Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Home Cooking >
Dec 9, 2010 06:08 AM

Pot Roast

I made pot roast last night.
4.75 lb roast, cooked at 325 for about 3.5 hours. It came out sorta tough or rubbery.
I cooked it in a roasting pan, with about 1.5" of beef stock and one beer of liquid, lightly covered with foil.

The vegetables tasted good as did the broth (I pulled some liquid aside and mixed in flour and incorporated back and brought to boil)
It was a thick roast and I almost cut it in half before I seared it and put it in the roasting pan.
Did I just under cook it as in not enough time braising? The internal temp was about 170.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. I think your problem may have been the lightly covered foil. I use a dutch oven with a heavy lid when making pot roast. This keeps all the juices in and keeps the roast from drying out. It may have needed extra time as well. Pot roast needs to cook until the connective tissue breaks down and the meat relaxes.

    1 Reply
    1. re: rhoneranger

      I used the Emeril recipe and it calls for covering with foil.
      I'm thinking it was under cooked then??? Some of the connective tissue was still connected.

    2. What cut did you use?
      If it was round-bottom round, eye round's not a braising meat and it will be dry when cooked for that long. Best to serve these med/rare to med at most.

      3 Replies
        1. re: McKinney777

          Hmm...chuck should have worked here...maybe you needed more liquid. I put in enough liquid to cover the meat etc by 2/3, and a tight lid would really help too.
          I think your heat and time was ok....perhaps go lower and slower next time as I would have expected the connective tissue to have rendered.

          1. re: monavano

            It definitely needs to be tightly covered with a lid. My favorite is to use something with the bone in, however. Gives it much more flavor. and as monavano said, low and slow will give you the best flavor. It should be fork tender. I do mine in an old electric skillet (and add in onions, carrots and potatoes all in one pot) then make gravy out of the juices.

      1. A general rule of thumb for pot roast is 1 hour per pound. 170F seems low for a pot roast, but I usually shoot for fork tender.

        Chuck is my go to cut for pot roast.
        For amount of liquid, I generally add enough to cover half to 3/4ths of the meat. Your 1.5" of liquid probably covered about 50% of the roast so that should have been good.

        My conclusion/comment is the roast needed a bit more time in the oven.

        1 Reply
        1. re: dave_c

          Ok, I'm hearin more time and I had the same problem with some pork, I just need to let them both cook longer.
          I think the liquid was ok too.
          The reason I put the foil on is because Emeril's show had him lightly covering it with foil.
          Keeping in mind this was suppose to be a cola braised pot roast. I switched out the cola for a IPA beer.
          I did add an extra pint of beef broth because it didn't look like it came up the meet far enough and I was using a big roasting pan.
          The left overs are in the oven right now cooking for another much worse could it be.

          Thanks all, love this forum.

        2. Two things - more liquid and if using foil you need to tightly cover it so no steam escapes. That's how my mom made it. She made that foil darn near airtight and never looked at the pot roast again until it was just about ready to serve. Fond memories.

          1 Reply
          1. re: TrishUntrapped

            "Not looking at it " was a revelation for me.

            Boneless Chuck Roast was recently just .99 cents in the markets here in LA. I bought two, freezing one. I made the first which was good but I did coddle it and put in potatoes as well as root veggies.

            I then used Pioneer Woman's Pot Roast recipe that calls for NO potatoes, and no peeking. It was vastly superior.

          2. I would expect to cook a thick roast of that weight for at least 4 hours, and it must be covered very tightly.

            2 Replies
            1. re: magiesmom

              I'm looking forward to the next one.
              One question; do you think it's ok to cut the roast in half, top to bottom and make two smaller (thinner) roasts? Or, just stick with all the above suggestions and more liquid, longer time and tighter lid/foil?
              I do like the potatoes, but my experience is that you can never freeze the dish if you use potatoes.
              I would seriously consider frozen peas right at the end next time.
              I'll let you all know how the left over tastes. It's cooking in the over right now, and the house smells great.

              Edit: I just tasted the meat again after about 2 hours in the oven in a small stock pot.
              Delicious. It was undercooked for sure. Can't wait to make this again.

              1. re: McKinney777

                You could cut it in half, but why rush? A nice thick pot roast is a treat. I often use chuck and if I season it before browning with salt pepper and crumbled bay leaf and garlic, it is very tasty IMO.