Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Los Angeles Area >
May 16, 2005 07:21 PM

how is Jar?

  • n

have any of you been there? if you saw my email a little lower down I'm trying to choose between Table 8 and Jar? (They are both restaurants I've wanted to try for a while.)

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. r
    rabo encendido

    Although not everyone does, I sorta like JAR.

    Service can be occasionally snotty (on my last visit this was not the case, however). The atmosphere is like your dad's study circa 1970---wood panelled walls, low-sitting, swivelling chairs. They only thing missing is the smell of pipe tobacco.

    Steaks are excellent, though very pricey (and served a la carte). Meats in general are their strong suit, and they have a few interesting appetizers (don't miss the fried Ipswich clams). Also, martinis are industrial strength.

    In sum, upscale comfort food, perhaps a tad overpriced. I always seem to enjoy myself here, though.

    Jar Restaurant Inc
    (323) 655-6566
    (323) 655-8613
    8225 Beverly Blvd
    Los Angeles, CA 90048

    3 Replies
    1. re: rabo encendido

      jar is a very good spot. Not a huge fan of the retro-70s look but the food is great.
      Recommend the following:
      Fried Ispwich clams
      Beet Salad
      Pot Roast (house specialty) - amazing!
      chopped sirloin with egg - old school and rich
      butterscotch pudding (or was it caramel?)
      hot apple pie a la mode

      excellend mojitos too.

      1. re: Dan

        thank you. Jar sounds perfect.

        1. re: Dan

          We went to Jar. It was fantastic. I had the chopped steak with eggs and my girlfriend had the halibut. We also had the fried calms and oysters and the butterscotch pudding -- all of which was incredible. Not to mention I got crazy shlockered on their gigantic martinis. Two of them and I was on the floor.

          thanks for the recommendation.

      2. Jar is dependable meats (roasts and braises) with very good veg sides. I am fond of the chopped steak and several salads. I would choose it over Table 8

        1. The food at Jar is quite good, although I agree with the previous posts that the revamped atmosphere leaves something to be desired. The pot roast is fantastic.

          Although there are some chowhounders who really enjoy Table 8, I found it to be lackluster, but in food and service.

          1. Funny so many people have an issue with Jar's decor. Doesn't bother me in the least -- and I recall the chairs being quite comfy. I've had good food and good service at both -- with the exception of a very long wait for a table at Jar once (nearly an hour after our reservation time, even though we arrived on time, though they did comp us for a round or two of drinks). But I'd still give the edge to Jar -- I find Table 8 crowded and noisy to LA standards -- the way the tables are packed in you'd think you were in Manhattan. If you're in the mood for something terribly rich, Jar offers a yummy lobster bearnaise with its steaks.

            1. any recent Jar's visitor care to chip in 2-cents? :-)
              I'm planning a bday dinner there... could use all the help I can get!

              2 Replies
              1. re: kelvlam

                Start here with the website:
                Next, the steaks, braises of almost any variety especially including the pot roast and lamb shank, fries, and butterscotch pudding for dessert if offered(frequently is not), are all very good. Picture of the place on the website. Room is L-shaped.
                Very good food and not ridiculously priced as other places we could both mention.

                1. re: kelvlam

                  I'm a huge fan. Prefer the filet myself, but whatever cut you choose, my don't-miss-it rec is the Lobster BĂ©arnaise sauce. It's life changing. That and the Kabocha Squash side, if they have it.