Top Chef All-Stars - Ep. #11 - 02/23/11 (Spoilers)
Well, it's here. The Paula Deen episode. Will we survive? Hopefully we will! LOL
After the last Judges Table, they show the remaining cheftestants in the Stew Room. Tiffany says that she was sure it was her, not Angelo going home.
Next morning at the house, Mike and Richard are discussing his 2 notebooks filled with recipes, ideas, and LOTS of details. Mike is seen reading through one of the books before Richard takes it.
They're off to the TC kitchen, where Paula Deen is there to greet them with Padma. Antonia says she knows it'll be a "fry me something, roll it in butter, and dip it in mayo" challenge. Yup - they're deep frying for the Quickfire - Paula Deen says "if you can eat it, you can fry it!" The winner of the QF will get $5,000.
Dale says Deen's style is night and day away from his...but...he's a greedy American and he wants that $5K! Mike is making chicken oysters, Richard is using MG to make some fried mayo, Carla is doing a catfish fry (and doesn't seem to be doing it well!), Tiffany goes with fried chicken wings and fried pickles, and Antonia makes fried avocado and shrimp. BUT!.......Antonia realizes she only has plated one dish, when she was supposed to plate one each for Paula and Padma. Rut-roh.
When Paula and Padma get to Mike's dish, Richard claims what Mike made was in one of his notebooks, while in a camera confessional, Mike claims he's seen it before.
Low Group - Dale and Carla
High Group - Richard, Mike, and Antonia - Paula Deen says Antonia absolutely had the BEST dish, but because of a technicality (plating only one dish) she cannot win. Damn! The winner is Mike! Richard's NOT happy!
Mike said he'll give Richard a Big Thank You for seeing a picture in his notebook and using it as an inspiration, but he says it was HIS dish. Gah.
Padma says John Besh will join Paula Deen at Judges Table, as the cheftestants will be cooking Gulf seafood for 300 attendees for a charity event for the Greater New Orleans Foundation. AND John Besh says they'll have helpers - in walks Tre, Fabio, Spike, Marcel, Tiffani, and Angelo.
Mike chooses first - Brown Shrimp / Tiffani Faison
Richard - Snapper / Fabio
Carla - Tre / Grouper
Tiffany - White Shrimp / Marcel
Antonia - Crab / Spike
Dale - Amberjack / Angelo
In the discussion before shopping, Carla finds out that Tre doesn't do Southern-style cooking - she jokingly says to Tiffany "you can have him!" and Marcel responds "No, she's going to keep the White Shrimp." Does he really mean himself? LOL Well played, Marcel. Nice bit of self-deprecation.
Back at the house after shopping, Mike is bitching in the confessional that Richard's being a baby and says "if you're going to win, be a winner!" Of course, *he* only won because Antonia didn't plate two dishes, AND he essentially took the recipe from Richard's notebook! Antonia tells Carla and Tiffany about Mike seeing the entire recipe in Richard's book - they're all shocked at his lack of Chef Etiquette.
So - there's a LOT of focus on Mike - is he going home after EC? Hmmmm....
We're back in the kitchen, and Mike seems to be heckling everyone else in the kitchen, especially Richard.
Richard points out how the teams are getting along.....or not. Such as Tiffany and Marcel. Marcel repeats 5 times about using the shrimp heads for flavor - Tiffany finally tells Marcel she's more worried about making sure there are enough dishes for 300 diners - and Marcel finally shuts up. Dale says "if anyone's going to put Marcel in his place, it's Tiffany. A 5'10" Southern black woman with some serious psshhhtt....." LOL
They're at the venue, and they have a VERY short period of time to finish pulling together their dishes. Dale and Richard are concerned with getting their stuff plated.
The diners arrive; lots of other chefs there - I saw Michelle Bernstein, Jonathan Waxman, Carmen Gonzalez.
Mike - Grit-Crusted Shrimp - they seem to like it a lot.
Richard - Citrus Polenta, Crispy Snapper and Pulled Pork - they almost weren't ready when the judges walked up. The judges liked it!
Dale - Amberjack Stew with Andouille Sausage - he's having a tough time getting everything done. When the judges came up, Tom noticed Dale wasn't well prepared. Padma said she had several pieces of undercooked potato, but Paula seemed to like the stew.
Tiffany - Honey-Glazed Shrimp - she needs to have Marcel make additional honey glaze, but she didn't get to taste it. Doesn't get much of a rave from anyone. Some liked the glaze, but most didn't really feel they tasted the shrimp.
Carla - Collard Greens and Grouper - Paula Deen didn't like the greens. Carla gives a Hootey-Hoo to several diners, but she also knows she needs to have someone else be worse than her so she doesn't go home.
Antonia - Crab Cake with Blue Crab Sauce - and the judges REALLY liked it. Could she win this one?
And when the chef helpers leave, everyone's laughing over Fabio stroking Richard's face and Tiffani Faison laughs about their bromance.
In the "in-between", Antonia says she sent Spike out into the dining area for him to be a mole and find out what the judges are saying. All he ends up doing is knocking over a woman's wine "and probably getting a few telephone numbers. Spike's a really good sous chef; but he's a really bad spy." LOL
OK, we're back in the Stew Room. Both Carla and Tiffany realize they could go home on a Southern Food challenge.
Antonia, Richard and Mike are called into JT by Padma. They're definitely the Top Group! John Besh and Paula Deen give the win to Richard! Yay!!!! He gets a 6-night trip to Hilton-Barbados! NICE! And he's going to invite Fabio to go to Barbados with him and his family - how sweet!
All three - Dale, Tiffany, and Carla are in the bottom. Dale said "All of us?" He's not happy.
Padma finds out that Marcel cooked ALL of Tiffany's shrimp - she didn't cook any of it. The honey glaze threw Paula - she liked the head-on shrimp; didn't like the sweetness.
Dale's overly mustardy crouton on his soup overpowered everything else except the andouille - Besh said you couldn't even taste the main ingredient of amberjack.
Carla's grouper was doused in hot sauce, the collards didn't complement anything else, per Paula.
Not sure which way this is going to go - it really could be any one of them! But I'm thinking it's either Tiffany or Carla. :-(
OK, we're back at JT - Tom briefly goes over each bottom dish, and then looks to Padma...and WHOA! It's DALE! No WAY!
Oh, I'm SO sorry to see him go! I was truly hoping he'd be in the finale! And he's really upset in the confessional - he also said he knows he's a better person now. He didn't like himself the first time around, and he hopes that viewers have seen he's grown up. We DID see it Dale, we DID!
And previews for next week's episode? Looks like Padma goes to the cheftestants' house; Liberty Island is going to be visited, and they cook on the (Circle Line?) boat on the way over to the Statue of Liberty. Interesting!
-
REMINDER TO EVERYONE: Tonight's episode (episode 12, 03-02-11) is a SUPERSIZED episode - 1 hour and 16 minutes!!
›3 Replies -
-
-
-
re: Joanie
You want funny? Richard Blais tweeted a link to this video on youtube yesterday: http://is.gd/e64Mh0 --the Top Chef part is at the end at about 1:07.
-
-
-
re: Joanie
A little late - was out of town last week and just saw last week's episode last night. Bummer about Dale, it would have been interesting to see what he would have come up with in the finals.
If Richard and/or Antonia don't make to the finals it will be disappointing. In my opinion those two are a level above the remaining chefs and have been the two consistently best chefs throughout this competition.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Oh goodness. This morning I finally found time to watch Wednesday's episode, but I don't think I can catch up on this thread. I have two things to say, neither of which is likely a new contribution:
#1 Nooooo! Not Dale!! I had really grown to like him this season and would have loved to see him win. I just might have to vote for fan favorite this year and focus in on him.
#2 Mike Isabella. Ew. Blech. Ick. Please oh please let him be eliminated this week.
Oh, #3, thanks for the recap Linda!
›1 Reply -
I'm having a serious ball with this season, and I have but one concern:
If Carla wins (and she's my darkhorse bet), her head will explode.
Just like "Scanners."›10 Replies -
Am I the only one who loves watching Mike? Dude is funny, shady, over the top, everything I want in a reality show. And people want to down his cooking skills, but he has been consistent throughout the season and has delivered some dishes that received compliments by renowned chefs. Will he win? No, but he is a very good chef.
