Top Chef Masters "Episode 7: Culinary Knock Out" (9/5/12) [*SPOILERS*]
It's elimination tournament time. Winners face off and losers face off. And Sugar Ray is there to judge it all.
Chris beats Takashi (in the bacon round).
Lorena is the other winner in the bacon round, beating Patricia.
So it's Chris versus Lorena in the sugar round (get it? "sugar"?!!).
Lorena takes the title with the old-standby, chocolate cake. Yawn.
In the chicken livers loser elimination round it's Takashi versus Patricia.
The loser? Syonara Takashi.
-
I guess I'm alone.
While I'm not enamored with Lorena, I think the way Patricia talks to her and the childish looks she gives/faces she makes is beyond juvenile. I try and give her the benefit of doubt and assume much of it is the editing folks but something is there which I find distasteful. (pun unintended.)
›9 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
re: iL Divo
My feeling is that she doesn't know how to work harmoniously in a kitchen, probably due to inexperience. Two episodes ago, she took 6 of the 12 burners in the kitchen to make soup. And this is with six contestants left in the game. It's a bit of a self-absorbed move on her part.
-
re: Miss Needle
Exactly, Miss Needle. It seems she's set off the other chefs with her interactions *in* the kitchen (other than Art). Taking over half of the burners when you've got so many others also working to do some catering (or whatever the challenge was) shows little thought for anyone else but herself. A sign of a good chef is being able to work with each other (see: Takashi and Cosentino sharing ingredients in the Knock Out challenge).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nooooooooooooooo!!!!! I wanted to see Chris beat Takashi in the finals. Really bummed to see Takashi cut.
I liked the format of this EC a lot. I thought Sugar Ray was worthless. Stupid one liner cooking equals boxing lines.
I'm not a Lorena fan, but Patricia was driving me nuts thus episode. Her win over Takashi was extra disappointing because I'd tired of her Lorena bashing.
Go Chris!!
›23 Replies-
-
-
-
re: piccola
picc, I really liked Art, seemed to be a sweet guy, but his southern 'only' cuisine seemed to be his downfall. yea, he can make a biscuit, but there's more to cooking that biscuits and gravy and fried chicken. still though, like him as a person.
didn't see the Chris/Art fight. I think Lorena handled her anger toward Patricia nicely. what I saw of Patricia tells me I wouldn't track down a restaurant of hers to seek out.
-
-
re: iL Divo
I'm not an Art fan and I'm not defending any of the ladies in particular (I feel like they're both being presented in fairly stereotypical ways anyway). I was just annoyed at the suggestion that an all-female cast would bring lots of "catfights," as opposed to the standard drama that comes with co-ed reality shows.
-
-
re: FoodPopulist
From what I can tell, Lorena is now used to overseeing restaurants, not working in one as part of a group, as Patricia still does daily. Different skill sets and behaviors.
Throw in healthy egos (which all of these chefs have to have to survive), the fact that Lorena was still mad at Art leaving - and unpleasantness was bound to happen sometime.
I have newfound respect for Lorena, as to how much she hustled in the dessert round. But Patricia, Chris and Takashi (sniffle!) are still my favs.
-
re: happybaker
I thought that at first about Lorena until I thought about what she made. Flourless chocolate cake, grilled pineapple. It's stuff that a skilled home cook could make but not on par w/ what the other chefs came up with. At the end of the day, I understand it's about execution at that immediate time but I expect chefs to take it up a notch or so. I might be biased against Lorena because of the Taco Bell stuff, though.
-
re: chowser
I actually buy into a conspiracy theory that Lorena is still there because Taco Bell is a sponsor. Her food looks ok, but did it really beat out Takashi and Patricia? I hate that Takashi is gone; now I'll have to root for Chris. (I loved how those two shared ingredients--even cooked.)
-
re: gaffk
Well, she didn't directly beat Takashi. She directly beat Patricia first, and then Chris. Not having tasted the food, who knows? But I do not believe that it's out of the realm of reasonable possibility that she could beat each of them in a single head to head competition. That doesn't mean she's a better chef. Just that in a particular challenge, she could beat them.
But I'm still declared for Chris. Actually, so comfortably declared for Chris not taht Takashi is out of it.
-
re: debbiel
Which is one reason (not the only) why I disliked the format here. If they're going to have a one-on-one format, make it a round-robin format rather than a knockout format with the ridiculous boxing scenario & trappings as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round-ro...
There were only four of them - having each one go at it against every other means only 6 matches, while the knockout needed 4 matches anyway. Each could be scored by points (or stars, a la restaurant reviews and like they did in the first season) awarded from the judging panel, and their scores added up to determine the winner and loser. In the case of a tie between two at either the top or the bottom, have a cook-off. Make it an hour-and-half episode if needs be.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I wanted to see Takashi and Chris in the final two, Patricia as the top three. Takashi was so close to winning immunity, too. I loved seeing Chris and Takashi in their duel. It must have been fun to be up close and personal. I was glad that Chris won that round. Molten chocolate cake and grilled pineapples take the win--we never see those in a home cook's repetoire because they're so complex and innovative to make.
