lamb shanks...roasted or braised?
i was going to make a lamb shoulder but decided it was just too fatty (vs. a pork shoulder which, i think, has more meat together with some fat). i was going to do the long cook - as described in the l.a. times article from way back in 2009 about 6-8 hours of slow cooking (i've done it for pork shoulder before and it was superb..but one of our guests doesn't eat pork but does love lamb).
anyway, am thinking lamb shanks now...thinking 1 per person (they are about a pound each) ...but wondering if they can be slow roasted at 250 or would braising be the much better way to go?
-
-
ok...love the responses here. i've decided to serve braised lamb shanks - am using lidia bastianich recipe which incorporates some dried porcinis and using a nice orange-rind gremolata on top. am making them thurs. night and then defatting the pan - serving them sat. night so the flavors will have time to develop a bit. am serving them on top of a soft polenta. olives and pieces of parm to start and an arugula and radicchio salad. no idea what to do about dessert - something to cut through all that richness i think. have to go find the shanks tomorrow...found some fancy butcher and they are charging a ton for them...almost $10 a pound! geez. i need 11 of them - i'll go broke!
›18 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: SeaSide Tomato
found them for $5.99 and bought 12...they are not huge - just under a pound a piece. the harder part will be browning them in batches. putting them on soft polenta. the decision here is (and i'd love opinions): a plain polenta made with water or a polenta made with chicken stock (there's stock in the braise liquid for the lamb.) i think the latter...I always want lots of bang for flavor but not quite sure.
-
-
-
re: hotoynoodle
i live in an mainly-orthodox-jewish section of brooklyn (not borough park) and we're not orthodox. but, guess what? orthodox families are BIG and the local store has some BIG pots and i bought one years ago. fit all twelve of them (yes, they aren't huge but will be perfect one per person). i wouldn't want to lift it though so i'm simmering them on top of the stove instead of in the oven.
-
re: redgirl
my dad lives in a neighborhood in brooklyn like that. i wonder if you are neighbors? lol.
i just finished a stovetop braise of 2 shanks that were almost 4 pounds with the bones.
red wine, onions, garlic carrots, tomato, bay, thyme and fennel. a bit of orange juice. the shanks took about 3 hours on very low heat. i reduced the cooking liquid and seasoned it. WOW! super good. will have it for dinner saturday, with polenta and sauteed zucchini ribbons with lemon and almonds.
-
re: hotoynoodle
YUM. ...we've been here a very long time and the neighborhood shifted around us. happens that way.
i made them and pulled them from the liquid - covered them and put them in the fridge. my intention is that tomorrow i'll easily grab the fat off the top and then - here's the 1st question...put the shanks back in the liquid til saturday? or keep them separate? i haven't reduced the sauce yet...thinking i would reduce it til later...but maybe i should before i put the shanks back in or it will be a pain and they'll really fall apart when i go to serve them hot!
2nd quesiton: how much actual polenta (dry and uncooked) for soft polenta for 8 or 9?
i-
-
re: redgirl
are you hoping to keep them on the bone for plating? just handle with care. you can always sort of arrange them to look on the bone, lol. mine are in the reduced liquid, waiting for saturday dinner. just be careful with the salt.
as for the polenta, it depends how much water you add. i use the no-stir, slow oven method and prefer it slightly stiffer, instead of really mushy and soft. i use stock, water and butter. when it's about 1/2 cooked, i stir in some grated cheese and salt to taste. i usually do 2 or 3 parts water to 1 part polenta. if you like it softer, consider 4 or 5 parts water. for 12 people for dinner, i'd make a big pan, probably 3 cups dry. leftovers will last a week and are great with eggs and such. i'd always rather have too much than not enough.
are you serving anything red or green, for color on the plate?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nothing wrong with braising...
But people are acting like it's impossible to roast a lamb shank and get a tender result when actually you can get it just as tender as a braise. Most roasting recipes call for the shanks to be covered for some or most of the cooking time (I'm sure someone will interject that using foil means you're not 'roasting' - semantics).
Upside of braise - braising liquid makes for an easy sauce, harder to screw up the texture
Upside of roasting - more intense and concentrated lamb flavor, generally better browning and crust
›3 Replies-
re: cowboyardee
i did a braised lamb shank with this great tomato/wine sauce, and ended up shredding up the lamb and it became sort of a lamb ragout. one night we had it over noodles, then the next night over polenta. it was sssooo gooood. i dont do recipes very often but we used the tom colicchio recipe as a base. it was great.
-
re: cowboyardee
But didn't you just argue in this thread
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/805158
that you can get the best of both worlds with a 'true' braise?-
re: paulj
Good point - I imagine that would be a pretty cool way of treating a lamb shank. Thanks for pointing it out. May have to pick up some lamb shanks and give it a try. Obviously I'm still working out ways to use the 'traditional' braise technique.
Plenty of good options for cooking this kind of cut.
-
-
-
Braised--and use this recipe:
http://www.sweetbasilneedham.com/Swee...
(sorry-don't know how to make a link here
)Absolutely. Flippin'. Wonderful.
Last time I made it, i did used canned whole peeled tomatoes, what wtih it being the dead of winter. Don't balk at the bottle of port--go with it, it's terrific.
Serve it over creamy polenta. you will be in heaven.
This is making my formerly delicious salad for lunch seem lacking..
›2 Replies -
Cast my vote for a braise as well. It's funny, I prepared lamb shanks two weeks ago, and pork shoulder this weekend- and I found the pork shoulder to be WAY fattier. In both cases though I made the meals a day in advance of serving, chilled them in the fridge, skimmed the fat and reheated before serving. I had maybe 1 cup of fat for the lamb and over 2 cups for the pork (probably more). And in both instances, I think the flavor improves with sitting overnight.
›2 Replies-
re: mjhals
OP was saying that the lamb SHOULDER was fattier than the pork shoulder, not the lamb SHANKS. the shanks alone (just the lower part) have way less fat than a whole shoulder. btw, that fat from the pork shoulder makes a great soup base for tom kha gai. at least my version of tom kha gai. i usually freeze some of the liquid that comes from making pork shoulder, pork belly or especially my carnitas for doing soups.
-
-
-
-
-
Braised in red wine is the way to go.
That said, make sure you brown the shanks well before you add the wine and braise them. That's the secret to great braised meat.
›4 Replies-
re: Db Cooper
Isn't it a pain to brown shanks well? How many minutes, dare I say hours, of painstaking turning does it require? An alternative is to limit the braising liquid, so a good portion of the shakes are exposed to the moist but hot air inside the braising pot. You'll be surprised how much good color and flavor develops during a proper braise.
-
re: paulj
If your oil is hot, it takes about 15 minutes to brown them. You have to turn them three times total. It doesn't have to be perfect on the outside, just a good start. Depending on how many you have and the size of your Dutch oven, may have to work in batches. But it isn't that big a pain and in no way takes hours unless you are browning a huge amount, something 99.9% of home cooks aren't doing.
-
-
re: hotoynoodle
Never thought about it that way. Looks like I'll have to start browning them. Thanks! Aside from that, my vote is for braised and with red wine, same as DB. Cooked with cumin and garlic and served with a side of rice to ladle some braising liquid onto. Salad too. If possible a cucumber& tomato salad.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-