Bummer than Angelo and Dale have left, but we're down to the wire now, and once Tiffany is offed the rest of the contestants (yes, including Mike) have serious chops.
›7 Replies-
re: fame da lupo
I'm sure quite a few of us can make dishes that taste good enough to elicit compliments from renowned chefs, but that doesn't make us all gifted chefs worthy of this competition. Mike is mediocre at best, at least in this group and his track record bears that out.
I don't find boorish, skeevy and obnoxious people fun to watch, unless they're at least witty and otherwise gifted, too, at least. Mike is just boorish, skeevy and obnoxious to this viewer.
-
re: fame da lupo
ehhhh.... mike had had his moments of being funny, and no doubt he's talented enough to have been asked to compete with this crop of chefs, and he's had some good dishes, and some misses, as all the others have. he's just past his "Use By" date. he appears to get more obnoxious as time goes by. and i know that has as much to do with editing as anything else - i am SURE he didn't JUST start farting, burping, et al, and he probably said nasty things all along, as they all have, and also had his share of good moments too, and we are at the mercy of the reality t.v. show formula. so, operating within that formula - and this is the only reality t.v. show i like/watch - i've been led to believe, by elves and also by my own taste - that i'm over him. i still feel hopeful for ALL the other contestants. they're ALL capable of pulling out a win. and probably Mike is too. just don't want it to happen for him. and I know that's all about personality and the whole reality t.v. show schtick, and NOT about cooking since i haven't tasted a LICK of anyone's food...... but all things being equal - Mikey,please pack your nasty-ass-plagiarizing-jersey-farting-belching-douchy-self and go.
-
-
I haven't read every single comment on this thread, but I don't think anyone mentioned a moment that struck me - right after they announced the winner of the QF, they showed Carla trying to hug Antonia and Antonia said, "Don't touch me." I generally have liked her this season, but I thought that was pretty horrible. Did anybody else notice this?
›12 Replies -
I can't be the only moron on the distribution list for Bravo emails. Are you kidding me, I save the show to watch tonight because of basketball games and look what happens- they put the loser in the subject of their email.
Are you kidding me? What are they thinking.
›3 Replies -
Not gonna contribute as much to this weeks thread as usual, due to busy-ness.
But have to say something about my boy Dale getting the ax. He became my favorite chef in the competition this season. I'm sorry to see him go. But he made a great storyline nonetheless.
I'm proud of him (to the extent you can be proud of someone you don't personally know). This season, he manned up and faced his demons head on. At the end of season 4, despite some great cooking, he was remembered mostly for his temper. Hopefully, this time he left little doubt in anyone's mind that he was a major force in this competition, one of the chefs to beat. I hope he gets his own restaurant. And that it lives up to the talent he put on display this season. I hope Bourdain (whose blogs betrayed an obvious bias for Dale) takes him on a pilgrimage - I'd watch that episode of No Res. He lost in the best possible way - with grace and humility, having already proven himself.
All the best to Dale.
›3 Replies -
Okay, I'm confused about something. In the prep kitchen, we see a lot of drama about Marcel repeatedly suggesting to Tiffany that they keep the shrimp heads on, and she tells him in no uncertain terms to take off the heads, cook the food her way, she's more concerned about getting 300 portions prepared. Then at the event there's talk of sucking the heads off the shrimp, and the photo of her dish on the Bravo website shows the shrimp with the heads on. What gives? Anyone have any idea what happened there?
›12 Replies-
-
re: gastrotect
I was wondering about that, too. Could Marcel have inadvertently helped her by leaving the heads on without her knowledge? I love sucking the heads off shrimp, and they ARE really tasty, although it's kind of messy - you need both your hands and lots of napkins for that kind of shrimp! :-).
-
re: KailuaGirl
"Could Marcel have inadvertently helped her by leaving the heads on without her knowledge?"
What do you mean "inadvertenly" helped her???
Uh - he was genuininely trying to help her!!
He was working with her - not competing against herI thought he was being very helpful to T and I thought she was being pretty rude and dismissive tooward him
Also, wouldn't leaving the heads on SAVE time -?
She was saying she was more concerned about getting it done -I just read the below - comment - I am almost positive he was talking about leaving the heads on for the finished dish - not stock.
Obviously, I'll have to re-watch to be sure.-
-
re: NellyNel
I meant that Marcel might have intentionally left heads on, against Tiffany's wishes, and thereby created a better tasting shrimp than it otherwise would have been had he de-headed the shrimp per Tiffany's instructions. I was unsure about how genuinely helpful Marcel was going to be. He doesn't seem to appreciate working as a team member or helper/assistant, He likes to be the one in charge and giving the orders (remember RW).
And like you, I thought he was talking leaving the heads on the shrimp for the finished dish, although the heads and shells do make a great stock. I'll re-watch, too.
-
-
re: gastrotect
I think perhaps there were two components, the whole shrimp (which were served heads-on), and a sauce or something made with shrimp, because the clips of Marcel asking if Tiffany wanted to use some of the shrimp he was handling, with their heads, showed him asking while she was chopping other shrimp on her side. So I think he was opining that using shrimp with heads in whatever she was prepping would add good flavor.
-
-
-
Another candidate for great lines: Paula to Richard, "I didn't hear a word you just said 'cause your hair looks exactly like mine when I wake up in the mornin'." Then did Richard describe his styling product as "duck fat and liquid nitrogen"?
›2 Replies -
Like everyone else, I was sad to see Dale go. I was really hoping he would be one of the final three, with Richard and Antonia. I would like to see Richard win, but I was still mulling over Dale or Antonia as my preferred runner-up.
As for the other three, I really won't mind seeing them go. In fact, I'm anxious to get rid of all of them for separate reasons:
Tiffany - I'm really, really tired of hearing her talk about Beaumont. Additionally, her food looks underwhelming, and most of the judges critiques seem to support that perception.
Mike - I don't have the dislike for Mike as many on this board. He actually seems to be a pretty talented cook when he's not stealing others' dishes. He's just a bit too loud, overbearing and egotistical for my liking.
Carla - The whole 'chicken-with-her-head-cut-off' routine is really grating on me. The general giddiness of her demeanor is also tough to take in extended doses, and I've seen about enough of it. I would like her a lot more if she could compose herself (and I think it'd make her a better cook).
-
The last two EC's have tested more than the chefs talents, it seems the challenges are becoming more about endurance. Under pressure, these chefs are resorting to type which explains Mike's antics. He is sleazy and once this competition is over, I doubt if his performance on TC will serve him well in his future as a chef. I really hope to see Richard,Antonia, and Carla in the final. And again, thanks to Linda for her objective recap. I must say it is not easy to just "state the facts" without any editorial comment. Good job!
›1 Reply-
re: foodseek
And again, thanks to Linda for her objective recap. I must say it is not easy to just "state the facts" without any editorial comment. Good job!
~~~~~~~~~~~And we all know I HAVE an opinion and like to express it! LOL
You're all quite welcome. We're coming into the home stretch, so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Yet again, are the MEE (Magical Editing Elves) leading us to believe it *could* be Richard that goes next week based on the few seconds of Richard Confessional we saw? I'm hoping that is just for DRAAAAAAMAHHHH!
-
-
Dale was the chef to go last night (undercooked dish, overseasoned with the mustard, primary ingredient made invisible) but I have gained an immense amount of respect for Dale with how he cooked and represented himself this season. I wasn't a fan of Dale when All-Stars started because of how he acted in his original season and was hoping he would go out early, but as the season went along he became one of my favorite chefs and i was pulling for him to make the final.
Mike's lifting of RIchard's oyster recipe is shady. It's just bad karma, I'd like to see if in a future episode Mike tries to ask Richard for some advice on technique and Richard stonewalls him.
›31 Replies-
re: Bunson
I feel the same way about Dale. I wasn't as big of a fan in his season, and I shook my head at him during his TCM appearance, but this time around I gained a tremendous amount of repect for him. I also wanted him to make it to the final.