-
I too am tired of Lorena Garcia. I kind of like the food that Chris Cosentino has been making (although I couldn't stand his Chef vs. City FN show).
I was a bit surprised to see one of the top people from this site (owned by CBS) as a Top Chef judge on Bravo (owned by NBC). I guess the elves don't care and apparently neither do the networks.
›5 Replies-
re: John E.
Yeah I was over Lorena a while back but what's a top chef show without a villain and drama??? I assume market research tells them that we need drama or we get bored, but personally I'd be happier just watching a cooking competition without the made up drama. I guess I'm not the norm.
-
-
aw shoooooooooooooooooooooot! My favorite (Takashi) is out. I missed this cause I was watching Bill Clinton. I wish Bravo would rerun the episodes, but they've taken to only doing so int he first hour after the show. Don't have a DVR.
so, where was Kerry in all this? Or did he have some kind of immunity?
Now I really don't care who wins. dislike Lorena.
›7 Replies-
-
re: ChefJune
I saw the beginning, just until Bill showed up, and I'm glad. I think I can catch it on line, or at the very least, at 9PM next Wednesday. Sorry Takashi is out. I guess that Lorena's food, while not being as complex and fancy as the other chef's, is very tasty. At the end of the day, it's about the taste.
-
-
-
I enjoyed the fact that Chris and Takashi help each other when competing against each other. Well played
›7 Replies-
-
re: scubadoo97
Agree. You could also tell that everyone watching thought the same.
I'm *so* tired of Lorena. Her grudge-holding over Patricia's telling her last week to clean up her station and to not hog the stove burners is rather childish. It seems that other chefs aren't particularly enamoured of her either. Perhaps there's more going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing.
Sorry to see Takashi go. I really liked him throughout the season. Would have much preferred seeing Chris, Patricia, Takashi and Kerry being in the final 4. And I liked the "battle format" of this episode. Pretty straightforward. You get one ingredient with which to work from. Although I found it interesting that the battle for 1st was with sugar; and the battle for elimination was chicken livers. I thought they might do the same - they had protein (bacon) for the initial rounds and they'd go with something sweet for the 2nd rounds. Instead, Takashi and Patricia get another protein.
And yes - "founder" of CHOW was a judge. Kind of liked when she countered James Oseland's comment re: his chicken livers being too underdone by saying "it's subjective - mine were perfect to me."
-
re: LindaWhit
We're on the same page with this- so happy Patricia stayed, so sorry Takashi left! Agree about the Lorena- she should be happy she won for pete's sake and get over it! Art's gone- she needs to make new friends.
I preferred this format hands down to the supermarket dash and pandemonium and drama in the kitchen. This was a straight forward episode about cooking showcasing ingredients most of us love to eat minus the faulty equipment, forgotten ingredient melodrama. Also loved the gorgeous old school Vegas showgirl who served the food.I had no idea who started CHOW before. Mildly surprised I never heard of her before but she added a fresh voice to the panel. I'm getting tired of James Oseland's whiny remarks and didn't missed Ruth but looks like she's back next week. And who knew Sugar Ray Leonard was a food lover plus all his brain cells seemed to be intact, unlike so many famous veteran boxers.
-
re: LindaWhit
Your observations completely echo mine, Linda. I'm a bit behind in the series so I just watched last night. I wasn't enjoying this season as much as the others the first few weeks, but now am feeling like we have a mature group of chefs who are confident and classy.
I was really sorry to see Takashi go instead of Lorena. He was a class act and a terrific chef and it would have been nice to see him in the final four.
-
-
-
-
Sayonara.
I just don't get Lorena Garcia's advancement through the series. Speaking personally, of course. None of her dishes have seemed enticing to me, even if I have not tasted them, based on what they appear to be. None of them.
The format of this episode was particularly trying to me. It felt very forced and even more artificial than normal.
›3 Replies-
re: huiray
If I had to characterize her cooking on the show, I think she's done better when they have a very basic ingredient list and is at a disadvantage when the chefs have more time and a wider selection of proteins to choose from.
I liked the format. At it's heart, it is two chefs cooking a quick dish using the same ingredient. They dressed it up in a certain way to fit their guest, but it was not so different from the elimination match they had at the end of the most recent season of The Next Iron Chef.
-
re: FoodPopulist
I thought it was odd that the winners of the round squared off against each other. I just assumed Chris and Lorena would be in then Patricia and Takashi would fight for the last spot. And that's really what it was anyway wasn't it? It wasn't like there was a point system so that if L. killed C. in dessert, he could have gone home right? Or did I miss something? I did miss what C. and T. cooked for bacon, can anyone tell me? And I was surprised P. beat T. in the chicken liver round cuz James didn't like her underdone dish so much. Seemed like someone else agreed. What exactly did T. do wrong? (Obviously I was doing some other stuff while this was on.) I know people think Lorena is subpar but she keeps winning and I thought the attitude of the chefs toward her was a little off putting.
And we forgot to mention that the head of Chow.com was a judge.
-
-















