HOME > Chowhound > General Topics >

Mark Bittman's Rhetorical Question: Should You Eat Chicken?

globocity Oct 17, 2013 02:07 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/16/opi...

What say you, Chowhounds? I don't eat poultry anyway so it's a non issue for me. Curious if any of you omnivores are taking a break in light of the recent salmonella outbreak.

Cheers.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. c oliver RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 02:19 PM

    I'm the least germophobic person I know. And lived in a "magic house" before Sam invented the term. But I'm concerned about this. I currently have no chicken in the freezer. As big a cheapskate as I can be I'm leaning heavily toward buying from local producers. As Bittman said, until the govt. does something, we're taking in my opinion, an unacceptable risk. Just me.

    3 Replies
    1. re: c oliver
      m
      ML8000 RE: c oliver Oct 17, 2013 02:30 PM

      Short answer; NO.

      The chicken industry is shooting itself in the foot if they think they're saving money because a few more of these incidents and the industry could take a huge hit. The thing is, it's only getting worse. Fewer USDA inspectors, faster kill lines, "self regulation" or selective testing (HIMP), and that sort of thing.

      http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpo...

      http://www.foodwhistleblower.org/the-...

      1. re: c oliver
        financialdistrictresident RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 03:42 AM

        We also buy from local producers whenever possible. I have chickens and ducks raised by a local farmer in the freezer.

        Since I only eat poultry and fish I am concerned but not alarmed.

        CSAs may benefit from this. Not knowing where your food comes from is unsettling. Especially when you eat out. Some restaurants buy from local farms but they probably can't source enough locally to meet their needs.

        1. re: financialdistrictresident
          c oliver RE: financialdistrictresident Oct 18, 2013 09:11 AM

          Our favorite restaurant at this point probably has two dozen local sources for their foods. It's something they strongly support and part of the reason we support them. And they make almost everything inhouse.

      2. fldhkybnva RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 03:16 PM

        I eat a ton of chicken, should be interesting. I'm interested to hear others thoughts.

        1. g
          GH1618 RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 03:34 PM

          I eat a chicken often and the recent outbreak doesn't change anything for me. I've known for a long time that raw chicken can contain pathogens, so I am careful to follow safe handling procedures and to cook it thoroughly.

          I don't go along with Bittman on his criticism of the FSIS. I think they have been handling this incident properly. It may be that the regulations should be more stringent, but in the meantime the FSIS must apply the regulations they have. They can't just make up rules as they go along. Regulatory bodies must follow proper rule-making procedure.

          I've read that there are about a million cases of salmonellosis a year in the US. This outbreak is a small part of that. It is probably impossible to eliminate salmonella from our food supply, so even if regulations are tightened, and recalls required for the most dangerous strains of salmonella, it would still be prudent to follow safe-handling protocols for poultry.

          33 Replies
          1. re: GH1618
            Chemicalkinetics RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 09:17 AM

            GH. I think there are two ways to look at this.

            1) Stop eating chicken because they are dangerous (more dangerous)

            or

            2) Stop eating chicken as a way to express and boycott the industry.

            I am concern about the chicken industry practice, but not concern enough to stop eating chicken. That is just me -- for now.

            1. re: Chemicalkinetics
              c
              calumin RE: Chemicalkinetics Oct 18, 2013 10:17 PM

              What about the third way, which to clean up the industry which in the US is so focused on profit that it is compromising the health of consumers? It's not like there is no choice.

            2. re: GH1618
              elegraph RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 04:47 PM

              I totally agree with you. Salmonella is endemic in our food supply. Clean your hands. Clean and disinfect your cutting boards and utensils. Cook your food to the proper internal temperature, And recently I read that washing your chicken before cooking actually spreads salmonella, so just pat it dry with paper towels.

              I think the government and Foster Foods handled this outbreak appropriately. The onus lies with the end user, namely US.

              1. re: elegraph
                c oliver RE: elegraph Oct 18, 2013 05:00 PM

                I was not aware that the government did anything other than alert the public.

                1. re: c oliver
                  c oliver RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 05:07 PM

                  Just found this re government regulators and regulations

                  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rena-st...

                  1. re: c oliver
                    g
                    GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 05:28 PM

                    No, they also increased the inspections, demanded process improvements, and threatened to close the plant if the improvements were not made in a timely manner.

                    1. re: GH1618
                      c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 05:44 PM

                      Did you read the article I linked to?

                      I guess I missed the things you reference.

                      1. re: c oliver
                        g
                        GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 06:00 PM

                        I did not. I don't generally read HuffPo. I did read the enforcement letter from FSIS to Foster Farms. I prefer primary sources.

                        http://www.marlerblog.com/files/2013/...

                        1. re: GH1618
                          c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 06:13 PM

                          Via your cited blog, here's a "primary" source:

                          http://www.marlerblog.com/uploads/fil...

                          1. re: c oliver
                            g
                            GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 06:18 PM

                            That has something to do with beef. Off topic. And what I am citing is the FSIS letter, not the blog which posted it.