There is an interesting article with him on Entertainment Weekly's website, he really goes into detail about how he didn't like himself during his season and how he was determined to change.
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I like his pick too, I've been rooting for Richard from the start. However, I do have to say that Antonia has been kicking it, especially lately. She has been a favorite of mine since her season, and I want her to do well in All Stars. I'm not sure that I would be that upset if she took the title.
-
-
-
re: nomadchowwoman
Dale said:
"What I thought was weird was that Mike confessed that he saw the oyster dish in Blais’ book and said he took it. I thought that was bizarre. Why would you even confess to that? But Blais didn’t create that dish. That dish has been out. Go on Ideas in Food and hit it up. That’s where that dish came from. It’s a cheeky play on that. Blais might’ve been writing it down and had a concept for it, but that dish has been done before. But for Mike to say that, that was like, “Dude why would you say that? Just say you got it from somewhere else!” But “chef code”? Really? Come on. To me, it doesn’t exist. You can’t put a patent on food. Food has been done before, no matter what anybody says."
****
So Richard may be Mike's inspiration but if Dale is right, Richard didn't invent the dish.-
re: Worldwide Diner
I'm not sure if it even matters if Richard invented the dish or not. Even if Dale is right, that does not mean that Richard knew that information. Dale also uses the word "confessed" more than once. I find that word choice curious, especially if there is not a "chef code." You can call it stealing, not cool or bad karma, but that doesn't change the fact that what Mike did was wrong.
-
re: lizzy
There's nothing "wrong." Mike didn't look through Richard's notebook without authorization. Richard freely shared his thoughts with Mike. Mike then used those thoughts to his advantage. I think Mike is lame that he used someone else's idea (no matter where it's derived) in competition but there's nothing wrong, either morally or legally, as far as I can tell. Here's a hypothetical. Let's say Mike already had the same idea before Richard talked to him. What is Mike supposed to do when Richard begins describing that idea? Must Mike announce that he already had that idea or forfeit his right to use that idea? It's a competition, so why the hell is Richard showing off his concepts?
-
re: Worldwide Diner
"Let's say Mike already had the same idea before Richard talked to him. What is Mike supposed to do when Richard begins describing that idea?"
Mike goes up to Richard and says he's seen that done before (if true) and would like to do a take on it, would Richard mind, or did he have a set plan to use it?
-
re: Worldwide Diner
So, if a designer shared an idea for a dress and that person took it, then it's only the author's fault for sharing it, not the person who stole the idea's fault? Richard was not "showing off" his concepts. Mike was looking at his books. Yes, Richard should have known Mike was a weasel and would do something like that. Richard's fault was in being trusting. It's such a stretch to create a hypothetical scenario where Mike had the idea first and then saw it in Richard's book, to defend Mike.
-
re: chowser
Stole implies taking without authorization. If Richard imparted that knowledge willingly, then no one stole. I already said Mike is lame but he did not steal anything. My point is people exaggerate Mike's conduct. He wasn't a good sport but nothing indicates he copied or stole. And where do you get the idea that Mike was just perusing Rich's notes? It's possible tbut nothing was shown one way or another why Rich let Mike see his notes.
By the way, I used the hypothetical only to demonstrate the can of worms that can open when you share knowledge with your competitor.
-
re: Worldwide Diner
Everything indicates that he stole -- him looking at Richard's book, him using exactly what Richard wrote, him saying to the camera that he used Richard's idea. What about that indicates that he didn't steal? The only way that's not stealing an idea is if you don't believe that ideas can be taken; while that's one view, that's not one that most people in the world share.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
We don't know if Richard specifically showed that particular dish to Mike, but it seemed pretty clear from what we did see that Mike was looking through his notebook with Richard's full knowledge (since he was sitting right there, and when he took it back he was very nonchalant about it). My thinking is, it may be against this so-called "chef's code" to use another chef's idea, but it's not against the rules of the competition, and that's what Richard should have been thinking about.
-
-
re: chicgail
I was a little surprised that Richard would show his book to a competitor, too. But I think it was more his boyish enthusiasm about food that makes him want to share what he's thinking about--I see it as coming from the same place as him helping someone use the pressure cooker or liquid nitrogen even when they're competing. Maybe it's not the best thing to do competitively (except in the Restaurant Wars challenge, where Richard got the win for helping everyone on his team), but it seems like a better attitude in the real world--would you rather have Richard or Mike on your team?
-
-
re: aching
Richard is too nice for his own good, as Mike has said. He helps his fellow competitors out, and Mike said he'd never do that. Richard wants to win because he's the best, not because he wants everyone else to screw up. There are competitors of all stripes--some want to win at all cost, some don't. And, Richard, stupidly, trusted Mike who will stab his buddy in the back to win.
-
-
-
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
It's interesting that people thought his comment was homophobic mockery. I thought he genuinely thought that Angelo was a good looking guy who cared/spent time on his appearance. I think the same thing, no slam.
I think the article showed Dale in a good light. He knows his problems, he's willing to learn, he's humble enough to accept his errors. He also acknowledges that Angelo was a bad pick, for the reason that Richard didn't take him--they all know how mentally and physically fried they are at this point.
-
re: chowser
I also thought Dale's views on Angelo were genuine. I think some of his past comments, like calling Angelo a mermaid during the fishing challenge, were Dale having a little fun at Angelo's expense. However, in this case, I think Dale was just being honest.
chowser, I think your second paragraph sums up why I like Dale this season as opposed to his season or his appearance on TCM. It was nice to understand the background for the change this season. It's rare to see someone be so open and honest in the press nowadays.
-
re: lizzy
Dale seems to like a little trash talk between friends (and he has said he is friends with Angelo and has been for years). I don't take his comments as homophobic or mean spirited at all. It's just a little mild teasing, directed at people he knows can take it (and probably dish it back out). These are chefs we're talking about - it's not a profession for delicate flowers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Count me as another Dale convert, also sad to see him go, but yes, his exit was classy. Hope he knows how many people recognize the truth of what he said: he left a better chef AND a better person.
And, wow, was I feeling sorry for Antonia last night. Antonia's food always looks good to me.
Note to Carla: remember the saying "pride goeth before a fall"? Don't cook out of (hurt) pride, Carla! Cook from the heart (your best asset and why so many of us love you), and redemption will follow.
As always, great recap, LindaWhit.
This is getting interesting.
-
I have a feeling that Mike is going to learn the same lesson Spike did - it's no fun being known as a d-bag in the real world. He might be getting over on people in this competition, but there IS a professional life afterward. How many people do you think are interested in eating at one of his restaurants? Would you invest in anything his poisonous hands touch? I wouldn't.
Mike, I hope you enjoy your 5 grand - it might be the most expensive money you ever make (that should have been split 3 ways with Richard and Antonia). You can say what you want about Marcel, Spike, or whoever - at least those people left with their integrity in tact.
Oh and one other thing, Richard shut your damn notebook!!!
›41 Replies-
-
re: ladybugthepug
While I agree with your sentinent about Spike (but I don't think he has any integrity), Spike has opened two restaurants in DC that are very popular. People go there just because he was on Top Chef, I presume (never been, have no interest in enriching him).
But seriously, I've never heard of the Chef's Law. Recipes are copied left and right in the restaurant world. I think Mike's lame for not coming up with his own idea but the outrage expressed here is over the top.
-
re: Worldwide Diner
I'm in this camp. Mike still had to execute the idea. Richard fried mayo which Wylie Dufrense has been doing for a while. Yeah, Mike has that Jersey boy attitude but he's a consistently good chef. Maybe not mindblowing dishes but he's not skating by by any means. Probably would have won that Rao's challenge if he used boxed pasta
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Tom Colicchio's twitter says it happens all the time and that Mike should have given credit (though with editing who knows what really occurred) for the technique, but isn't the focus good food. If Mike copped the recipe and fucked up, would this have been a big deal?
Either way, Mike is getting the bad guy edit. Its not entertaining television if there isn't someone on there to hate and with Mike's mouth, its easy to make him a villain.
-
-
-
-
re: Worldwide Diner
I was waiting for someone to express this idea.
