Is alcohol intergral to a good meal or your dream meal?
I was reading a thread on my local board about a resaurant. The OP gave a less then glowing review of the place. He mentioned that he did not get to enjoy the wine pairings as much as he might have liked due to the fact that he had a long drive home. One chower suggested that if he did not have to drive home and was able to partake of the full experience that he might have enjoyed his meal more. Personally I find this suggestion to be a little crazy. Shouldn't food taste good even if you are unable to pair it with the proper beverages? I often have to drive to get to restaurants etc.... so I often have to limit or completely cut out alcohol. I shudder to think that I am eating sub par meals because of this.
-
-
-
I have mixed feelings on this one. I hate when a strong red overpowers the food. However, wine is one of those components, like chocolate or vanilla, that has complex flavor. By adding complexity, you're going to dramatically alter the meal experience. Unfortunately, wine and other flavor intense alcohols don't do me any favors the next day, so I personally have a two drink maximum. (Although there are wine experts on CH who say that the better, smaller production wines are less headache inducing.) Any dream meal of mine would include champers, for sure.
›1 Reply -
I agree that a wonderful meal can be had without a drink. I'm thinking Lexington #1 with that otherwise dreadful sweet tea or a plate of pancakes with a cup of black coffee. Nevertheless, if you want to hit a higher place with your experience, alcohol should be on the table.
Drinks containing alcohol present additional elements of taste. Those astringent and anticeptic components are beyond the usual sweet, sour, bitter, and salty normally experienced. Consequently, it is hard to deny that alcohol adds another dimension to a meal. Perhaps, the best analogy would be the way that the heat of capsaicin adds a different component to a dish. I acknowledge that tea and coffee will present some of these taste qualities. They do so with less depth, merely providing notes - not chords.
So, if you're talking ultimate meal . . . bring on the booze.
›10 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: Passadumkeg
Ah, life's short (my list of creditors on the other hand . . . ). Glad New Mexico agrees with you. I'm sure you're mised in the Pine Tree State.
The seasons seem to have turned early this year. I think most of the blue claws have dug in. Lobster season was a good one, though - local shedders still only 3 bucks a pound. I'll get an extra one today. I have work to do on perfecting the steamed lobster and Octoberfest marzen pairings.
-
-
re: Perilagu Khan
Picked grapes yesterday, at Guadalupe Vineyards in San Fidel in exchange for some German whites. Can't wait to stomp.
http://guadalupevineyards.com/
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: MGZ
I couldn't agree more.
I've had meals that are very good and great without a drop of hooch. But all of my meals that are special memories included at a minimum a glass of wine. More often there is great wine or great beer with the meal followed up by port wine or brandy afterwards.
-
-
-
-
I'm sometimes amused by those, usually from California, seeking the correct wine for Mexican food and barbecue because beer is too pedestrian. Ask for wine with Q or Mexican in Texas and the merciful may buy you a plane ticket home, others would stone you. In either case, they just want you out of the room.
›21 Replies-
-
-
re: Veggo
I wouldn't skip the ribs, if the ribs, sauce and sake are right, the combination would be better than the sum of its parts. Part of the reason why sake can work better than wine is the lower acidity -- too much acidity can overdo sour components in the sauce (e.g. from vinegar or tomato). The mild sweetness and clean finish of certain sake also handle the smoke and meaty richness well. Not saying that all sake work (they're quite diverse), but hitting on the right match could be a great pleasure. Recommend you try it if you haven't.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Veggo
PK, I noticed the difference. In Maine I get locally produced real butter milk, but all brands are only in quarts. New Mex, it took me a while to figure out why it was only in 1/2 gallons. I knew it wasn't a popular drink. Ah, ha! Biscuits and fried chicken batter!
I grew up drinking a cultured mil product made by my Russian immigrant grandmother; Kulturni Moloka or cultured milk, kdfir?
Try butter milk w/ Mexican food, it dos go well.
Veggo, how'd you know hoe I fix a flat?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don't drink. However, I do think service of alchohol can enhance a meal by helping to creat a more relaxed and festive environment. I also think alchohol help creates a cadence to the meal that help make it more of a experience rather than sit, eat and leave which seems to be the norm in most household dinners (mine included).
-
-
-
-
-
re: beevod
And certainly to a dream meal. Hell, even a good meal.
To reiterate what limster said above, "Sometimes the food and wine pairing is better than the sum of its parts". Blue cheese and Sauternes is an example of such. The flavor they create together cannot be replicated and is pure magic.
I realize some people don't drink (for whatever their reasoning is), but in my mind, they're 100% missing out.
-
re: invinotheresverde
Or, and I'm not trying to say this condescendingly or anything, wine and alcohol can be treated like anything else in life (i.e. subjectively) and it depends on people's personal preferences. It'd all be kind of boring if we all liked exactly the same food, made and presented exactly the same way, etc. I would never say someone was "missing out" if they preferred cheeseburgers over dim sum or anything, especially if they had already tried dim sum and made up their mind about it. If they refuse to even try it, then I might start getting judgmental...
-
-
re: invinotheresverde
I guess from a strictly culinary lifestyle, I can maybe see it. But I would never say that a recovering alcoholic is missing one of life's great pleasures because he hasn't tried a particular dish with a glass of red wine.
And personally, as I mentioned in my first post in this thread, the alcohol taste overrides any other taste in any alcoholic drink I taste (I've tasted and continue to taste many), so when someone does tell me to drink a particular wine with a dish, it ruins the flavor of the dish for me rather than enhances any part of it. Missing out on something that you know you won't enjoy isn't exactly missing out to that person in their lives, just to you projecting your life on that person, kwim?
