HOME > Chowhound > Washington DC & Baltimore >
What have you made lately?
TELL US

Palena vs. Central

l
LeChoiSauce Jun 2, 2010 01:23 PM

It was a hard decision, but in the end I made my reservation for Palena instead of Central. Do you think I made the right choice!?

-----
Palena
3529 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008

  1. Pool Boy Jun 4, 2010 06:18 AM

    Both are great restaurants. I've loved most everything I have had at Central (their lobster burger is to die for). But Palena is superior, to me. Chef Ruta is one gifted dude.

    -----
    Palena
    3529 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008

    1. e
      Elyssa Jun 3, 2010 02:44 PM

      They are both very different restaurants with incredibly different food and vibes. That said---I think you can't go wrong with either, so clearly you made the right choice :)

      1. d
        dcandohio Jun 2, 2010 02:47 PM

        Palena is a much more relaxing experience. I also think the food is fresher and more seasonal. I like Central, but it's often really frenetic there. Also, the food can be heavy.

        -----
        Palena
        3529 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008

        1. d
          dinwiddie Jun 2, 2010 01:53 PM

          Two very different experiences (I assume you mean the back room at Palena since the Cafe doesn't take reservations.) Personally, if you are looking for a more formal meal, good service, and great food, you made the right choice. I've never had a disappointing (or even a minor glitch) meal at Palena.

          -----
          Palena
          3529 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008

          Show Hidden Posts