And there IS something to it - chefs steal ideas off each other all the time (though ripping an entire recipe is considered low). Heck, the whole field of molecular gastronomy is by and large chefs stealing ideas from just a handful of guys with their own research kitchens. Richard certainly seems to have been influenced by Wylie and Heston and Ferran.
Still to me, there is an added factor of lameness when you steal ideas from a competitor and use it in that competition against said competitor. That's gotta account for some of the outrage.
On top of that, best I can tell, Mike did nothing much to make that dish his own. He ripped it off wholesale and arguably took $5k out of the pocket of the man who gave him the inspiration.
It wasn't merely an instance of one chef being inspired by another. It was an abuse of trust. Not cool.
-
re: cowboyardee
I think that's exactly the outrage. He used it in a competition, didn't tweak it at all, and won. Do we know if Richard was going to make that for the QF? We don't know if he went with mayo BECAUSE he knew Mike was doing the chicken oyster OR if he was going to hold that idea in his back pocket for another challenge.
Either way - Mike still sucks for ripping the entire thing off for a competition. He won solely using someone else's idea. He's not imaginative enough to have come up with that on his own.
-
-
-
re: cowboyardee
In this case, he admitted that he got the idea from Blais's notebook and there was no indication that he had put his own spin on it. "I thought Richard had an interesting idea, but I thought I'd do it this way" would have been "influenced" -- this was just copying. If you want to copy in your own restaurant, fine. But copying directly from a competitor in a competition is really low.
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Its a competition though. He didn't avoid cooking nor did he sabotage any equipment, Mike just made good food which, correct me if I'm wrong is the entire point. I'm competitive as hell, if someone had a good idea and wasn't going to use it, I'd take it in a heartbeat.
Did he violate the spirit of the game? Maybe. Did he do anything that any other chef wouldn't do and try to make a good recipe? No.And to cowboyardee above who said its low to rip entire recipes, David Chang's cookbook has numerous places where he says he straight-up took the recipe from another chef. Does that make him any less of a chef?
-
re: Chaptastick
"Did [Mike] do anything that any other chef wouldn't do and try to make a good recipe? No."
__________
I very, very much doubt that. At least within the context of a competition against the person whose recipe you're ripping off."David Chang's cookbook has numerous places where he says he straight-up took the recipe from another chef. Does that make him any less of a chef?"
______
I have that cookbook. To what recipes are you referring? There were several places where he credited a recipe to another chef in the book - a chef under his employ at his restaurants, whose food his book was documenting. Are you seriously equating this to what Mike did? Really??Or is there something I'm missing? He admitted to being influenced by a lot of chefs and recipes, but I don't remember him admitting to ripping them off, aside from little techniques and such.
-
re: Chaptastick
" I'm competitive as hell, if someone had a good idea and wasn't going to use it, I'd take it in a heartbeat. "
That's not competitiveness, that's opportunism. Competitiveness would mean creating something to beat it.
"Did he violate the spirit of the game? Maybe. Did he do anything that any other chef wouldn't do and try to make a good recipe? No."
Have to disagree. In fact, none of the other chefs there would do it and I doubt that all chefs everywhere else are as lazy or unscrupulous as you suggest.
And Mike didn't admit to straight up taking the recipe, he alleges he was inspired. Two competitions and inspiration is one thing Mike has never demonstrated.
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
There's no confession that Mike "copied" Richard's recipe or that Richard even had a recipe rather than a concept. Yes I agree Mike is low to even use Richard's concept in a competition but there's no way based on what we saw that you can definitively say it was "copying" vs. "influenced."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: mcf
The sheer audacity of Mike to take an idea and use it in front of the person he took it from is rather unbelievable. I agree that being influenced or even copying a dish from another chef in a restaurant setting is not a big deal, though it does make you look a little unoriginal. But in a competition where concepts and innovation are a factor in judging? Yowsa. Methinks that be stealing.
-
-
-
re: JuniorBalloon
Ummm, chicken oysters are just part of the chicken, nothing new. It's how it was prepared/presented that was stolen. Richard Blais isn't claiming an entire part of a chicken as original. It would be as if someone had an original idea for the chicken liver and someone used the idea--that doesn't mean that chicken liver won't appear anywhere else.
-
re: chowser
Never heard of a chicken oyster, but being that it's common and called an oyster the idea of serving it on an oyster shell doesn't seem to be a great stretch.
Mike is still a douche bag for many reasons. I'm just not convinced he stole some big secret from Richard. Elves are having a good laugh on this one.
jb
-
-
-
-
-
re: jujuthomas
Chow or chowhound? Here's one on chowhound:
-
-
-
-
re: Shrinkrap
You don't have to "toss" anything. In fact, since the oyster is in the chicken back, all you have to do is break down a chicken, using the other parts for anything you like. Your'll wind up with two breasts, two legs and two wings. In other words, a whole chicken that can be used for anything you like.
-
-
re: JuniorBalloon
They showed Richard writing in his notebook. They showed Mike looking at Richard's notebook. They showed Richard saying Mike got the idea from his notebook. They showed Mike saying he got tge idea from Richard. They also showed Mike denying he got the idea from Richard. You choose to believe what you wish to believe. I'd say 98% of the viewers know that without Richards notebook Mike likely would not have presented a fried chicken 'oyster' on the half-shell.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm so sad Dale was sent home, I was hoping he'd take it to the very end. After the show my 10 year old daughter said she was done watching, she doesn't care who wins now, made me laugh. I almost agree with her.
Mike didn't deserve to win the quickfire, it was obvious it wasn't his dish, especially plating on an oyster shell. That's not his style. I'd bet dollars to dimes that Tiffany F was responsible for his elimination challenge dish too.
I'm really disappointed with the elimination challenge & I know I've said this before, but I really think they need to give the chefs more prep time. How can they do their best work when they are behind from the get go? Give them the proper amount of time & the food they prepare will be better for it. I understand it's a reality show, but in real life a chef has time to plan, shop & a kitchen crew to help prepare. When you have 2 people prepping to feed 300 people in a very limited amount of time, it's not going to go very smooth.
Upthread were some comments about gulf seafood being safe, I think Bravo chose this challenge to show the country that it is indeed safe to eat. Like the poster above said, the gulf is more than just Louisiana. We each have the right to eat what we want & I'm sure there are people who will refuse to eat gulf seafood for many years, but they don't need to knock the ones who are willing to eat it.
I can't wait to see how heated this thread will be this week on that subject! Bravo is certainly giving us Top Chef fans lots to talk about this season.
›2 Replies -
Update to last week's Carla-as-model post. It sems they've posted more pixs of her modelling days.
http://www.ivillage.com/carla-hall-di...
There's also a transcript of her interview, but I'll warn of *potential* spoilage.
Luckily, the transcript and pixs are available via separate links on the page, so you can just look and not read.
›5 Replies -
Dale and Angelo are out. Carla and Antonia are still in. You sure this is "top" chef and not "lucky" chef? Or fan favorite chef? Not to mention the fact that Mike skated by this entire episode on the ideas/skills of Blaze and Tiffany. I can't believe he just took credit for coating the shrimp with grits/lobster sauce and didn't say sorry to Richard. "If it were his dish, he would have made it." "Thanks for the 5 grand." I thought I liked mike despite his loud personality; but he's turned out to be a sore loser, a sore winner and a plagiarizer. I still think he's more talented than Carla or Antonia.
›24 Replies-
-
re: Scagnetti
I don't agree. Carla has won more than almost all the chefs left in the competition. She is not a train wreck, but her off-beat personality seems to mask both her talent and her fierce competitiveness. I may be mistaken, but I think that, with the exception of Blais, none of the other of the remaining chefs have gotten this far in the competition before.
-
re: roxlet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Chef...
3 EC wins - Richard and Carla
1 EC win - Antonia
0 EC wins - Tiffany and Mike2 QF wins - Richard
1 QF win - Antonia and Mike
0 QF wins - Tiffany-
re: LindaWhit
That's interesting, but by "gotten as far" I meant that by this point in the competition they had been eliminated in their original season. OK looking at that the Wikipedia page-- so Tiffany made it to top 4, Antonia to top 4 and Mike to top 7. Only Blais and Hall made it to the finals and both were runners up. Antonia and Tiffany made it this far before.