                            1. re: GH1618
                              c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 06:23 PM

                              Food. From what I've read that court ruling is used for chicken also.

                    2. re: c oliver
                      globocity RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 07:31 PM

                      I'm with you, c Oliver. Seems we should take a cue from Sweden.

                      1. re: globocity
                        c oliver RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 07:35 PM

                        And thanks for bringing that up. Sweden has what about 1% and we're at 66%ish? So there's plenty to do.

                        1. re: c oliver
                          globocity RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 07:42 PM

                          Where is the consumer outrage? Seems that is the only thing that will light the fire under the arse if out government.

                          1. re: globocity
                            ipsedixit RE: globocity Oct 19, 2013 09:08 PM

                            Outrage over what?

                            1. re: c oliver
                              ipsedixit RE: c oliver Oct 19, 2013 09:50 PM

                              I'm sorry, but excuse me?

                              How many people have died from this current salmonella incident?

                              Bittman in his article cites to none, and there are no reported deaths that I am aware of being reported. (And the most recent data from the CDC shows that for 2009-10 there were 5 deaths related to salmonella http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsfoodbor... That's 5 in a 2 year period. I'm guessing more toddlers died from accidental drownings in bathtubs during that same time frame.).

                              Now, one can say that 1 death is 1 too many (especially if it's a loved one) but in the grand scheme if things it doesn't even rise to the level of a rounding error.

                              (And that inane example Bittman provides of possibly dying from salmonella is just as likely as dying from a deep gash on your arm. So please, hold the hysteria).

                              In the larger context of food relate problems like world hunger, food deserts, etc. salmonella just isn't worth getting riled up over.

                              It's like throwing a tissy-fit over a hangnail when your arm is broken.

                              I am outraged that millions of children go to bed hungry every night in this country.

                              But this? This, I don't even give another thought to during those moments of contemplation while sitting on the toilet waiting for nature and gravity to converge.

                              1. re: ipsedixit
                                c oliver RE: ipsedixit Oct 19, 2013 10:32 PM

                                As I've said before, I'm referring to the organism, the pathogen if you will. Food borne illnesses are grossly underreported. But the fact that 2/3 of the chickens in the US have salmonella vs. one tenth of one percent in Sweden is atrocious. It shows yet again that the government has sold out to Big Ag. And sharing your toilet habits brings nothing to the argument, IMO.

                                1. re: c oliver
                                  g
                                  GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 19, 2013 11:30 PM

                                  Sweden does some things better than we in the US do. There are likely many countries with more contaminated food than ours. We are not going to model our agricultural practices after Sweden's, so the important question is what improvements should be made to poultry production in the US to make it safer.

                                  1. re: GH1618
                                    c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 20, 2013 07:52 AM

                                    What are Sweden's agricultural practice and why aren't we going to model ours after theirs? Sincerely asking. Obviously we need to do something. As a government.

                                    1. re: c oliver
                                      ipsedixit RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 10:37 AM

                                      You can read about the Swedish poultry industry and its Salmonella prevention measures here:

                                      http://www.svenskfagel.se/?p=2216

                                      1. re: ipsedixit
                                        c oliver RE: ipsedixit Oct 20, 2013 10:43 AM

                                        Thank you. Allow me to repeat:

                                        why aren't we going to model ours after theirs?

                                        1. re: c oliver
                                          g
                                          GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 10:51 AM

                                          Sweden's debt to GDP ratio is 38% and falling. The United States' debt to GDP is 100% and rising.

                                          1. re: GH1618
                                            c
                                            calumin RE: GH1618 Oct 20, 2013 11:57 AM

                                            GDP ratios aren't really relevant here, right? This isn't a question of macroeconomic policy and the evolution of capitalism. It's about whether the US will continue to tolerate the salmonella infection levels of poultry in the US, when the trends are that it is getting worse. I think the answer is "no" but it's an issue of timing, given that poultry manufacturers have a lot of influence on consumer opinion.

                                            The Sweden example shows that the state of poultry production in the US is the product of choice, not of necessity. The reason we choose to adopt our current standards is that we like really cheap chicken. But antibiotic-resistant salmonella strains are not a minor issue.

                                            1. re: calumin
                                              g
                                              GH1618 RE: calumin Oct 20, 2013 02:52 PM

                                              This is most definitely not the place to discuss politics and economics, but when you raise the question of whether and how government should overhaul the production of chicken in the US, that's what you're getting into. It isn't going to happen in my lifetime, so it's pointless to debate it.

                                              I expect improvements in reducing pathogens in chicken will be made from time to time, if public health warrants it, and especially if public opinion demands it, but not to the extent of making chicken salmonella-free.

                                              1. re: GH1618
                                                c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 20, 2013 02:59 PM

                                                To me that smacks of if we can't fix it completely then we shouldn't do anything. Aim low and achieve even lower. Aim high and that lower is better. Does that make sense?

                                          2. re: c oliver
                                            ipsedixit RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 11:27 AM

                                            c,

                                            I was going to respond to your initial point about Sweden, but what little Chowhound discretion I have, got the better of me.

