-
I've been checking the Indian press, and the big news -- apart from jubilation at Floyd winning -- is that upma, a simple, ubiquitous breakfast food, was a part of that win. If you Google "upma wins $100000", you'll get a lot of hits. The Indian Express had an editorial about traditional food's evolution. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/its...
-
-
-
Floyd was my favorite to watch of the final 3, so I am glad he won. I wouldn't have minded if Mary Sue had won instead though. She seems like a lovely person, and her numerous wins indicate to me that she can definitely cook.
No one else has mentioned it, but I really enjoyed the little bit where Curtis cooked for them. I like seeing them all enjoy each others company.
›2 Replies -
hmm..should the winner have been decided on the last meal? Maybe they should have factored in the other episodes as well as the finale meal. like a 50% finale, 50% other episodes..
›15 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
re: chowser
YMMV. I think there could be some sort of design where past performance is factored in but still have eliminations. I think this structure is why we have Kevin win season 7 and Hosea win season 5 (?), both who were not front runners throughout the entire season. And how Mike I. and Tiffany F. made it to the finale of TC All Stars. I don't want to end up debating over whether or not they deserved to be there, and you can argue that they played the game well, but I just honestly want to see good food, with interesting concepts, and made with "love". I was so disappointed that I didn't get to see Angelo or Dale cook for the Ellis Island challenge.
And it isn't always a level playing field for each elimination. The twists are often ridiculous and aren't reasonable expectations for a professional chef. I don't fault a chef for not being able to sprint around Target to assemble their crappy kitchen equipment and ingredients in time, or not being able to prep with sharp tools in a moving vehicle.
-
-
re: LindaWhit
If you want to get technical, Richard and Mike I. were the only finalists. Still, Tiffany D. made it all the way to the Bahamas despite being on the bottom on almost every challenge. Either way, the point I'm making is that I see so many chefs I don't care about make it so far, and so many chefs I'd like to see much more of cut earlier. The main reason I posted was in defense of samtron, that having previous performance factor in isn't a totally crazy idea.
-
-
-
-
re: nanobabes
I disagree. It would make the finale less interesting, and less compelling TV through the season. For ex., it makes it much more interesting knowing that even though Stefan has kicked butt episode after episode, he can go home at any time. If it was cumulative, he could coast near the end knowing that he would not get sent home unless he blew it hugely.
-
-
re: saeyedoc
I'm sure they never will incorporate past performance due to the same points LurkerDan made. It does makes for more suspenseful and dramatic television for their fates to be more up in the air every week. Which I buy into as well. I don't really care enough to design a system of elimination myself, but maybe some sort of points system (which I liked on TCMs before), with points only rewarded for the top group, or certain amount of strikes for being on the bottom ... either way, it wouldn't get adopted because it would change the structure of the whole show. It's not even a matter for me of who eventually wins, I'm just always interested in seeing what the promising chefs will put out every week, and get annoyed by the lesser chefs taking up screen time that could be occupied by some good food porn.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: samtron608
Finales are finales. Most reality shows depend on the last challenge, not what happens over the course of the show.
This has been argued many times before here, for Top Chef, since you're new. I can see it either way but I do think if it's the final competition, it's fair to go by the performance in that episode. That's how it's done all along anyway in this show. People learn the game and improve. Those who learn and improve win.
-
-
-
-
-
Here's an interesting piece by Ruth Reichl about Floyd and judging TCM:
http://www.gilttaste.com/stories/576›16 Replies-
-
-
re: Brian S
Speaking of age, how old is Mary Sue? The way she carries herself and her general energy level plus appearance I was guessing around 40, but some of the things I'm reading about her career make me think that can't be right, like the sous chef she has who looks older than her but has been with her since he was 16, and the 25 years with Susan Finegan.
-
re: TuteTibiImperes
She seems to have gotten her start back in the late 1970s, so she's definitely older than 40. http://marysueandsusan.com/about/abou...
-
-
re: DGresh
@DGresh: I know it has nothing to do with food, but I SO agree about Ruth's hair. Every time I see her I want to grab a scissors and cut it off! (My bad.)
btw: Suvir is a nice person, too. He just got a little carried away. and he is, after all, a vegetarian, even though he serves meat in his restaurant.
-
re: ChefJune
Women "of a certain age" need to take a few inches off and lighten it up a few notches.
As far as the show goes, I knew it was Floyd cuz of the spoiler in the previous episode's thread but would have thought Mary Sue was the winner. It seemed like hers got more wows but hard to tell. I agree with whomever said they all should have worked on the same memory.
