HOME > Chowhound > Kosher >

Mislabled fish

AdinaA May 27, 2011 07:34 AM

According to the New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/sci... Tests Reveal Mislabeling of Fish

Something to watch out for.

I don't see how they could mislabel salmon, trout, flounder or bluefish. And mako shark fillet being passed off as swordfish doesn't really affect anyone reading this board. But catfish passing as grouper does. And it says they're selling some other species as cod.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. berel RE: AdinaA May 27, 2011 07:39 AM

    except for Salmon , which has a unique color, I can very easily see how fish could be mislabeled.

    6 Replies
    1. re: berel
      racer x RE: berel May 27, 2011 09:16 AM

      That salmon color is often somewhat artificial these days, a fact that is frequently exploited to pass off farmed salmon as more costly wild salmon.

      "Dietary supplements and/or artificial dyes now closely match the color of aquaculture salmon to meet consumer expectations. Yet the large difference in price tempts many to sell farmed salmon as 'wild-caught' (Rasmussen and Morrissey 2009) as often as 56 percent of the time, as found in a study by Consumer Reports (2006)."
      (from Oceana report mentioned in the NYT article - pdf link in the article)

      1. re: racer x
        ferret RE: racer x May 27, 2011 09:20 AM

        All salmon color is a function of diet, even for "wild" salmon. As I mentioned on another board a couple of days ago we buy "color enhancing" feed for our pond goldfish. It's a nature-derived colorant, much like the feed that makes some chicken egg yolks a vivid yellow/orange.

        1. re: racer x
          berel RE: racer x May 27, 2011 10:03 AM

          even with the "artificiality", salmon is the only fish that will pick up that color.

          I'm not commenting on the healthiness of the salmon, only the kashruth question of buying salmon without seeing the simonim

          1. re: berel
            DeisCane RE: berel May 27, 2011 10:57 AM

            Rainbow trout picks up that color.

            1. re: DeisCane
              berel RE: DeisCane May 27, 2011 11:08 AM

              I stand corrected salmon & trout, but kosher


              1. re: berel
                AdinaA RE: berel May 27, 2011 11:12 AM

                And Arctic char. But they (trout, char) are all in the Linnean family Salmonidae.

      2. f
        ferret RE: AdinaA May 27, 2011 09:03 AM

        Icelandic wolf fish is a relatively new (and plentiful) cod substitute. It is not Kosher.

        1. r
          racer x RE: AdinaA May 27, 2011 09:09 AM


          1. r
            RLTRLDY RE: AdinaA May 27, 2011 11:33 AM

            i have sensitivity to a lot of fish. cod is one i can eat. it is a shame food sellers don't take more responsibility or care.

            1. z
              zsero RE: AdinaA May 28, 2011 10:18 PM

              This has been going on forever. Back about 1980, The Age did an expose, finding that 50% of fish sellers in Melbourne substitute fish. More barramundi was sold in Victoria alone than the entire national catch. There was no government inspection. Other than honesty, there's no reason why a fishmonger *wouldn't* do this.

              Which is why the halacha is that one may not buy fish without some scales on it, so one can tell that it's a kosher fish. The only exception is if the flesh is unmistakably that of a kosher fish, e.g. the pink flesh of salmon/rainbow trout/etc.

              1 Reply
              1. re: zsero
                gotcholent RE: zsero May 28, 2011 11:45 PM

                Totally correct Zsero, some Kosher agencies, like the STAR-K, do not even allow their clients (ie, restaurants, caterers, Chowhound requires that I mention here that I am one) to use fish that come from many labled, kosher vendors (OU for instance) without their skins....especially many of the frozen products coming out of the far east.....Same as extra virgin olive oils, there is a lot of hanky panky in the fish biz

              2. hill food RE: AdinaA May 29, 2011 01:01 AM

                can anyone provide a link for me to learn what constitutes a Kosher fish? I'm just an interested bystander, but I find these rules utterly fascinating. (I do know no shellfish, but beyond that I thought it was mostly the handling) the Kashrut article does help.

                3 Replies
                1. re: hill food
                  tichyek RE: hill food May 29, 2011 04:12 AM

                  Kosher fish needs to have fins and scales (hence the need to see the fish).

                  1. re: hill food
                    zsero RE: hill food May 29, 2011 07:26 AM

                    A kosher fish must have scales that come off easily by hand, without tearing the skin. This is easily determined, so long as there's a tag of skin attached to the fish, with some scales embedded in it. If you can remove the scales without a tool, and without tearing the skin, then the fish is kosher.

                    1. re: zsero
                      hill food RE: zsero May 30, 2011 09:43 PM

                      Thanks to t and z, I love it when I learn something new. (plenty of non-observant family and friends so it's of no use asking them, but always good to know)

                  2. m
                    mrogovin RE: AdinaA Jun 1, 2011 09:46 AM

                    Fascinating that the Times article specifically cites the need to see fins and scales to identify the species of fish. All this time, the kashrut agencies told us to be sure we see the skin or buy a whole fish. They were not being overly pious; they knew exactly what they were saying.

                    1 Reply
                    1. re: mrogovin
                      berel RE: mrogovin Jun 1, 2011 10:27 AM

                      either see it or buy it from Kosher supervised fish monger

                    Show Hidden Posts