-
-
re: LJNew
She's terrible at quickfires, as she herself admits. A quickfire requires a whole other set of skills and who wins can be somewhat quirky (as there's only one judge -- often not a food professional -- instead of a panel). People are free to do otherwise, but I don't consider quickfire wins in my assessment of a chef's ability. If I did, that would mean some of the Top Chef Masters were lousy chefs, because quite a few of them struggled with their quickfire challenges.
-
-
re: LindaWhit
My problem w/ going by "wins" on skill is that it doesn't take into account the number of times a person is close to winning. Someone like Antonia does pretty well overall, is in the top far group five times. She's making pretty good food (except when she's not because she's been in the bottom a lot, too) and if she can pull it together, I think, has a good chance, especially when she's been in the top the past four times. Sometimes winning and being in the top can be splitting hairs.
Mike, who can't think more highly of himself, has been in the high group fewer times than Tiffany and yet he seems to discount her completely. Mike needs to go, if it hasn't been said enough yet.
-
-
re: LindaWhit
BTW, I wasn't critiquing your tallies and they're very helpful. I was just commenting that it wasn't a complete picture and think it's funny that Mike thinks so highly of himself when he's been the worst performer, as being in the top and winning go. But, then again, he also put himself in the same category as the Volt bros. and Kevin Gillespie.
-
-
re: chowser
If anyone hasn't seen it, Wikipedia has a nice chart showing not only EC and QF wins and losses, but highs and lows as well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Chef...
Antonia: 1 EC win, 5 highs, and 4 lows (one low has an asterisk because she had one of the best dishes, but was on the losing team).
Mike: 0 EC wins, 2 highs, and 2 lows.
Tiffany: 0 EC wins, 3 highs, and 6 lows.
That makes it look like Mike has been skating by in the middle a lot.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: ucallthatcb
My assessment of Mike's talent: he may have better overall skills, but he doesn't consistently put out good food like Antonia or Carla. From what I've seen in their respective seasons and in this one, I'd much rather eat their food.
I'd love to see Richard leave out his little notebook with some bogus creation, just to see if Mike would be dumb enough (and assholian enough) to copy it.
So sorry to see Dale go. He's grown so much as a chef, and especially as a person, and I was really enjoying watching him work this season. I'll miss his laugh, his humour, and his finesse in the kitchen. And what a classy exit he made!
Thanks again for a great recap, Linda!
-
-
-
re: Parrotgal
You are right, it's not about the best chef, the whole competition is about the best food each time it is judged. If it were otherwise, the 16-0 Patriots would have been given the Lombardi Trophy for the 2007 NFL season instead of playing the 10-6 Giants in the Superbowl. Hosea had the best food in the finale.
-
-
-
I sensed Dale was in trouble when he was standing at his station looking VERY dazed... kind of like Carla did last week in Target. He wasn't happy with his food and couldn't figure out how to make it better. However, he exited the competition a much better person than any of us would have imagined. He was felled by a bad day, and we've all been there. He won a lot more than he lost.
Carla hit the bottom because she was cooking from pride, which traps us all in its ugly maw from time to time. She always loses when she strays from her good place.
Poor Antonia. She really has gotten a bad deal, but at least she's still in the game. I couldn't believe that Richard won a trip... another trip given away as a prize for winning... and still Antonia comes up empty-handed. She has to be feeling some crazy mixed emotions at this point.
I am disappointed to see Tiffany still hanging on. Her food is totally unappealing to me, and she keeps messing up fish... which is pretty sad, considering that she heads a seafood restaurant, as she keeps telling us.
Maybe Richard is finally hitting his stride. I was glad that he won using innovative flavor combinations, not innovative techniques.
Mike? One word: jackass.
My sincere hope for top three at this point: Richard, Antonia and Carla. But if Carla doesn't get her head and heart back in the right place, I fear she may not make it.
-
I get the fact that they judge each dish on its own merits every week, but maybe Bravo should reconsider this format? The star system seemed to kind of work on TCM (even though that was only within an episode, not week to week.)
I understand the arguments against it being totally point based (some chefs would be mathematically eliminated early on.) But are we really looking at the possibility of Mike Isabella, Tiffany and Antonia being the final three on TC All-Stars? That just doesn't seem right to me.
›33 Replies-
-
re: piccola
I don't have any strong objections to her, I meant more when you think of the contestants as a whole. At the beginning I could have pictured a finale without Jen Carroll. Or Dale T. Or Richard. But the possibility of NONE of those chefs going through? I guess that's why they call it a competition.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Pylon
I'd love to see the Vegas odds on this. I've said in the past, and been criticized for it (among other complaints of sexism) that Carla can perform well but she also underperforms and does very poorly, like the little girl with the little curl. These two weeks show exactly what I meant--very inconsistent performance. How is that rated against someone who is more steady, but doesn't have as many stellar performances, like Antonia?
-
re: chowser
I think Carla's ADD like manic attacks may lead to some of her great food, but are also why she's so inconsistent. If she was able to focus just a little bit more, I think she'd be hard to beat (but probably also less entertaining to watch). Betting she is much less this way in her normal catering job, as, to me, it looks very much like a coping mechanism to overcoming the crushing stress of a long, competition type environment.
-
-
re: Pylon
gotcha - thanks for the explanation. i've made no secret of my distaste for Carla in recent weeks, but i'd still rather see her succeed over Mike & Tiffany...Mike's a classless putz who hasn't wowed anyone with his food all season, and based on Tiffany's poor performance thus far i'm scratching my head over how she's even still there. Carla irritates me to no end, but at least she's put up some good food (though i wouldn't want to see her win).
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
so now it’s only acceptable for us to express our opinions here on CH if they’re all rainbows, unicorns, and in agreement with everyone else’s, lest we offend the sensibility of a fellow Hound? okay, let’s all join hands and sing kumbaya before proceeding...
just because someone’s behavior on TV is “harmless” doesn’t mean we’re all required to *enjoy* watching it. Padma’s behavior is “harmless” as well, but i don’t see Hounds getting all up in arms or accusing anyone of being judgmental or critical for observing/opining that she’s a crappy host.
oh, and news flash, folks, there’s a reason i use those silly smiley-face emoticons after some of these comments...they’re said in FUN and not intended to be mean-spirited. I’m truly puzzled by how super-sensitive and touchy so many people are in the TC threads this season.
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
well, one could reasonably say you are the one being super-sensitive and touchy! I was only expressing my opinion that sometimes we can get carried away in trashing people on the show, and it seems to me, only speaking for myself, that we forget they are real human beings, not cartoon characters. I wasn't even thinking about you, GHG. Walking away now......
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
Gee, ghg, wasn't I obvious enough that I wasn't addressing your comment specifically by using the terms "people" and "reality show"?
I think there's a difference between criticizing Padma's ability to do her job hosting the television show we are watching and making personal comments about someone's eccentricity. Which you are free to do. I just think it's SAD (not evil or even wrong) that so many PEOPLE are so invested in such a narrow definition of acceptable behavior and so judgmental of others that they are unwilling or unable to enjoy a wide range of harmless (i.e., not racist, sexist, mean-spirited) but eccentric behavior for a few short minutes on a television program. Sad for them, and sad because when they express those opinions widely on the internet the create an atmosphere where people feel inhibited and unwilling to express any kind of individualism.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
When it comes to Marcel and Mike, I do think there have been some really mean-spirited, gang mentality comments, but In the Carla case - I think everyone has agreed that she is a nice person, but slightly annoying! So not too mean!
And I think GHG's inner chicken comment was hilarious!
-
-
re: chowser
Main reason I think Marcels eccentricities get slammed more often than Carlas is the difference in their personalities. Carla seems to be always trying to be nice while Marcel seems to often try to act superior to others as well as trying to instigate fights. Thus, many are willing t,o forgive Carlas oddness compared to Marcel. (standard caveats about editing apply of course).
-
re: chowser
Actually, I think Marcel gets a bad rap (no pun intended). I think Marcel's attempts at rapping are almost endearingly clueless. I guess I identify with his social awkwardness: he's a bright, talented guy who I think wants to be liked and admired but doesn't have a clue how to go about it.
