HOME > Chowhound > U.K./Ireland >

Royal Oak vs Hinds Head

m
ManInTransit Jul 9, 2013 02:26 AM

Anyone have any strong views either way on these two? I've seen pretty positive reviews from Harters and others but anyone who has eaten at both got a comparison?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. h
    Harters RE: ManInTransit Jul 9, 2013 05:50 AM

    If you're looking for Michelin pub food in that neck of the woods, what about the Hand & Flowers (which had been our first choice, but was full)?

    1 Reply
    1. re: Harters
      m
      ManInTransit RE: Harters Jul 9, 2013 06:04 AM

      Ditto John - I did try but if you look at their website there is a ridiculous waiting list, mostly to 2014 for any reservations at the weekend.

      I have to say that while I would like to visit the hand and flowers I'm not so desperate as to book a year in advance.

    2. m
      mr_gimlet RE: ManInTransit Jul 9, 2013 09:52 PM

      Assume you mean the Royal Oak in Paley Street

      I've been to both several times (used to live locally) and I would pick one over the other particularly. I slightly prefer Royal Oak as it still feels like a normal pub, the Hinds Head is a bit up itself with food tourists

      2 Replies
      1. re: mr_gimlet
        m
        ManInTransit RE: mr_gimlet Jul 10, 2013 01:33 AM

        That's useful to know thanks, the menu at the Royal Oak looks a bit better as well (although as we all know that can be deceiving) so I think we'll stick with that.

        1. re: ManInTransit
          zuriga1 RE: ManInTransit Jul 10, 2013 03:08 AM

          I'm sure you'll report back, which would be great. We always went to the Hinds Head but could use a change of scene, especially as our last lunch there wasn't as good as previously, but I seriously think it was just an off day.

      Show Hidden Posts