663176 Wed Oct 28 19:11:42 -0700 2009 262 33 Food Media and News 0 5139094 The Quickfire is a a Gourmet TV dinner, inspired by shows that TV Guide has chosen: The Sopranos, Gilligan's Island, Flintstones, Sesame Street, M*A*S*H, Seinfeld, and Cheers. Paul Bartolotta is the Guest Judge. And Jennifer is really screwing up! Bryan's meatloaf dish looked REALLY good, as did Kevin's meatball dish. And the winner is? Kevin again! No immunity, however. But his dish will be featured in a Schwan's line of Top Chef Frozen Foods - interesting! For the Elimination Challenge, they'll take over Craftsteak @ the MGM. But hey - there's going to be a hitch! Tom's special guest is Natalie Portman...and as we've said in earlier threads, she's a vegetarian. And they're cooking in a steak restaurant. What FUN! (not! LOL) The previews show Jen and Mike I. not doing well. Hmmm.... Wed Oct 28 19:11:42 -0700 2009 10532 LindaWhit 1 5139102 i think she's even vegan. hard. but jen really seems to be hitting her limit - be it physical/mental whatever. despite that, i think she's good. but kevin's amazing!!! Wed Oct 28 19:14:22 -0700 2009 5139094 99136 AMFM 2 5139109 She just said vegetarian, so that gives them a *little* leeway. ::::Sob:::: All that beautiful meat in the walk-in. Wed Oct 28 19:17:52 -0700 2009 5139102 10532 LindaWhit 3 5139132 agreed. just read an article where she was VERY vehement in her anti-meat stance. i love a good steak but enjoy eating vegetarian done well too - vegan, however, i couldn't do! Wed Oct 28 19:25:58 -0700 2009 5139109 99136 AMFM 4 5139422 I think she "converted" from vegetarian to vegan since this show was taped. Wed Oct 28 23:12:07 -0700 2009 5139132 10159 Ruth Lafler 5 5139587 Jenn's sauce was a verjuice with butter. Ok for a vegetarian, but verbotten for a vegan. Thu Oct 29 05:03:21 -0700 2009 5139422 24468 chicgail 6 5139618 But no one else seemed to use butter or eggs or cheese. I wonder why. That would have given them much more options. Thu Oct 29 05:34:30 -0700 2009 5139587 24468 chicgail 7 5141540 pretty sure I saw kevin melting butter at the beginning of the challenge. Thu Oct 29 16:46:30 -0700 2009 5139618 65780 jujuthomas 1 5139161 BEST LINE EVER! Tom C: "We went from little prick to big in my mouth." And a wry eye-roll. Friend of Natalie's: "Yes, that's what usually happens!" Brilliant. :-) Wed Oct 28 19:36:08 -0700 2009 5139094 10532 LindaWhit 1 5139166 This episode has me worried. Showed very little cooking, what are they going to show for the last 20 minutes? And the promos showed Natalie Portman tasting something and saying, "this is disgusting", and that didn't come out in the episode, what? Did anyone else note this omission? Maybe I'm a little grumpy tonight, but I don't care for this episode (so far). Wed Oct 28 19:39:04 -0700 2009 5139094 220645 mjhals 2 5139172 I noticed that preview as well, mjhals...was waiting for it to see what it was. I think the Elves are screwing with us again. And after last week's show, this one is a great let-down. But....as charmedgirl points out below, Fabio's hosting a TC reunion dinner next week - looks like Marcel is just as snarky as ever! Wed Oct 28 19:41:56 -0700 2009 5139166 10532 LindaWhit 3 5139175 This time it really bugged me. I was expecting the comment, so w/ each course thought it was coming. So with only one course left (Kevin's), I was convinced he'd seriously messed up (and he's far and away my pick to win it all). Creative editing is one thing, but I think this has crossed the line into misleading. Wed Oct 28 19:44:31 -0700 2009 5139172 220645 mjhals 4 5139425 There's no rule that says they can't be misleading, is there? Like you, though, I was waiting for it and then dreading it was Kevin, especially since his dish didn't look pretty like the others. But I think that she probably did say that about one of the dishes, but they realized if we knew what dish she said that about it would be obvious who