                                            I suppose i could have refuted your argument point-by-point and made it a complete mockery, but I just felt it wasn't really necessary to elevate this discussion to the point of argument, much less disagreement and animosity. I enjoy my discourse I've had with you, and hope to continue to do so -- either in a serious discussion or (as you put it) with an "ipse factor".

                                            Suffice to say, you have your position about why the US should model it's poultry system after Sweden's, and so be it. More power to you and you are fully entitled to that position. But if the fulcrum of your argument is why the US can't be (more?) like Sweden, then really you and are speaking on different planes. It would be like us trying to figure out how many corners a circle has.

                                            In any event, keep up the good fight c.

                                            Cheers, and Go Sweden!

                                            1. re: ipsedixit
                                              c oliver RE: ipsedixit Oct 20, 2013 11:39 AM

                                              Thanks, ipse. An adult way to handle it. And, yes, I've more than once been criticized for being too idealistic, expecting more out of people (and govts.) than I'm ever going to see. I can live with that :)

                                              1. re: c oliver
                                                ipsedixit RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 02:06 PM

                                                Hey! I take offense to being called an adult ...

                                                Talk to you on another thread.

                                        2. re: c oliver
                                          g
                                          GH1618 RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 10:44 AM

                                          Perhaps you should write your Congressman. But lately, they haven't been able to keep the government running on all cylinders.

                                          1. re: GH1618
                                            c oliver RE: GH1618 Oct 20, 2013 10:57 AM

                                            But that doesn't mean we just throw in the towel. I was listening to a program on NPR and it was suggesting that rather than writing one's congressperson to get involved in a program that you're passionate about That's more likely to effect change. Also we could stop buying tanks that the generals don't want.

                                        3. re: GH1618
                                          mcf RE: GH1618 Oct 20, 2013 08:31 AM

                                          Well, China is much more contaminated, but increasingly, we're buying food an drugs from them, or constituent ingredients unlabeled as Chinese.

                                          1. re: mcf
                                            westsidegal RE: mcf Oct 20, 2013 04:49 PM

                                            fwiw, i'm doing my best to NOT be part of the group that is buying food and drugs from china.
                                            (additionally i don't buy cookware or dish-ware that was produced in china)
                                            found a source for US grown organic edamame, my latest quest.
                                            read labels religiously.

                                            i'm sure something must have slipped through my sieve, but i am all-out trying here.

                                            1. re: westsidegal
                                              mcf RE: westsidegal Oct 20, 2013 05:02 PM

                                              Moi, aussi. The problem is that there are so many constituents in food products that come from or have been processed in, China that it's hard to avoid.

                                              Doing my best, at least where I know what something is and contains, too.

                      2. g
                        GH1618 RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 03:41 PM

                        I'll add that just because Costco claims its rotisserie chicken is cooked at 180 °F, that doesn't mean it has been properly cooked. Chicken must reach an internal temperature of 165 °F everywhere for ten minutes to meet FSIS standards. An independent inspector must verify that their cooking procedure meets this standard before I'll believe it.

                        5 Replies
                        1. re: GH1618
                          g
                          GH1618 RE: GH1618 Oct 17, 2013 04:00 PM

                          The Los Angeles Times reported that the Costco location which cooked the chicken which was recalled cooks about 1000 birds per day. It could be that their procedure is safe but that the proper procedure wasn't followed for some of the product. Mistakes are more likely when a system is overloaded.

                          1. re: GH1618
                            mcf RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 08:21 AM

                            It also doesn't mean that it hasn't been touched with utensils, hands, etc. that were not heated.

                            1. re: GH1618
                              t
                              thursday RE: GH1618 Oct 19, 2013 10:05 PM

                              Speaking of Costco - I was appalled, frankly, when I went to Costco the day after the chicken story broke. Ralph's had pulled all their Foster Farms chickens, and the news story I read said that the chickens had been pulled from every grocery and Costco in a voluntary recall. I went to Costco to see if I could get some fish or something for dinner instead, and they had a fully stocked chicken case, rotisseries, etc. Surprised, I asked the man restocking the meats, "Oh, I thought the chickens were recalled!" hoping to hear news that the recall was over, and got instead: "No. There was no recall" in a tone that implied I was a paranoid idiot. "I thought there was; Ralph's pulled all their chicken." "No recall. You just have to make sure you cook it really, really well, and it should be fine. Just cook it a lot."

                              I was flabbergasted - not just that Costco would decide NOT to pull their chicken when every other store had, but that their advice is to just cook it to death?? I did not buy chicken that visit, and I am not a suit-happy person, but if I had bought chicken and gotten sick, I would have sued them in a heartbeat. I think I'm just astounded that we all just sort of accept, "oh well, chicken is diseased" and go about our business as if there is no solution...

                              1. re: thursday
                                g
                                GH1618 RE: thursday Oct 19, 2013 11:33 PM

                                It wasn't all Costco stores, but only in the area where the contaminated chickens were found.

