Psst... We're working on the next generation of Chowhound! View >
HOME > Chowhound > Home Cooking >
Oct 29, 2009 01:23 AM

Why did my homemade lobster stock smell so foul? Help!

A few weeks ago I boiled two lobsters for myself and my boyfriend and then returned the shells (head innards included) to the pot along with the original boiling water, a bit more water, an onion, celery, a carrot and herbs. This was my first time attempting lobster stock.

I brought it to a boil and simmered it for quite a while. (I did not roast or broil the shells before bringing them to a boil, as some recipes suggest, since I had just cooked the whole lobsters.) I simmered the whole thing for probably two hours while I watched a movie.

Afterward I removed the solids, strained the stock somewhat and reduced it way down, probably wrongly -- because it then turned an unappealing muddy gray color. Oh well, it would still taste lobstery, I figured. I strained it a few times through a sieve lined with cheesecloth, poured it into a plastic container and put it in the fridge.

A day or two later, when I looked in the fridge, I noticed that it had a lot of sediment at the bottom, similar in proportion and appearance to the sediment that forms at the bottom of a carboy of fermenting wort when I home-brew beer.

I opened up the container with plans to strain the stock some more, but the stuff was head-boltingly stinky -- and not like fish. It didn't even smell like food, really -- more like some weird chemical concoction, or the damp, stuffy smell of subway stations in disrepair. It was seriously gross. It had smelled similar but not nearly as strong right after I'd made the stock.

I was afraid to try it, but I diluted a sip of the concentrated stock with water, heated it and tried it. It tasted slightly odd and musty but not foul like it smelled. It still tasted like stock, but the smell, sediment and color -- and what I'd read about possible seafood contamination -- frightened me. I regretfully dumped the entire batch, and the unsalvageably smelly container.

So... What did I do wrong? Why did the stuff smell so incredibly awful? Was it because I didn't sufficiently strain the stuff right off the bat? Was it because I overreduced it? Was it because I didn't cook the shells in the oven? Or should I have removed all the stuff from inside the heads, or anything else, before boiling the lobster carcasses?

Given how cheap lobsters are (and given that I'm going to Maine soon), I'd love to know how to avoid my awful lobster stock-making screw-ups next time. Thanks!

  1. Click to Upload a photo (10 MB limit)
  1. no clue but i'm curious to know what you've found out...

    1. I was going to make lobster stock on new year's day and checked probably half a dozen recipes to see what approach I wanted to take. Each of those recipes said to clean the bodies, but each of those recipes seemed to have a different idea of what that meant. Nearly all said to remove the gills. Many said to remove the sand sac from between the eyes; a couple said to remove the lungs and stomach; and at least one said to remove the tomalley. Okay. I know tomally and gills; but I couldn't figure out what the rest of those parts were. So I cleaned it all out. And using Eric Ripert's recipe on Epicurious, I ended with the best lobster stock I've ever made.

      I suspect your offender was at least one, if not a combination, of the above removeables. One of the recipes I read, but I can't locate it again now that I'm looking for it, specifically mentioned that including one (or was it more?) of those things will give you a cloudy stock with an off taste.

      Try the Ripert recipe next time.

      I made the two cups of stock and froze that and then made the remouillage. Hadn't done that before and just loved the idea. I was surprised by how much flavor was still left in the shells.

      6 Replies
      1. re: JoanN

        I make lobster stock using a very simple recipe with shells from cooked lobsters. The only thing I remove is the sac between the eyes; I like all the lobster meat that's in the nooks and crannies. I chop onion/carrot/celery and use fresh water. Using the lobster cooking water may have been the thing that made your stock funky.

        Edit: I don't cook the stock very long. 30 minutes at most.

        1. re: Gio

          I certainly didn't mean to imply when I said that I cleaned the shells that I removed any meat (although, I must say, that by the time I'm done with a lobster there's damn little meat left). I just clean out anything "loose" and mushy.

          Really interesting that you don't remove anything but the sac. (And you'd think that with all the lobsters I've eaten I'd know exactly what that is--but I don't.) As I noted, nearly all the recipes I read said to remove at least the gills as well. Wonder if it's just the sac that could be the culprit. And I hadn't even caught that the OP used the original water in which s/he cooked the lobsters. That probably didn't help any.

          1. re: JoanN

            LOL Joan... I've done serious damage to lobsters all my life. But lately we've been buying 2+ pounders and after the claws, knuckles and tails plus any roe or tomally, I'm not interested in the legs and bodies. If the bodies have lots of meat left I make a lobster red sauce with them. But everything else, the empty shells as well, go into the stock. Here are 2 diagrams I find invaluable:

            1. re: Gio

              So, is what everyone seems to call the "sand sac" actually the brain?

              1. re: JoanN

                From the diagrams I say yes. Wouldn't want to eat that one.
                I've hard it called various names over the years, but always have heard to stay away from it, although there is some choice meat near or behind it, I never ventured there. There are some other organs that come out when you pull out that whole section.

                1. re: Gio

                  Evidently not. A quickie Google didn't turn up anything, so I hauled down "La Technique." Pepin says "remove the sac (stomach) behind the eyes." Says it's full of gravel. Guess that's why it's often called a sand sac.

                  Thank you, Jacques. As always.

      2. I agree about the internal components needing to be left out of the broth. Another likely possibility:
        hot broths should not be covered...they need to cool down considerably before being covered and refrigerated. Covering hot chicken stock results in a sour brew that needs to be discarded...

        2 Replies
        1. re: penthouse pup

          "Covering hot chicken stock results in a sour brew that needs to be discarded..."
          I've never ran into this issue.

        2. Lobster stock should be made immediately, cooked briefly (<1 hour) and used shortly thereafter.

          I've made successful stock without removing anything from the lobster bodies. That being said, I've done better after removing gills/tomalley (a friend loves the tomalley spread on bread, so I save it for her).

          Perhaps the OP's bad luck was due to using the original boiling water from the lobsters.

          1 Reply
          1. re: shaogo

            The shells can be frozen and then used for broth if you do not have the ability to make the stock immediately or when running a restaurant and making a lobster stock for a shrimp or crab bisque. The frozen shells come completely cleaned and ready to make use when bought in bulk for this purpose.

          2. It is because Lobster stock should never be cooked past 40 minutes. Once you pass this point the lobster shells begin to break down and release contaminants into the stock making the stock gross and foul smelling. If you pull the stock from the heat after 35 minutes every time you should be fine. Chicken stock- no more than 4-5 hours and Beef- 8-9 hours or overnight. Beef bones do not tend to start breaking down like seafood and chicken do. It takes MUCH longer.