was going home. Wed Oct 28 23:16:06 -0700 2009 5139175 10159 Ruth Lafler 4 5139704 It really bugged me too--knowing the context of the comment would have helped us understanding the judging better. Not fair, elves! Thu Oct 29 06:23:15 -0700 2009 5139175 100412 newhavener07 3 5139184 Still don't particularly like this episode, but Natalie's comment about Mike's dealer almost won me over completely. I thought it was cute and pretty loose for a celebrity that's supposed to be "on" all the time, kind of edgy! Wed Oct 28 19:48:52 -0700 2009 5139172 220645 mjhals 4 5139188 I missed that - what exactly did she say? It did crack up Tom, I saw that. Wed Oct 28 19:51:09 -0700 2009 5139184 10532 LindaWhit 5 5139199 She was commenting on how inventive and surprising Mike's dish was and she asked who his dealer is and if he wants more customers. Wed Oct 28 19:57:19 -0700 2009 5139188 220645 mjhals 2 5139336 I was watching with a group of family members, and we were all cringing, expecting the "disgusting" line to get hauled out for one of our favorites. No clue who was the target. GO JEN! Get your fire back! Wed Oct 28 21:30:55 -0700 2009 5139166 130151 dmd_kc 3 5139590 Jen seems to be psyching herself out and it's getting worse for each challenge. I think she's great, but at this point her biggest challenger is in her head. Thu Oct 29 05:05:27 -0700 2009 5139336 24468 chicgail 4 5140180 At JT, Colicchio mentioned that they were all very tired and could use a rest; at that point they have been going full tilt for several days and she was physically ill for a couple of challenges, too. Thu Oct 29 09:07:49 -0700 2009 5139590 47289 araknd 4 5140219 Jen's inclusion into the bottom 3 seemed like a filler to me. While I agree her performance has dropped off, her biggest faults were it was too small and she was nervous doing her tableside pour...yet Eli''s and Bryan's dish looked just as small...and i concede that could be the magic of television. Thu Oct 29 09:19:56 -0700 2009 5139590 11548 Alex318 5 5140252 Yeah, Tom said in his blog that the only problem with her dish was that it was too small, but that it was well prepared and tasted good, especially the sauce. Thu Oct 29 09:28:55 -0700 2009 5140219 13525 JasmineG 4 5140231 My thoughts exactly, She's definitely psyching herself out. Too bad b/c when she's on, she's great. Thu Oct 29 09:22:42 -0700 2009 5139590 255446 Gigi007 4 5142224 On the flip side, she's also showing a good sense of humor. I liked her feisty quotes about not being a vegetarian and never becoming one. And also Bam Bam (Flinstones) being a boyfriend who carried a club and dragged his girl by the hair... which she kinda liked from time to time. Nice! Leading the line at Ripert's place every night has got to wind anyone up. Meanwhile the shooting schedule might be wearing down her robo-chef persona, but it's also showing her real personality, which I find funny and full of self examination (which sometimes includes the being down on one's self). She needs to relax a bit and have fun, trusting the skills and intuition we've already seen, Fri Oct 30 03:26:40 -0700 2009 5139590 15036 tastyjon 5 5142320 i loved Jen's Pebbles & Bam Bam comment! it definitely showed a [very likable] side of her we don't really get to see much. Fri Oct 30 05:23:53 -0700 2009 5142224 103920 goodhealthgourmet 5 5142405 Now that you mention it. Self awareness is not an attribute that most of the folks on this season has in abundance. Ash did, but he did nothing with it. I thought Richard Blais did and it actually cost him in the final challenge. I thought Harold was pretty self-aware. So, the attributes of a successful human being may not be the same attributes for a Top Chef winner? Fri Oct 30 06:06:15 -0700 2009 5142224 11826 Phaedrus 6 5144512 Ha ha, that's funny. In my experience, there are two types of successful people: 1. People who think everything they do is awesome, which gives them the