                                1. re: thursday
                                  c
                                  calumin RE: thursday Oct 20, 2013 02:29 AM

                                  The advice to "cook it really, really well, and it should be fine" is ironic, given that the two recalls Costco made for this store was for chicken products which they are claiming were all cooked to 180 degrees.

                              2. Veggo RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 03:51 PM

                                I expect that poultry producers are more strongly motivated to deliver a safe product because of plaintiffs' attorneys rather than FSIS standards. Parasitic as they are, they occasionally serve a useful purpose.

                                1 Reply
                                1. re: Veggo
                                  kaleokahu RE: Veggo Oct 17, 2013 04:28 PM

                                  Hey Veggo: "...plaintiffs' attorneys... occasionally serve a useful purpose."

                                  Wait a minute. I resemble that remark! Or, as Groucho, in dictating a letter to his attorneys, instructed" "Gentlemen. Question mark."

                                  Aloha,
                                  Kaleo

                                2. c oliver RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 04:09 PM

                                  http://www.nbcnews.com/health/costco-...

                                  Another 47,000# of chicken from the same Costco. It appears to be after cooking that the problem occurs. But if we weren't having these high rates and if they weren't pumping these birds so full of antibiotics, I have to believe the situation would improve

                                  1. Ttrockwood RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 07:57 PM

                                    In a word, no.
                                    Especially not if you're in california or the affected western states right now.
                                    But in general i'm going with no.

                                    1. ipsedixit RE: globocity Oct 17, 2013 08:55 PM

                                      There will be days when I will be sick.

                                      There will come a day when I will die.

                                      Whether I eat chicken or not will change neither of those two things.

                                      6 Replies
                                      1. re: ipsedixit
                                        c oliver RE: ipsedixit Oct 17, 2013 10:53 PM

                                        But I'd rather not rush the process unnecessarily.

                                        1. re: c oliver
                                          ipsedixit RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 11:21 AM

                                          Oh, I dunno.

                                          I hear the food is better in Hell, anyway. Plus, I like hot food.

                                        2. re: ipsedixit
                                          financialdistrictresident RE: ipsedixit Oct 18, 2013 03:52 AM

                                          You have to die of something. I don't like to get sick. Especially food poisoning kind of sick . . .

                                          This thread is making me appreciate farmers even more.

                                          One of my meat eating friends sent this to me:

                                          "Note to All Hunters: This is from a San Francisco newspaper!

                                          To all you hunters who kill animals for food, shame on you; you ought to go to the store and buy the meat that was made there, where no animals were harmed."

                                          Deer hunting season starts in about a week. At least hunters and anglers know where their food comes from . . .

                                          1. re: financialdistrictresident
                                            TroyTempest RE: financialdistrictresident Oct 18, 2013 10:10 AM

                                            When you say it was from a San Francisco newspaper, was it a letter to the editor, advertisement, editorial? And what newspaper?

                                            Or was it from your friend who got it off the internet somewhere, and probably somewhere along the line made it up?

                                            I know. There is a lot worse stuff out there, but this kind of stuff just bothers me.

                                            1. re: TroyTempest
                                              financialdistrictresident RE: TroyTempest Oct 18, 2013 02:11 PM

                                              My apologies, Troy Tempest.

                                              I have no idea . . .it was just a joke (the joke I received is in "quotes"). Especially the part that says "go to the store and buy the meat that was made there. . ."

                                              1. re: financialdistrictresident
                                                TroyTempest RE: financialdistrictresident Oct 21, 2013 07:56 AM

                                                OK. No worries.

                                        3. l
                                          LADave RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 01:36 AM

                                          And then there is the issue of the horrible lives the critters are forced to live on factory farms.

                                          1. h
                                            Harters RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 05:48 AM

                                            Short answer is there's almost nothing going to deter me from eating chicken. I buy high welfare birds (no guarantee against salmonella) and cook it throughly.

                                            2 Replies
                                            1. re: Harters
                                              c oliver RE: Harters Oct 18, 2013 09:13 AM

                                              Not familiar with the term "high welfare," Harters.

                                              1. re: c oliver
                                                Will Owen RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 12:01 PM

                                                I'm going to guess it's a term meaning something like the grade Whole Foods gives to all their meat - points added for free range or cage-free, organic feed, no antibiotics or hormones etcetera. I'm not giving up on eating chicken, but Foster Farms has been off my shopping list for a long time before any of this hit the news.

                                            2. tcamp RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 06:16 AM

                                              I'm still eating it. But I will say I'm making sure it is well cooked and following safer than usual handling standards. I'm also buying more from my CSA farmer.

                                              I have backed off the Costco cooked chickens for a bit.

                                              1. c
                                                calumin RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 06:30 AM

                                                Mark Bitman got this completely right. Our chicken supply is becoming more contaminated as a result of our mass production processes, and the evidence is clear. 40% hospitalization rate is a scary number.

                                                This isn't just about the presence of salmonella, it is about the fact that those who become ill are becoming harder to treat. And as the CostCo incident shows, it is not always in our individual control to stay clear of illness.

