Losing interest in Iron Chef America
Sorry chairman, but the revolving door is not doing it for me. I tried watching the first Zakarian show, and ended up shutting it off in the middle and deleting it.
Zakarian, Forgione, Garces are certainly talented chefs, but that's all they are to me. Watching a show with them as the Iron Chef to me is like watching two challengers. In the immortal words of Bill Parcells, they are simply JAGs. Just another guy.
Flay, Morimoto, and Batali have that something extra.
-
I thought the show took itself too seriously and could not live up to the original Japanese one which at least had some charm, some humour. I could never sit through a whole hour of the American version and the Super Chef thing was excessive, over the top.
›2 Replies -
-
Totally agree with you, the novelty seems to have worn off and all the bells and whistles just bother me now. I still learn something interesting now and then, but now it's very rare. My favorite part is when they introduce the challenger and getting to see their career and restaurant, because right now I'm still learning about all the famous/talented chefs out there.
-
I have lost interest when they have shows like last night when it was Battle Tortilla and Tequila. First you take Ecuadorian chef Garces and the Argentine lady and make them make Mexican food with a "mixologist". After about 5 minutes I could not watch any longer.
›8 Replies-
-
re: LikestoEatout
Neither contestant is known for cooking food from their country of origin, though both have stayed within the broader Hispanic world.
Given the challenger, Chef Alexandra Raij, what you have chosen (for IC and ingredient)? Maybe it is time to revive the 'what you choose as a secret ingredient' thread
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/516147IC has done a mixologist pairing before - in 2007 with Batali and mangos, and same winning bar tender, Tony Abou-Ganim
-
re: paulj
I'd love to see the show go back to the basics...can Iron Chef French cook a better french inspired meal than the challenger can in his/her culinary area? And the secret ingredient would be....giant water bugs
http://images.joelsartore.com/gallery...
LOLOLOL-
re: freia
The American chefs are not tied as closely to a particular culinary area as those Japanese chefs in the 1990s. In this latest battle, Garces is described as 'Latin Fusion', and Raij as 'Contemporary Spanish'. (from the Wiki ICA episode guide). Batali was 'Italian', but no one batted an eye when he based his dishes on his latest trip to Spain.
Morimoto cracked the original Japanese mold, with a modern American-Japanese fusion. Compared to the American contestants he is thoroughly Japanese, but he was the main target of the Ohta faction (representing traditional Japanese cooking). But I think Japanese have different ideas about team spirit and competition, ones that don't fit was well with contemporary American chefs.
For some reason I'm reminded of MXC, the redubbed Japanese game show that Spike TV used to run - and its contrast with the individualism of American elimination shows.
-
-
re: paulj
What would be fun would be to have a specifically Italian-American Iron Chef defending the fusion of Old World and New World against a horde of authenticity snobs who whine about anything presenting itself as Italian-influenced that wouldn't be done back in Italy a hundred years ago.
-
-
-
-
-
ICA is getting tired because almost every food show is now some sort of a competition and it's just been beaten to death. ICJ was really the first "competitive" cooking show where there was a winner/loser when someone was cooking a piece of food. It was somewhat tongue-in-cheek at the time but competitive cooking is now probably the biggest sub-genre of food programming.
It's almost like Survivor and reality TV. It was the groundbreaker but now there's so much reality TV the original show itself is tired and worn out.
-
-
-
-
-
a neighbor and I used to joke about the voiceovers in the original and the judges were usually movie stars "oh yes! it looks he is doing a most amazing thing with sauteed liver and rock candy" "oooh, very intriguing"
I sort of doubt that was the true dialogue but it was a lot more fun than the US version.
›1 Reply -
-
re: Kagemusha
I think its limping badly. I liked the Japanese version most, where you picked an Iron Chef based on cooking style not on the personality. Iron Chef Japanese, Iron Chef French, Iron Chef Italian, you know, then you had battles based on best of food styles rather than choosing a personality per se.
-
-
-
-
re: Bob W
Agreed on Symon. And that personality DOES matter. But so does skill, and in my opinion Garces, Forgione, and Zakarian aren't in the same league as guys like Morimoto and Batali. And they would be absolutely crushed in a battle with the likes of Chen Kenichi. Good chefs, perhaps, but Iron Chefs they are not. The show has definitely jumped. (But I'll still watch it, every week, just to see how bad it gets :-))
-
-
-
and yet, people complain that FN has abandoned food for personalities. Seems that personality does matter! as long as it is the right kind. :)
›3 Replies-
re: paulj
First they make an Iron Chef America that is more based on personality than food, unlike the original Iron Chef. Then, they hold real contests that pick iron chefs who cook better than they project a personality. There's no hook, if you can't follow the food closely due to sketchy narration and then you have dull chefs.
What I watch is Next Iron Chef. Next Iron Chef is the new Iron Chef.
-
w/o the bad voice dub of the original Japanese version it just sort of lost something at the start.
›6 Replies-
-
re: zin1953
Cooking Channel, 11 pm, every night!
One of my most memorable life's lessons comes from the original Iron Chef: On an episode in which the secret ingredient was the apparently disgusting natto, one of the judges, a good sport, said, "Well, some days you get homard lobsters, and some days you get natto."
So true!
-
-
re: EWSflash
That's where I learned about nato. I think it was a tie breaker ingredient (30 minutes). But I must have missed the comment that implied the judge(s) did not like nato - though I'm sure some Japanese like it better than others. I think it is eaten more as a condiment with breakfast rice than as a fancy cooking ingredient.
Koniyaku was another such ingredient (both as tie and introduction).
I have enjoyed ICJ more as a window on Japanese food culture than as a cooking show.
-
-
-
-
re: hill food
Totally agree. I tried watching ICA a few times and it just never captured my interest like the original. The format works a lot better in Japan for some reason. Also, the host and comments by the various folks get on my nerves. I can take about the first 10-15 minutes and then I have to cut it. I hope no one tries to duplicate Dotchi Cooking - that would really suck over here...
-
-
-
re: iL Divo
Being an Iron Chef is not a full time job, so presumably both have continued to do what they did before - run one or more restaurants. Elsewhere Cora's family has been mentioned, as well a talk show appearance. Batali made the Spain road trip series, and has insulted some paying customers (Wall street bankers).
-
-
re: iL Divo
Cat Cora has a new show coming out with Curtis Stone "Around the World in 80 Plates" on Bravo.
http://eater.com/archives/2012/01/09/...
-
-
-
-
-
You got 2 out of 3 in the latest episode
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/826082While Batali is gone, I don't detect a significant drop off in Morimoto and Flay appearances. In 2010, season #8 Morimoto peaked at 7 episodes, but that was above the 3-4 of previous and subsequent seasons. (Wiki has a nice set of tables of episodes)
-