gumption to try anything -- and the freedom to succeed without overthinking it. 2. People who scrutinize their every move so closely that it makes them agonizingly self-aware. Many of these people achieve greatness through knowledgeable critique of their own actions. Most successful creative performers/interpreters I've known -- singers and actors (and that's many) -- fall into the first. Process-oriented creator/artists like cooks, photographers and musicians are often the latter. Jen's definitely in the second group. Fri Oct 30 21:24:33 -0700 2009 5142405 130151 dmd_kc 1 5139167 Fabio hosts a Top Chef reunion dinner!! So excited for next week! ETA: what restaurant was that in the little short during the commercial break? Did Kevin say it was one of his best meals ever? I missed part of what they said. Wed Oct 28 19:39:38 -0700 2009 5139094 23389 charmedgirl 2 5139186 I think that was Paul Bartolotta's restaurant in LV. Wed Oct 28 19:49:03 -0700 2009 5139167 10532 LindaWhit 2 5139442 Kevin was hilarious in that short. What did he say, something like "I eat everything, I didn't get fat accidentally"? Delightful. He's fantastic. Jen seemed very relaxed in that short, I wonder when they filmed it. Wed Oct 28 23:42:13 -0700 2009 5139167 13525 JasmineG 1 5139177 And Kevin, Michael, and Eli are in the top...and based on the comments about Eli's dish, will he win? Kevin's dish looked really good, yet again! And Kevin has a DOUBLE! He wins Elim. as well. A suite of GE appliances is his prize - and doesn't he seem thrilled! LOL Oh Michael - aren't YOU a sore loser! Wow. In the Bottom - Robyn, Jennifer, and Mike I. Wed Oct 28 19:44:51 -0700 2009 5139094 10532 LindaWhit 2 5139194 Mike I has got to go home with the "whatever, whatever comments". So, so off-putting. Gails comments about him are right on. And I just want poor Jenn to have faith in herself. This episode does reinforce the feeling that she's losing it. Really want her to pull it together next week, if not...I think she's gone, but I suspect this time she'll hang around. Wed Oct 28 19:54:19 -0700 2009 5139177 220645 mjhals 3 5139197 I do think it's Robyn (all over the place with her dish) or Mike I. But Jen is definitely losing confidence, and is showing her tiredness, as Tom said. And Mike I. is gone! Wow. Wed Oct 28 19:56:18 -0700 2009 5139194 10532 LindaWhit 2 5139233 What was Michael's (I think I can finally tell the brothers apart now) dish? I only remembered the banana polenta as he was claiming to be able to reproduce Kevin's dish in 20 minutes. Wed Oct 28 20:10:18 -0700 2009 5139177 73860 jules127 3 5139248 The banana polenta is all I remember as well. But I did get a giggle from Bartolotta's grimace when he heard what he was served. As Tom C. said, generations of Bartolotta's family were rolling in their graves. :-) But it made Natalie laugh, and she was guest judge! Wed Oct 28 20:17:43 -0700 2009 5139233 10532 LindaWhit 3 5139432 Oh, I just wanted to slap Michael -- that was such a rude thing to say, not only disparaging Kevin but disparaging the judges by implying they were stupid to choose him. He probably didn't even taste Kevin's dish, so how can he know what really went into it? You can slop a bunch of ingredients on a plate, but you won't necessarily develop complex, interesting flavors. *Smoked* kale? That's pretty damn inventive, Mr. This-sounds-daring-and-creative-but-I-stole-it-from-another-chef. Wed Oct 28 23:26:05 -0700 2009 5139233 10159 Ruth Lafler 4 5139593 Michael is clearly a creative and talented cook, but as a chef or someone in charge of a kitchen, he has no sensitivity to the people he iw working with. I would be disappointed if he won this season's TC. At this point I am rooting for Kevin or Brian. Unless Jen gets herself back under control, she doesn't stand a chance. Thu Oct 29 05:08:49 -0700 2009 5139432 24468 chicgail 5 5139630 I agree with you. Michael's moved down on my "top" list. I'd like the top 3 to be Kevin, Brian, and Jen. But unless Jen gets those personal bugaboos out of her head, she's going to sink. I will be interested to read/see Mike I.'s exit interview. He's gotta be ticked that Robin outlasted him. It was VERY obvious in the Stew Room that Eli was pissed off. Thu Oct 29 05:40:18 -0700 2009 5139593 10532 LindaWhit 6 5140817 Mike has an interview on the Washington Post. I suspected he was a jerk, now I know. Honestly, his comments about Robin are BEYOND unprofessional--and its his comments, not editting. Glad he is gone! