HOME > Chowhound > San Francisco Bay Area >

Discussion

Incanto 2.0 [San Francisco]

Incanto is reopening after a remodel and menu update. Not sure how extensive the changes will be since they were only closed for one week, but it looks like they gutted all of the tables and decor. The new menu will be a mix of new dishes and old "favorites". I plan on going in the next week or so to check it out. Figured I would start a thread now to get the word out and to see if anyone has more info on what's new. The website isn't updated yet so details are hard to come by.

-----
Incanto Restaurant & Wine Bar
1550 Church St, San Francisco, CA 94131

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
Delete
  1. The website is updated (look for Mark's letter) along with today's menu. Very little is changed in the food department.

    2 Replies
    1. re: Windy

      Great, sounds like more of a refresh than a remodel. Here are the highlights:

      New floor, photos & acoustic panels replace the drapes, refinished tables, two new 8-10 top tables, new banquette.

      Ham in Hay shared entree, small & entree size options for pastas, antipasto now in 3 sizes, "odds & ends" chalkboard menu with limited items, a "featured bottle" list of wines that will delve into a region or theme every 4-6 weeks, artisan beermaking.

      1. re: Shane Greenwood

        a shot of the dining room and several dishes are on @offalchris for anyone who is interested.

    2. Went last night, the space is feels more modern with the art on the walls, the removal of the drapes and added a communal table. The food and service was excellent as usual and no major changes in the menu. Highlight was the lamb neck with a delicious polenta that had a special fragrance - I couldn't identify.

      4 Replies
      1. re: wanderlust21

        Yes, that lamb neck is amazing. I'm not so sure about the giant photos of hogs, or the lack of sound proofing.

        I had the head and shoulders (literally a duck's head and neck--tasty, but don't tell my nutritionist), smoked snails and chanterelles appetizers (similarly delicious but now I need to go run 5 miles), and the Meyer lemon risotto (very mild flavor if perfectly prepared and a generous portion). The chilli and bones pile that went by looked great, or at least very macho.

        The staff seemed to be having fun with a few new offerings and a blackboard to play with.

        1. re: Windy

          do you think it is noisier than it was before the re-do?

          1. re: susancinsf

            No, it was always noisy. It's just clear there's no padding on the walls or the floors.

            1. re: Windy

              http://www.incanto.biz/letters_-_a_le...

              The website indicates the following: "...the new photos hide heavy-duty acoustic panels to further dampen the noise of a busy dining room. We've also hidden a few more panels around the dining room to help take the din out of dinner. If you're curious, ask us and we'll be happy to point them out. They're pretty well hidden."

              We'll be there tomorrow night. I'll try to make note of the noise level, and report back on the food.

      2. Went to the Head to Tail last night.

        Venison pluck was really good, some of the best kidney I've had, nice spice level.

        "Peasant pappa" was focaccia pap, sort of like polenta or cream of wheat, with a sort of creamy blood pudding and poached egg, delicious.

        Oxtail and beef lip terrina was basically a variation on head cheese, served with a nice salad.

        A light fish soup included cod "tongues" from Spain, milt, and I'm not sure what all else. Delicious and very unusual, exciting variety of textures.

        Lamb mincemeat pie was great. I could not taste the hay in the lavender-hay ice cream but it was good too.

        I think the progression of the menu from heavier to lighter was smart, that way people with smaller appetites were able to enjoy dessert.

        They said there were still a few seats available for Wednesday's dinner.

        5 Replies
        1. re: Robert Lauriston

          I was also there.

          Venison pluck I thought was good, but not great. The onion ash was described as sweet, but just tasted bitter.

          Peasant pappa with salt cured pork liver and blood mousse was my favorite dish of the night. The slow cooked egg tied it all together. I heard it took months of trial and error to get the blood mousse perfect for service.

          Oxtail and beef lip terrina was nice, but it needed more salt or acid for me.

          The cod tripe and tongue had nice textures but I didn't finish it.

          The dessert, I liked ice cream mostly, but enjoyed a few bites of everything together.

          Our table thought the progression should have been terrina, fish soup, venison pluck, then peasant pappa.

          1. re: DezzerSF

            The onion ash seemed weird at first but a little dab on the meat gave it a smokiness. One of my companions recognized the dish as a variation on something some other chef does.

            I ate the terrina and salad together, that gave it some acid.

            I'd have served terrina, fish soup, pappa, pluck, which would be a more conventional Italian course order, but I understand their reasoning in going from heavier to lighter instead.

            1. re: Robert Lauriston

              I guess the main reason I didn't favor the coursing was that I wasn't a fan of the last savory course. Sort of anticlimactic for me, especially since I'm not generally a fan of dessert.

              1. re: DezzerSF

                I'm not usually big on dessert either ... maybe because there's usually no meat in it.

                1. re: Robert Lauriston

                  Good point, although the meat in this one was too cloying for me.