Shunji's --- now reviewed by the LA Times ...
I guess that's a good and bad thing.
I have to say the tomato dish was exceptional and the ankimo mousse and bleu cheese call great as always. And he even makes chocolate mousse for dessert now.
Enjoy before it gets too busy.
-
Hubs and I were there on Thursday, and OMG, it was a stunner. I gave Shunji my take on the Tomato Tofu dish, the Squid Ink'ed truffle dish, and the potato with blue cheese and dried Persimmon on top....I labeled this, his "Trifecta". Truly, 3 dishes that defy description....as if they were newly created foods. Just ummmazing. They were so nice to us as well. I'm not sure if the server is Shunji's wife or not, but she gave us a little heads up for future visits. While the Shunji Tasting at $120 was exquisite, for some of us, it's not an every day occasion to spend over $400 per couple after Sake and tax and tip. But it's not just the price point. We were blown away by his sushi quality, and next time we want more as the focus. Our server explained that for the first time it is great to do the full Shunji tasting, to learn about this master's signature dishes....then when a reprise visit is made, we can now order off the menu, but request his special creations to augment. Personally, I am excited as heck to go back and order Shunji's "10 pieces of Sushi, and a Roll" for $50, and then include his "Trifecta". Shunji could not have been more warm and gracious a host. As his fame soars (not to mention throngs of diners), I am betting that he will maintain this demeanor. I hope so.
Cheers,
Jeff›8 Replies-
-
re: JeffW
Here's a link to PeterCC's post re: the 10 pieces of sushi + hand roll for $50 http://theoffalo.com/2012/07/shunji-n...
-
re: chrishei
WOW, I guess my 3rd. eye was on the money when I felt that this would be a great way to go. We did get to try Shunji's Uni, and well....can't think of the words to describe how special it was. Not to mention his Toro, etc. etc. Oh yes, mustn't forget the baby Kanpachi.....which brings me to the following question....Kanpachi is baby Yellowtail, isn't it? So does this mean that baby Kanpachi is a "baby" baby Yellowtail :) ? All I know is that it was superb.
-
-
re: JeffW
"So does this mean that baby Kanpachi is a "baby" baby Yellowtail...?"
I think it means baby baby Yellowtail in the same way that La Brea Tar Pits means the "Tar Tar Pits" - in other words someone is simply making sure that folks who don't speak the language that the word "kanpachi" comes from, (or "La Brea" comes fom) gets the meaning of the word by adding an English translation...
-
re: JeffW
As chrishei said, kanpachi is a different fish than hamachi (yellowtail). And hamachi generally refers to farmed yellowtail.
Wild yellowtail is called different names for different stages of development: wakashi (baby yellowtail), inada (young yellowtail), warasa (uh, teenage(?) yellowtail), buri (mature yellowtail). I've only seen/had inada and buri, both are different in flavor and texture than the melt-in-mouth hamachi. Curious to try wakashi and warasa myself.
-
-
-
-
If you read the review - it's not exactly stellar. He mostly describes the food more than he praises it. The sushi gets high marks, but the appetizers not so much. It isn't critical, but then it's not exactly a rave review either.
Or maybe I'm reading my own experience into the place. I went there back in April and I'd say my date and I both like it, but can't say either of us loved it. I certainly don't share the enthusiasm many on this list have for Shunji. If I understand bigjelly - that for the money, there are other restaurants - prettier, more upscale restaurants are going to win out over the funky looking place/great food concept. I like the idea of a great hole in the wall - and Shunji pretty much falls into that category. But I would MUCH prefer to eat at, say, n/naka - which is around the same price - but a far prettier venue (with indoor toilet facilities) . I prefer my hole-in-the-wall restaurants to be a bit cheaper. I might give Shunji another try- but my date would not. That said, I've been back to n/naka a number of times in the same period.
›2 Replies-
re: foodiemahoodie
J. Gold in his weekly lunchtime chat: "Shunji is exceptional. The review is coming out this Saturday. Not quite sushi, but Shunji Nakao is a virtuoso with fish. Very expensive though - tasting menu is $80; omakase is $120 and up. Possibly even worth it."
For what it's worth, I love Shunji.
-
-
-
-
Weird. The article is posted online, dated 8/11/2012.
http://www.latimes.com/features/food/...
However, it doesn't appear in the printed edition with same date I have in my hands right now.
Oh well, I assume hard copy readers are now considered second class.›1 Reply -
-
-
re: kevin
That's true but I would bet most of the people that eat at Valentino, Spago and Mozza couldn't care less about sushi, especially sushi at a restaurant that is in an ugly building in a not so great location and has the bathroom outside in a metalworking facility. Recently J.L. posted pictures of his dinner at Shunji and said it was $185 PP before tax and tip, that translates roughly to $250 per person. For my money I'd go to Spago, Valentino, or Osteria Mozza. Just my opinion.
-
re: thebigjelly
I don't know why you'd just assume that those who eat at Valentino, Spago, and O. Mozza couldn't care less about sushi. Why do you think those places usually have raw/crudo fish dishes as appetizers in the first place? Maybe because a lot of people who eat at Valentino, Spago, O.Mozza do like raw fish?
The JLomakase is usually 1.4-2x more food and more expensive than the standard omakase. A typical tab at Shunji is probably half.
Shunji along with Red Medicine is serving some of the most exciting cuisine in LA right now.
Just my opinion.
-
-
-
re: Porthos
Didn't Shunji close his restaurant on Melrose due to the lack of customers? Same food,same guy. And I didn't say all of the customers at Spago etc. don't like sushi, the point I made was that most of the people that eat there would rather spend their money at a place like Spago, Valentino, or Mozza. The article in the LA Times said the omakase was $80 to $120 and up. Add tax and tip and, well, you already know.
-
-
re: thebigjelly
yeah, i'd bet that the people going to Valentino, Spago, and others that are there for the food and not the scene would like to visit a great sushi/creative japanese restaurant.
my big pet peeve though with shunji and the key to the bathroom. it doesn't work for the place. but that building is simply beautiful on the inside and it's not too shabby on the outside either. the atmosphere on the inside is serene, minimalist perfection.
and you can get out of there for way less than $200 buckaroos and still feel well fed and well satisfied. the hound that spent 185 bucks on dishes alone is not representative of the average or rather usual meal there.
but yes at the same time, you won't be spending 40 to 50 dollars per person there, it just wouldn't work at that end of the scale.
-
-
-
-







