thanks.

  • k

Happy NYE !!!!! hounders.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Depends on your mood.

    Q Sushi for Edomae style.
    Zo for, well... Zo style.

    1. honestly, if I was paying, neither.

      5 Replies
      1. re: TailbackU

        Are you saying it's too expensive, or you don't like it?
        I don't consider Zo to be that expensive considering the cost of sushi these days. My last two meals there with drinks were around $100 per person.

        1. re: cls

          Wow. I thought Zo started at 150 per person for just food even before drinks are added in.

          1. re: kevin

            my last bill was right around $180 sitting at the bar. 2 people a couple of drinks.
            My dinner before that was around $400 for 3 people with a couple of beers each.
            Both pre tip.

            1. re: cls

              was this at the downtown location ??????

              Thanks.

          2. re: cls

            I don't think the quality to price ratio is there. My last meal at Zo was $400+ after tax and tip for 2 people. I haven't been to Q yet, but their prices are similar if not higher, and from what I've seen, doesn't seem worth it to me.

        2. I'll probably try Q sometime in 1Q 2014 (as well as Sushi Kimagure Ike, since I'll be near that area for something next month).

          4 Replies
          1. re: chrishei

            Nice Shunji visit earlier today. :)

            1. re: chrishei

              Kimagure is my go to place. I've been a big fan for Ike san since his days in Hollywood.