HOME > Chowhound > China & Southeast Asia >

Discussion

Shinji by Kanesaka, Singapore

  • 13
  • Share

Singapore never lacks of good Japanese restaurants such as Tetsuya, Shiraishi, or Aoki. The quality there is high, in fact better than most of HK’s Japanese places, but nothing is as spectacular as the latest and arguably the best resto to eat Japanese sushi/omakase in the island – Shinji by Kanesaka. The original branch is in the historic Raffles hotel while the 2nd branch just opened in OUE building. The meal here is not cheap and Singaporeans are usually not that friendly to restaurants that charge astronomical price – they will become more ‘demanding’ (Tokuoka and Savoy are some of the ‘victims’). To my surprised, many diners raved about Shinji’s food quality and experience; many say it’s worth the dollar. After visiting there for lunch at the other expense, I found that the sushi is nearly as good as sushi Jiro Ginza. Only then, I decided that I would like to try Shinji’s at its best – Omakase dinner

Food (and wine) - 94/100

The omakase mainly consisted of sashimi, cooked food and sushi. Here what I had,

Sashimi: duo of uni was fantastic. It demonstrated the contrast of Murasaki uni (the long spikes) that is soft, moist and sweet vs Bafun uni (the short spikes) that has denser texture, but also delicious. Both uni were from Hokkaido.
- I also enjoyed the “spiral” shell sashimi (called ‘chubu gai’?): it’s very crunchy, a bit sweet with sea flavor. Almost as tasty as akagai sushi. The Chutoro was smooth and melting the mouth. Additionally, I also ate: kinmedai (red snapper), quite tasty and fatty for white fish; bonito (it looks like tuna but tasted differently) with ponzu sauce; hotaru ika with its liver – ok.

Cooked dishes: uni rice served with negi toro and ikura is excellent, my favorite dish at Shinji. A generous portion of uni mixed with sushi rice to produce creamy and golden 'risotto'. The salmon roe was sweet, nicely burst in my mouth; the toro with chopped spring onions & freshly grated wasabi enhanced the overall experience of this delicious dish
- Another wonderful cooked item would be awabi chawanmushi: the high quality abalone is from Chiba prefecture; good texture and a bit chewy. On the contrary, the chawanmushi was warm and smooth. This dish went very well with cold sake. Furthermore, Shinji also served cooked botan ebi in 3 ways: the savory egg, the head (sweet & crispy) and the tail (tender & delightful - the best part); tofu skin with kekani was fragrant and savory, like the ‘sweet & sour’ sauce; the grilled sardine with radish ponzu was alright

Sushi: Among the 3 parts, sushi time is my favorite part. I really love the uni, among the best I’ve ever had – it’s ethereal, fresh, creamy and sweet. The akagai was also delicious, pure and crunchy. And lastly the kuruma ebi was savory and with nice texture.
- Both the chutoro and otoro were very good – but I rememberd that my lunch version here was better. The anago was about at the Jiro level, I got a very generous portion this time. For the rests, the chef gave me shima aji, aji, zuke, kohada, tuna roll (I’m not a fan of this, especially when I eat lots of food) and tamago.

Urasawa is the only place I can think of that’s worthy of Kanesaka’s comparison. Normally, the sushi quality of a restaurant can be measured by its tamago. At shinji, the tamago is served cold, sweet and not too soft. By virtue of the tamago, Urasawa (at Beverly Hills) won – more moist and spongy as if I ate a cake. However, I had to say that Shinji served slightly better sushi than Urasawa. (Sushi: If I grade Shinji sushi A, then Urasawa will be A-). How about the non-sushi dishes? Urasawa is better in this department IMHO; Hiro-san is more creative and personally I enjoy his kaiseki better than the sushi part. Nothing wrong with Shinji Singapore, but if you’ve been to Urasawa then you will know what I’m talking about. (Non sushi: If I grade Urasawa kaiseki A, then Shinji will be B+)

I also had small portion of sake served in a flask – Kokuryu Kozuryu, it’s medium dry and a bit sweet at the beginning. Though it’s more famous for its hot sake, but since it’s Singapore, I take it cold. The Shinji’s omakase is indeed very good and tasty; it deserved 2 ½* by Michelin standard – it ranks in the top 2 among the best Japanese restaurants I’ve ever visit, outside Japan’s of course. The sushi served here is Edomae style aka traditional; in short forget about eating salmon, mayo, or cooked/marinated fishes

Service (and ambiance) - 93/100

The staffs are friendly and helpful. Since the restaurant is small (only about 20 people in the main dining room served by 3 sushi chefs), they are ready to response to whatever need you have but they don’t know much about the food. So, the other aspect of the Shinji’s hospitality is actually coming from the chefs. In spite of some English limitation, all chefs make conscious effort to communicate with their guests whether informative, small talks or even a few jokes.It could be a new experience for some guests, but again the Urasawa comparison fits in – Hirosan also entertain his guests throghout the entire meal. By the way, both places remember repeat guests quite well. I was fortunate to be served directly by Oshino-san (the executive chef) himself.