-
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
It would be far worse if someone kept leaping to slap down a fellow poster here in such a way as to inhibit participation. Commenting on characteristics of contestants has always been fair game. Even though I find Carla amusing, I'm also amused by GHG's witty commentary about her eccentricities.
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
@karen and Ruth, i apologize if i misconstrued your intentions - i assumed your comments were directed at me because they were posted as direct replies to mine...then again, my replies have ended up in the wrong place more than once so perhaps i should have known better than to jump to conclusions! thanks to both of you for the explanation.
@Ruth, my eccentricities - and i have MANY - are not for everyone, and i've grown to embrace that. so i don't see it as sad that Carla's not everyone's cup of tea. i know i'm certainly not, and i'm cool with that - life would be awfully boring if we were all the same. to clarify - and i'm pretty sure i've said this before - i don't sit in *judgment* of Carla as a person, i just don't find her personality as endearing or entertaining as some others do. that's all.
we all good now? :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I was watching a video from last night's ep after the QF when Antonia was bumming about not plating two dishes for the QF, and Mike dooooshily says "Yeah, I feel sorry for you too Antonia, Antonia............thanks for the five G's!" and then he's the only one cackle-laughing.
http://www.tvsquad.com/2011/02/24/top...
It also has Mike sitting down next to Richard and saying in the confessional that Richard pisses HIM off! "If you're going to win, be an effing winner! If you're going to lose, go in the effing corner!" Dipshit.
It also has the part where Antonia tells Carla and Tiffany about Mike taking the idea from Richard's book - Carla said "There's Man Law...and there's Chef's Law. Chef Law is you don't take another chef's idea. That's a no-no."
BTW, Mike being in the top group for the EC? Was pretty much thanks to Tiffani Faison, who suggested he coat the shrimp in the grits. (She'd worked in NOLA for 2 years and obviously did that there.) So NEITHER of Mike's dishes were his ideas!
He's going to be reamed up and down on various sites today, I think.
›23 Replies-
re: LindaWhit
It also has Mike sitting down next to Richard and saying in the confessional that Richard pisses HIM off! "If you're going to win, be an effing winner! If you're going to lose, go in the effing corner!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~There are a couple of things I noticed about this whole scene. First, while Mike is saying this and they are showing the shot of him and Richard sitting at the table, Richard is sitting there calmly while Mike is the one fidgeting. Secondly, when you see Mike in the confessional he was fidgeting and he couldn't even look straight at the camera, or if you will he couldn't look the camera in the eye. Despite what he says, Mike knows what he did was wrong, and I can't wait to see him PYKAG.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Here's his Twitter directly: http://twitter.com/#!/tom_colicchio -- most of what he said was in responses to other people, because he was trying not to spoil last night's show. Specifically, he said http://twitter.com/#!/tom_colicchio/status/40616716262178816 and http://twitter.com/#!/tom_colicchio/s... (basically, that it happens all the time, and it's not cool).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wow, Dale. Who'da thunk?
And Mike is still a parasite, hanging on to the V-bros for ideas and technique in his first season and first Angelo and now Richard in this one. Disgusting. I'm almost embarrassed for him. Time for him to go.
And much thanks and appreciate for Linda - and all of you - for the recaps and conversation. Still out of the country and I can't even get the videos on Bravo for my fix.
›4 Replies-
-
re: LindaWhit
I think we need to get more specific. Mike is a tapeworm that was so far up the Voltaggio's butts he thought he was in the same skills category as them. This season he had to find a new host. Last night it was Richard and Tiffani. Last week it was Angelo. He is running out of suitable hosts.
(To be fair however, tapeworms do not have a central nervous system and Mike is not aware of his actions).
-
-
-
As everyone has said, sad to see Dale go and surprised he was so emotional.
Mike kept yammering on trying to justify himself but it just made him look like a bigger dick.
Antonia's getting a little screwed it seems. I mean, I know you need two plates but she keeps doing well and just falling short then when she *does* win, she gets nothing! They should retroactively give her a trip for her win a few weeks ago.
›3 Replies -
Poor Antonia... always a bridesmaid...
She has been in the top so many times but never got the win, she consistently makes fabulous looking food that is well received by everyone, but always gets edged out for the win. And Isabella wins $5k in the quickfire by default....
›12 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
re: roxlet
True. But perhaps it wasn't mentioned by Padma - it was a producer-type thing.
There was someone who used to post on these threads (and may still; cannot recall the name) who was a PA for Bravo and worked on TC episodes. Said that for EACH challenge, filming stops, and a PA or producer will have each cheftestant read the rules (or is read the rules out loud) for that specific challenge, and then the cheftestant is required to sign a document stating they understand the rules.
I'm thinking it was the latter situation - and Antonia just forgot in the 30-45 minutes she had to make the QF dish.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Shrinkrap
Yes, I think that Antonia was pissed at herself for her mistake and didn't want Carla's expression on sympathy right then--I know for myself that sometimes someone acting sympathetic can make me totally break down and cry, and I'm guessing that Antonia didn't want that to happen on camera.
-
-
-
-
Bourdain's blog entry at bravotv reflects part of what we're all thinking, but I sure hope we get to hear what he thinks about MIke.
›1 Reply -
It was so disappointing to see Dale go home while Mike lives to cook another day. Somehow, I wish they could have factored in Dale's previous wins in making their decision. I guess that I think this every season when someone really talented goes home and someone mediocre stays. I mean, look at Tiffany -- she's been in the bottom regularly and has never won a single challenge. Carla's dish looked gross (and I'm a Carla fan), but at least she has proven that she has real cooking chops and has won several challenges. Mike --- ugh! I can't get over what a creep he is and how he appropriated Richard's recipe. Right now, I want Richard, Carla and Antonia in the finale. Wouldn't it be great to have two female chefs competing at the end? I think the door to that possibility just got opened.
-
I tried mustard on fish I fried exactly once. It was supposed to be a great recipe. It tasted like mustard, and I like my fish to taste like fish, not the mustard mess Carla made, and then putting hot sauce on it, not something you do to a beautiful tasting fish like grouper, where a simple presentation is better.
›4 Replies -
SHOCKED that Dale went! and sad. I really thought he'd be in at the finale. I really thought it was Carla or Tiffany. Poor guy. he's talented, he's funny, he cleaned up his temper. Sad to see him go.
Mike is the new Marcel. DOOOOOCHE. all the chefs agreed (or at least the women, and Blais), that you JUST DON'T DO THAT. "Less is more and simple is better," - HAH - yeah, when you're stealing someone else's idea, when it's all been laid out for you in a DIAGRAM, it's much easier, isn't it.
Blais is wonderful, a class act, still, through and through.
Felt bad for Antonia, with her technical screw-up. they are all soooo tired and under so much pressure......
›16 Replies-
-
-
re: Withnail42
Have I got some extra reading for you.
http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2007/05...
Marcel was involved in a big scandal a little while ago for pretty much the exact same thing. You can decide whether you think it was deliberate.-
-
re: Joanie
It does look a bit different. Flavors were pretty much the same, and that would seem to be an unlikely coincidence (though Marcel claims they were both playing off the same flavor combinations and happened to arrive at the same place).
Not sure what 4 years has to do with anything.
It definitely could be a coincidence - stranger things have happened. Though it strikes me a enormously unlikely that Marcel would be unfamiliar with one of Wylie's well known creations.
-
re: cowboyardee
"Not sure what 4 years has to do with anything."
I thought the comment made it sound like it was something Marcel did recently regarding Top Chef. And while he may or may not have copied a dish, it wasn't done the same way as the Mike/Richard scenario. (I can't call him Mikey, it makes him sound too cute and cuddly.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wow, I despise Mike Isabella. What a horrible person, in so many ways, and I hate that Dale had to go before him. And see, Dale, that's the way to turn yourself around -- I couldn't stand him in his season, but I liked him so much this season, and I'm so sad that he left tonight. What a class act, though, and a nice way to go.
I didn't really like this challenge, though -- it's a little late in the season for the cook for 300 people challenge, and it just ends up being overwhelming and doesn't seem to get us either good TV or good food. I appreciated the benefit aspect, but couldn't they have done a smaller dinner with the gulf seafood instead? And God, there were so many people in that room; when the judges were talking the ambient crowd noise behind them was so loud that I could barely hear what the judges were saying.