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discus sion/2009/10/29/DI2009102902002.html?hpid=discussions Thu Oct 29 12:12:37 -0700 2009 5139630 10505 jenn 7 5140854 How is it unprofessional for Mike to state his *opinion* on Robin's cooking. Unkind and undiplomatic, maybe. Unprofessional? No. BTW you link is broken. The interview is here http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/10/29/DI2009102902002.html Thu Oct 29 12:25:53 -0700 2009 5140817 10195 KTinNYC 8 5140902 thanks for fixing the link. I stand by unprofessional---the only reason for a person to speak the way he does of a competitor is when deep down you lack confidence in your own abilities. Focus on the food!!! Who cares if she is annoying? Compare his behavior to all the Masters in the TopChef Masters--no one felt the need to dis the other contestants, they were too caught up in their own creations. Thu Oct 29 12:42:12 -0700 2009 5140854 10505 jenn 9 5140923 Its not like Robin ever shown to back down or respect others boundaries when all they want to do is get away from her, or for her to stop talking about herself. They don't like her, but she keeps joining them, forcing herself on them. Makes for compelling TV. Thu Oct 29 12:52:09 -0700 2009 5140902 323958 dach 9 5140931 He was asked a questions and he answered them. It's not like he just spouted off on her. Washington, D.C.: I didn't think you were a jerk -- and you certainly had personality. I've never tried your restaurant in D.C., but will stop in sometime. Enjoyed your style of cooking. You mean to tell me Robin is still there? That woman could not cook her way out of a paper bag. Mike Isabella: That's totally true. She can't cook. Arlington, Va.: If you were to enter a restaurant where Robin is the chef, what would you order? Mike Isabella: Nothing. Thu Oct 29 12:56:12 -0700 2009 5140902 10195 KTinNYC 7 5140867 The link to the Washington Post live chat w/ Mike I. was posted earlier downthread by newhavener07 a couple of hours ago. I actually had one of my questions answered by Mike I. and commented on it following newhavener07's post. Thu Oct 29 12:30:49 -0700 2009 5140817 255446 Gigi007 5 5140239 I agree. I think he's showed his immaturity and unprofessionalism time and time again. It's too bad because I admire his creative cooking style. Bryan's point from the RW episode is well taken: Michael V. shouldn't be rewarded for bad behavior. To my thinking, someone who is in charge of a kitchen absolutely should have interpersonal skills. Both Kevin and Bryan seem capable of this. Jen too, if she could get herself together. Thu Oct 29 09:26:02 -0700 2009 5139593 255446 Gigi007 6 5140402 the only thing worse than mike isabella's attitude was gail's dress. yowzer. she needs to fire her wardrobe person yesterday. Thu Oct 29 10:10:20 -0700 2009 5140239 13592 isadorasmama 7 5140433 I usually like what Gail is wearing - It's usually Padma that gets my "Yowzer!" remarks! Thu Oct 29 10:17:58 -0700 2009 5140402 174753 NellyNel 8 5140487 Padma's been dressing better this season, not so much like the confused fashionista of seasons past. Poor Gail - I have her body type, and it's not easy to look fashionable when one's built quite the opposite of Padma; still, wearing a frilly Leprechaun dress is inexcuseable. Thu Oct 29 10:36:43 -0700 2009 5140433 17220 Claudette 9 5140551 Last week during Restaurant