HOME > Chowhound > Food Media & News >

Discussion

Cook's Illustrated letter from the editor: Henry?

  • 8

I like the magazine a lot but have to wonder what gets into Mr. Kimball with his personal essays. Enough already with the oldtimey stuff! I am old enough to have read the comic strip Henry (subject of this issue's reminiscence) as a child and remember it being unbelievably, mindbendingly, unremittingly dull. Even duller than Little Lulu. Even then it seemed a relic of the far distant past. I know the magazine is his to do with as he wishes but why not put more food content and less maundering on about his idealized past in it?

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. Henry -- was that the bald-headed kid?

    There were some pretty lame classic strips. The artwork was better then -- simpler and clearer.

    1. That crap from him and his farm drives me crazy. I wont read it anymore.

      1 Reply
      1. There was a great profile of Chris Kimball in the Boston Globe Sunday magazine a while back that touched on the fact that everyone hates his essays. His quote was something along the lines of "It's my f---ing magazine and I'll do whatever I want with it." Which...fair enough!

        I actually really like the essays, in large part BECAUSE they're such an odd, quirky thing to put in the magazine, plus he's not a bad writer.

        1. He's an odd duck. Don't see him around the Village as much these days and yes he wears a bow tie. My take is that he's modeling himself on such characters as Henry Beetle Hough, who wrote a folksy (better) column for a few generations for the (Martha's) Vineyard Gazette.

          1. One of the reasons I cancelled my subscription. Dull blather about himself, his precious offspring, and religion.

            And I love a man (NOT HIM) in a bow tie.