                                                If FSIS took a new look at the problem, they could lead the industry to produce a safer chicken supply. But their interests lie with the producers more than they should.

                                                2 Replies
                                                1. re: calumin
                                                  g
                                                  GH1618 RE: calumin Oct 18, 2013 07:32 AM

                                                  I wouldn't assume that the FSIS isn't looking at the problem. Remember that they recently reclassified certain strains of E. coli as adulterants.

                                                  1. re: GH1618
                                                    c
                                                    calumin RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 11:23 AM

                                                    Well I assume they are looking at it, and that they're also moving very slowly.

                                                    The Bittman reference to Sweden is interesting. Salmonella in commercial poultry in Sweden is less than 0.1% and the country treats poultry containing salmonella as unfit for human consumption. Now that these salmonella strains are becoming more resistant to antibiotic treatment this will become more of an issue in the US.

                                                2. m
                                                  mwk RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 07:05 AM

                                                  I think he's crazy to suggest that there is now a salmonella strain that can withstand high heat.

                                                  What is 1000% more likely is that Costco didn't cook those birds properly, and so they were not safe. Costco can state that they cook all the birds to 180, but what do they do to enforce that? I've NEVER seen anyone attending one of those rotisserie stations with an instant meat thermometer checking every bird that comes out of the oven. How do they know that the entire bird made it to 180 for the appropriate amount of time?

                                                  Having said that, whenever I buy a rotisserie chicken I always heat it again in my oven at home until it's thoroughly hot, unless I'm using it in something that I'm cooking again, like soup. Also, I have found a local farm where I can get pastured, free-range heritage chickens, and I buy those as much as I can afford (they are not cheap).

                                                  1. b
                                                    beevod RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 07:43 AM

                                                    Avoid the beaks and you'll be fine.

                                                    1 Reply
                                                    1. re: beevod
                                                      Veggo RE: beevod Oct 18, 2013 07:49 AM

                                                      No pico de gallo?

                                                    2. Davwud RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 08:03 AM

                                                      I bet more people are hit by cars while texting and that doesn't stop them.
                                                      Certainly more people die from smoking than get sick from chickens and that doesn't stop them.
                                                      I suspect more people will be hit by lightning this year than will get sick from poultry. And that won't stop people from going out in a storm.

                                                      I will not stop eating chicken. Will take my chances with cars, lightning but don't smoke anymore.

                                                      DT

                                                      1. mcf RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 08:10 AM

                                                        I don't buy factory farmed chicken, which tend to be the most virulent and I am uber careful about cross contamination in my own kitchen.

                                                        Still on the menu.

                                                        I'd scrupulously avoid chickens raised in unwholesome conditions and on antibiotics that lead to resistant regimens.

                                                        Did Bittman suggest readers stop eating leafy greens when e. coli was found in those?

                                                        1. biondanonima RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 09:12 AM

                                                          I'm still eating chicken. I almost never order it out and I rarely buy rotisserie chickens, so whatever chicken I consume has been cooked by me. I am careful about cross-contamination and thorough cooking (made easier by the fact that I rarely eat white meat, and I prefer my dark meat WELL done), and like many others I am less inclined to believe that this is a new heat-resistant strain and more inclined to believe that someone in the Costco meat department didn't know what they were doing.

                                                          1. e
                                                            ellabee RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 09:46 AM

                                                            Three years ago I swore off industrially raised meat in all forms, in favor of locally grown, small-producer chicken, lamb, pork, and beef. It's more expensive in immediate dollar terms, so we have a few more meatless meals -- less but better is the watchword.

                                                            In big-picture terms, it's much _less_ expensive: the raising, butchering, and transport of the meat that we cook with doesn't abuse the animals, the land, the workers, or the planet's carbon load. The money stays in the local economy. The farmland stays farmland, and farmers' children are taking on farming again. And the people eating the food aren't made sick.

                                                            In the last year the federal govt has allowed a tripling of the speed of poultry processing lines -- already one of the hardest and most injury-producing jobs in the country -- while cutting the number of inspectors. In the last month or so they've green-lighted the import of meat processed in China, with no labeling to let consumers know the country of origin. Nothing now could persuade me to cook with supermarket chicken.

                                                            1 Reply
                                                            1. re: ellabee
                                                              c oliver RE: ellabee Oct 18, 2013 09:52 AM

                                                              What a great and succinct piece. That pretty much covers it.

                                                            2. c oliver RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 11:27 AM

                                                              It appears that there are strains that are more heat resistant than others.

                                                              http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...

                                                              1. c oliver RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 11:33 AM

                                                                And here's another bit of data:

                                                                http://www.fooddoctors.com/FoodSafety...

                                                                It seems like even the govt. recommended ITs could wind up being too low in some cases. And I don't like overcooked anything. Another argument for me to change my buying habits. And has been said, have more meatless meals to save money.

                                                                1. kaleokahu RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 11:40 AM

                                                                  Hi, globocity:

                                                                  My take is that it's the typical Bittman shouty, speculative, alarmist overreach.

