HOME > Chowhound > Food Media & News >

Discussion

No reservations-Return to Beirut

  • 5
  • Share

The original program on Beirut was famously changed by the suddenly erupting war in Lebanon during the shooting. As such, we got a harrowing and real look at the uneasiness of a nation at war against the Israelis and amongst themselves. I believe the episode won a lot of awards. I think the effectiveness of the episode was the earnestness and fear portrayed. These people were very scared and you can tell. Tony dropped all pretense of cool and rejoiced in being on board the Navy ship and eating tuna noodle casserole.

I was kind at two minds about the return, will they be overwrought, imbuing the episode with heart wrenching drama or will they ignore the richness of what they had done and return to the snarky modus operandi that they are so famous for.

I thought they showed that they weren't all too sure about how to approach this episode either. They came back to the people who were taking them around the first time, a few years older, a few years more vulnerable. I think the idea of returning to make the same episode was a good one but a limiting one. The food porn scenes were, as always, delectable. The slightly deeper foray into social and political commentary was less so. The trek into the Hezbollah neighborhood didn't really tell us anything we did not know. The most touching social and cultural statement was the mien and comparison of the two young men who were showing them around. Both seemed more somber, both seemed to have much more gravitas, whether that was age or experience, or both, I am not sure. But the juxtaposition of the footage made good points.

In the end, it was a great travelogue, the shots of the Bekah Valley made me want to go visit, the foods, arak, and street scenes were de rigeur. But the ending commentary by Tony made me wonder whether he had accomplished what he set out to do, or whether the situation was so complex and enveloping that he himself didn't know what questions he was asking, let alone answering.

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
Posting Guidelines | FAQs | Feedback
Cancel
  1. I haven't seen the episode yet. I was glad to hear that they went back. The original was quite gripping( and was robbed of an Emmy IMO).

    I'm lookng forward to seeing it.

    1. Somebody is bound to complain about something (although they certainly cant complain that it wasnt in color), but I thought it was brilliant. The food looked delicious, and I thought they did an excellent job of showing just how conflicted the years since the original visit have left everyone involved.

      2 Replies
      1. re: Fydeaux

        The food looked much better than I was expecting.

        1. re: Fydeaux

          Perhaps weirdly, it made me *really* want to go to Lebanon. The food looked fantastic and there was some amazing scenery. Sadly, I don't think I'm brave enough (maybe, before I had a little kid, I would have been).

        2. Nice perspective on the show. Thanks. I agree with you about the two young men who showed them around both times. The expression in their eyes was startlingly changed - the way it changes in someone who is has grieved for a loved one.
          I was glad they got away from the city, to show some of the lovely countryside and the home cooking there.
          And yes, I think you are right on the spot about the ending commentary. It's an unstable situation there, and he can't just say 'they lived happily ever after'.