HOME > Chowhound > Los Angeles Area >

Discussion

What is the most vibrant, exciting high-end restaurant in LA right now?

What would you say is the most interesting high end restaurant in the LA area right now? What's exciting?

Providence? Bazaar? Rivera? Something new and different?

I haven't been to the latest Bastide incarnation, would it fit in this category?

-----
Bastide Restaurant
8475 Melrose Place, West Hollywood, CA 90069

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Probably my vote would go to Bazaar, but the Mozza's are still tough reservations. But if I was going to spend my hard earned money it would still be Animal. Even though Bazaar has the cache Animal has the most vibrant tastes I have had in the last year.

    1. Since you seem to be looking for something a little trendy, here ya go: http://la.eater.com/archives/2010/10/...

      1. I would add Bistro LQ and Ludobites 6.0 to your list. I haven't been to Bastide since it first reopened in its current incarnation, but I did not find the food interesting or memorable.

        -----
        Bastide Restaurant
        8475 Melrose Place, West Hollywood, CA 90069

        Bistro LQ
        8009 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048

        6 Replies
        1. re: mollyomormon

          Totally forgot about Bistro LQ and haven't been there yet; great suggestion. Thanks.

          Would people put First & Hope in the category?

          -----
          Bistro LQ
          8009 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048

          1. re: sku

            Bistro LQ isn't quite at that level - Providence is still the one to beat, especially with Sona gone and the restaurant at the Langham on hiatus. But First and Hope, even before it lost its chef, isn't even close to measuring up.

            I find Bazaar loathsome, but that's a different story.

            -----
            Sona
            401 N. La Cienega Blvd., West Hollywood, CA 90048

            Bistro LQ
            8009 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048

            1. re: condiment

              I agree that Bistro LQ isn't at the level of Providence (at least yet), so I don't think it could be considered THE most interesting restaurant in LA, but I think it belongs on a short list of places where the chef is serving exciting food.

              -----
              Bistro LQ
              8009 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048

              1. re: condiment

                The original request was for most exciting high end restaurant in LA. I think that would have to go to Bistro LQ (mid-high end). Providence may be the best high end restaurant in town, but I don't know if its exactly vibrant or exciting. It's not boring, and its very delicious, but it's not the most cutting edge restaurant out there.

                Hatfield's isn't exciting but is solidly delicious and a very safe pick for an excellent mid-high end dining experience serving progressive american cuisine.

                -----
                Bistro LQ
                8009 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048

                  1. re: Porthos

                    Not sure if Providence is even the best high end place, but vibrant and exciting are words never to be used in describing the place.
                    I can live with high end though.
                    And yes it is boring,, meaning somber when thinking of the atmosphere, the decor, etc.

            2. I would say WP24, downtown, which we haven't been to yet, but I can't wait to go.

              Not high end, but very innovative, would be Lazy Ox Canteen.

              -----
              Lazy Ox Canteen
              241 S San Pedro St, Los Angeles, CA 90012

              WP24
              900 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90015

              3 Replies
                1. re: Phurstluv

                  When I went to WP24 I liked it okay, but almost every single dish had me thinking that I could find a version of what it was based on that was far better tasting and much much cheaper in the San Gabriel Valley. There was nothing that stood out as being an improvement on, or even all that interesting of a play on the original dishes that were the inspiration. The "fusion" dishes just weren't different enough from what they were fused from to be all that interesting. The more traditional dishes were certainly no better, in most cases worse, than what I can find elsewhere.

                  The view was great, though. And the cocktails were very nice.

                  -----
                  WP24
                  900 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90015

                  1. re: estone888

                    Yes, the view. Can't get that in SGV. And I don't go there at all, since my DH is just not a huge Asian food fan.

                    But he will take me to WP24 ;)).

                    -----
                    WP24
                    900 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90015

                2. Interesting the responses so far, especially given your headline using the words "vibrant" and "exciting".
                  Most of the places mentioned are high enough price-wise, yet I am not sure any would qualify with both the words exciting and vibrant.
                  First & Hope - huh?!
                  Bazaar, maybe
                  LudoBites whenever and whereever, maybe, sort of
                  Hardly Bastide, Providence, Rivera, The Mozzas, Bistro LQ. WP24 or Lazy Ox.
                  Good restaurants, but exciting or vibrant - not really.
                  I consider Hatfield's a better restaurant than some mentioned above, yet would not use the words exciting or vibrant to describe it.

                  4 Replies
                  1. re: carter

                    Anything you can think of in SoCA matching both qualifiers?
                    ( Me, none; with the possible exception of Craft, back upon a time when Matthew Accarrino was at the stoves )

                    1. re: RicRios

                      No, that is the problem with the current dining scene.
                      No new moves as the economy has so many future chef-focused places on hold, meaning not even making deals to secure the sites, as there will be many more opportunities next year, so why buy a dead business now when it might be in the hands of the landlord come early 2011. May be a way of saving $500,000 of developmental costs.
                      Why is Ludo keeping his name in front of the public without having a place, ditto Walter Manzke. Think about how many chefs are no longer with the place where they achieved their fame. Do Water Grill and Bin 8945 and Sona and Anisette come to mind, and I am sure many more could be added to the list.
                      How many more?
                      I think Ludo is creating the most interesting buzz these days, yet on a pop-up, bite-sized basis!!!

                      1. re: carter

                        Well, after last night's overwhelming response to LudoBites 6.0, I feel my last line above may be true. Caused the entire OpenTable system to die.

                      2. re: RicRios

                        I've now been to Craft three times in the past four months; and while I would agree that it's not as exciting as when Accarrino was at the helm, I have to say that chef Zappola has really hit his stride and it's a LOT better than it was in the first couple of months after the change in regime It got a well-deserved 3.5 star review in the Times a couple of weeks ago. I often disagree with S. Irene, but in this case I think she was spot-on. I think you'd be pleasantly surprised if you return.