Wars, Padma looked absolutely amazing in that low-cut dress and tiered necklace. She is a wonder of nature. Thu Oct 29 11:00:06 -0700 2009 5140487 100412 newhavener07 10 5141860 true, but the way she speaks makes her look robotic. man, i'm feeling snarky today. sorry. Thu Oct 29 19:15:17 -0700 2009 5140551 13592 isadorasmama 11 5141865 You hit the nail on the head! I think that Padma is strikingly beautiful, but the way she speaks is off putting. Thu Oct 29 19:18:28 -0700 2009 5141860 255446 Gigi007 5 5143109 At this point I'm mainly rooting for Kevin. He and Mike V are the two chefs whose food looks most interesting to me (well, Mike's looks interesting and Kevin's looks just plain delicious), and Mike is too big a jerk to root for. Fri Oct 30 10:14:56 -0700 2009 5139593 10159 Ruth Lafler 6 5143200 +1, Ruth. My thoughts exactly, although I can't seem to let go of Bryan. I'll admit that I'm probably biased b/c I've eaten at his restaurant and have been quite impressed. Am getting annoyed by Mike V. If Tom C.'s blog is any indication, his attitude and behavior are hurting him. Fri Oct 30 10:39:34 -0700 2009 5143109 255446 Gigi007 1 5139205 Top Chef Frozen Dinners?! Awesome! I can't wait for the ceviche! Wed Oct 28 19:59:23 -0700 2009 5139094 235489 ktb615 2 5139221 LMAO! nice :) i'm going to reserve any comments about the episode itself until i have a chance to watch it all the way through. i missed at least half of it. hooray for DVR! Wed Oct 28 20:06:16 -0700 2009 5139205 103920 goodhealthgourmet 2 5139661 Rocco is going to be ticked, its going to cut into his Bertoli frozen dinner sales. Thu Oct 29 06:04:32 -0700 2009 5139205 11826 Phaedrus 2 5139962 <Top Chef Frozen Dinners?! Awesome! I can't wait for the ceviche!> But will they pair it with scallops? Thu Oct 29 07:58:28 -0700 2009 5139205 52499 ChefJune 3 5140258 Of course, "Top Chef Scallop Ceviche" from the camping out episode. UGH! Thu Oct 29 09:29:56 -0700 2009 5139962 47289 araknd 1 5139300 Kevin gets a double win QF and Elimination..way to go. Mike V is a little bitter awwww suck it up and stop crying. Wed Oct 28 20:53:36 -0700 2009 5139094 143892 chris2269 2 5139340 And how nice for him to win another really good prize. His Calphalon pans, while not a stick in the eye, were the worst elimination challenge prizes this season. Though weren't there a couple of times where winners got something like a signed book by the guest judge and a firm handshake? I'd have loved to try a lot of these dishes, but Kevin's actually made me excited. Love mushrooms -- though I think they're borderline-dangerous as the centerpiece of any dish because of how many people absolutely loathe them. I guess Top Chef judges should be expected to have broader palates than the general population, huh? Wed Oct 28 21:34:34 -0700 2009 5139300 130151 dmd_kc 3 5139446 I don't know what segment of the population "loathe" mushrooms, but I think your supposition that implies a large segment of the dining public does not like mushrooms is faulty. Kevin's choosing to do mushrooms was a brilliant move, well prepared mushrooms are in fact "meaty like" and can stand on their own as a substantial center piece of a dish. The fact that he was the last to serve also was to his benefit, as after eating all of the "vegetably" dishes, the diners last taste memory was of something substantial, flavorful and satisfying. If Kevin does not ultimately win Top Chef, it just means that he is destined for something bigger. Now I think I'll do something with some meaty portabello mushrooms next week. Wed Oct 28 23:47:43 -0700 2009 5139340 10059 ChinoWayne 4 5139787 I have to agree with dmd_kc - many of my friends don't like mushrooms, including a coworker who was a vegetarian for 20 years. (She now eats seafood and a bit of chicken now and again.) She said that while she wouldn't eat Kevin's winning dish, she did think that he was the only one who thought about the dish