Singapore - IGGY's or JAAN PAR ANDRE
Which one would you go for? I am looking for best bang for the buck -- prix fixe lunch, which I believer is similarly priced between the two. Food wise? Atmosphere?
Thanks!
-
I would say go for Iggy's. Their lunch menu is hard to beat in terms of value for money and quality. I second FourSeasons in recommending Gunthers. Their cold angel hair pasta with caviar and truffle oil is one of the best things I've ever tasted and crave on a regular basis (but check what lunch menus they have). I went to Jaan for dinner and had a great time, but it's the kind of place that you go to once for a unique dining experience but you may not necessarily crave the food there. Also, with Chef Andre Chiang gone, I'm not sure if the quality of food is the same.
In terms of atmosphere among the 3, Jaan probably is the nicest with views of the water. Decor at Iggy's is comfortable but pretty understated and Gunthers is modern with dim lighting and service is the most "formal" out of the 3.
For pictures of dinner at Jaan (pre-Chef Andre Chiang leaving), go to: http://eatingsumo.blogspot.com/2010/0...
›4 Replies-
-
-
-
re: theskyflyer
I agree wholeheartedly with you on both counts:
- good, but not exactly memorable food. And I strongly suspect that they managed to get into the rather suspect Restaurant magazine UK as a Top 50 restaurant in the world is due to the concerted effort of a few very influential friends of Ignatius (Iggy) Chan in the publishing/food & beverage world.
- the dull setting. It's like eating in a secret basement/dungeon with no windows or views to speak of.I, too, have also read somewhere that they are moving to the Hilton Hotel on Orchard Road, to take over the premises formerly occupied by the hotel-owned Harbour Grill. If that eventuates, the premises will be larger than the current hole in the wall they occupy at the Regent Hotel. But you still won't get a view. Boo!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Between the two for lunch, I would pick Iggy's. But I prefer Fifty Three, or even Gunthur's, to both of them.
›6 Replies




