HOME > Chowhound > Food Media & News >

Discussion

NY Times Westchester reviews

  • 2

I've been thinking it for a long time now, but it's recently started to become extra irritating, for whatever reasons.
The NY Times regional food reviewers for Westchester are simply awful.

Bad writing, bad taste, and utterly convinced they are 'interesting' (despite all evidence to the contrary)

Isn't about time the region gets a real food writer?

5 minutes on this site is worth a year of NY Times Westchester reviews

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Same for the Connecticut section. Just terrible. And their rating categories are ridiculous. "Worth It". I think 99% of the restaurants are given a "Worth It". Makes it all "Worthless".

    1. after reading today's review in the NY Times Westchester, I'm reviving my own rant!

      MH Reed couldn't know LESS about food and restaurants.
      She likes bland. She likes boring.

      THey seem to have decided they need to 'speak for' an uneducated and pedestrian taste suburban audience.
      but that is NOT what Westchester is or wants.