Does anyone else but me prefer, or even insist on, light roast coffee?
It seems like dark roast coffee has taken over the world, maybe it's the Starbucks effect but if feels like people have this (misbegotten?) notion that dark is always better than light.
That's just not true.
If you're working with quality, single-origin beans you'll more likely pick up on the subtle nuances of the terroir from light roasting than roasting the hell out of that sucker.
In fact, if one wants to hide the flatness of mediocre beans the best way to do it is probably to roast and burn all the flavor dimensions (good and bad) out of that bean.
Anyone with me?
-
My first really good cup of coffee was a dark roast at Starbucks when they first came to Chicago (eons ago).
I have moved toward lighter roasts. Starbucks originals now taste bitter. Since I have easy access to Inteligencia - where they are very conscious of matching the roast to the beans (really good beans) - I routinely opt for a non-dark roasted coffee.
-
-
No way. No light roast coffee for me, of any kind. You have had too much burnt Starbucks. Why anyone drinks that is beyond me. Most coffees are best at medium or dark. It depends on the coffee. Just had some Kenya AA at medium. Delicious.Work at a roaster. Know what is good.coffee is me.
›1 Reply -
-
-
-
I live for two to three months each year in Antigua, Guatemala, a region famous throughout the world for the quality of it’s coffee. Just yesterday I was in Tostaduria Antigua, a tiny shop in town run by a gringo coffee nerd who buys only shade-grown highland coffee from small growers who dry their naturally sweet Arabica berries in the sun. He roasts the coffee in his shop and offers a dark, medium, or a light roast. When I first met Tony a couple of years ago, I was a die-hard dark roast drinker. Tony convinced me to try the medium roast and I’ve never looked back. I did try the light roast once, but it just didn’t have the richness of flavor I was looking for. Coincidentally, I was in the shop yesterday and Tony was telling me that very few of his customers order the dark roast once they’ve tried the medium and that he hates it when he has to grind it for someone because the whole shop smells as though something burned for at least half an hour afterwards.
›1 Reply -
I hate the charred taste of Starbucks (and preferred Seattle's Best before S'Bucks bought them out - no char taste). That being said, what I want is rich taste, regardless of roast. I've been served coffee that one could drink all day long and not feel satisfied because it is brewed too weak (and usually with canned preground coffee). I want to taste the bean characteristics when good beans are used and care taken with the roast. As with any other food, excellent raw materials plus talented preparation of it plus proper ambience equals a quality experience whether at home or elsewhere. I like a light roast when beans that are complemented by it are used. And like darker roast when beans beans that are complemented by that are used.
-
-
It's so funny that you mention this because I have the opposite problem -- I am a dark roast drinker (always black coffee, Chemex) and I am always wondering to myself why medium-bodied coffees are so popular. All the trendy coffee snob places like Blue Bottle, Grumpy etc seem to me to almost never have a darker, richer roast. Got a subscription to Craft Coffee and I have seen nary a dark oily bean in any of their shipments.
Barring the basic Starbucks blends and brews (which I do not typically drink) I think it's mostly a matter of personal preference. For me lots of the medium or light beans produce a coffee that tastes sweet (to me, cloyingly so), and I just like the bitter, chocolately richness of a dark roast.
›1 Reply -
-
-
Hmm... you've got me thinking, Ipse. I really like dark roast coffee. But it occurs to me that I have never given strong-brewed light roast coffee a chance. I know that I don't like weak coffee, which is why I always show up at the mother-in-law's with a full travel mug ;-) But I'd like to try what you are selling. So tell me, is Starbucks Blonde, or another chain that might be near me, a good example? What should I try, short of buying a bag of beans that I am not sure I will like? I am certainly open to suggestions!
›7 Replies-
re: Cheez62
If you want to try a light roast, your best bet (aside from buying a bag of light roast beans yourself and brewing it at home) is to find a coffee shop that has a good selection of light roast beans.
Dunno where you are at, but in Chicago and LA there's Intelligentsia Cofee, in SF and NYC there's Blue Bottle.
-
-
-
re: ipsedixit
Haha, now you see my lot in life. If it weren't for the fact that I spend 100+ days per year on the road for work, I would lead a very sheltered existence. That is why I asked about Starbucks - not because it is good (or not good), but because such things are all that we have. But it turns out that I will be staying in Brooklyn next week for a few nights, so I may find the opportunity to look up Blue Bottle. I'll let you know my thoughts if I get there. Thanks for the "help"!
-
-
-
-
-
-
I've never liked dark roasted coffee. It's always tasted burnt and bitter to me, and like you, ipsedixit, I've come to believe that the way coffee roasters disguise bad quality coffee is by over-roasting it. It's hard to believe that "Charbucks" has become so big selling the stuff.
I really enjoy a cup of fresh, light roasted coffee, and lately light roasted beans are all I've been buying. And I don't want my coffee to be called "morning buzz" or "afternoon delight." I want to know the country of origin AND I want to know how long ago it was roasted. That last one is often hard to learn.