needing to be an entree vs. an appetizer. The mushrooms are hearty and filling vs. most of the other dishes, which seemed to be less substantial. Thu Oct 29 06:56:23 -0700 2009 5139446 10532 LindaWhit 4 5139857 ChinoWayne, I'm just going by what I've witnessed more times than I can count at pizza places and the like. I have one friend who can't eat anything on her plate if mushrooms have touched any part of it. Maybe it's just my experience, but if you asked me to guess the most frequently-disliked common ingredient, I'd say mushrooms. But again, yes -- I think it was a great move on Kevin's part. Thu Oct 29 07:21:30 -0700 2009 5139446 130151 dmd_kc 5 5140104 Maybe you are right dmd_kc and Linda, it's not been my experience, but rather the opposite, particularly when I scarf all of the mushroom/port reduction before my dining companions can at our favorite steak house. ;-) Thu Oct 29 08:44:28 -0700 2009 5139857 10059 ChinoWayne 6 5140118 Save some for me, CW. ;-) And to add to my comment above, two of my friends have said "it's a texture thing" when it comes to mushrooms. One of them enjoys a mushroom reduction or can tolerate teeny-tiny bits of mushroom (as in a duxelles), but larger pieces she won't touch. Thu Oct 29 08:49:53 -0700 2009 5140104 10532 LindaWhit 7 5140475 My husband's line is that he'd never eat anything that closely related to athlete's foot. :) Thu Oct 29 10:31:42 -0700 2009 5140118 99136 AMFM 8 5140566 ::::snort::::: OK, now THAT'S a good line. ;-) Thu Oct 29 11:03:08 -0700 2009 5140475 10532 LindaWhit 8 5140918 he must be a real funghi...;-) Thu Oct 29 12:51:12 -0700 2009 5140475 195694 edible complex 8 5141566 my husband says something similar... fungus grows in your shower... would you lick the shower walls? ;) Thu Oct 29 17:00:13 -0700 2009 5140475 65780 jujuthomas 2 5144538 I've read many remarks about Mike V's reaction. I'm curious, how should he react? Good sportsmanship suggests he should shake Kevin's hand and say "good job." There is no requirement to then say "oh yeah, Kevin kicked my a$$, my dish was no good at all." Watch any sporting event and you'll see a perfunctory handshake and then a bunch of excuses as to why the team lost and how the team should've won. This is something I read years ago about Jack Nicklaus: *** "I have never three-putted the last hole of a tournament or missed from inside five feet on the last hole of a tournament," Jack said. He continued with his talk. That was more than one member of the audience, a man in his 60s, was able to bear. When question time came, he stood up. "Uh, Mr. Nicklaus," he said, "I really enjoyed your talk. But the statement you made about never three-putting the last green of a tournament or never missing from inside five feet on the last hole of a tournament--well, I was watching you in the Senior PGA just last month and I distinctly remember you missed a three-footer on the last hole." "Sir, you're wrong," Jack said firmly. "I have never three-putted the last hole of a tournament or missed inside five feet on the last hole of a tournament." "But, Mr. Nicklaus," the man objected. "I have it on tape. I could send it to you. Lee Trevino was in the broadcast booth, and he said you never used to miss short putts, but now you miss them to the right sometimes and then you missed an entire cup to the right . . . " "There's no need to send me anything, sir," Jack interrupted him. "I was there. I have never three-putted the last green of a tournament or missed from inside five feet on the last green of a tournament." Jack finished his talk and headed for the airport where his jet was parked. He has a busy schedule. But the questioning man lingered, and he approached me. "Dr. Rotella," he said, "what's wrong with Nicklaus? Why can't he just admit it? You're the psychology expert. Can you explain it?" I asked the man whether he played golf. "Yes," he said. "What's your handicap?" I asked. "About 16," he