-
Mike said he's seen fried 'chicken' oysters served in an oyster shell before he saw them in Richard's notebook. Bullsh•t. Too bad Richard had not yet figured out how despicable Mike is. Everyone knows how despicable he is now. It will be interesting if the topic of Mike's theft comes up in future episodes.
I was sorry to see Dale go. I was sure it was going to be Tiffany.
Regarding the quickfire... Does this mean they actually had to make three plates? I know they always make an extra one that we do not see that the producers take away for camera closeups.
›4 Replies -
when Dale made that hilarious comment in the beginning about being a greedy American, i had a *really* bad feeling it was an indication that tonight would be his last. i hate when i'm right like that. i went into this episode hoping Tiffany or Mike would go home..but once i heard the comments at JT, i would have settled for Carla. just not Dale! boo :( his exit interview was great, and i hope he does open his own restaurant.
Isabella needs to go away. he's a total d-bag, and he's giving my home state a bad name! i'll be interested to see if any of the blogs address the "borrowed" recipe issue.
Blais really is a class act. happy to see that he hasn't completely psyched himself out...yet.
thanks for yet another great recap Linda!
›9 Replies-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
I was really moved by Dale's interview, when he talked about not liking himself much during his first season and trying to change. He has changed--I think a lot of us have noticed that!
I was pretty disgusted by Mike's behavior, and I'm so glad that he didn't win the EC. When they showed Richard letting Mike read his book, I'm thinking that it's nice that Richard likes sharing his ideas. But, dude, it's a competition!
-
-
re: Shrinkrap
I was thinking pea puree, too, but this is much worse. With the pea puree there were some questions as to whether it was stolen. Tonight we saw the filmed evidence that Mike stole Richard's dish straight out of his personal chef's notebook! What an asshole! I'll be interested to see what Tom et. al. have to say on their blogs.
I was bummed to see Dale go, too. Loved Richard saying that he was taking Fabio along with his family to Barbados! Wouldn't that be a fun vacation to watch/hear all about?
-
-
-
re: Nettie
I imagine a beautiful Barbados beach - camera panning then focusing on Richard and Fabio splashing in the surf and then a cutaway to to Mrs. Blais and child under an umbrella. Boys giggling like girls. Girls glowering and unhappy. But my brain is just not right. Then again, as a fellow redhead (who has been to Barbados) I know 10 minutes in that sun and Blais will be the white shrimp, fully cooked and pink.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Scagnetti
I really thought it was going to be Carla the way she was talking throughout the show. And the way they said none of her ingredients did not make sense. But the challenge seemed really hard! to cook for 300 ppl, and still make it out alive. Their gonna beat these chefs until they come out crying.
-
-
dale!!!??? why do they keep consistently mediocre chefs while sending gifted chefs home? i'm losing interest in the finale cuz it won't have the top 2, 3, or 4 chefs. lame.
›5 Replies-
re: lakeshow318
Hey - it's been said many times before and Tom Colicchio said it tonight. They're all great chefs, but sometimes one bad dish can send you home. This was Dale's one bad dish. This contest is not judged on how they did overall throughout the show. They're judged on the dish that was in front of the judges for that specific challenge.
-
-
-
-
I knew it. And I'm SO sad. What a classy exit interview too. I still heart Dale - probably more now. But this show will be way less fun (and less funny) now.
›2 Replies -
-
-
-
re: chowser
Dales maturing as a person compared to his season is what has impressed me most about him as well. It takes a lot of strength of character to boldly identify a flaw within yourself and be willing to do what it takes to correct it. Glad to see a number of people have been complimenting him on this to his twitter account too.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ok, does anyone else have a huge problem with the fact that they're cooking with Gulf seafood?! I mean, I want to see their economy recover as much as anyone, but I still don't think it is/was safe. The FDA just cleared Gulf seafood a couple of weeks ago, which means it hadn't been when this episode was filmed...not to mention the fact that independent studies still don't agree...
›43 Replies-
-
re: edible complex
"Yet" being the operative word. There haven't been any long-term studies on the effects of the consumption of petrochemicals. I'm not even sure I'm necessarily against it based on what little I've personally read, but it still strikes me as irresponsible on their part, especially given the timing. What if the FDA hadn't cleared it? Did they have an alternate (and potentially rigged) episode filmed? I'm not saying it's completely wrong, but it's definitely not the smartest challenge they've ever come up with. Best of luck to you with keeping the horns at bay.
-
-
re: theferlyone
I live here so I was/am concerned as anyone, but one thing to remember is that the Gulf is a very big body of water and as much oil as gushed out, there was still a lot of the Gulf that wasn't affected. And from all accounts, there has been more testing than ever since the spill. BTW, John Besh was one of the most vocal critics over the oil spill; he's also known as a true conservationist/outdoorsman so I don't think (and I certainly hope) he wouldn't be promoting seafood that he didn't deem safe.
-
-
-
re: nomadchowwoman
Let's not eat up space on this thread with a tanget that could really get out of hand. For an in-depth discussion of the entire Gulf seafood controversy, go here:
-
-
re: nomadchowwoman
OKAY, THIS IS CRAZY
I'm late to the party..
I have been reading the posts through...
We've discussed poitical correctness, Paula Deen, and the safe-ness of seafood from the Gulf.WTH?
Am I the only one steaming mad about Dale leaving???????????????
I mean, I don't think I have ever been more shocked or disgusted by an elimination EVER before on TC.
I'm boiling.
Obviously, I didnt taste his dish, and can't judge just how bad it was, but through the entire competition - he has been kicking ass.
It's the first time I have ever felt like the judges are toying with us.I'm pretty pissed!
-
re: NellyNel
I understand how you feel but instead of conspiracy I think this points to fairness. The losing dish sends the chef home.
To my mind, Tiffany is this season's Robin, or even Lisa: almost the worst in each of the last three outings, but not the worst. She's skating by. If it were about who they 'want' to send home, then it would clearly be Tiffany. Am I the only one who sees Tom almost wince every time she opens her mouth? It could all be in my head, I guess - the timbre of her voice is nails on a chalkboard to my ears.
-
re: MplsM ary
At least Tiffany acknowledges she's not performing. Mike is doing worst and still thinks he's doing well. I think Tiffany makes the bottom, often not because she had a terrible dish but that hers wasn't as good as the others. Tom said that her chicken tortilla soup was good, just not chicken and dumplings. While she completely accepted responsibility for her dish (and should have), it was Marcel's fault that it was slightly overcooked and the sauce too sweet.
-
re: chowser
I'll give you that Marcel is on the hook for the shrimp being overcooked, but I'd not be so quick to jump in him for the sauce. It's her sauce, she gave him the directions. She didn't taste it, so we don't know if it was the same as hers or not. She said she didn't tell him to dilute like she normally does, as well.
So either she left out part of the instructions making it too sweet or, potentially, it was just too sweet to begin with. Either way, it's her dish, her responsibility.
-
-
re: MplsM ary
i have to disagree with that one. i was never convinced Robin could actually produce a winning dish on purpose. the times she was around the top everyone was always surprised, and it seemed to normally be a fluke. Tiffany we at least know is capable of producing some very good food.
-
-
re: roxlet
yeah that may be true... but i still get the sense that far more of the chefs this season have respect for the skills of tiffany that they ever did for robin, and i think that really says something. ive never once heard a chef this season say anything along the lines of "tiffany shouldnt be here anymore. she doesnt deserve it" whereas that was said AT LEAST once a week about robin.
-
-
re: mcf
In season 7, Tiffany had two double wins (i.e., she won both the QF and the EC in the same episode), and she was in the high group five other times, more than anyone else. She was never in a low group until she was eliminated fifth from the overall win. I'd bet that, like Angelo, she's feeling some burnout after doing the two seasons in succession.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: edible complex
<I've been eating gulf seafood and haven't grown any horns yet.>
Ditto.
