Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Cookware >
Dec 31, 2010 04:23 AM

Any comments about Farberware pans?

My daughter is getting ready to register for wedding gifts .she is interested is keeping the cost of her selctions in the moderate range and is looking at Farberware for her sauce pans. The selections are within the price range she is looking for. I want her to have pans that are good tools and will last. Will farberware do it or is there something that is better value?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. I bought one of those Faberware sets you see at Walmart for like $50-$60 a few years ago when I graduated and got my apartment. They are decent. Definitely wouldnt last a lifetime or anything like that, atleast in the price range of the ones I purchased. The Non-stick surface on them, atleast in that price rage isnt great IMO. I was careful to use only non-stick utensils with them, and I rarely even cook, and I noticed the non-stick surface chip in a few spots. Maybe it was a manufacturers defect, I dont know.

    They will definitely last years and years in my opinion, if she is care to take care of the non stick surface. Lately, Ive been reading up on non-stick surfaces, and the potential dangers, so Im actually slowly replacing all of my non-stick pans.

    Of course, if she is looking at their stainless pans, or premium non stick pans, then I probably wasnt much help lol.

    3 Replies
    1. re: Rebelatheart

      She is looking at the stainless steel but thanks for th einput

      1. re: Fiona

        My mother still has her Faberware Revere/Ware line she purchased in the early 60's.....they have the copper bottoms......and they are still going strong today. They look similar to this item offered on eBay.

      2. re: Rebelatheart

        WalMart leans on their suppliers to cut every little corner. Often a company's line available at WM is made for & sold only at WM. We've had one non-WM Farberware saute pan for about 15 years now & it's going strong.

        Note! This isn't an anti-WM tirade.


      3. I have several of the Farberware Classic stainless pans and like them very much. The handles are comfortable, especially for a woman's smaller hand IMHO, they are 18/10 stainless, and they clean up very well. Another feature that I like is that the stockpots have glass, rather than solid, lids (glass lids are a personal preference of mine).

        I don't really agree that they "would not last a lifetime" when referring to the stainless ones (nonstick absolutely would not, no argument there). My pans range in age from about 8 months to about 12 years and the older ones perform as well as the new ones. An added plus is that the Farberware Classic design has not changed, and thus a collection can be added to over time.

        FWIW, these are the ones I own (all Farberware Classic stainless): 4 qt stockpot with glass lid, 8 qt stockpot with glass lid, 11" covered saute pan with glass lid, 3/4 qt warmer/small saucepan with one lip, 1 qt saucepan double-lipped with stainless lid with drainer holes, 2 qt covered saucepan with glass lid.

        I have other (too many?!) pans in other sizes etc but they happen to be other brands; not because the Farberware versions aren't good, but because there were certain things about the others that specifically prompted their purchase.

        A step up from the Farberware (IMHO) would be the Henckels Classic Clad. The difference is in the construction. Although both use 18/10 stainless, the Henckels "sandwich" is not only on the pan base (as Farberware is), but extends upward a bit on the sides as well. The handles on the Henckels pans are also stainless and quite substantial, while the Fware handles are plastic. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just pointing out another difference in materials.

        A quick price comparison:
        Farberware Classic 2 qt saucepan with lid $24.99 on Amazon
        Henckels Classic Clad 2 qt saucepan with lid $59.99 on Amazon

        1. I don't know about the new versions of Farberware.
          I only know that they are the only pots and pans sets my MIL ever owned.
          They did very well for her.
          My first set was RevereWare. It did fine for me for years.
          But now with all the newer developements in cookware it's hard to say if they'd hold up.
          I bought my daughter a set, a really large set of stainless steel for Christmas a few years ago as all she had were teflon that had scratches after years of use. The stainless not being teflon/nonstick threw her for many loops. Just a consideration.

          What kind of a cook is she? Is she in the kitchen all the time, is it a passion of hers to cook/bake or is it something that she'll*** have*** to do "get in the kitchen"?

          1. I have Farberware Advantage pans that I got 25 or more years ago. They're still beautiful and work great.

            At the time it was, to the best of my knowledge, the first or a very early foray into laminated metal technology. These are stainless/aluminum/stainless with the aluminum core going up the sides and thinning out to a rolled stainless lip. They had rosewood knobs and handles. They marketed them for 4 or 5 years and then dropped the line since it was far more expensive than all the competition's lower tech, single metal alternatives.

            I mention pots you can no longer get because I'd investigate if they've recreated a laminated line it may be less expensive than something like All Clad. But I can tell you they had a superior technology and set of quality standards that I'd recommend in a hot second.

            The thing would be to see what they offer not at places like Walmart but in boutique stores carrying higher end lines.

            1. When I was growing up, our "good" pans were the classic Farberware ones; the ones that were single-layer stainless with thick, exposed raw aluminum cast-bonded to the bottoms. They were indestructible. The new Farberware "Classic" line has similar design cues (handle, knob & lid styling), but uses a (glue?) bonded layered metal sandwich on the bottom. Obviously, raw aluminum bottoms wouldn't pass muster in today's market.

              As much as I have a soft spot for Farberware from growing up with it, I wouldn't recommend it over one of the readily-available Chinese-made tri-ply cookware lines. The tri-ply is a better construction method (IMO), & the cooking heat will more evenly distribute over the surface of the pans, rather than being concentrated only on the disk bottoms.

              Calphalon would be my first recommendation for a bridal registry. Not as expensive as US-made All-Clad, but maybe a better name than Tramontina. ("Better" maybe in the sense of quality control and/or customer service, should any issues arise years from now; but I don't really know if Calphalon is better than Tramontina in either of these regards.) That would enable them to get some nice pieces as gifts, & then easily fill in any missing pieces they wanted via Bed Bath & Beyond's 20% discount coupons. Or they could drop in to Walmart any time & fill in with Tramontina pieces.

              1 Reply
              1. re: Eiron

                We've been using the same Farberware for almost 40 years, and I think having the aluminum disc only on the bottom has a certain advantage in keeping food that gets up the sides from burning on. Anyway, a properly heated pot or pan on the stove will only be getting heat from the bottom anyway.