                                                                  Wolf. Wolf! WOLF!

                                                                  Aloha,
                                                                  Kaleo

                                                                  1. o
                                                                    ospreycove RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 12:13 PM

                                                                    Another reason that I seek out local pastured animals, (poultry, pork, rabbits, and beef). Recently I have found a few larger scale "backyard farmers" that produce very high quality meat that is hunanely and carefully tended and raised.

                                                                    1. n
                                                                      NVJims RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 12:17 PM

                                                                      I have chicken from the batches that was suspect. I am continuing to COOK and eat it. Virtually all poultry is suspect, including your vaulted small supplier all natural, organic supplies. These small suppliers, and especially the hobbyist producers are even more prone to having problems and not even knowing it.

                                                                      8 Replies
                                                                      1. re: NVJims
                                                                        c oliver RE: NVJims Oct 18, 2013 12:26 PM

                                                                        Could you give a citation please regarding local, small producers? TIA.

                                                                        1. re: NVJims
                                                                          mcf RE: NVJims Oct 18, 2013 12:30 PM

                                                                          That's a really dubious assertion. Unless you have documentation that small suppliers have 70% or more infection rates in their poultry like factory farmers do?

                                                                          1. re: NVJims
                                                                            o
                                                                            ospreycove RE: NVJims Oct 18, 2013 01:35 PM

                                                                            Actually, the Salmonella Enteritidis bacterium flourishes in the warm fresh feces of many animals. Meat chickens are especially vulnerable when raised in close quarters as found in "factory farms" where it is not uncommon for 1 1/2 to 2 feet of chicken fecal matter to build up on the floor of the warehouse where the meat birds spend their short lives, usually 10=12 weeks max. One of the advantages of pastured, humanely raised animals, is this lack of concentrated fresh manure in a confined space. Hens that lay eggs in a factory environment do not fare much better. Battery cages are stacked 5 high, not fun if you are on the first level and all of your neighbors above are crapping on you 24/7, eventually the birds' feathers burn out and leave ther laying hen featherless and crusted with feces.

                                                                            1. re: ospreycove
                                                                              c oliver RE: ospreycove Oct 18, 2013 01:39 PM

                                                                              That had been my take but hopefully NVJims will give us more info.

                                                                              1. re: ospreycove
                                                                                JayL RE: ospreycove Oct 18, 2013 05:49 PM

                                                                                I have a cousin with laying houses and at one time came close to purchasing one myself...now there are different ways to skin a cat, but the laying houses I know of are in no way close to the way you describe them.

                                                                                1. re: JayL
                                                                                  c oliver RE: JayL Oct 18, 2013 09:54 PM

                                                                                  Are you talking large, commercial setup or something small? The "factories" definitely operate as ospreycove described.

                                                                                  1. re: c oliver
                                                                                    JayL RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 06:37 AM

                                                                                    Small...I thought I had said that or at least made that clear...sorry.

                                                                                    Anyway, my point was to not paint the whole industry with one wide brush.

                                                                              2. re: NVJims
                                                                                c
                                                                                calumin RE: NVJims Oct 18, 2013 01:51 PM

                                                                                There was a 2011 study by University of Georgia and Ohio State which found salmonella presence in conventionally-grown chickens at 7x the rate of organically-grown chickens.

                                                                                More importantly, the salmonella in organically-grown chickens didn't have the same multi-drug anti-microbial resistance that's found in conventionally grown chickens.

                                                                              3. Veggo RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 12:18 PM

                                                                                I lean toward Purdue, for lack of better knowledge. I suffered from salmonella from a chicken quesadilla from a food truck, several BAD days.

                                                                                11 Replies
                                                                                1. re: Veggo
                                                                                  mcf RE: Veggo Oct 18, 2013 12:29 PM

                                                                                  Why Perdue? I recall a statistic from probably a decade or more ago from public health authorities citing a 70% infection rate in factory farmed chickens with one or more infections, most typically salmonella an campylobacter.

                                                                                  1. re: mcf
                                                                                    c oliver RE: mcf Oct 18, 2013 12:31 PM

                                                                                    I think that statistic is still valid. I did read that 'air-dried' birds are better. I've bought those a couple of times from WF when seeking a small(er) chicken for Zuni.

                                                                                    1. re: mcf
                                                                                      Veggo RE: mcf Oct 18, 2013 02:04 PM

                                                                                      Why Perdue? I attended a business seminar in DC with Frank Purdue back in the 70's, and he was smarter and more entertaining than the instructor.

                                                                                    2. re: Veggo
                                                                                      Chemicalkinetics RE: Veggo Oct 18, 2013 12:40 PM

                                                                                      Now, I am going to throw a curve ball. Isn't it not a bad thing to get sick once or twice? While I don't want people die from food poisoning, I can see a problem if everything is too clean.

                                                                                      1. re: Chemicalkinetics
                                                                                        mcf RE: Chemicalkinetics Oct 18, 2013 01:16 PM

                                                                                        Unrelated point.

                                                                                        There's a vast middle there.

