Log In / Sign Up
HOME > Chowhound > General Topics >
Passadumkeg Oct 6, 2010 09:41 PM

Are Processed Meats too Dangerous to Eat?

A review of research, published by an alternative food source, Total Health Breakthroughs:

http://www.totalhealthbreakthroughs.c...

What do you think?

  1. b
    bellybones Oct 7, 2010 02:42 PM

    Positive side is that it's better to support farmers who offer organic products.
    Other side is I used to work on a giant chicken farm. Their feed was ground up animal parts ( pig, cow, turkey ) . The parts that the farmer could not sell to humans was ground up and sold as feed for animals. Spine, brain etc. The chickens ate this.
    What I experienced has been well documented re: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Know anyone who has died from this ?? It come from made cows. This farmer also ground up his spine and beaks and sold it.
    . My point here is why support these guys - those poor animals were so sick and sad. I never again ate non-organic meat again. I buy organic cause it tastes better, it is correct politically and it is my vote against the processes used. No one hot dog will not kill you, I mean just as a rule for my own home.

    11 Replies
    1. re: bellybones
      Sal Vanilla Oct 7, 2010 02:47 PM

      Is that still the practice (of grinding spine and brain into feed)? I had read that is no longer done. Maybe I misunderstood.

      1. re: Sal Vanilla
        chowser Oct 8, 2010 05:20 AM

        They don't use downer cows as feed any more but there's nothing wrong per se with spine and brain of healthy animals. Why not use those parts if they're selling the T bone, rib eye, etc. for human consumption? Given how few cases there have been of varCJ disease, with how many people actually eat beef, it's not something I worry about at all. Organic means nothing as this goes. Putting it perspective, look at the number of deaths caused by varCJD (the only CJ passed through eating downer cows):

        http://www.cjd.ed.ac.uk/figures.htm

        We're probably more likely to die with a slip in the shower.

      2. re: bellybones
        Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 02:48 PM

        Good points. You just named the reasons why I hunt.

        1. re: Passadumkeg
          n
          nvcook Oct 8, 2010 05:49 PM

          We hunt quite a bit also. I do remember a few years back when I believe Montana and Wyoming asked the hunter to bring in the heads of their kill because CJ (wasting disease) had been discovered in the elk herds. Don't hear much about it lately - a very good thing. And in case I've given the wrong impression, I'll eat what hubby shoots anyday over most grocery store meat.

          1. re: nvcook
            Passadumkeg Oct 9, 2010 06:39 AM

            Tons of elk here in NM, lots of good fishing and bird hunting. My bro loves your area. Will be in Henderson at Xmas. Two new grand nephews.
            I go to Albuquerque for my sausages.

        2. re: bellybones
          alanbarnes Oct 7, 2010 02:51 PM

          Most organic chickens are raised on the same sort of factory farms as commercially produced chickens. The only difference is that they're fed organic feed. Oh, and they have "access to the outdoors," although that requirement can be met by opening a door leading to a small concrete slab for a few hours of the chickens' short lives.

          If you really want chicken that tastes better and is "correct politically," buy it from a small operation where the birds are pastured. Otherwise, you're just paying extra for hype.

          1. re: alanbarnes
            Veggo Oct 7, 2010 03:57 PM

            PC chicken? No red or blue or tea party chicken? Gimme a slice of white meat. No, no, no, don't do that either. Please pass me a thigh. No, can't do that either.
            Alan, you are the wind beneath my chicken wings.

            1. re: Veggo
              j
              jumpingmonk Oct 8, 2010 05:14 AM

              Another thing to consider is that according to waht I read NOT all cured meats still retain significant quantitites of sodium nitrite at the time of consumption (bear in mind though I read this in a side panel in a Zingerman's catelouge so the information may be biased) It goes like this. The old tradtional way of curing the meat was to add Sodium nitrate (2 Oxygens) which isn't carcinogenic. As the meat cured the nitrate would lose one O to become sodium nitrite which did most of the curing (and which is carcinogenic) as the meat aged further the nitrite would lost the other O and become sodium nitride (which also isn't carcinogenic). The problem is as follows, since it it the nitrite that does the workhorse amount of curing, a lot of industrial meat processing systems add the nitrite directly in massive quantites, which speeds up curing time (and therfore speeds up the time between when the meat is made and when it can be sold) the problem is that the increased amount of nitrite has no time to break down so a lot of it enters the consumers unchanged.
              Oh and if one's body can naturally turn nitrate into nitrite you may want to avoid eating any celery as well, it is LOADED with sodium nitrate (as are many other fruits and vegetables). If you ever have seen "nitrate free bacon" that is how they do it, they add celery juice to accomplish the job. Under the law it is only artificial sodium nitrate that needs to be cited (though a lot of the Nitrate free products do mention the celery juice), in much the same way that a resturant is allowed to say that thier food is MSG free, even though most meats and vegetables contain measurable quantites of MSG in and of themselves.

