Sushi Zo has anyone been lately
I prolly asked this question a few months ago.
but it seems like our sushi regulars, i.e. porthos and jl, respecitvely, never seem to sing the praises of this place.
and i have not been in years due to a serious service issue. but i still believe he serves the best sushi in the Sushi Nozawa style, and that yuzu juice shot is pretty un-fucking-believable, if I could get that actual recipe, not similar but the exact recipe at one of the markets in Little Tokyko, Gardena, Torrance, or Little Osaka on Sawtell or rather anywhere in LA for that matter besides dropping close to what is it $200 bones now per person at Zo.
That would be great. But I've never found any of the yuzu juices in those markets to come even close to the depths and subtleties as Zo's creation.
-
My first and last visit to Zo was probably back in 2007. Since I had nothing to compare that visit with, I thought it was stellar at the time. But with more eating experience under my belt as time passed, I do want to address the over-saucing issue which in some cases I did feel so at the time.
Even back then it seemed that Keizo-san only had maybe 2 (tops) kinds of nikiri he would use to sauce the various fish. The nikiri as I distinctly recall, was a very heavy thick konbu dashi shoyu, almost molasses like in thickness, which would have been ok for certain fishes, but he applied it to delicate white fleshed naturally sweet fish like hirame or kinmedai which caused an imbalance, as well as other various fish.
Having had nigiri at two highly rated places in Hong Kong, I'm curious if using aka-su / red vinegar to season sushi rice is common in LA's top tier places (Yasuda did it but the rice still looked white), and if places are still doing it, where? One place I went to in HK (Sushi Mori, not related to Mori in LA) the sushi rice was dark red...the chef seasoned with 3 years aged red vinegar, and applied it quite liberally.
›2 Replies -
Great meal there in November with Keizo-san manning the sushi bar. No yuzu juice finisher, though. Haven't had that in a long time there : (.
Interested in his DTLA project in the Bank District. Perhaps that's why he's transitioning other chefs.
›3 Replies -
Yes, Kevin, I have been, and lately.
Everything was excellent, as always. The fish pieces remain small and thin, but the rice seems appropriately sized. To me this means you can eat a greater variety without getting so stuffed - a good thing; to my good friend this means he's ripping us off by charging the same amount for a smaller piece. The prices are indeed very high.Here's one big thing: I was surprised that Keizo was there but not working behibnd the counter. He popped out to say hi, but he was not cutting. Now, to me THAT felt like a bit of a rip-off. If I pay his prices, I want him, thought I must say, it was just as tasty without him.
›25 Replies-
-
re: Porthos
<<Which means the fish was pre-sliced then?
Was the rice also pre-molded or did the assistant do that himself?>>No, the other chef cut fish and made the pieces. I am not defending the whole deal, but I will say this was not simply an "assisstant" [as he used to use employ some non-Japanese dudes to help him], but a very experienced Japanese chef. When I watched "Jiro Dreams" this occurred as well, FWIW.
--
-
re: Ciao Bob
Wow.
But yeah, after the first couple years, he started to add assistants.
In fact, in that first year or so, you could actually order what you wanted, the omakase only policy was not in place, but when he ramped up the omakase I think the fish got even better, maybe because he was charing higher prices too.
anyhow, how many pieces did you have and what was the cost before tax, tip, and drinnks, it's been a while so I'm trying to gauge how much it has increased from a couple years ago, when with tax and tip for 25 pieces, including the one sashimi at the beginning, a C-note and a half.
also, is he still serving the sweetened yuzu juice or does he deign to serve it ???
-
re: kevin
Went a couple of months ago, after a 1.5-year absence. Pieces look like they might've gotten even smaller, but quality of fish is still high. And yeah, it's like an assembly line of chefs, albeit experienced Japanese ones. Keizo-san was mostly in the back working on non-nigiri items like the maguro sashimi, ika/uni, and ankimo. But one improvement - they seem to be...happier. Chatted a little w/ my itamae, and Keizo-san even came over a few times to see how I was.
-
-
re: chrishei
Are they still over-saucing their nigiri? Not sure if I want to go back to Zo anytime soon, given the current reports.
