-
-
My vote of favor is for the one at La Maison du Pain. it's a little different, since it is not swimming in Béchamel which I find common in other versions, they just put a dollop under the egg. This makes the dish much more balanced and pleasing.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/36456197...
-----
La Maison Du Pain
5373 W Pico Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90019 -
-
-
Champagne French Bakery & Cafe which has several locations in OC (irvine, Costa Mesa, etc.) makes a rather good traditional croque monsieur. Since they also have a full breakfast menu...eggs, omelettes, etc., I can't imagine why they wouldn't put a fried egg on top of a croque monsieur...et voila, une croque madame!
-
-
-
-
re: carter
Upon re-reading your question, you mention traditional croque.
Well, the version at Hatfield's is anything but that, but a modification that to me works better than the original. Here are the ingredients:
"Yellowtail sashimi, prosciutto, sunny side up quail egg, grilled brioche"
If you don't like it, I will buy!-
re: carter
Although the Hatfield's sandwich sounds delicious, I think it's sort of silly to refer to it as a Croque Monsieur (if they indeed do, as a few of the postings imply). It's one thing to update a classic a bit (and clearly state this on the menu), but when you present something entirely different, as delicious it may be, it seems to me you should call it what it is.
-
-
-
re: josephnl
I wouldn't call it "ridiculous". It's got the fried egg, brioche, proscuitto instead of ham, and beurre blanc instead of béchamel. The only thing extra is the slices of hamachi. 4 out of 5 layers of the Hatfield's version is related to the traditional version. And on the menu it's: "Croque Madame" with parentheses so it's recognized that it's not your traditional version. I'd take Hatfield's version over the traditional version every single time.
-
-
-
-
-
-





