Want to help move threads? Check in here.
There are lots and lots of active threads that are going to need new homes after we change the breakdown of the Chowhound boards (see: http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/682188 ) and we're asking the community for help.
We tried auto-moving threads when we split the Austin board out and that didn't go well, so we want actual people to make those decisions. The moderators will be working on moving threads, but we know the job will get done faster with more people involved.
If you want to help, and you've been around the site for awhile, please post below and let us know and we'll grant you the access. If you've already got access to edit Restaurant data, you're all set.
Once the changes go live, if you've got access to move threads, you'll see a new panel called "Contributor Panel". If there's an active discussion on one of our archived or changed boards that belongs on one of our new boards, you can go ahead and move it. Your choices will be limited to new boards that were created from the current board, so you won't be able to move things anywhere on the site. If you see things that belong on topical boards like Home Cooking or General Topics, you can still use "report" to flag those for the moderators to move.
-
How about expanding this to put all boards on the menu?
Also, how about adding a feature that would let us correct bad auto-links?
›6 Replies-
-
-
re: Robert Lauriston
I don't know, That is often still a difficult call as those topics get mixed. It is rare that someone asks about a place such as Monterrey which would be California. Often it is someone who is coming to California and ask about food anywhere from SF to Big Sur. They get responses to both.
My own thought is that it happens infrequently enough that reporting them works for me. There is a good enough number that the mods don't move that make it seem I would not be making the correct decision.
-
-
re: Robert Lauriston
Just to add a little insight (along with a disclaimer that I am not on the "Chowhound Team" and do not speak for them)...
I think the original purpose of providing the "Contributor Panel" function was merely to permit us Chowhounds to move topics from the closed "General X Archive" forums to the active forums where they belong, especially whenever topics were "bumped" with a new post. However, in the confusion regarding the revised geographical boundaries of the new forums shortly after they were created, quite a few topics were created in the wrong new forum. Fortunately, the "Contributor Panel" function permitted the movement of any topic from and to any of the forums involved in the revision. So, for example, if someone created a new topic about Seattle in the Pacific Northwest forum, those of us on the Contributor Panel could move it to the Greater Seattle forum where it belongs. When I've noticed such occurrences, I've moved topics to the proper forum, and (thankfully) I haven't been chastised for doing so. I would hope that the Chowhound Team would extend this capability to ALL of the geographical forums, under the assumption that those of us making these moves would only do so based on a good understanding of where topics belong, based on the stated geographical boundaries of the forums.
Or, to put it more concisely... +1!
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'd like to move some threads in the old tristate... is this still the way to make this happen or is there another way?
›7 Replies-
re: DGresh
This is the way to make this happen. Once the Chowhound Team gives you privileges (as a result of your post here), when you bring up topics in the archive forum, at the bottom of the first post you will see a fourth option, "Contributor Panel", in addition to the usual Permalink - Report - Reply. Click on that and you will be able to move the post.
-
-
-
-
Should a thread such as this:
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/121169
be left to die a slow death in Archive Hell?
I was having a merry old time moving things til this one.
Thanks.›8 Replies-
re: bbqboy
Unfortunately, there's really no way for us to split a thread like that. Our split function doesn't allow us to go through the thread picking and choosing posts to move as a group -- we can only select a single sub-thread and split it off. So we'd have to split that into about 30 threads, which wouldn't really help the situation any.
-
-
-
-
re: bbqboy
I've been moving posts from the Midwest General Archive forum when they get updated. However, when a topic covers more than one of the new forums - usually because it's a question about the "best X in the Midwest" and has recommendations in the states in the Great Lakes forum as well as the Great Plains forum - I've left it in the archive forum. The same situation applies for topics in some of the other archive forums (e.g. topics in the New England General Archive forum for the "best X in New England" with recommendations for states in the Northern New England forum as well as the Southern New England forum).
-
-
-
-
-
I just noticed today a thread on the NY state board that belongs on the Outer Boroughs board when I went to go move it "Outer Borough" was not an option, neither was Manhattan. They had the Middle East and Asia and everything else but not the breakdown for NY.
›2 Replies -
Bit late to the party. I can help out on the South Board (mainly for Athens, GA) and Central South although it still irks me that Alabama is not part of the Southeast board. Southeast is mostly Research Triangle now, which maybe has enough traffic to warrant its own board. Whine, whine ...
