UV deep fryer ... where can I get it?
I was told once that there is a deep fryer that doesn’t use oils. It uses this UV light or something… I was wondering if anyone knows what I am talking about. I am a heath nut but love fry foods. If I could get the name of this , I would buy it! Thanks
Janine
-
Thanks everyone.. but I am looking for something I can fry French fries or something small.. those are for big things like turkeys. But good to know for the future!!! :) So, is there anything like that out there?
›7 Replies-
-
-
re: paulj
http://www.amazon.com/T-Fal-FZ7000002...
Yeah, the idea is to use minimal amount of oil. Of course, it isn't going to taste as good. Here is the link for those who are interested.
-
re: Chemicalkinetics
Then there's the question of how much oil is absorbed during deep fat frying - properly done. I believe Modernist Cuisine claims that as long as the oil is bubbling around the food, no oil is entering the food. The bubbles are steam from water that being expelled from the cooking food. It's just at the end, when the bubbling subsides that oil can be drawn in to replace the displaced moisture. So a rapid and thorough draining should minimize the fat addition.
So reading up on the science of fat frying may be the first step to minimizing the added calories.
-
-
-
re: mexivilla
The cold oil method is still part of the science, or at least can be examined scientifically. It's just not part of the accepted wisdom. In a chapter on confit, Modernist Cuisine explains that at the lower temperatures, the oil is poaching the food, but is not being absorbed. In my limited experience it requires paying attention to proportions, because it depends critically on the timing of the temperature rise.
Even the classic french fry method calls for 2 temperatures, one lower that essentially cooks the potatoes, the other high enough to crisp them.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
UV or IR? I have definitely heard of IR deep fryer, like this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Char-Broil-Oil-...
UV seems a bit crazy.
*Edited: just realize that Paul, GH and I came to the same conclusion*
›2 Replies -
-
re: paulj
Probably meant "infrared" instead of "UV."
-

