-
-
Have you ever tried baking it? Haven't made this in a long time,due to the fat content,but when I used to make it,it was gone as soon as I set the plate down.
http://www.recipekey.com/therecipes/B... -
but doesn't cooking hard salami sort of ruin it?
I'd rather just eat less of something that was really good than screw it up just to save a few calories.
›11 Replies-
re: sunshine842
If you are eating it as a cold cut sandwich, you don't want to fry or microwave it. However, I like it with cooked with hot mustard and dilll pickle, which is delicious to me. It removes the greasy taste (which you can feel when you pick up a slice).... so I've always fried mine even before I had a calorie concern - I think it actually tastes better - just don't over cook it - you don't want if brittle, just shrunk up a little bit.....its also great with eggs for breakfast (as opposed to using bacon). There are many recipes on-line for fried salomi...
-
-
re: barbs4by4
I'll just limit the quantity, thanks.
(recipes for fried salami? like this one? http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/pa...)
-
-
re: sunshine842
I actually love it fried - if you get it crispy enough, you can use it as a dipping chip (and replace the fat that way, LOL). If you fry it just enough to warm it and degrease it a little, it stays pliable and makes a most delicious sandwich or wrapper for vegetables or cheese cubes.
-
-
-
I frequently fry salami and pepperoni and I promise, you lose WAY more than just water. These are cured sausages, so there's very little water in there anyway. The best way to estimate the reduction in fat/calories is to fry the sausage, then measure the fat left in the pan (and it will be FAT, not water, left behind - pour it into a separator if you don't believe me). Each tablespoon of fat in the pan represents 140 fat calories that you're not eating.
›1 Reply-
re: biondanonima
Thanks - I actually weighed 6 slices before microwaving it this morning, and then weighed after microwaving (left a lot of greasy residue on the paper towel and poured some out of the cup formed by reshaping of the salami), and it reduced the oz by 1/3...I usually fry it, so will do that so I can actually measure the fat.
-
-
-
re: grampart
Well, thats a cute answer, but maybe not too good of a comparison... lol! Meat should be weighed after you cook it because it weighs less, thus less ounces, thus less total calories. So maybe I should weigh my salomi after its microwaved, ie. 29g is 99 calories, so if it reduces it to 20 g, then it would be less than 99 calories - whatcha think?
-
-
-
-
re: barbs4by4
Much of what cooks out of raw meat is water, so it doesn't necessarily significantly reduce the calorie count proportional to the weight. Generally if you're looking up the calorie count for meat, you should look for information that matches the state you're measuring it in, as it does differ, but moreso because the lost of water means the cooked food is more calorie dense per ounce than the raw food was. You can sometimes pour off significant fat from, say, ground beef, but in most other cuts of meat the vast majority of the fat remains.
Here's a couple of examples from nutritiondata.com:
Cooked boneless skinless chicken breast, 46.2 calories per ounce: http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/poultry-products/703/2
Raw boneless skinless chicken breast, 30.8 calories per ounce: http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/p...
When it comes to salami or other high fat foods, microwaving them and having some of the fat deposit on a paper towel does moderately reduce the calorie count, but not in a particularly predictable way (because again, some of what's being lost is water, not fat). So, if you're trying to save calories and you like it microwaved, that's great, every bit helps. But it won't magically turn salami into something that's genuinely low calorie, unfortunately.
-
-
-
-
-