            2. re: alanbarnes
              chowser Oct 8, 2010 05:24 AM

              Exactly, know your farmer. I've also read that large organic farmers have to restrict chickens more so they can control what they eat. Many small sustainably run farms can't afford or can't be bothered to get certified organic but their practices are far better than factory organics.

              1. re: chowser
                alanbarnes Oct 8, 2010 06:34 AM

                Very good point. When farmers let their chickens have space to roam around and eat grass and bugs like chickens are supposed to do, those chickens can't be certified unless every place they might graze qualifies as "organic." That's far too much of a burden for most farmers, so they just keep the birds in the chicken house (and that adjacent concrete slab) to preserve the certification.

                1. re: chowser
                  g
                  GibsonGirl55 Oct 9, 2010 06:13 AM

                  I wouldn't have a problem purchasing chicken raised this way.

                  Just because a given farm isn't certified organic doesn't mean that nothing good comes from it. I saw Food Inc., which profiled Joel Salatin and Polyface farm. His farm is considered "beyond organic" and the pigs, cows and chickens there are raised as they should be raised. http://www.polyfacefarms.com/default....

                  Btw, I eat processed meats, but it has to be from Whole Foods or homemade.

            3. alanbarnes Oct 7, 2010 09:22 AM

              That article affirmatively misrepresents the primary study it relies on. The WCRF expert panel never said that "Processed meats are too dangerous for human consumption" or that "[c]onsumers should stop buying and eating all processed meat products for the rest of their lives." Rather, it said that people who want to minimize their risk of cancer should limit red meat consumption to less than 500g a week, and that "very little if any" of it should be processed.

              It also recommended that you keep your BMI under 23, exercise for at least half an hour daily, never have more than two alcoholic drinks a day, and avoid sugary drinks, fast food, and dietary supplements.

              As for me, well, I don't take dietary supplements. That's a good start, right?

              4 Replies
              1. re: alanbarnes
                Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 09:34 AM

                I take vitamins, and eat fruit and yogurt for breakfast every weekday morning. But then.....
                I'm in the land of red and green chile (good for the prostate). What can a man do?

                1. re: Passadumkeg
                  jfood Oct 7, 2010 09:52 AM

                  Every five years you know exactly what a man can do. A little scope and check to make sure everyhting is OK, grab a cheesesteak on the way home.

                  1. re: jfood
                    Perilagu Khan Oct 7, 2010 10:57 AM

                    Bearing in mind that the scope and the cheesesteak are hardly interchangeable.

                2. re: alanbarnes
                  c oliver Oct 7, 2010 01:35 PM

                  Who was it who said "you won't live longer, it will just seem longer." I don't drink sugary drinks ortake dietary supplements. Ha!

                3. jfood Oct 7, 2010 08:37 AM

                  seems somewhat inflamatory with very little cross references to make an educated conclusion. Almost like ready, shoot, aim.

                  1. p
                    pikawicca Oct 7, 2010 05:50 AM

                    Hogwash!

                    1. chowser Oct 7, 2010 05:23 AM

                      Having taught stats, I always emphasized that correlation is not causation because you'd be surprised the number of people who get that confused. My example: wearing bikinis increases with eating popsicles. Stats in the hands of the uninformed can be scary. That said, even if what they said were true, it's all about moderation. What is that saying about giving up drinking, swearing, things that aren't good for you--you might not live forever, but it'll feel like you have.

                      12 Replies
                      1. re: chowser
                        jfood Oct 7, 2010 05:26 AM

                        C

                        Jfoods favorite was:

                        Dead bodies turn to maggots...That always got jfood's attention of correlation vs causality in stats.

