HOME > Chowhound > Site Talk >

Any thought of an "edited" comment like FB has?

c oliver Oct 13, 2013 07:38 PM

When I edit it's either grammar or some such error. Otherwise I will sometimes use "ETA." But if it's a BIG difference I'll reply to my own post so that anyone who's already seen will see the difference. But sometimes people come back and pretty seriously change/add on to their post. And those of us who have seen or particularly replied to wind up dealing with a significantly different post. Just a thought.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. h
    HillJ RE: c oliver Oct 14, 2013 08:12 AM

    One unfortunate flaw in the "already read" layout of a thread is that going in and changing a post already read or adding eta: and then add'l text to the same comment box might not be seen by your intended reader.

    Seriously changed posts that alter the meaning of a comment you've responded to based on the original remarks doesn't always get seen either for the same reason I'm observing above. Once collapsed, I might not even realize my own comment is now out of context.

    But if I do realize it the only way to address it is by adding another, new comment or asking for my comment to be deleted. Or, if I catch it during the 2 hour window of edit function now, rewriting it....which is a real pita.

    1. chowser RE: c oliver Oct 14, 2013 11:51 AM

      This would be a good idea. I don't add the ETA but I do edit. Added to which, if someone has read my post, pre-edit, they might not get the full picture, eg, when I clarify cooking directions or edit recipe amounts. That person might not ever see the new edited version.

      Show Hidden Posts