I would also never go bungee jumping or skydiving because I'm deathly scared of heights. Some people say I am missing out on a great, thrilling life experience. I say that I can derive just as much, if not more pleasure from other things in life.
-
re: yfunk3
I'm pretty sure a recovering alcoholic knows what he's missin out on. ;)
If what you describe is true, you have a different palate. I don't know how, for example, a beer with only, say 7% alcohol creates an overpowering taste of alcohol. Something may be a bit "off" with your sense of taste. That's not a dig, by the way.
You don't really drink. That's cool. Do, or don't do, whatever you'd like. From a pure taste perspective, you can't recreate certain flavors without booze, and that's true. I like that combination way too much to ever think about not partaking in it for a "dream meal". I mean, how does one fully enjoy oysters with out Champagne? Foie without Sauternes? It's like only getting half the experience. You simply won't convince me otherwise.
-
re: invinotheresverde
Wholeheartedly agree. Of course I don't imbibe with every meal - in fact, most meals I don't (breakfasts & lunches). Dinner is the exception... especially when dining out. The intimate relationship between food and wine exists and cannot be denied. And as you mentioned, when you experience that perfect pairing it's magical and it always amazes me.
Why'd you have to say foie gras and sauterne??? Damn you... :)
-
-
-
-
-
re: invinotheresverde
What is not integral to a good meal is driving. Very dangerous, that.
I'm happy to live in a city with a good public transport system and lots of places I can walk to.
I don't need wine if it is just sustenance, but most superb or shared meals do involve a modicum of wine. An exception would be foods from another culture with a different shared-ritual drink, especially tea.
And no, I'm not talking about "getting drunk".
-
-
-
I'd say it depends on the food, but in general, no. I'm not a wine lover. I don't hate it, but it doesn't really add anything to the experience for me, and I'm certainly not willing to pay the prices for wine pairings that a lot of places charge.
Now, if I'm going to a brewpub or something along those lines, of course I have to have a couple beers with my meal. Over the course of a meal there is no reason you can't enjoy a couple drinks and still be perfectly legal to drive when you are finished.
›11 Replies-
-
re: coll
That's why I specified a couple. Just using the rule of thumb that an average drink will raise your BAC between .01% and .015%, and that on average the human body burns alcohol at the rate of one drink per hour, and that most states have DUI set at .08 or so, over the course of an hour long meal an average person could have 6 drinks (using the .015 figure) and still be legal to drive.
Keeping it to half that amount or less gives plenty of margin for error.
-
-
re: TuteTibiImperes
Yeah we used to have .08, but those days are long gone. Zero tolerance means .00. We don't go out to eat anywhere as much anymore, too risky. If you get in an accident (someone else's fault let's say), or get pulled over for anything, you're in big trouble. You see cops using Breathalyzers on the side of the road all the time.
-
re: TuteTibiImperes
Your figures are accurate for a man weighing approx 260 lb. For most people, you'll be over the legal limit long before 6 drinks in an hour.
http://www.bloodalcoholcalculator.org/For me -175 lb male - 4 drinks puts me right at the legal limit. It's also important to note that some people will feel the effect more than others even at a very low BAL. I don't drink very often, don't have much of a tolerance, and as such, there are times when 2 drinks would leave me unsafe to drive. At 4 drinks in an hour, I would be a real danger to myself and others, even if my BAL was a technically-legal 0.076.
-
-
-
re: TuteTibiImperes
In all of Scandinavia, the alcohol blood limit is .01% One drink and wait 3 hours or risk 6 weeks in jail. Breath analyzers in restaurants and bars are common and used. I drove around and picked up many a guest for dinner parties. They took a cab home or spent the night, depending on the relationship!?
Skoal.
-
-
-
Nah. I can't seem to process alcohol very well, so I tend to not drink alcohol, period. I'm also super sensitive to the taste for some reason and hate it. ::ducks tomatoes::
I'm fine with using it to cook, but not too much or the taste overrides everything and ruins it for me.
Saves me lots of money when dining out and for happy hours, though! :o)
-
-
-
re: Perilagu Khan
Agree. I especially like when restaurants do the pairing for you, because you know someone took care with the choices, so that I, a wine "very much liker" but not a wine "knower" can benefit from someone else's experience and/or expertise. But, i agree with others that pre-selected wine pairings are really too expensive to enjoy most of the time. For those times it's good when you have a knowledgeable server. But most of the time, I get a glass of wine or a style of wine that I already know I really like, and it adds to my enjoyment of the meal not necessarily because it is well-paired with every or even any dish i'm having, but because it is another flavor in my meal to enjoy.
I also occasionally like to dabble in wine pairings myself when I have small dinner parties. It's a challenge and it's fun to come up with wines that go well with the dishes I've made, and doing the research online is informative and helps me appreciate wine pairings at restaurants.
-
-
Sometimes, certain wines can interact synergistically with certain dishes, to make both food and wine taste better than the sum of their parts. It's not that the food is bad on its own, but that it could be even better with the correct wine.
However, this may be restricted to the minority of cuisines where wine is important, as most cuisines don't necessarily involve food/wine pairing (although that doesn't mean that one couldn't pair wine with foods from those cuisines). And in certain cases, non-alcoholic beverages might be involved, e.g. tea.




