-
having trouble moving a thread to "Manhattan" from "The Best"; the choice doesn't show up in the dropdown. link in question:
›2 Replies-
-
re: kpzoo
Kpzoo is correct, moving things to Manhattan isn't an option.
We don't mean for people with the ability to move threads to be policing our board boundaries in general, just helping out with the moves necessary as a result of the boards we split out. If something is in the wrong place for some other reason, please just flag it using 'report' for moderator review.
-
-
-
Just a quick note to say "Bless You" to all who put SD or San Diego in the title of their posts over the years on the California board. A blessing (although smaller) to those who put it somewhere in the body of their write up. To those who gave a name of a restaurant with NO location information what so ever, a blessing to Google for it's uncanny ability to run down the location of said place in one try. ;-D>
-
-
WARNING...WARNING...NOT WORKING TODAY
Jfood tried to move some threads this morning in Mid-west...some worked, some did not even after receiving "success" on the bottom right.
›25 Replies-
-
-
re: jfood
You put your left leg in / You put your left leg out / You put your left leg in / And you shake it all about... ;-D>
Next you might try closing your browser and then opening it up again and if that doesn't do it you can fall back on that old tech trick of a hard shut down and reboot...
-
re: Servorg
OK Jfood reporting back:
1 - dosie do'ed
2 - argued with UPS (site lies)
3 - had a bagel with cream cheese and novey, a little more herring and another cup of coffee
4 - turned off computer
5 - nice chat with mrs jfood
6 - turned on computer
7 - started watching Travel channel on Hot Dogs
8 - tried to move the threads on Midwest
9 - received action successful
10 - checked and thread not moved
11 - came to this thread
12 - receive "there is a slight problem"
13 - hit f5
14 - reloaded correctly
15 - went to your post
16 - hit reply
17 - typedgotta get another cup of coffee and go o the pool...75 degrees already
-
-
-
-
-
re: Jacquilynne
Sure. ie: While on page 8 of the MidA posts and I realized one of the posts on page 8 posts that I had already moved was now on page 13. Is it possible that what I am moving is not actually being moved or that I'm moving a thread that another CH helping out is moving back? Should I continue?
-
-
re: Jacquilynne
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/586246
okay, I think this is an example of what I mean. I moved this around page 6 and found it on page 13
-
-
re: Jacquilynne
Hmm. That's odd. As well as Jfood's example. Well, Jacq. if it comes up again in the moment, I'll zap the link over here rather than try to recall.
Action Successful is what I wait for each time. Sometimes the submit button is visually missing but accepts a click in the "area" the submit would appear and Action Successful! prompts in a few seconds. The reason for box is annoying and unnecessary in this excercise so I'm hitting a random key to bypass it. But otherwise I'm not noticing anything else odd. I'll keep on.
-
-
-
-
re: Jacquilynne
http://chowhound.chow.com/topics/185877
okay now I could have sworn I moved this post earlier today...
-
re: Jacquilynne
I am seeing the same thing, which is that threads that I've previously move are still showing up in the old boards after a search. Not only that, but in the header for the thread the old board is also showing up. The latter part is a bit of a surprise if the delay is attributable to a slow spider for the search engine. At one time I thought that perhaps each of these moves goes through a review process, but I would doubt that too as being too time-consuming.
Please let us know that we are not wasting our time in trying to get this work done.
As time goes on it gets more and more difficult to remember which threads I've already moved and which ones I have not yet done when they both turn up in search results under the old board name.
Note: I do wait for the action complete message each time...
I did notice, however, that when I try to move some threads, particularly those that I think I may have already moved but still show up in their old board that when I click upon move thread that in the destination box "San Diego" already shows up, the destination for all of my moves (California -> San Diego).
Obviously the system somehow remembered the preferred board destination, but somehow has not yet acted upon it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Can we please kill the "reason" part of moving threads- at least for now....it takes my computer about 20 seconds to allow me to write anything in it...i've taken to copy-pasting the word "annoying" for each reason.
›3 Replies -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Should we only be moving threads that have been active recently, or is the idea to purge the old Tristate board of everything except for ambiguous NY/CT/NJ topics?
›4 Replies-
re: i_eat_a_lot_of_ice_cream
The priority is moving threads that have been active recently so that those conversations don't get ended in the move.
If you'd prefer to move older threads, whether in large batches or just selectively moving posts you might have bookmarked as particularly valuable, you're absolutely welcome to do so. There's no push, however, to completely reassign all the threads on the boards -- that would be a lot of work, and it's not necessary. The threads on those boards will still be available to people via search.
