Log In / Sign Up
HOME > Chowhound > General Topics >
d
das6332 Jul 1, 2012 01:09 PM

Traditional chicken paprickash

Can anyone help me? I've had traditional chicken paprickash at a couple of resturaunts and from a homemade recipe and all of them had the bones left in when served. My wife has never seen it this way. So are the bones left in or no?

  1. l
    LauraGrace Jul 4, 2012 08:38 PM

    Bones IN! As with all stews/casseroles. Long cooking necessitates inclusion of the bone, and it's much much tastier that way.

    1. d
      DockPotato Jul 3, 2012 03:47 PM

      Bone in, skin on. Neck should be included too.

      Big sigh... at our later stage it's boneless, skinless breasts and/or thighs with oil - not lard. Still enjoyed though.

      1. Bacardi1 Jul 2, 2012 05:09 PM

        I make a Czech version of it frequently, & while I cook it with bones in, I do sometimes remove the bones before serving, as the meat is falling of them anyway & it makes it easier to serve to guests.

        1. Tripeler Jul 1, 2012 06:39 PM

          Just tastes a whole lot better with the bones left in, particularly with dark meat.

          1. mamachef Jul 1, 2012 01:57 PM

            In traditional paprikash, chicken is served bone-in. I'd bet that your wife had it out a restaurant that serves boneless white as a matter of course.

            3 Replies
            1. re: mamachef
              Will Owen Jul 2, 2012 07:38 PM

              Wrong on both counts, says me. Meat on the bone is always better, and in this household white meat is considered good for sandwiches, period.

              1. re: Will Owen
                mamachef Jul 2, 2012 09:21 PM

                Um, not so. Traditional paprikash is served bone- in. I posited nothing whatsoever about flavor or my preference; just that if his wife ate it in a restaurant, it was probably boneless or semi-boned breast meat, which is not the traditional preparation for the dish. So I'm not sure where you think I was incorrect here. Few restaurants other than Asian serve bone-in dark meat because the perception is that the customer will prefer white (and support a higher price point.) But I'd bet you know that.

                1. re: mamachef
                  Will Owen Jul 9, 2012 03:19 PM

                  Sorry for the confusion, mamachef - I was not saying that you were wrong about anything. I was trying to say that the chicken is supposed to be on the bone, but in my kitchen it won't be breast meat. I should have hit the Reply to Original Post tab instead of the one in your post.

                  We had pretty much given up on chicken from restaurants long before Mrs. O decided she wouldn't eat it anymore, exactly because too many offered nothing but that dry, boring white stuff. Even some of our plate-lunch places back in Nashville have stopped frying anything but breasts, a profoundly disturbing trend. But when I make the so-called "chicken paprika" I got from ex #1, you can bet it's bone-in, skin-on legs and thighs. Or sometimes just thighs.

            Share with your friendsX