                                                                                        And these food borne superbugs tend to be more lethal to children, especially, in many cases.

                                                                                        1. re: Chemicalkinetics
                                                                                          c oliver RE: Chemicalkinetics Oct 18, 2013 01:17 PM

                                                                                          There's the natural "flora and fauna" and then there are the "toxic" organisms. You need and want the former and you don't need or want the latter. Ever.

                                                                                          1. re: c oliver
                                                                                            drongo RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 05:54 PM

                                                                                            No, that's not completely right. There's a school of thought that people need to be exposed to pathogens to "train" their immune systems. Most of the articles on this that I found are behind scientific journal pay walls. But see http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/opi...

                                                                                            I think that chemicalkinetics is not letting on all he knows -- he (like me) is a professional scientist (I don't know him, but it's evident in his posts).

                                                                                            1. re: drongo
                                                                                              c oliver RE: drongo Oct 18, 2013 06:05 PM

                                                                                              I don't disagree with you..but there are pathogens and then there are pathogens :) I honestly don't want to "train" my gut on small doses of salmonella. One bout from a recalled (but not removed from the shelves) jar of peanut butter was enough for me, thank you very much. But I devoutly believe that all this obsession with "germs" is ridiculous and causes harm. Except on a cruise ship where they damn near tackle you, I've never used hand sanitizers, drink tap water all over the world, wash my hands mostly when there's noticeable dirt on them, etc. And I have gut of iron :) So I do believe that I've immunized myself to a lot of things.

                                                                                              1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                drongo RE: c oliver Oct 19, 2013 12:20 PM

                                                                                                I agree with you that training one's immune system on highly pathogenic strains of Salmonella is not appealing!

                                                                                          2. re: Chemicalkinetics
                                                                                            g
                                                                                            GH1618 RE: Chemicalkinetics Oct 18, 2013 05:30 PM

                                                                                            There are some pathogens that are best avoided altogether.

                                                                                            1. re: GH1618
                                                                                              drongo RE: GH1618 Oct 18, 2013 05:56 PM

                                                                                              Definitely true. Including some strains of Salmonella (a genus very near-and-dear to my heart, for reasons unrelated to this discussion board).

                                                                                        2. drongo RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 01:18 PM

                                                                                          I am going to eat only pink slime from now on -- the ammonia used in processing kills the bacteria. I'll recommend it to Mr. Bittman too.

                                                                                          Maybe I can invent a poultry version of pink slime and make my fortune!

                                                                                          1. j
                                                                                            John Francis RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 01:28 PM

                                                                                            It's a non-issue for me too, and I eat chicken in one form or another at least a couple of times a week. Why a non-issue? Partly because the odds against getting sick are immense - I'm not panicked by 7,500 cases out of tens or even hundreds of millions of meals eaten in restaurants or at home. Partly because I personally have never been sickened by chicken. :-)

                                                                                            Mark Bittman is an outstanding cookbook author, but as an editorial columnist he can get carried away. I'd want to see some other, calmer opinions about this. Of course we need to be careful in how we handle and cook chicken, but that's old news.

                                                                                            4 Replies
                                                                                            1. re: John Francis
                                                                                              c oliver RE: John Francis Oct 18, 2013 01:33 PM

                                                                                              I'm actually focused on the data not "opinions."

                                                                                              1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                mcf RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 01:45 PM

                                                                                                Most cases of food borne illness never make it into the data... a very small percentage, even of of surveillance illnesses, ever get reported, or even diagnosed.

                                                                                                You can assume that the folks who got reported were *damned* sick and/or hospitalized.

                                                                                                1. re: mcf
                                                                                                  c oliver RE: mcf Oct 18, 2013 01:54 PM

                                                                                                  I was just referring to the citations I linked to above. Those were about the organisms themselves rather than people. And I agree with you btw.

                                                                                                  1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                    mcf RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 02:01 PM

                                                                                                    I knew you knew, I was just piggy backing on your statement.
                                                                                                    :-)

                                                                                            2. l
                                                                                              luminousparagon RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 01:28 PM

                                                                                              All the more reason to be indians and farmers and such.

                                                                                              1 Reply
                                                                                              1. re: luminousparagon
                                                                                                x
                                                                                                xanadude RE: luminousparagon Oct 18, 2013 03:38 PM

                                                                                                what?

                                                                                              2. PotatoHouse RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 02:11 PM

                                                                                                If I stopped eating something just because the media started a scare campaign about it I would have starved years ago.

                                                                                                2 Replies
                                                                                                1. re: PotatoHouse
                                                                                                  c oliver RE: PotatoHouse Oct 18, 2013 02:20 PM

                                                                                                  What I'm reacting to isn't the media. I'm reacting to the facts. There's a ton of data from very reputable sources. As I wrote at the top of the thread, I'm in no way a germophobe. But I also have an amount of scientific and medical background. The data is there, for me only as I said, to stop eating these factory-produced chickens.

                                                                                                  1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                    mcf RE: c oliver Oct 18, 2013 05:13 PM

                                                                                                    It's been there in some form since at least 1985, IIRC.

