Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Cookware >
Jul 7, 2011 01:11 AM

Sous vide equipment

I was looking to buy either the sous vide supreme or the sous vide professional. Really to use once or twice a week for home cooking, and possibly a few dinner parties.

Obviously the supreme is the cheaper option, but does it do a good enough job? And is it going to limit my cooking options in the future.

Did some searches previously, but nothing came back conclusive.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. I have a sous vide supreme and it works great, although if I had it to do all over again I would probably get something like this

    And cook in a coleman ice chest.

    The sous vide supreme is great, although it doenst circulate the water so its not quite as precise as something with a bubbler or circulator. The fact that the fresh meals magic setup can be put in anything also allows you to cook bigger things and larger quantities of things. Ive actually seen photos on another site of someone using it to sous vide a whole hog in a bathtub. I frequent another forum where there is tons of sous vide talk, and everyone has really high praise for the fresh meals magic setup.

    2 Replies
    1. re: twyst

      By the way Id just like to add that whatever route you choose to go with your sous vide equipment you should definitely dive right in and get something. It truly is a superior method of cooking, I expect every home kitchen will be set up for sous vide in 10 years or so, its that amazing of a cooking method.

      1. re: twyst

        I was an early adopter of the Sous Vide Magic and although I do love how cheaply I got in on sous vide cooking I think I may have to get that water heater and try it in a big lexan tub.

        Personally if I was rich I'd buy a rational combination oven like what I use at work but I can only dream.

        For now I'm saving up for a Vacmaster VP112 which is only $600 for a true chamber vacuum sealer. Don't bother with the foodsavers unless you really can't afford it. I try it at home and the things you can do with a true chamber sealer is a worlds difference.

    2. There is no one best way to go for cooking sous vide. That said, some recommendations:

      An immersion circulator like the SVP does give you more options than other equipment. Mainly in terms of how big a bath you can create, where you can create it, and how quickly you can bring the bath up to temperature and stabilize it. Also, as Twyst pointed out, a circulator provides a little extra temperature accuracy. In practice, there are only certain circumstances where that extra accuracy is really important - cooking eggs to specific effects, adding frozen or very cold foods to a bath already cooking something else, cooking to pasteurization at the lowest end of pasteurization temperatures (131 F for most foods). It will also help if your bath is especially crowded. On the other hand, there is a lot to cook sous vide that doesn't require the degree of precision that a circulator ensures. And, obviously, you pay quite a premium for the ease and versatility of an immersion circulator.

      I don't have a SVS. I haven't heard anything bad about it, in terms of breaking or being poorly designed. It does offer a fairly large bath in its 10 liter tank. My issue with it though - it offers no added functions over a basic PID and crock pot/rice cooker set up. None. Contrary to what some confused online reviewers have claimed, it does not contain a circulator. And it costs ~$400, while a crock pot + PID set ups costs about ~$200, less if you already have a slow cooker or rice cooker of decent size.

      You can rig your own temperature controller, to spend even less money.

      I've been using a Sous Vide Magic PID along with a 5 qt slow cooker for a while now. No circulator. Plain old convection from the bottom and sides along with the occasional stir while the food is still cold seem to work well enough. The temperature control is accurate enough for maybe 95% of sous vide applications - very even once the bath is stabilized, just a couple degrees (F) of variation until then. It's far more affordable than the SVS, and unless there's some reason you actually need a 10L bath (I submit you'd be better off spending your money creating a second smaller bath) I really feel there is no reason to drop $400 on the SVS.

      The FreshMealsMagic Twyst linked you to is interested and promising. It should have the versatility and accuracy of an immersion circulator costing 3 times as much because it is basically all the same components, just spilling out rather than integrated into one unit. I haven't tested it and haven't seen many reviews though. I also wonder whether the heating element would get in the way. Still, looks promising.

      I'll also point out that until you get more elaborate equipment, sous vide on the stove top in a large stockpot works better and more easily than most people think. It's worth some practice runs to see if you like the technique in general.

      We're not even getting into vacuums yet.

      4 Replies
        1. re: cajundave

          Yeah. I started a thread about it when I was learning to use it.

          That thread made it a good deal more complicated than it has to be, but it really breaks down how a PID works.

          1. re: cowboyardee

            Thanks for doing the research and application history. You saved me a lot of time.

            Yes it was quite complicated and I have an electrical engineering degree! Too bad they didn't vary the output voltage instead of turning the power on and off.

            1. re: cajundave

              It was one of those things where I fell pretty deep down the rabbit hole, got very fascinated in figuring out the minutiae of the device, then made a nice short rib dinner and never thought about it again.

              Varying voltage output would have made intuitively more sense to me, but I'm no engineer. In practice, it offers pretty tight temperature control without too much overshoot (and just as importantly, the overshoot is fairly predictable), so I'm happy enough.

              You'll still have to spend a little while with the manual just to figure out the control interface if you do go the PID route, BTW.

      1. I'm starting to shop for the bits for this DIY version:

        No plans to use it for sous vide. Will be hacked to heat developer chemistry for a home darkroom.

        Why not?