                        1. re: jfood
                          chowser Oct 7, 2010 05:32 AM

                          Hmmm, wonder what would get college students attention more, talking about bikinis or talking about maggots. Pretty even.:-)

                          1. re: chowser
                            jfood Oct 7, 2010 03:33 PM

                            undergrad at georgetown...bikinis
                            b-school in chicago...maggots

                            know your customer

                        2. re: chowser
                          Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 05:39 AM

                          My fave, thanks to Disraeli: There are lies. There are damnable lies. And there are statistics.

                          1. re: Passadumkeg
                            chowser Oct 7, 2010 05:46 AM

                            I also like the bikini comparison:

                            Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein

                            1. re: chowser
                              tommy Oct 7, 2010 06:18 AM

                              :like:

                              1. re: chowser
                                bagelman01 Oct 7, 2010 08:21 AM

                                and of course:

                                Figures never lie, but liars often figure.........................

                                How much is one plus one? How much do you want it to be?

                            2. re: chowser
                              Rmis32 Oct 7, 2010 10:42 AM

                              I always say "Everything in moderation, INCLUDING MODERATION."

                              1. re: Rmis32
                                Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 11:57 AM

                                That was a Dean Martin joke. He said to the effect, "I only drink moderately." I keep a case of Moderately in the trunk of my car.

                              2. re: chowser
                                t
                                Terrieltr Oct 7, 2010 11:12 AM

                                Wearing your seatbelt causes cancer.

                                1. re: Terrieltr
                                  ipsedixit Oct 7, 2010 11:19 AM

                                  No. Cancer causes you to wear seat belts.

                                  1. re: Terrieltr
                                    chowser Oct 7, 2010 01:51 PM

                                    Life causes cancer. The longer a person lives, the higher his/her risk of cancer. Die young, reduce the risk. Pass the bacon.

                                2. ipsedixit Oct 6, 2010 09:57 PM

                                  Do the words "association does not mean causation" ever filter into mainstream consciousness?

                                  That article is nothing but an agenda-driven editorial piece.

                                  Let's repeat some facts:

                                  1. Nitrite is a salt used to preserve meat, fish, and poultry. It is also a chemical substance in the human body, formed through normal physiological processes and the digestion of foods containing nitrite or nitrate.

                                  2. Nitrite has never been shown to cause cancer in humans or animals.

                                  3. When nitrite is acidified in the stomach, it stimulates antimicrobial activity. Just as nitrite protects food and is essential for processed foods, it may also protect the human stomach against other food borne pathogens.

                                  Relax, and go and enjoy that hot dog.

                                  No matter what you eat, or how much of it, you're going to die eventually. No one lives forever.

                                  13 Replies
                                  1. re: ipsedixit
                                    MGZ Oct 7, 2010 04:58 AM

                                    “Post hoc ergo propter hoc” may not roll of the average tongue, but it seems a big part of the problem comes from those who report on reports. In this instance the phrase “increase the risk” is used twice thereby implying causation. Without the ability to readily reference the underlying studies, one doesn’t know what the research showed – thus the author’s implication of causation will generally prevail. Perhaps the problem is compounded by poor critical reading skills and short attention spans.

                                    Since I too accept my mortality, I choose revel in an occasional Pork Roll, Egg, and Cheese on a Hard Roll (a little ‘chup please). On the other hand, there is a certain inherent common sense that leads me to avoid overindulgence in anything processed based simply on the notion that the less man has touched something the safer it is likely to be . . . there's no need to rush things, right?

                                    1. re: MGZ
                                      Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 05:16 AM

                                      Gimme some kolbasa!

                                    2. re: ipsedixit
                                      Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 05:03 AM

                                      Whew, I just finished making my ham and salami sandwich and Lottaburger (with green chile, please) is just a block away!
                                      Fourunder, go eat me an Italian hot dog a Taylor Pork Roll sandwich w/ a fried egg, will ya?

                                      1. re: Passadumkeg
                                        f
                                        fourunder Oct 7, 2010 05:06 AM

                                        I'll do better than that.....I go eat a double Italian Hot dog and a Double Fried Egg with DoubleTaylor Pork Roll...on a buttered roll...on both sides of course, in your honor.