And so have the folks on the Gulf Coast. The green light was given quite a while ago.Thanks, Linda. I fell asleep and missed all but the tag end of the 11 pm repeat. So sad to see Dale go. Sure hope Mike doesn't make the finale. That would be tragic, with all the talent that's gone home already.
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Eh, I'm spoiled by being in New England, I guess. I have plenty of sources of good seafood without taking that risk...and I'll admit, I'm particularly sensitive to the issue at the moment ' cause my husband and I just decided to start trying to conceive (like, literally, the conversation happened a few hours ago).
-
-
-
re: mattstolz
Again, any problems that you know of...the FDA's testing basically amounts to a sniff-check. If it doesn't smell like crude, it must be ok, right? Further independent testing has shown petrochemical levels far above normal. If anyone wants to take that chance, that's their business, but I don't think it's right for the show to pretend like everything's fine when it might not be...it's not like the FDA's never been wrong before...
-
re: theferlyone
A second test examining for dispersants was added back in October 2010.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroo...
"Experts trained in a rigorous sensory analysis process have been testing Gulf seafood for the presence of contaminants, and every seafood sample from reopened waters has passed sensory testing for contamination with oil and dispersant. Nonetheless, to ensure consumers have total confidence in the safety of seafood being harvested from the Gulf, NOAA and FDA have added this second test for dispersant when considering reopening Gulf waters to fishing.
Using this new, second test, in the Gulf scientists have tested 1,735 tissue samples including more than half of those collected to reopen Gulf of Mexico federal waters. Only a few showed trace amounts of dispersants residue (13 of the 1,735) and they were well below the safety threshold of 100 parts per million for finfish and 500 parts per million for shrimp, crabs and oysters. As such, they do not pose a threat to human health.and
The 1,735 samples tested so far were collected from June to September and cover a wide area of the Gulf. The samples come from open areas in state and federal waters, and from fishermen who brought fish to the docks at the request of federal seafood analysts. The samples come from a range of species, including grouper, tuna, wahoo, swordfish, gray snapper, butterfish, red drum, croaker, and shrimp, crabs and oysters.
Previous research provided information about how finfish metabolize DOSS, and at FDA’s Dauphin Island, Alabama lab, scientists undertook further exposure experiments on fish, oysters and crab; similar experiments on shrimp were held at NOAA’s Galveston, Texas lab. These exposure studies further support that fish, crustaceans and shellfish quickly clear dispersant from their tissues, and provided samples with known concentrations for use as standards for validating the methodology. Samples undergoing chemical analysis are always accompanied by standards with known concentrations of DOSS, to verify the equipment continues to measure the compound accurately.Nearly 9,444 square miles, or about 4 percent of the federal waters in the Gulf are still closed to commercial and recreational fishing."
~~~~~~~~~~
As Scagnetti said below - the Gulf of Mexico is big. It's not just Louisiana fishermen who fish there. Texas and Mexico's fishing grounds weren't affected.-
-
re: gaffk
No, but I felt it was necessary to at least post that info from the FDA, since theferlyone seemed so adamant about their stats. I'd think that any additional discussion should go to a separate thread on NAF. But since they were using Gulf seafood, I found it appropriate based on theferlyone's comment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: mcf
It's a personal choice, obviously. Eat Gulf seafood, or don't. The chefs feel the seafood is safe.
New Yorkers and WTC rescuers unfortunately didn't have much of a choice with WTC air. One can choose not to eat seafood. One cannot choose NOT to breathe.
And I'd really not rather let this part of the thread regress any further.
-
-
-
-
-
re: theferlyone
Maybe news hadn't reached Yankee land yet but here in Texas and Louisiana, we've been eating gulf seafood for a long time. The Gulf of Mexico doesn't end at the Louisiana border, it extends all the way around Texas to Mexico. All fertile shrimp and oyster grounds that were never affected by the oil spill.
BTW, did you know that Johnny Carson isn't hosting the Tonight Show anymore?
-
re: Scagnetti
Scagnetti, you are wrong. The Gulf does start and end at Louisiana. Just like Mississippi didn't get hit by a record 28 foot storm surge from Katrina, which people seem to forget. I had the very same conversation this morning about how people are avoiding Texas oysters, even though the bays got zero oil from the spill. The oysters are great this year with the cold winter down here, and I've been gorging myself, and will continue to do so. The shrimp are beautiful too. Some of the seafood they are eating almost certainly came from Texas or Mexico, as well as most of the crabs consumed in Maryland are from the bays along the Gulf. I can't wait for May when the speckled trout get hungry, I'll catch my share, and you won't see me putting mustard on fried trout al la Carla's grouper.
-
re: theferlyone
nope...been eating gulf seafood the entire time
there is a huge part of the Gulf that was not affected by the spill and generalizations don't help anyone- fishermen or consumers
sorry to be short, but we're living with this everyday, trying to stay educated on the subject, and I have little patience for disinformation these days
now, I'm off to KJean's for some boiled crabs!
-
-
It's killing me, but once again, I am in a hotel with no Bravo channel. 3rd time in 6 weeks. So sad! Thanks, Linda, for the recap. At this point, I can't help myself!!!!!
›3 Replies -
Credit to Marcel for some good self deprecating humor referring to himself as Tiffany's 'white shrimp'.
Second best line (so far) Richard reminding Fabio of his ex-wife.
Mike a serious d**k in this episode.
Foreboding with Dale.
Still less than happy that Paula Deen is in this episode. Forgot she was on TV almost went off when she came on screen.
›20 Replies-
-
-
re: karenfinan
I loved it when she told Antonia, "I could bend you over my knee and whoop your cute little ass!" Antonia was on the top in this episode... Maybe it's because I'm from the south or because Paula reminds me of my mother when she's in a good mood, but I'll go to the mat for her too.
-
re: LindseyBrook
I too am from the south, and I feel like she is a relative, as well. She was related to my next door neighbor, who was an honorary part of my family- so in away, Paula and I are related! ( I don't know her at all) I really admire her as she did not have an easy life and worked VERY hard to get where she is now. She's nobody's fool in my opinion.
-
re: karenfinan
I am glad to have found a fellow Paula fan! It takes a very gutsy woman to take nothing but her family recipes and traditions and become successful by popularizing or characterizing them even. I wish I had thought of that! Her recipes have saved my ass on many family occasions. They're easy to execute and everyone always likes them.
-
-
-
re: Clarkafella
i'm always willing to check it out if recommended by a fellow Hound - assume you mean this one?
http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/pa...
definitely still a bit too typical "Paula" for me with all that heavy cream, but i could definitely tweak it and i'm sure a lightened version would be terrific.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Withnail42
"Credit to Marcel for some good self deprecating humor referring to himself as Tiffany's 'white shrimp"
As if we need any proof that each one of us sees this show from a different point of view. My take on that clever comment was that Tiffany was so eager to use the white shrimp that she was willing to endure Marcel's presence. Whichever intrepretation matches Marcel's, if he had shown any of that wit and self-deprecation, this group wouldn't have had dozens -- of not hundreds -- of posts containing the vitriol we hurled his way.
He's been a contender for a while, but with last night's episode Mike officially earned the delusional label. Going on about his dish and his skills. Yeah. Right.
-
re: Indy 67
I don't think that anyone was disagreeing with you there -- I think it was clear that Tiffany wanted to use the shrimp (and didn't want to use the other stuff left) and so took Marcel with it. But it was funny when Carla wanted to give her Trey and Marcel referred to himself as the "white shrimp" though.
-
-
-
-
-
My fave line was when Carla said about tre - "we should take away his NAACP card". Hilarious.
›4 Replies-
-
re: AMFM
My fave line was when Carla said about tre - "we should take away his NAACP card". Hilarious.
_______________________________________________________
Why isn't there more outrage over this line about Tre?
It's totally un-PC, and bordering on racist.
It's sort of like if someone was shocked that Tre didn't like watermelon and fried chicken.
What if it was Angelo (i.e, a non-African American person) stereotyping every African-American person as a card-carrying member of the NAACP? Clarence Thomas would be offended, I'd imagine.
Just playing that annoying advocate of the Devil ...
-
-
-










