        3 Replies
        1. re: Kagemusha

          I'd seen that a while ago - it would be a fascinating project. But do you know whether anyone has gotten around the problem of the heating elements' tendency to burn out without custom designing/building the element or wiring it to an external heat source?

          1. re: cowboyardee

            I'll find out! Several friends are building these and repurposing them as I am. The "inventor" has upgraded several components that amount to a 2.0 version. We'll be using these at lower temps. It's the ability to heat, circulate and hold a set temp that's the grail here.

            1. re: Kagemusha

              Good luck. If you have time to write up some of your experience, I'd like to read it.

        2. I have been doing SV for quite a while using the pot and thermometer method and it's time to come out and get some equipment.

          I came out of a lab environment where we used jacketed water baths and immersion circulators with 0.01ÂșC tolerance and given that I've been trying to make the ideal onsen and hanjuku eggs for a while now, I've gone with Julabo's FusionChef circulator.

          That said, everyone I know who has the SV Pro loves it and the accompanying booklet, and I've never heard anyone who has one speak ill of the SVS. Cowboyardee's right in that it offers nothing over a PID system.

          I guess it really depends on what you cook and how you cook. Apart from being able to scale up significantly, a circulator transports better and can be clamped onto a large stock pot or any other container. The pot obviously can be used for other things (like making stock or bathing small animals) when not part of a SV setup.

          5 Replies
          1. re: wattacetti

            If you're going to spend that kinda money for either the svs or the svp, just save the extra bit to get the svp. The fact that it circulates the water and the svs doesn't is a huge difference. I bought two svp's for work earlier this year and they've done really well for us, though I don't use them heavily.

            1. re: jrock645

              Well, yes that would be the way I would go if I were the OP. And I've gone a bit further than that by picking the same manufacturer we used in the lab.

            2. re: wattacetti

              There is a really good thread about cooking eggs sous vide on the egullet forums. Getting the perfect egg is actually shaping up to be much more of a challenge than it should be using sous vide methods. It actually requires baths of a couple of different temperatures or a carefully timed bath at a high heat to achieve "perfect egg" results. Cooking eggs and holding them at a desired temperature leaves the whites not quite set enough at the proper temperature for the yolk to be truly consedered a "perfect egg". I dont go through all the fuss and just deal with a little bit of runny eggwhite :P

              1. re: twyst

                I love onsen eggs but my dream is to have the perfect hanjuku egg with a cooked but soft white and a warm and runny yolk *after* it's been seasoned in a shoyu marinade.

                1. re: twyst

                  I always was a little displeased with the questionable perfection of 'the perfect egg.'

                  OTOH, I've had success cooking 'the perfect egg' to 148 then adding it to very hot ramen and serving it pretty much immediately. Obviously this is a little less scientific a method than some of those EGullet suggestions.

                  I also like cooking a 148 degree egg and then cracking it into a very hot pan for a nice sunny side up egg with a lava-like yolk and crispy edges.

              2. Hi - thanks everyone for their feedback. I think I'm going to go for the pro - the key drivers being that its easier to store, it circulates and that it can be used in different size pots (quite fancy trying the roast!

                Follow up question - Im looking for a vacuum packer, really cant spend a fortune on it. Any options?

                6 Replies
                1. re: olly78

                  Chamber sealers are very nice, but not necessary. They are very expensive.

                  I use a foodsaver v2440, it was highly recommended to me and I have been totally satisfied with it. They run a little under $200.

                  1. re: olly78

                    I don't know anyone who uses a chamber vac at home. If I hit the lottery, I'll try one out and review it.

                    I have found that ziplock freezer bags are excellent and fully serviceable for most meat applications - the only ones that give it problems are highly irregular shapes such as chicken wings. Submerge in water and work the air out before sealing. Leave the zipper part out of the bath. No problems at all with liquid. Little enough air to avoid oxidation and freezer burn.

                    For vegetables (typically cooked at a higher temperature and more irregularly shaped), a foodsaver or comparable vacuum sealer is more necessary. I don't know enough about the different models to guide you in buying one. I do know that some of the egullet guys have figured out how to effectively use them when cooking in liquid (and I don't just mean freezing the liquid first). You might want to look over there for more guidance.

                    1. re: cowboyardee

                      "I don't know anyone who uses a chamber vac at home. If I hit the lottery, I'll try one out and review it."

                      Its becoming a little more prevalent now since the introduction of this unit

                      its sold in several places, but its very cheap on that site (comparitively speaking)

                      1. re: twyst

                        Holy crap. I had no idea such a product existed. And at something like 1/5 the price of other chamber vacs. Must look into this more - looks too good to be true.

                        Thanks for the heads up.

                        1. re: cowboyardee

                          From what I've read it's way better than a foodsaver but not near as good as the more professional vac machines. And for a fraction of the price there should be a difference.

                          1. re: scubadoo97

                            Did anyone end up buying a VacMaster VP112 chamber vacuum sealer? My husband and I are thinking about splurging and buying one as a joint birthday present to each other (we have the same birthday so it works out well!) -- they are still quite expensive at around $600, so I was wondering if anyone had used them and how much they had liked them?

                            The other brands I have seen recommended by chefs -- Mutilvac and the Koch ultravac but those seem probably out of the price (and size) range of most home chefs.