said. "And if you missed a short putt on the last hole of a tournament, you'd remember it and admit it," I observed. "Of course," he confirmed. "So let me get this straight," I said. "You're a 16-handicap, and Jack Nicklaus is the greatest golfer ever, and you want Jack to think like you?" The man had no answer. The point of the story, of course, is not whether Jack Nicklaus has ever missed a short putt on the last hole of a tournament. Of course he has. The point is that Jack's memory works differently from the memories of a lot of golfers. He has selective amnesia. He's able to block from his mind all the missed putts. He keeps and replays the memories of made putts. He's able to retain a firm belief that the next one is going in the hole. He's able to think of himself as a great putter. Fri Oct 30 21:48:06 -0700 2009 5139300 180506 Ericandblueboy 3 5144833 there are actually studies that show patients with clinical depression actually have the opposite type of selective amnesia. they remember with FAR more frequency the negative events in their lives or the negative outcomes and it shapes their opinions. Such things are very interesting. Sat Oct 31 07:20:54 -0700 2009 5144538 99136 AMFM 4 5144847 I don't think that "selective amnesia" is necessarily a function of clinical depression or any other kind of pathology. Human beings tend to remember whatever supports their current occurring reality and not remember those things that would conflict with how they have constructed their world. Sat Oct 31 07:27:29 -0700 2009 5144833 24468 chicgail 5 5145321 it's hard to know which comes first is all i'm saying and is an interesting study. is their view of the world shaped by their memories or vice versa. Sat Oct 31 12:12:51 -0700 2009 5144847 99136 AMFM 3 5145073 Really interesting post, Eric. I can think of some top-level tennis players who also think this way. Some might call it arrogance or as you alluded to earlier, a lack of good sportsmanship, but for these athletes, it is how they construct and see their reality. Yet I'm not completely convinced this applies to Michael V. Maybe. To me, it appears that the guy has a huge ego. Sat Oct 31 09:35:58 -0700 2009 5144538 255446 Gigi007 4 5145480 it appears that the guy has a huge ego *** Many of the good ones do. According to the latest Michelin guide, Tom Colicchio has no stars. If you put Volt's Table 21 in NYC, I'll bet it gets at least 1 star (if not 2). I just ate at Ko (a 2 star restaurant). Table 21 vs. Ko - twice as many courses (just as good food - in terms of ingredients, inventiveness, and cooking technique) at the same price. Sat Oct 31 13:46:13 -0700 2009 5145073 180506 Ericandblueboy 5 5145688 You would probably not get twice as many courses at the same price were it also in NYC, considering the cost of doing business there, in terms of real estate (highest $/sq ft), etc. And while it may be true that many good chefs have big egos, it is surely simplistic to claim a causal equation where bigger ego = better restaurant or higher ratings. Sat Oct 31 15:47:46 -0700 2009 5145480 10074 Caitlin McGrath 6 5145702 or that a chef's big ego=better food, for that matter. a lot of people that have a prima donna i-wanna-be-a-celebrity-chef attitude don't have anything but the flash. Sat Oct 31 15:58:55 -0700 2009 5145688 46030 soupkitten 6 5146080 And while it may be true that many good chefs have big egos, it is surely simplistic to claim a causal equation where bigger ego = better restaurant or higher ratings. *** Did someone make that claim? Or is this a public service announcement? Perhaps you should consider the reverse, it's the best chefs that have outsized egos, because they can afford it. Sat Oct 31 20:39:20 -0700 2009 5145688 180506 Ericandblueboy 5 5146118 Yes, many good chefs, athletes, etc. have huge egos. I guess what I was trying to say and perhaps it's not all that different from your point about Nickalus, is