Do You Serve Shrimp With Tail Shells On?
I can't stand this "accepted" method of serving shrimp, it just seems like a really rude thing to do--making the guests go digging and maneuvering around, or leaving a perfectly nice last bite of shrimp on their plate.
Any thoughts???
-
Actually I love buying whole shrimp with heads and tails. They are much more flavorful when broiled/baked/stirfried and served whole.
For shrimp cocktail I serve with the tail. Those in the know pinch the tail and it comes loose easily. It also makes for a nice "handle" when dipping in cocktail sauce.›2 Replies -
-
Rarely, but I usually cook them with shells on for the flavor. If I serve tails-on for serving reasons (cold app), the doggies get all leftover tail bits. Actually, I even take the shells and make a weak stock out of them, pour it over the doggies' dinner, and then dry out the used shells in the toaster oven for crunchy treats for the doggies. (Seeing a pattern here?)
-
I totally agree with you K Slink. Never have understood the concept behind it. Tail on shrimp doesn't make the dish any more appealing. Not all tails come off easily either. It doesn't always come down to the diner's technique on how to properly "pinch" the tail. It has a lot to do with it being properly cooked, and the type of shrimp used. Also, I don't think the percentage of people eating the shell is really that high. I don't like having to set it aside somewhere on my plate. However, I am in total agreement with preparing "fresh" head on shrimp at home and getting every last bit of juice from the head.
›1 Reply -
-
asians including my wife commonly cook and serve shrimp with the entire shell on. i said entire. and i dont mind eating the shell. dont even peel it off.
›6 Replies-
re: MarkG
I have to confess - I have no qualms at all about cooking them with the head on - I'm not even remotely squeamish about twisting the heads off fresh shrimp with my bare hands.
I'll save the heads for broth (if I don't boil them head-on) and savor every tasty drop.But I find the texture of shell in my mouth to be incredibly unpleasant. (not even that it makes me sick -- akin to taking a bite of something and realizing that the waxed-paper wrapper is still attached. yuck.
-
-
Depending on the dish, it's either tail off, tail on, shell on but head removed, or whole. When I'm cooking really fresh shrimp, I cut the heads off to make sure they're dead before cooking them.
Personally, I prefer them whole, or if shelled, with the tail on.
›3 Replies-
-
re: tastesgoodwhatisit
If you're just making boiled shrimp, leave the heads on -- the flavor is far better! I didn't believe it either til I had some extra shrimp and extra time -- it's definitely better with the heads.
And don't worry about the shrimp - if they're not dead when you dump them in the pot, they will be within seconds.
-
-
-
re: KSlink
You might also be in interested in these existing threads on the exact same topic:
Shrimp Tails
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/645044Tail-on shrimp.
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/359483Tail-On Shrimp Protocol
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/390731Here's your shrimp - you finish the prep
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/472402Shrimp Tails; WHY do they Leave them ON ?!?!
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/299197Why do restaurants leave the tails on shrimp?
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/297480
-
-
-
-
Tails on when serving "Shrimp Cocktail".
Tails & shells (& heads) on when serving a steamed, boiled, roasted, grilled, or any other spiced "peel & eat" preparation.
Everything off, buck naked, shrimp for any sauced preparation that would normally be eaten with cutlery - Jambalaya, pasta dishes, Gumbo, stirfries, etc., etc.
›8 Replies -
-
No tails when I cook shrimp. BUT it makes me a little crazy to see someone LEAVE that last bite IN the shell when shrimp is tail on!?! One of those things Dad taught us when we were kids.
›2 Replies -
-
-
-
re: FoodPopulist
If they are fresh and alive, yes I serve the head. The problem is when they are dead. there is an enzyme in the head that starts changing the texture of the flesh to mush after they die. This is why the head is usually removed after they a caught.
the only side note I can add to this is serving the head itself. If I'm frying it, like at a sushi bar. I remove the the two armour plates that are on the side of the head. Otherwise, it's all edible.
-
Evidently, your guests don't know how to eat shrimp. One gently pinches the tail where it surrounds the last morsel of meat, while gripping the exposed meat with the teeth and pulling gently. The whole thing pops out intact. No "digging" or "maneuvering."
›8 Replies-
-
-
-
re: huiray
It's completely possible to eat shrimp with tails with a fork and knife...without making a mess or breaking a sweat.
I've yet to perfect getting that last little bite out of the tail itself without using my fingers...but then if I'm using a fork and knife I'm probably also eating somewhere that the risk of ruining whatever I'm wearing is pretty high.
-
-
-
-
-
Tails if appetizers/fingerfood like shrimp cocktail, but never tails if they are incorporated into a dish. I have read here that many people actually enjoy eating the tails.....
›4 Replies -