I loved when they said "Let's get in the Lexus whatever" and drive to the store. The product placement hadn't seemed so obvious for Masters.
-
-
-
-
While I did not see every episode, I am glad they got rid of the numbering/scoring system they previously used. I thought Mary Sue Milliken should have won.
I did see an episode where Floyd went on and on how bad red meat is just prior to one of the others serving red meat. As I recall it was Hugh Acheson that Floyd annoyed. While Hugh may have gone a little overboard in his reaction, he was correct in that it was a thoughtless thing fir Floyd to do. I think it might have been part of a team competition as well.
›5 Replies-
-
re: dmjordan
Exactly - that was not Floyd - it was Suvir Saran:
-
-
-
Ended up happy to see any of these three win ... and the finale was the first episode where we really got to see them cook ... it was so refreshing after this awful season of gimmickry.
›2 Replies-
re: Siun
I agree--I liked seeing how well they all cooked, how well they all worked together and worried about each other, the respect they all have for each other (and with past top chef masters), how this came down to their cooking their best interpretation. I would have been happy to see any of them win.
I do think, though, it's unfair for each to have to cook a different memory. I think it would have shown a lot more, as comparisons go, if they'd all do the same memory. And, it would have been great to see their different interpretations of the same dish.
-
re: Siun
It is really such a shame, too, because this season could have been chock full of drool-worthy amazing dishes if it weren't for all the extra twists and turns and gimmicks they threw at them this season. I found it almost disrespectful to this season's chefs, which especially annoys me since these chefs were such a nice and likeable bunch.
-
-
-
re: araknd
i disagree - mary sue ahd one great dish and 2 good ones, it seemed.
more to the point, past performance is never supposed to come into play in top chef. each competition is a fresh start with all contestants on an equal footing. she could have won every challenge going in to this, and still it wouldnt matter if floyd was better that meal.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm happy. I predicted it last week. I posted this: From the start of this lackluster season I've pegged Floyd Cardoz as the best chef of them all. That's because I ate at Tabla, his NYC restaurant, quite a few times, and loved it. But don't rely on me. Check out what Top Chef judge Ruch Reichl had to say about this restaurant when she reviewed it in 1999.
›5 Replies-
-
re: ChefJune
Well, I was cheering for the Bruins last night - and it WORKED! ;-)
Didn't watch the finale either as I lost interest in the TCMs this season, but I guess I'm glad for Floyd, although he barely registers in my brain. I remember Mary Sue and Traci; wish Naomi had been in the finale.
Interesting - all three TCMasters have been guys.
-
-
-
-
I was happy with the results. I knew Traci was not in the running, and I figured it would be between Mary Sue and Floyd. I ate at Tabla once, and it was a fantastic meal. Too bad the restaurant closed, so I wonder where Floyd is now...
›4 Replies-
re: roxlet
Floyd has been named as chef for Danny Meyer's North Cove restaurant opening (hopefully) this year near the World Financial Center (where I work so I am very excited about it). I would have been pleased with either Floyd or Mary Sue as the winner based on what we saw last night. - so yes indeed good result!
-
-
well, that Saveur editor with the pinched face always talks as if he has the supreme authority, so perhaps he gave us some satisfaction after ruining many episodes, by pushing his 'personal chef' to the top. Floyd took the most risks in his dishes (the disparaging comments on his upma sounded pretty clueless or utterly jaded) with the least time to prep, stuck with poorly dressed fish for his middle course. He was consistently impressive each week and had little prize $$ to show for it. Mary Sue's dessert course did get the most raves from the hyper-critical diners. The chef who got saddled cooking for Greene was going to have the toughest time. Her food memory sounded pretty fuzzy, and perhaps her brain's endorphin triggers have been overheated too far, too often over the years of hedonism. des Jardins knew the pitfalls of re-creation and saw problems right away with the type and quality of the birds she ended up utilizing. [fried duck in itself isn't unusual at all, in Chinese cooking anyway, where there are a few regional variations on it].
No complaints here with the result. Floyd maintained a marvelous attitude through the whole competition, perhaps best portrayed in the meal he cooked for the army officer's home coming, executing a seemingly simple meal flawlessly in a huge quantity, totally committed to serving the famiies.
›1 Reply-
re: moto
I too felt the comments about the upma were clueless...I think someone described it as "simple and homey" as if that were a bad thing. Well, duh....its comfort food! And it was supposed to be a childhood memory; choosing a comfort food from teatime just made sense! Then he managed to add his own twist, and it looked delicious to me. Come to think of it, do they publish the recipes anywhere? I think DH would like some of that upma :-)
-