-
-
-
re: cgfan
No, I didn't mean that you could do more than one at once -- I just meant some people will plug away at moving a whole bunch of threads when they have an hour or so free, while other people will just move threads when they come across something interesting that they feel is worth moving, and both of those are fine.
-
-
-
-
-
All the recent requests should have access granted, but you may need to log out and back in to see the contributor panel.
›7 Replies -
-
-
-
-
-
re: jfood
Hey there...I don't know if it was your bad or not. I just moved three threads over, now I click Contributor Panel and nothing happens...
In any event, I'm psyched to be sharing a united Connecticut board with you and the rest of the FFD county hounds. Let me know if you're able to move anything. I appear to be stuck though I've tried a few times...
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'll assist for the CT area if you need more assistance.
I can't promise to get through hundreds of them, but I'll pitch in when possible.
If you need my help, just let me know how and when to begin.›2 Replies -
-
›11 Replies
Thanks to everyone who has volunteered so far. Anyone else interested in helping can still sign up below.
Once the changes to the board structure go live on the site, everyone who signed up should see a 'contributor panel' option on the original post for each thread. You may need to log out and back in if you aren't seeing new button. I've attached a picture to show where to look for it.
Hit the link to open up the contributor panel, choose to move the thread and which board to move it to. Adding a comment explaining the move is optional.
If you mess up move, and can't move it back because the original board is not available as a destination, please send an email with a link to the thread and the board it came from to moderators@chowhound.com. Using "report" will NOT reach us under these circumstance.
You can only move items to new or changed regional boards, not to topical boards or any of our unchanged boards. If you run across things that need moving, but aren't directly because of the board splits, please continue to flag them for the moderators.
You can only move a whole thread, not individual posts or sub-threads. For the most part, we won't be able to split up old threads to move different parts to each individual board they belong on, as we can't pick and choose posts out of a thread to split and move, we can only move a single post and all the posts that are direct replies to it. If there's a recent thread you really, really think we can and should split, you can flag it for the moderators to review.
-
re: Jacquilynne
I know you have a lot on your plate but it occurred to me since we're embarking on this effort it might perhaps make sense to have some more precise guidelines for southern California. For San Bernadino County the "southwest corner" is currently considered LA Board, and the rest on the CA Board. This is Victorville south and west of Yucca and Morongo Valleys? This appears to work fairly well, so maybe best left alone.
Then there's Riverside County, roughly the western 1/8 that includes (N>S) Riverside, Corona, Perris, and Murrieta. Posts on these were about equally split between the LA and CA boards last time I checked. It appears the dividing line is the 215 Fwy except for Hemet., The southern most burg on the 215 is Temecula, which seems to appear mostly on the CA board as do the desert cities that lie east of the mountains (Banning, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Indio, etc.). However, up in the mountains Idylwild is on the LA Board.
Any thoughts, or is it too much to try and deal with at this point? TIA
Dave
-
-
re: rworange
The comment does not seem to be optional with me too, though I have been filling out the reason for each move.
Actually what would really help is if there was a more wholesale way of moving the posts, such as in batches. It would be nice to do a search, for instance topic titles containing "Encinitas", then amongst the result being able to check off which ones really can be moved to the new "San Diego" board. Any chance that such a tool might be forthcoming?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I can help out on the Tri-State Boards. Will there be anymore instruction on how you want it done? What about those threads that include Westchester and Fairfield together or Westchester/Rockland and Northern NJ, there are several on the boards, what do you do with those??
›2 Replies-
re: GIOny
>> What about those threads that include Westchester and Fairfield together or Westchester/Rockland and Northern NJ, there are several on the boards, what do you do with those??
My suggestion would be to leave them in the General Tristate Archive, and not move them at all.
Note - I am not part of the Chowhound Team and do not speak for them. This is solely my opinion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: bob s
You have been, but you won't be able to tell unless you:
-- log out and back in
-- go look at a the page of a specific restaurant, where you'll see you have 'edit info' and 'mark as duplicate' and 'mark as closed' links where none were before.You'll eventually see a 'contributor panel' on board posts next to where 'report' is now, but not until we release the changes later this week.
-
-
-
-
-
-



