                                        1. re: fourunder
                                          Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 05:11 AM

                                          Bon Jovi and I went to the same high school. Add a stromboli and a soft shell crab sandwich.

                                          1. re: Passadumkeg
                                            jfood Oct 7, 2010 05:27 AM

                                            sounds like you were a 609 area code, ergo you did NOT grow up in the real NJ.

                                            probab;y doing a hot dog run this weekend to Newark to Best provisions to bring back to CT.

                                            1. re: jfood
                                              Passadumkeg Oct 7, 2010 05:38 AM

                                              Come on J, I used to go to Jahns'. Nope, the old 201. Just because you incorrectly call it Taylor Ham! I would not want to grow up north of Union. New Brunswick is the epicenter of NJ. Go Scarlet Knights!
                                              I've got to go on food runs to Albuquerque now, but less than an hour, better than the Maine to NJ.

                                            2. re: Passadumkeg
                                              f
                                              fourunder Oct 7, 2010 05:32 AM

                                              Everyone knows the best Italian and French breads come from this area......and there's no better vessel to enjoy the following slathered in oil & vinegar....

                                              Genoa
                                              Sopressata
                                              Prosciutto
                                              Coppa
                                              Mortadella
                                              Salame
                                              Bresola

                                              Then again, how can we fortget about othe meats..... can I give up a Pastrami sandwich from Katz's......I don't think so.

                                        2. re: ipsedixit
                                          Sal Vanilla Oct 7, 2010 01:59 PM

                                          Thank you.

                                          1. re: ipsedixit
                                            Rmis32 Oct 9, 2010 08:48 AM

                                            "Association does not mean causation", but it would seem unwise to ignore the possibility. The correlation between smoking & lung cancer was observed long before there was proof. The association between being born & eventual death may not prove causation, but I'm not making any bets on immortality.

                                            1. re: Rmis32
                                              ipsedixit Oct 10, 2010 12:07 PM

                                              No, of course it shouldn't be ignored.

                                              That's not the point.

                                              The problem with the article is that is was stating that an association (or a correlation) does prove causation.

                                              Not only was it making that claim, but it was making that claim in the face of clear evidence that there are no scientific studies that actually show there is a causal link between nitrates and cancer in human beings.

                                              This is very different than your example of smoking and cancer.

                                              Prior to epidemiological studies showing that tobacco can (stress the word "can") cause cancer in human beings, the studies that showed there was a correlation was done when the state of science lacked any evidence of the contrary -- i.e., that there is no causal link between tobacco and cancer in human beings.

                                              Not so with nitrates. While there are studies showing an association or correlation, there are countervailing studies showing no causation between the two. If you have the latter, how in the world can you give any credence to the former?

                                              Demagoguery. Nothing else.

                                              1. re: Rmis32
                                                Indirect Heat Oct 13, 2010 09:06 PM

                                                Well... the degree to which we take correlation v. causation seriously also has to do with plausibility. Take smoking. Smoking plausibly introduces various reactive foreign compounds to one's lungs. Therefore, tobacco smoke can plausibly cause cancer. Nitrites ingested are rather identical to nitrites produced in situ during normal human biology. Therefore it is less plausible that nitrites are dangerous (notice I say less plausible, not impossible). If we spend our lives avoiding all barely plausible risks, we might as well live in a bubble. And indeed, we may expose ourselves to even worse risks by avoiding risks that are highly publicized.

                                              2. re: ipsedixit
                                                Indirect Heat Oct 13, 2010 09:02 PM

                                                Thanks for that.

                                              3. f
                                                fourunder Oct 6, 2010 09:45 PM

                                                If it comes down to eating what is recommended in the article or steamed chicken for the rest of my life to live a few years longer.....or eating different processed meats and enjoying myself in the present.......I' ll opt for the latter.

                                                I'm from Jersey and I'm not giving up Hot Dogs or Taylor Ham

                                                2 Replies
                                                1. re: fourunder
                                                  Passadumkeg Oct 6, 2010 09:46 PM

                                                  Four, you live in Bergen C.? The air and water are toxic enough!
                                                  And don't forget the mercury in fish!

                                                  1. re: Passadumkeg
                                                    f
                                                    fourunder Oct 6, 2010 09:51 PM

                                                    you ain't kiddin' Bro.....and yes, to BC

                                                Share with your friendsX