A Curmudgeon Curmudges About The Cooking Channel
Does "Stay Hungry" bug anyone else? To me, "Stay Hungry" is synonymous with "Don't Eat!" Couldn't they have done better than that? What WERE they thinking! I could handle something like, "The Cooking Channel, Eat Well." Or maybe, "The Cooking Channel, Good Food." Or just plain, "The Cooking Channel," followed by silence. But "Stay Hungry?" It's like being thirteen again and my mother nagging me to go on a diet. <sheesh>
EDIT My apologies to those of you who live outside of The Cooking Channel's viewing area. They have a "signature" screen that says "THE COOKING CHANNEL," a pause, then "STAY HUNGRY" in smaller letters under it and a voice over that does the whole thing. Makes me want to throw rocks at my screen!
-
I knew I hated paying money for cable for awhile before Cooking Channel started. I figured I'd wait to see what it was like before I quit, though, hoping it would be cooking shows like Ina and Tyler and Giada and Alton, and the contests could just stay on FN, which I could then delete from my remote.
That's not what happened, so I dropped down to basic-basic cable ($8.95/mo). I don't miss the rest at all. I don't even remember the "Stay Hungry" phrase. I can say for sure that life is better without the possibility of landing on the likes of Sean Hannity.
My point is that no one _has_ to have cable, especially now that so many shows are available online. How online TV will shake out in light of Comcast now owning NBC, I don't know, but for now, I'm happy.
›5 Replies-
-
-
-
re: Jay F
gotta admit while the hosts can be annoyingI still like "Worst Cooks in America" on FN. the rest can go jump down the insinkerator. (and if I were the producer it would weed out the contestants starting with the OK and leave the show with the truly wretched (Iknow that would just be mean and painful)
I'll go hide now.
-
-
-
re: Jay F
I, too, hated paying money for TV - 3 HD amounted to over $90 a month and I was only watching a 2-3 channels, FN, CC, and Travel just for Bourdain. When CC came on I was happy, but not to the tune of $$ and before long, it was more and more repeats. When my contract was up, I dropped everything.
I couldn't stand the "Stay Hungry" phrase because it was so nasal and reminded me of being stuffed up from something one eats, so 'don't each so much.'
-
-
It reminds me of the 'can you hear me now?' tag line from one of the phone companies. Does that mean if I can hear you now, then I couldn't hear you earlier? If your phone's so good, why couldn't I hear you?
Some ad geniuses don't understand that you want to sell what the product DOES.As far as 'stay hungry', that's exactly what Cooking Channel should not want its audience to do. How about 'Stay Satisfied' ? Isn't that what they are really trying to sell?
-
-
-
re: Caroline1
Okay. I watched about fifteen minutes of her show today. She was extolling the use of canned tomato soup instead of tomato sauce or paste in a recipe because it tastes so good. NOT my style of cooking! I'll bet she's the Queen off Hamburger Helper. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I'm strictly from scratch. And tomato sauce or paste is "scratch," tomato soup isn't! '-)
-
-
-
I'll play devils advocate with you; I like it. It's direct and clever, referring to the dual meaning of the word "hungry" as it applies to a quest for knowledge, not just the food you put in your stomach. It's like saying, "Don't get complacent", or "keep learning". Now the extent to which the Channel actually succeeds at providing a way to do that is another issue, but I think it's good marketing.
-
-
While I see your point C1, I also feel that being sensitive, politically correct about the plight of the hungry isn't the audience/goal/focus of this tag line or its stamp of the CC. Should it be depends on the perspective one has on life. In the context of CC, stay hungry reminds me of my own belief to teach, learn, explore food in every way that I can. I'm not offended in that context and I'm not holding this tag line against this new channel.
›1 Reply-
re: HillJ
I didn't t hink they were addressing the plight of the hungry either. But I do feel invitiing people to a banquet and then telling them to "Stay Hungry" is like being put on a diet. If you are going to offer m e plenty, whether it be actual food, new and interesting recipes, or information about an esoteric subject I'm deeply interested in, for pity's sake, DON'T steer me toward a luxury buffet and tell me to stay hungry! That's NOT what i'm there for.
-
-
See, my take is much darker than yours. In this day and age where according to World Hunger there are "925 million hungry people in 2010 ," this is just a slap of a tag line. Food Network can join Share Our Strength and boost for hunger charities, but this callous tag line lets me know that they are clueless when it comes to perception vs reality. My hopes for Cooking Channel were very low based on the tag, alone.
›4 Replies-
-
-
re: Caroline1
Maybe they outsourced the task to India
http://www.stayhungrybook.com/
or Apple
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6... (last sentence)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: coney with everything
Obviously Create has no budget for any other promos, so we're stuck with the perky one and those terminally annoying "real folks" chopping the garlic and threading the bobbins. The endless march of these segments also drives home how overused the word "passion" is. I guess "passion" is the new "interest". I reserve passion for my loved ones, and engage great enthusiasm and interest for what I eat and cook.
-
-
-
-
I always thought it was more of a connotation than a dictation, referring to "stay hungry so you'll eat more" and "stay hungry MENTALLY so you'll always want to learn more and try more".
But then again, that's how advertising usually works, through lots of implication and sublimation.
›2 Replies -
-















