first course, appetizer or soup?
I'm serving a 5 course dinner this weekend, and I'm not sure what to serve first. Soup or app?
In terms of place settings, soup bowl will be on top of small plate (for app) and medium plate (for salad). Dinner plate on bottom. Appetizer is hot: smoked trout ravioli with gruyere white sauce. Soup will either be roasted beet or pumpkin (still undecided..)
I can of course pull top plate with bowl, and serve in either order...but which is quote on quote "proper"?
In terms of prep, rav's may be easier to start the night with, since they require more effort plating and I can give more attention to this first. Soup will just be held warm, so this will be an easy transition between courses. Am I overthinking this!!??? help!
I would think the soup would go first. Your appetizer sounds substantial enough to be a first course. If it's more of a tiny amuse-sized thing, you could serve it first, but I guess I think an amuse really only works in a restaurant setting, as a show-offy sort of promo item; for dinner guests in your own home I don't see the point.
If this is a formal dinner and you wanted to serve it Emily Post-like formal, you'd serve your appetizer first, then your soup.
Otherwise I'd go with whichever order you feel suits your menu best.
I'm with souschef on this, I'd likely go with the soup first if its a chilly day. I too have served soup in cups when its cold out. In my case, I've greeted guests w a hot cup of soup once we've taken their coats. The nice thing about a cup is that its easy to manage if you're walking around mingling.
If you ask appetizer or soup first, people will say appetizer.
If you ask veggie soup or fish pasta first, then I would say fish pasta.
I think it ultimately comes down to the size of your pasta: If you are serving a small portion of it, amuse/canape-sized, then it will come first. Otherwise, it goes after your soup.