Are Food Critics The Emperor With No Clothes?
Drew Magary writing in Gawker seems to think so:
-
-
I remember when Gawker used to be good. It was a long time ago. Lately it's composed of 85% Reddit reposts, 10% "Amirite?" rants (like this dumbass one, which sounds like it was plagiarized from Andy Rooney) and 5% John Cook, who's the only reason I still visit the site.
The fact that Robert Sietsema is pictured as an example of one of those supposedly fancy-pants, elitist critics speaks volumes.
›1 Reply-
re: small h
At least crowd-sourcing can ferret out the terrible food reviewers out there, like Judie Dweck in the Scarsdale Inquirer in NY. Has never written a single negative word in her reviews, and clearly gets the restaurant to comp her meals, not the paper. I asked the paper, they confirmed she isn't paid by them. And she interviews the chef before every meal.
-
-
quite possibly the dumbest thing i have read in a long time. however, kudos to the author for missing the point so radiantly.
›4 Replies-
-
-
re: small h
And I do, To be honest, I make more money and can eat better than any food critic. So a food critic's review is worthless to me. I'm more interested in reading reviews of others like me who are adventurous eaters that have traveled all over the world - hence I watch No Reservation (even though I detest AB) and Bizarre Food. That's also why I participate on Chowhound. There are more dedicated "amateur" foodies here than employed by any newspaper.
-
-
-

