<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<topic>
  <id>665496</id>
  <title>Ratings changes at the New York Times</title>
  <published_at>Sat Nov 07 18:47:51 -0800 2009</published_at>
  <post_count>3</post_count>
  <board>
    <id>33</id>
    <name>Food Media and News</name>
  </board>
  <posts>
    <post>
      <post>
        <level>0</level>
        <id>5164221</id>
        <content>The NYT has changed the rating system of its suburban restaurant reviews (CT, NJ, LI &amp; Westchester) from the timeless (Extraordinary), Excellent, Very Good, Good, Satisfactory, (Fair) &amp; Poor to:

"RATINGS Metropolitan has changed its restaurant rating system to: Don&#8217;t Miss, Worth It, In a Pinch, Don&#8217;t Bother."

(Note: Extraordinary &amp; Fair were not used in all 4 regions.)

Yet another brilliant idea from the offices of the NYT. Change for the sake of change. Can't wait to see what's in store for the 5 boroughs.</content>
        <published_at>Sat Nov 07 18:47:51 -0800 2009</published_at>
        <parent_id></parent_id>
        <user>
          <id>13170</id>
          <name>rbailin</name>
        </user>
      </post>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>5165240</id>
      <content>I like that. It's self-explanatory and isn't subject to different interpretations by reviewers.</content>
      <published_at>Sun Nov 08 11:48:30 -0800 2009</published_at>
      <parent_id>5164221</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>11369</id>
        <name>Robert Lauriston</name>
      </user>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>1</level>
      <id>5165335</id>
      <content>Read the first review today in the CT section with the new ratings. Happened to be a new restaurant in my town that we've eaten at about 5 times, we like it very much. The review was pretty spot on, the reviewer had almost nothing negative to say, gave it a "Worth It", although it reads like a "Don't Miss" review.

I have to say that the categories just sound a little obnoxious (maybe condescending) to me.  "In a Pinch"? What does that mean? If there is no where else to go you should go there? But the food will be bad? Then wouldn't you just stay home?

However, I disagree that it is "self-explanatory and not subject to different interpretations"...it's a review, the reviewers opinion, of course it is subject to different interpretations, same as any category designation. </content>
      <published_at>Sun Nov 08 12:58:01 -0800 2009</published_at>
      <parent_id>5164221</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>142362</id>
        <name>sibeats</name>
      </user>
    </post>
    <post>
      <level>2</level>
      <id>5182404</id>
      <content>I agree, I think the new categories are horrible...how about this for an idea...use stars like everyone else in the world!</content>
      <published_at>Sat Nov 14 20:33:23 -0800 2009</published_at>
      <parent_id>5165335</parent_id>
      <user>
        <id>1099692</id>
        <name>mcllmlathd</name>
      </user>
    </post>
  </posts>
</topic>