Non-farmed seafood prices have gone up almost 30% over the past 5 years worldwide. It's not at all surprising that reputable sushi purveyors are now forced to pass on that cost.
-
re: J.L.
<<Are they still over-saucing their nigiri? >>
With all due respect J.L., I think the way you put that is more a way of picking a fight than a way of asking a genuine question.
As a guy who clearly loves it raw, and one who had a wide experience with sushi chefs (shokunin?), you know very well he is not the type of guy who is going to change things one iota. One man's over-sauced nigiri is another man's great pleasure. Can't we all just get along?
-
re: Ciao Bob
That's why I always compare Zo to the style of a Nozawa because of the oversaucing.
But and here's a huge but : Zo is a gourmet, greater variety of fish, fresher fish version of Nozawa where Nozawa who started the over-saucing game along with sasabune, echigo, wasabe, nishi-ya, oshima, are all disciples of the same master, nozawa, but Zo is a case where the pupil one-ups the master.
-
re: Ciao Bob
No disrespect intended at all. I'm simply stating my personal aversion for Zo's level of "saucity" (OK a neologism, but you get my drift) on his creations.
More interestingly, if Zo is "not the type of guy who is going to change things one iota", why (according to these recent reports I'm reading here) has he adopted an "assembly line" method?
-
re: J.L.
Excellent point. Are you a lawyer, by any chance?
I guess I meant his approach to what is on the "plate" and his preparation methods -- like those of many serious Japanese chefs -- seem unwavering.
Off to a good start - insulting lawyers, J.L. and the Japanese - all before 9 AM.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: ipsedixit
Maybe because its a nicer setting so you think it's more expensive. I was shocked my last visit to Yasuda prior to his retirement. His prices hasn't changed in 8 years while LA's prices went from $90pp omakase to $150pp (Zo) in the same time span. At Yasuda you got 5 types of toro, 30-40 types of sushi items, 2-3 types of fresh eel. At Zo, much much less. It's a myth that LA has "better" sushi.
I'm comparing high end to high end. Of course LA has more medlium/cheap sushi but that is an odd definition of "better".
-
-
re: ipsedixit
Kurumazushi is easily pricier than Zo and even more than Urasawa at times. One goes there for the sashimi. The sashimi there is unrivaled and the quality is probably as good as if not better than Urasawa. It's pricy because you're consuming thick cuts of sashimi of the highest quality which goes down pretty quickly without any rice filler. Pristine stuff. I highly recommend it if price is truly no object. With Urasawa, at least you know the damage. With Kurumazushi there is a "OMG what have I done?!" moment of panic just before you see the bill.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Ciao Bob
I was back last night and it was my first real dissapointment at Sushi Zo. Keizo was not there, they told me he was in Japan.
-- I asked for no truffle salt and my first piece had it.
-- The servers, and chefs, rushed everything. Every plate was grabbed immediately, often while were still chewing. And then the next plate came in, often while we were still swallowing. It was so annoying. I can understand some pressure to turn over seats on a crowded night with patrons waiting, but the place was not crowded on this Tuesday evening (maybe, 25% full) or when it is close to closing time (we got there at 8:15). But even under those circumstances I do not think anyone would be happy to have the servers hands dispatching dishes so quickly.
-- Many of the sushi pieces were “mushy,” the fish had no texture at all. The surf clam was terrific, the uni first rate, the squid was fine, and the ikura excellent. I loved the firefly squid too. Most of the fish and the scallops served with lemon and salt were good; however, the albacore, and any of the sauced pieces were very, very mushy.-
-
-
re: kevin
Every other time you have been Keizo was there ?
---yes but if you read my previous post on my last visit he was not front-and-center, he was in the kitchen in backWhat were the damages ?
----$270 + tip for 2 with 2 beers and 3 hakaaisen sakeAnd who is worthy enough to take over in his place ?
-----young guy named Masa
-
-
-
-
I was there in November. I think it's easily one of two best sushi bars in L.A. - the other being Mori.
This is pure sushi - no "appetizers" - which Mori has (and why I'd put Mori over Zo.)
Zo is great. And if you're in a hurry (this can be a benefit) and want some great sushi - this is your place.
-