›12 Replies-
re: CindyJ
It's funny but it seems like just about everyone at Starbucks fills 1/4 of the cup with milk and some sort of sugar or spices.
Every time I see that I always think if I want sugared cream or milk, I'll just eat ice cream.
Almost makes me wonder if the dairy producers are in cahoots with Starbucks ...
-
-
re: linus
I could be wrong but I believe I read somewhere the profit margins on their regular coffee is higher than the specialty milk-based ones. I could be mistaken however.
The problem is that most Americans don't really like the taste of coffee. So instead of letting the customers add cream and/or milk for free to regular coffee Starbucks figured they might as well charge for the privilege.
-
re: ipsedixit
"the problem is that most americans don't really like the taste of coffee."
that's a bold statement. based on what? and please don't say because they put milk in it.
though, if you want to take it to the next level, i suppose you could say most people in the world don't really like the taste of coffee.
-
re: ipsedixit
Your Starbucks doesn't provide endless free half and half, sugar etc? Really?
Maybe the ones on the West coast are different. When I'm shopping, in the mood for decadence and need a coffee fix, I'll get a cup of regular brew at Starbucks, ask for them to do just a half of the pour-over, leaving lots of room for half and half. It's always available in pitchers. Sometimes I'll dust it with cocoa powder and cinnamon, also always available. Makes me happy and gives these old bones a caffeine jolt so I can continue shopping.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I prefer a dark roast but I can drink a light one, as long as it has been brewed strongly AND isn't too acidic. I really dislike acidic flavors in coffee, and I find the best way to avoid them is to go for medium or darker roasts, but I know it's possible to get a non-acidic light roast if you try!
›1 Reply-
re: biondanonima
If you want to avoid acid do cold brew. I do it every day for my mother cause she can't tolerate acid. I do it the old fashioned way 1/2 cup coffee in a quart mason jar. Let sit on counter for 12 hours. Strain and drink. that method was good enough for my Grandma and works for me.
-
-
I think the variety/origin of the coffee should determine what roast it gets. The Ethiopian Sidamo I buy is light to medium roasted but is very bold and full bodied, and smooth, too.
I think different beans call for different roasts, and I like some dark and some light. My decaf is a combination, and it's full bodied and delicious.
I don't think the problem is dark roast so much as the wrong roast, or how dark.
I have two issues with Starbucks; one is the nym Charbucks, which the've earned for burning, not just dark roasting, their beans. The other is they're brewing weaker coffee than they used to, a dastardly combination.
-
It's only been since I first began roasting my own beans that I've gotten into the lighter roasts. Too light and, while you do pick up on some fruity notes, you add the possibility of it being over acidic. Too dark (like when the beans are covered in a sheen of oils) and you start getting that burned taste of which you speak. Sometimes, depending on the particular bean and/or temp, the interval between the two can be a very short length of time. Home roasters are advised to "think 15 seconds ahead" in the process since cooling isn't immediate and one must allow for that. For a point of reference, I wonder if you might take a look at the chart (link) and tell us which you would consider the right color of the roast you would find most preferable.
https://www.sweetmarias.com/library/c... -
If it tastes burned, it's over-roasted. But there is no ideal roast for any coffee. There are tradeoffs in roasting. Darker roasts can lose the nuances of flavors, but they also break down the acids. Under-roasted coffee with too much acid is much worse than over-roasted coffee. I prefer low-acid coffee, because I drink a lot of it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I hate dark roast coffee. At least if Starbucks had good coffee it would just be the roast that I didn't like, but mediocre quality + lack of light roasts (most of the time) means no Starbucks for me. Thankfully I live in an area where I can get lots of different single-origin beans roasted many different ways. I've gone so far as packing my beans and grinder on trips with me when necessary.
-
Well, since Starbucks themselves have been emphasizing first their medium-roast Pike Place Blend (which is actually a perfectly fine cup of coffee) and now their new lighter Blonde Roasts (which I haven't tried yet because on those rare occasions that I go to Starbucks, I just stick with the PP, which I know I like), I'd say that you're far from alone!
I tend to prefer medium-roast beans in general myself, as far as that goes.
›4 Replies-
re: Jenny Ondioline
I can't have caffeine so I have ordered the decaf blonde. They make that on the Clover. I still taste burned flavors. Maybe that's a carryover from whatever else they put through the Clover. I am part of a group whose weekly meeting is at Starbucks.....I have yet to find anything there that I enjoy drinking.
Though I like light roasts like Eight-o-clock and Dunkin Donuts, I do brew my coffee strong. Trader Joe's now has decaf 100% arabica beans in medium roast. The roast gave me pause but I bought it, and LOVE it. I just use the regular amount rather than the extra half scoop per mug that I have been doing with other decafs.
-













