HOME > Chowhound > Cookware >

3 qt saute, 5 qt saute, or 12" skillet (all stainless steel) to brown 1 pound of ground beef?

kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 01:28 PM

Assuming minimal or no other ingredients added (not a lot of liquid)....

Don't 3qt sautes have same cooking surface area as 12" skillets?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. junescook RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 01:30 PM

    My 3 qt sautes are 10".

    1. pinehurst RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 01:34 PM

      Depends. As Junes said, my 3qt pan is 10.5", so not the diameter of your skillet.

      My preference would be a saute pan. I don't want stuff to fly out when I'm breaking up the ground beef. I'm messy like that.

      1. k
        kimbers324 RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 02:04 PM

        I know the bottom of a 3 qt saute is 10" or approx 10" but the actual cooking surface of a 12" All Clad skillet, for example, is 9 3/4 inches. (The sloped sides account for some of the 12 inches.)

        1 Reply
        1. re: kimbers324
          John Francis RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 10:00 PM

          Looks like you knew the answer to your question before asking it. As for which pan is best, it makes no real difference which you use - all of them are fine for the job.

        2. DuffyH RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 02:10 PM

          CI compared sauté pans last year. Cooking surface ranged from 9" to 11".


          1. g
            GH1618 RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 02:52 PM

            A 3 qt sauté is plenty large enough. Mine (All-Clad) is about 10 inches diameter. The 4 qt is the same diameter but a little deeper.

            1. m
              mikie RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 07:38 PM

              I've got a 3 qt saute and a 6 qt saute, they are about 11 inches and 13 inches respectively. A 12 inch skillet will not have that much bottom area. The 3 qt saute is plenty for a pound of ground beef.

              1 Reply
              1. re: mikie
                Sid Post RE: mikie Jun 11, 2013 08:32 PM

                My Demeyere 5Star skillets are a dream to use for this type of thing as is my my old school Lodge cast iron. They are larger size for size then the Lodge CI equivalents.

              2. kaleokahu RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 09:01 PM

                Hi, kimbers:

                I hope you've not been waiting all day for this answer.

                It doesn't really matter, any of the 3 will work. If it's very wet *thawed* burger, I'd choose the largest effective diameter, the 5Q saute.


                1. Chemicalkinetics RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 09:55 PM

                  <Don't 3qt sautes have same cooking surface area as 12" skillets?>

                  I have no idea how your 3 quart saute is made. Most likely they are similar, however, you need to appreciate the fact that 3 quart is "volume", while 12" (diameter) is surface area.

                  If your 3 quarts has the same cooking surface as a 12" pan, then go for it.

                  1. KarenDW RE: kimbers324 Jun 11, 2013 10:51 PM

                    I would use whatever is handy, and brown the meat in batches if necessary.

                    1. k
                      kimbers324 RE: kimbers324 Jun 12, 2013 07:13 AM

                      Thanks everyone! I have been clearing out/replacing cookware over the past few months and want only what's necessary for common tasks - otherwise, too much clutter in the cabinets! I have several cast iron pieces but was missing a large stainless steel pan of some sort - think SS is easier to lift and it seems to work faster so definitely wanted to include that. I settled on the 3 qt saute b/c the higher sides will help reduce splatter all over my stove! And, I think it is more versatile. I do have a very good 10" SS skillet and the current 12" Tramontina 18/10 open fry pan (unfortunately the one reviewed by CI is sold out everywhere) - the small surface area there was disappointing, though! Thanks again.

                      Show Hidden Posts