Boston lowest in fast food consumption
We must be doing something right! This article from Bundle analyzed spending data from 100 cities in the US and ranked them in amounts spent at the major fast food chains - specifically, McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Taco Bell, Subway, Pizza Hut, Arby's and Burger King.
They then ranked all 100 and found that Boston came in dead (or is that live?) last, #100 out of 100 cities surveyed, spending 92% less than the national average on fast food.
http://money.bundle.com/article/fast-food-nation-cities-spend-most-fast-food/1
The full list, 1 to 100, is here: http://money.bundle.com/article/fast-...
Thanks to the Globe's Dishing column for spotting this.
-
I'm not anti-fast food. Yes, it's generally unhealthy, but honestly, I trust the nutrition info from McDonald's or Wendy's way more than I trust it from, say, Panera (which has huge signs boasting their healthy eating accolades, which I do not understand...).
Anyhow, I moved here from a more fast food reliant place. (Of course, when you've got Chick-fil-a and Bojangles, it's way more tempting....) What I've noticed about Boston fast food is that the experience usually sucks. It's more expensive here than other places I've been, the ordering experience is disorganized and hectic, usually there's uncomfortable vibe in the seating area, and it's not like you can go through a drive through and take your McNuggets to go. You don't really want to stand in the street eating a Baconator, but there's nothing appealing about sitting down inside for it either. The traditional model doesn't really work here, which I think at least partly figures into the lack of fast food.
-
-
While fun to see, Boston's lowest ranking has more to do with the viability of certain foodservice business models than Bostonians' presumed healthier / more refined eating habits. All the lowest cities on this list have a high and dense enough population with a high enough percentage of ethnic diversity to support a thriving independant "fast-food" / ethnic food market. Instead of McDonalds, Bostonians are buying cheap burritos, pizza, Pho, Bah Mi, Brazilian buffet, etc. from a sleu of independant eatieres that are just as fast and unhealthy as their franchised fast food counterparts, just without the stigma. Same for NYC, San Fran, Phili, Detroit, and all the other major cities at the bottom.
We don't build more McD's and Wendy's here because we all can get a cheap, filling, fast, unhealthy meals from local places that simply taste better. With all these easy access alternatives with meals that are $1-$2 difference from the FF chains but have massive improvements in flavor, there's just no appeal.
›1 Reply -
-
-
-
Interesting. I'd be curious to see the numbers normalize on a per-location basis or something. It seems like Boston just doesn't have many McDonald's, Wendy's, KFC, Taco Bell, Subway, Pizza Hut, Arby's, and Burger King.
›14 Replies-
re: emannths
I agree. Plus it has lots of other, non-fast food options. I noticed that a lot of the cities with low fast food consumption seemed to be larger (or more metropolitan, if that makes sense); I suspect those cities have a more varied population that makes speedy, but non-fast food food.
-
-
re: emannths
Yes, if we are talking Boston Proper, then only Subway seems like a major presence. For McDonald's I can think of Kenmore Square, Downtown Crossing, one in the Fenway on Boylston I think, and one in Chinatown....Wendy's, I can only think of Copley and Downtown Crossing....Pizza Hut is nonexistent AFAIK. Arby's?? I'm not even sure if that exists in all of MA. Burger King...hmmm...one in Brighton, one in Copley...I'm sure there are a few others. Used to be one in BU East but it closed, as did the McDonald's in BU West. I can't think of a single Taco Bell...one in Central Square near Koreana I think, but I'm only counting Boston proper. There is a KFC in Brighton...maybe that has a Taco Bell too. The one on Comm AVe in BU central closed down.
So, no, it is not necessarily easy to find these places in Boston.
Good thing they didn't include Popeye's because I was definitely a guilty partaker of the Kenmore locaion!
-----
Koreana
154 Prospect Street, Cambridge, MA 02139-
re: tamerlanenj
There's an Arby's out in Chicopee -- I have an unapologetic love for their potato cakes, so I make a point to swing by if I'm out that way.
There's a McDonald's and a Wendy's on Mass Ave near Berklee, a McDonald's in Allston Village (dunno if the one on Soldiers Field Road is technically in Brighton or Watertown, but I think it's Brighton), a KFC in Union Square Allston, and one of those combo Long John Silvers/Taco Bells on the VFW Parkway heading towards Dedham. Only Pizza Huts I know of are out in the burbs.
My assumption has always been that Boston rents eat into the profit margin too much.
-
-
re: tamerlanenj
I remember - this is years ago so I don't know if it's valid anymore - my brother worked for Proctor & Gamble. He said they always tried marketing their new food products in New England first because the folks here were more conservative about trying new things and if it sold here it would sell in the rest of the US.
Have always been sorry A&W never made it here. Hot days like this a root beer float would be spot-on.
-
-
-
-
re: BobB
Absolutely, which is why looking at the data in other ways (like on a per-location basis) might help explain why Boston has such low consumption.
Some towns use zoning and licensing laws to make it hard or impossible for national chains to open locations. Does anyone know if that's a factor in Boston?
-
-
re: emannths
We have competition for them: independent restaurants, many small, mom & pop type places. Many areas of the US don't have as much. Of course, I have no idea if this theory is true - my only experience was w/Tucson. Ugh. For me, it was as much as a desert food-wise as the Sonora Museum (which, oddly enough, is actually a natural park). I imagine Chandler is the same.
-
-











