HOME > Chowhound > Home Cooking >

Discussion

PORK HELP PLEASE!

  • 11
  • Share

I bought a shoulder blade pork roast, and after reading through 49 or so different post, I thought putting it in the slow cooker would be the best. It is a 5 pound roast. It has been cooking for 5 hours on low and when I checked it the thermometer read about 160. My question is, why did it cook so fast in a slow cooker, and why is the middle of the roast still red/pink? This is my second attemp at a pork roast and I am determined to get this right. The last one was very dry and tough after roasting in the oven. Any info and tips would be greatly appreciated!!!
Thanks

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
Posting Guidelines | FAQs | Feedback
Cancel
  1. Fast? Or slow...? Turn it to to high and check it again in two hours...

    Shouldn't be red, either your thermometer is off or the probe is in the wrong place.

    4 Replies
    1. re: jaykayen

      I think the thermo might be off, but I read that it would take 8-10 hours for a roast that big in a slow cooker? I just don't want it to be tough and dry, wich is what happened to the last one.

      1. re: iheartfood1616

        oh, ok, I wasn't sure if you wanted it done in time for today or not.

        If you're shooting for 8-10 hrs, I'd still turn it up to high. Reddish pink pork means that it's probably more like 130 degrees.

        But that is just me, keep going low/slow if that is what you prefer.

        1. re: iheartfood1616

          Agree that it sounds like your thermometer is a bit off

          That said the days of overcooked pork should be over! Pork can easily be served at ~160F with no worries, anything higher and you will experience tough dried out meat. Even a bit lower than 160F is OK

          As long as the meat is cooked through, that is no "pink" you should be fine...if still red/pink then you need more cooking time (actually a little pink is fine as well. The days of trichinosis are gone

          I have slow cooked a roast that size for 6 hours or so at 225 and all was well.

          Enjoy

          1. re: Yellowshirt

            I only cook pork to 145 at most, then let it rest. Otherwise it's too dry at 155, frex. Even heritage pork is, IMO. Trichinosis stopped being a public health concern quite a few years ago.

      2. Thanks everyone for the tips. I tossed that thermometer! I just kept it on low and cooked for a total of 10 hours and it turned out so delicious!
        Thanks again!

        2 Replies
        1. re: iheartfood1616

          If your roast had a bone in it, and the thermometer was hitting that (or a pocket of fat), that would give an anomalous temp reading. If your thermometer goes high enough, you can always check its accuracy in boiling water.

          1. re: ronnielee33

            I never find roasts do very well in the slow cooker. They tend to dry out.

        2. You probably just tossed a perfectly good thermometer. A blade also called butt (Boston butt) has a lot of connective tissue that must be broken down - it needs to be cooked low and slow - especially for bbq or pulled pork or puerco pibil. For that, the inside has to get to 190 or even higher - hence cooking it for 10 hours. If you want a pork roast for slices, do what everyone else is talking about - cook to 140, slightly pink but juicy, but with a loin roast - not a blade. Unless you are actually bbqing (at 240 or below - with smoldering wood embers), the blade needs to be braised (with liquid), not roasted. If you roast a blade at a high temp, it won't matter if the interior temp is 130 or 140 - it will be tough.

          1 Reply
          1. re: applehome

            That makes so much sense now. The roast turned out wonderful because I just kept cooking it slow and low. No one has ever explained it that way to me, I really appreciate it!

          2. Water boils at 212F at sea level, simmers at 190F. (In Denver CO, which is a mile above sea level, water boils at 203F.) So you can check your thermometer by holding it in boiling water, but to be *really* accurate you I suppose you'd need to know your elevation.