                                                                                                2. emglow101 RE: globocity Oct 18, 2013 06:57 PM

                                                                                                  Yes, I am taking a break. For more than a month now. Just got bored with chicken.The super market brands were tasting crappy.Oh,well. Then the salmonella outbreak that happened here in CA.I'm completly turned off with chicken now. It will be some time before I buy it again. I could get one from the farmers market, but not that into it. So with Thanksgiving coming up I would think this applies to Turkey also. I missed Thanksgiving last year and everyone who ate that turkey got sicker than shit. Scared. You bet !

                                                                                                  1. s
                                                                                                    sedimental RE: globocity Oct 19, 2013 05:50 PM

                                                                                                    Does this issue apply to Cornish game hens too?

                                                                                                    I can never find out info about the processing concerns about game hens.

                                                                                                    7 Replies
                                                                                                    1. re: sedimental
                                                                                                      mcf RE: sedimental Oct 19, 2013 05:56 PM

                                                                                                      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20...

                                                                                                      Concerning testing of Cornish game hens. I think the broader issue of food borne superbugs, resistance to antibiotics is typical of all factory farmed animal products.

                                                                                                      1. re: mcf
                                                                                                        s
                                                                                                        sedimental RE: mcf Oct 19, 2013 06:00 PM

                                                                                                        Damn...love those hens!

                                                                                                        1. re: sedimental
                                                                                                          mcf RE: sedimental Oct 19, 2013 06:07 PM

                                                                                                          I never see any pastured ones, but I haven't really looked. Probably really spendy, though. http://www.motherearthnews.com/homest... :-

                                                                                                          )

                                                                                                          I think in the U.S., Whole Foods has them. Haven't priced them, though.

                                                                                                          1. re: mcf
                                                                                                            s
                                                                                                            sedimental RE: mcf Oct 19, 2013 06:15 PM

                                                                                                            Yes, I haven't found any in my area. I have continued to buy from the regular chain store. I love them. Eat them every other week. I have wondered how healthful they are :(

                                                                                                            1. re: sedimental
                                                                                                              Veggo RE: sedimental Oct 19, 2013 06:24 PM

                                                                                                              I like Cornish game hens also, but I never understood why a smaller younger chicken costs more than a larger one that has eaten more. For the price of 2 I can buy a duck for 2 which I enjoy more but of course it is more work.

                                                                                                              1. re: Veggo
                                                                                                                s
                                                                                                                sedimental RE: Veggo Oct 19, 2013 06:53 PM

                                                                                                                I know! Pricing is not reasonable. But I really like them. They are perfect for a dinner for two, no leftovers.. And a little carcass for stock to make soup for the weeks lunches.

                                                                                                                1. re: sedimental
                                                                                                                  c oliver RE: sedimental Oct 19, 2013 08:17 PM

                                                                                                                  Well, if you compare the price to a better chicken, then I wonder. I pay more for the smaller, better chickens. You truly do get what you pay for. IMO.

                                                                                                    2. s
                                                                                                      Stardustgirl RE: globocity Oct 20, 2013 04:23 AM

                                                                                                      I'm still buying and eating chicken, but I stopped using factory/supermarket birds (and every other meat for that matter) in 2009 - inspired by a horrific case of food poisoning. Local is more expensive but I am happy to cut costs elsewhere. I've walked the pastures where the chickens are raised and pick up my meat at the processing plant, so I really do know where it comes from.

                                                                                                      1. c oliver RE: globocity Oct 20, 2013 07:50 AM

                                                                                                        http://www.salon.com/2013/10/19/7_hor...

                                                                                                        Here's something that showed upon FB this morning.

                                                                                                        4 Replies
                                                                                                        1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                          kitchengardengal RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 08:25 AM

                                                                                                          Reading these posts, I had been thinking that living in Georgia, I needn't worry about eating California chickens.

                                                                                                          After reading this salon article, I think I will spend the extra and buy chicken from the local small growers. There are commercial chicken farms by the hundreds here, but I have no idea what conditions those birds live in.

                                                                                                          1. re: kitchengardengal
                                                                                                            c oliver RE: kitchengardengal Oct 20, 2013 08:31 AM

                                                                                                            Which Georgia?!?!?

                                                                                                            1. re: c oliver
                                                                                                              kitchengardengal RE: c oliver Oct 20, 2013 09:00 AM

                                                                                                              Georgia in the Deep South, US.
                                                                                                              Our state is a huge commercial poultry producer.

                                                                                                              http://www.gapf.org/IndustryFacts/def...

                                                                                                              1. re: kitchengardengal
                                                                                                                c oliver RE: kitchengardengal Oct 20, 2013 09:19 AM

                                                                                                                Being originally from Atlanta, I'm aware of that. I'll add that the only salmonellosis I got was from tainted peanut butter from a Georgia processing plant :( I firmly believe this is a nationwide problem fostered by the government's leniency And now they're talking about not even having outside inspectors, just letting their be inhouse ones.

                                                                                                        Show Hidden Posts