Log In / Sign Up
HOME > Chowhound > General Topics >
ipsedixit Feb 4, 2012 12:12 PM

Is there such a thing as a "great eater"? And if there is, what does it mean?

When someone says, "she's a great cook" we all sort of know what that means -- at least generally.

But what about the phrase "great eater"?

Does that phrase even make sense? If it does, what does it really mean?

How does a person define what a "great eater" is?

Is it someone like Andrew Zimmern who's intrepid and unabashedly curious?

A glutton like, say, Paula Deen or Adam Richman?

A (supposed?) savant like Frank Bruni or Ruth Reichl?

  1. eclecticsynergy May 28, 2012 02:21 AM

    "My doctor advised me to stop ordering intimate dinners for four unless there were three other people." -Orson Welles

    Now that's a great eater.

    Humor aside, I'd say that last post laid out a pretty good set of parameters.

    1. t
      tastesgoodwhatisit Feb 5, 2012 01:55 AM

      I would describe a great eater as someone who enthusiastically enjoys eating food for its own sake, who is willing and eager to try new things, has a broad range of likes and few dislikes, has a reasonable breadth of knowledge and experience about food and cuisines, and is able to appreciate foods from different classes - from plebian standards to frou-frou gourmet, to earnestly granola.

      This would exclude people who are more interested in talking/reading/debating about food than actually eating it, picky eaters, and people who fit obsessively in one extreme - the only chicken nuggets and french fry eaters, the obsessively locavore, hand picked by virgins under a full moon crowd, and those who figure the more you pay, the better it is. It would also exclude those with serious food restrictions, whether voluntary or not.

      1. f
        FoodPopulist Feb 4, 2012 10:59 PM

        Takeru Kobayashi

        1. g
          GH1618 Feb 4, 2012 08:44 PM

          "Great" is too general and imprecise a term. Why not use a word such as "epicure" or "gourmand" if that is what is meant?

          3 Replies
          1. re: GH1618
            ipsedixit Feb 4, 2012 08:52 PM

            If "great" is too general and imprecise, then why do we use it to describe cooks?

            1. re: ipsedixit
              g
              GH1618 Feb 4, 2012 09:03 PM

              "We" use it to describe a lot of things, but it doesn't convey much information. In contect, a word without much intrinsic meaning can be understood to mean a little more. So a "great" cook is just one whose food is generally considered much better than average, I suppose. That's not saying much. Someone who is educated in both food and language could do better.

              1. re: GH1618
                ipsedixit Feb 4, 2012 09:05 PM

                See, you just disproved your point.

          2. t
            thomas64 Feb 4, 2012 12:17 PM

            The phrases "great eater" and "good eater" are used in reference to children who are not picky about what they eat.

            2 Replies
            1. re: thomas64
              c
              CanadaGirl Feb 4, 2012 12:57 PM

              That's the context in which I've heard the phrase "good eater" used too.

              1. re: CanadaGirl
                Chemicalkinetics Feb 4, 2012 08:12 PM

                Excellent, but I may say it also apply to puppies.

            Share with your friendsX