Iron Chef, Bean Battle
I started to watch a little late, does anyone know who were the two other judges on the show?
-
I was watching tonight as well and was thinking would the results of the Iron Chef competition be any different if the tasting by the judges was done blind? There is definitely bias involved since each plate is presented by each chef personally.
›23 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: DGresh
I''d be surprised if someone served me pureed beans at a fancy tasting, but the theme ingredient was BEANS which aren't exactly a budget busting item. Exotic mushrooms may have thrown off the balance of the dish or overwhelmed the theme ingredient, but at least your reasoning for not using them has substance. Dismissing an ingredient because he has unilaterally declared them declasse makes him come across as a smug tool.
-
-
-
-
re: Chinon00
Yes, it was a moronic comment by the judge, but it is based somewhat in reality. Many ingredients may not appeal to someone looking for a "fine dining" experience, no matter how tasty they actually are. It's quite easy to think of more; consider the foods you eat on a daily or nearly daily basis. Commonplace foods simply don't create an atmosphere of experience.
By the way, this isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened on Iron Chef. I can remember a cod roe battle on the original Japanese version of the show during which the IC complained that he would never serve it at his restaurant and wasn't sure exactly how to make it into an IC-quality dish. Cod roe is a very common ingredient in Japan -- easily compared with portobello mushrooms or pureed beans here ...
-
-
re: Chinon00
Sure. Off the top of my head: Canned tuna fish (and many other things that come in a can). Sliced deli-style turkey breast. Iceberg lettuce. Kraft singles.
And when I asked a co-worker, the first thing he mentioned: ground beef. This seems off-base to me given how often Kobe sliders and the like seem to be appearing on various menus, but it does highlight the fact that people may consider a given ingredient to be less interesting than some other ingredient that they encounter on a less regular basis.
And people expect certain things of a fine-dining experience. How many menus have you encountered that include, e.g., Russian caviar, Scottish smoked salmon, or other delicacies? Most restaurants have to manage expectations in order to make money, and that means offering these kinds of things and avoiding ingredients that customers feel is beneath the amount of money they're paying for the experience.
-
re: davis_sq_pro
The conversation started with portobello mushrooms and beans. So I thought we were discussing whole foods (or near whole foods) and not stuff like Kraft singles or Slim Jims. As far as the two whole foods or near whole foods that you did mentione (iceberg lettuce and ground beef) I'll concede that iceberg would be uncommon. However what level of dining would you consider steak tartare to be?
Thanks
-
re: Chinon00
Ok I've got one. Tilapia. It's perenially popular on the "meal plan" at my father's retirement village, and we all know why. It's cheap. And many people like the mild flavor, especially when dressed up in a sauce or coating. And I'd be pretty surprised to see it on a fine dining menu.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
No, but the third bald judge was a tool. His criticism of one of the dishes using portabello mushrooms is that they (the portabello's) are "so 1990". Apparently I didn't get the memo that we should stop using them.
›5 Replies






