HOME > Chowhound > Food Media & News >

Discussion

Consumer Reports: alarm about factory produced (presumably) pork safety

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505269_16...

"Of nearly 200 pork samples tested by Consumer Reports, many tested positive for salmonella, listeria, staph bacteria. The magazine says a whopping 69 percent contained yersinia, which infects nearly 100,000 Americans every year. Children are especially vulnerable."

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Seriously this shit has to stop... Candy and antibiotic eating cows , poison pork, corn that is no longer classified as a food but as an insecticide, turkeys that have little to no dark meat on them but giant genetically modified breasts...we are killing ourselves!!!

    1 Reply
    1. Gross gross gross. And I've never even heard of yersinia, a new plague of the day.

      1. So I should skip the pork with rice and stick with the bagged spinach salad.

        10 Replies
          1. re: ennuisans

            No, you should skip the factory farmed pork and buy it from a reliable, preferably local as possible producer. Or one that's not strictly local, but who adheres to humane and healthy for all (animals, people, environment) agricultural practices.

            1. re: mcf

              Hard to find in my neck of the woods

              1. re: scubadoo97

                There are ways to buy online, but spendy, to be sure.

                  1. re: rockandroller1

                    Heritage Foods is one outlet, but there are quite a few other producers if you search out heritage pork and include "pastured" or other terms used for animals raised without antibiotics, crowding into dirty and inhumane conditions, and even small, local slaughtering that doesn't mix with feedlot animals.

                    1. re: mcf

                      Did CR test non-factory processed pork?

                      1. re: paulj

                        Nope. They tested supermarket pork. Pastured, non antibiotic treated critters not crowded together in filth tend to be much lower in the quantities and types of pathogens factory farming produces, though one wants to be careful about knowing how and where they're slaughtered, not just raised. Contaimination can happen there, too. http://www.eatwild.com/foodsafety.html

                        1. re: paulj

                          They tasted mostly processed pork but a few samples were from boutique stores i.e. antibiotic free like Whole Foods.

              2. One of the oddest comments about this came from the USDA, who said the pork was "safe"
                and that pork producers were compliant.

                This brings up the questions of what the USDA is doing to monitor the safety of pork.

                "For its sample, Consumer Reports included the same pork products millions of Americans buy every day at their supermarkets. The study included 148 pork chops and 50 ground pork samples from around the United States. In the samples tested, 69 percent tested positive for yersinia and 11 percent for enterococcus, which can indicate fecal contamination that can lead to urinary-tract infections. Salmonella and listeria, the more well-known bacterium, registered at 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively."

                “ 'The results were concerning,' Urvashi Rangan, one of the authors of the report, told ABCNews.com. “It’s hard to say that there was no problem. It shows that there needs to be better hygiene at animal plants. Yersinia wasn’t even being monitored for.”

                The National Pork Producers Council said the 198 infected samples of 240 total was not large enough to be a representative sampling of the national pork supply, and claimed the study was a tactic to get people to eat organic pork.

                The information above is from the ABC News broadcast yesterday and from an accompany article. You can watch the video excerpt by going to the website link, then using the down arrows to scroll down to the segment on pork.

                video: http://abcnews.go.com/wn
                article: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/20...

                Here is the Consumer Reports study:
                http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/po...

                7 Replies
                1. re: maria lorraine

                  http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseas...
                  cdc on yersinia. Accrording to them, this is not a common problem, and mostly comes from eating raw or undercooked pork. They also advise good sanitation when handling raw meat, and in particular
                  ' After handling raw chitterlings, clean hands and fingernails scrupulously with soap and water before touching infants or their toys, bottles, or pacifiers. Someone other than the foodhandler should care for children while chitterlings are being prepared.
                  '

                  1. re: paulj

                    Hi, paulj,

                    Were you able to find anything that's current?

                    Anything more recent that shows the incidence of this bacteria?

                    The CDC report is from 2005, so that data is almost eight years old,
                    and I'm guessing the incidence of it -- like the increase of MRSA --
                    has increased greatly in that time. If you come across it, great.

                    I did a quick check and couldn't find anything. Didn't go into the
                    med/sci databases though.

                    1. re: maria lorraine

                      http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/data/trend...

                      In this table the infection rate for yersinia in 2011, 158, is about the average for the past 15 years. The rate is well below the 2 biggies Campylobacter, Salmonella. It is even an order of magnitude below Cryptosporidium. Most of the other ones in the table have seen an increase. Yersinia has not.

                      See also table 2b, which lists lab confirmation rates, and 'Healthy People' targets. Assuming these numbers are realistic, yersinia is well under control.

                      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20...

                      Judging from the handling warnings in this article, and from the CDC, I suspect 'factory pork', is a rare source of infection, especially among Americans who avoid offal. Those of us who cook intestines and tongue (with attached salivary glands and possibly tonsils) might have more exposure - but more from unsafe food handling practices than from eating the cooked product.

                      1. re: paulj

                        Dunno. Recent data is always better than old data.

                        1. re: maria lorraine

                          I've since edited my reply to show recent data.

                          1. re: paulj

                            Thanks. Good job.

                            Though the pork industry doesn't test for yersina so the data does not include that large number of infections.

                            Maybe this Consumer Reports study will cause the USDA/pork industry to begin regular testing for yersinia and the new numbers will show pork as the primary source of infection for humans -- as the second medical link states it is. Or, better outcome, if regular tests happen, the infected pork will never enter the food supply.

                            1. re: maria lorraine

                              Yes, I am sure the USDA will spring into action like they always do and the federal government will reward them by supplying adequate funding and oversight powers.

                              But IF that doesn't happen I'll continue to avoid filthy factory meat.

                2. Folks there is an elephant in the room!!!

                  1. Moral of the story - No pork tartare, crudos, sashimi, carpaccio or mett.

                    2 Replies
                    1. re: dave_c

                      That's kinda how i read it as well. It looks like the biggest danger is cross contamination. Start using the same precautions you use with the "other white meat".

                      1. re: dave_c

                        Thinking about this earlier today reminded me of Bruce Willis' character in Fast Food Nation: if you cook it through, like you're supposed to, it's not a problem. There's probably still reason to believe that something in the production chain could be improved, but in the end no matter what we do, raw meat is icky until we set it on fire.

                      2. Is that 'nearly 100,000 Americans' a well documented number?

                        According to the CDC
                        http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseas...
                        "Based on data from the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), which measures the burden and sources of specific diseases over time, approximately one culture-confirmed Y. enterocolitica infection per 100,000 persons occurs each year."

                        With a population just over 300,000,000, that means about 3000 infections, not 100,000

                        http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/data/trend...
                        "Number of laboratory-confirmed bacterial and parasitic infections" for yersinia is 158 in 2011, or 0.34/100,000. Actual infections will be higher, since not everyone who gets the infection will get a lab test. But the most likely reason for not being tested is that the infection is minor, and the person does not see a doctor. From table 2b, the 1/100,000 is a 1996 number.

                        1 Reply
                        1. re: paulj

                          Could it be that someone misread 'one case per 100,000' as '100,000 cases'?