Like many other Japanese sushi high end place, the dining room may look deceptively simple. The most amazing part is the main sushi counter that’s singularly carved from more than 200-year-old Japanese cypress tree. I learned that most of the restaurant’s wood and paper materials for furnishing were brought from Japan as well. Essentially, everything in this restaurant is imported from Japan (the fishes and seafood, the dining room materials as well as the sushi chefs/a few waiters). Oh, the interior designer is the talented Junzo Irikado.

Thus, what’s the verdict of Shinji Singapore vs Urasawa Beverly Hills? It’s indeed a tough call, but I’m slightly more in favor of Urasawa due to the kaiseki part. Urasawa will be about S$ 50 more expensive but there you will get 8-9 kaiseki dishes, 20 pieces of sushi, and 2 desserts whereas Shinji Omakase’s shin, you will receive 9-10 sashimi/cooked dishes combined, 12 pieces of sushi and a dessert. I think Urasawa provides ‘better’ value of money as well. Anyway, will I return to Shinji? Certainy whenever I have the money and when someone treats me :) moreover, Singapore is a lot closer than US

For the dishes’ pictures (most of them): https://picasaweb.google.com/11823790...

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
Posting Guidelines | FAQs | Feedback
Cancel
  1. Very good writeup. I didn't realize we have such a good Japanese restaurant in Singapore.

    By the way, you mean to say that Kunio Tokuoka and Santi closed down already, right? Guy Savoy is still around, for the time being anyway.

    My favourite restaurant at the moment is CUT by Wolfgang Puck, as he serves the best steaks around. I used to like Morton's a lot, but CUT's creamed spinach with the sunny-side egg on top won me over!

    2 Replies
    1. re: makanputra

      Thanks for reading
      Tokuoka has been closed indeed

      What I meant by Guy Savoy was that based on several conversations with my friends, they're not impressed by Savoy (though the menu is very similar to its Paris version). Moreover, they charge a lot - another example of an expensive place with big name chefs that does not receive many positive response from 'the locals'

      I agreed that CUT is indeed very good (I heard it's even more expensive than the one in the US) - I'm usually not that into steak house as I often find the best place to eat beef/steak actually in some gastronomy restaurants. For 'cheaper' version, I also enjoy Bedrock bar & grill

      1. re: Bu Pun Su

        CUT in Singapore is much much more expensive than the one in Los Angeles. I recall the average bill in CUT SIngapore was around SGD300pp while about USD100-150pp in LA. Also, they offer mostly waygu steak in Singapore but more USDA steak in LA.

    2. I tried the Raffles Hotel branch a while back - it's good. But couldn't bring myself to pay for the omakase dinner though.

      5 Replies
      1. re: klyeoh

        True, it's not cheap
        I usually save for a couple of months so that I can splurge somewhere

        Probably, not anymore now ... I'm not sure where else to go
        No restaurant in particular at Singapore that I really want to repeat, referring to a high-end place

        1. re: Bu Pun Su

          What's the difference between lunch and dinner in terms of the food you get? It looks like lunch is substantially cheaper.

          1. re: mikey8811

            Lunch is much cheaper and better value for money. But they do offer more expensive stuffs in dinner such as abalone that is not available in lunch.

            1. re: FourSeasons

              Thanks FourSeasons - hope you are well. Not really a big abalone fan. From the report the uni rice sounds the most delish ;)

            2. re: mikey8811

              Also, if you like sushi a lot like me ... Lunch is probably better
              My next visit should it happen will likely be Yuki for lunch (20-pieces of nigiri sushi)

        2. Nice report.
          Judging from your photo, the "spiral shell sashimi" you refer to is mirugai. Bonito, also known as katsuo in Japan, is from skipjack tuna.
          I actually prefer the preparation by Kikuchi-san to Oshino-san but I think he has moved to the OUE site.

          3 Replies
          1. re: FourSeasons

            Thanks for the update. I'd never tried Shinji before but now really felt like going for the OUE outlet.

            1. re: FourSeasons

              Thanks for reading and the bonito info
              I was not really sure about the name of those shell sashimi - you may be right
              What's the preparation like for the bonito made by Kikuchi-san?

              1. re: Bu Pun Su

                I don't mean the preparation of bonito.
                I just meant that I prefer the sushi prepared by Kikuchi-san.