that in Michael V's case, I would guess that his huge ego is more responsible for how he sees things and behaves rather than selective amnesia. Or it could be that in the case of some individuals, the two go hand in hand. And this is just a guess (and my own humble opinion), but I bet Bryan V. has less of a problem than Michael V. in owning up to things he screws up on. The editors showed us his "sour grapes' face when his brother won challenges, but we don't know know what else went on. I'm not saying that he's the humblest of guys/chefs, but I would guess that he's more humble than his brother and has less "selective amnesia" or as large of an ego in that case. And I agree with you Volt's Table 21 is likely worthy of 2 Michelin stars. Sat Oct 31 21:16:41 -0700 2009 5145480 255446 Gigi007 6 5148186 Bryan is intense and competitive but he hasn' shown any ego that I recall. He's been churlish when someone else wins but he never had a totally rude confessional about a competitor. Sun Nov 01 20:55:44 -0800 2009 5146118 180506 Ericandblueboy 7 5148234 I agree, and I do think Bryan is more mature than his brother. Although I'm rooting for both of them, I can't help wanting our local guy to win. If I get my wish (and right now, I'd say Michael V. and Kevin may be favored over Bryan), I would be sorry 'cause then it might be near impossible to get a reservation at Volt! Sun Nov 01 21:56:40 -0800 2009 5148186 255446 Gigi007 1 5139456 I now like Natalie Portman less. All that lovely meat at Craftsteak...and not one bit of it touched. What a shame! Awesome wins for Kevin...very well-deserved. So sad for Jen...she's so talented. Mike V. was indeed a sore loser...or was it fatigue and the constant demands of competition? I'm very glad we don't need to hear Mike I.'s cocky and off-putting comments anymore. And Robin is delusional thinking that there's going to be less tension with him gone...she's still a sub-par chef in comparison to the remaining cheftestants. Thu Oct 29 00:06:30 -0700 2009 5139094 142682 attran99 2 5139480 Because I'm sure Natalie Portman was the one who came up with the challenge. Personally I really liked this challenge. Who was talking sous vide for steaks (why do I think it was Mike I?) but then they have trouble cooking vegetables and coming up with a veggie main? Come on! The kitchen obviously had no vegetarian cheese, or any of the usual suspects in veggie fallback land like tempeh and tofu. Which again I appreciated because it meant they had to really think. Aside from the prize I also liked the TV dinner quickfire. In my mind I took away points from those who did not fill all four compartments. I'm mean that way. Congratulations to Kevin. I like him more with each episode. Thu Oct 29 00:49:32 -0700 2009 5139456 10516 MplsM ary 3 5139569 I also thought it was a good challenge, but I suspect even without tofu and tempeh, they could have used regular ol' cheese (just not head cheese ;-), eggs, legumes, etc -- they certainly used butter. It was vegetarian, not vegan. Thu Oct 29 04:36:11 -0700 2009 5139480 53971 momjamin 4 5140373 Rennet makes regular cheese a proscribed food for most vegetarians. Thu Oct 29 10:02:08 -0700 2009 5139569 10516 MplsM ary 5 5141789 There are two types of rennet - animal based (often veal) and vegetable based. Packages will typically specify which is used. Thu Oct 29 18:52:06 -0700 2009 5140373 97804 cmvan 3 5139580 In a schadenfreude sort of way I don't feel to bad about Jen. She started out so cocky she needed to be taken down a couple pegs. I initially liked the Volt brothers but their childish behavior and immaturity is showing through. (At least one of them- I can't always keep them straight.) I'm growing tired of all these egotistical, arrogant chef's strutting around. Can I please have someone with quiet modesty, with humility, maturity and self-effacing humor excel at cooking? Oh wait, Kevin! He was the only one who got it that vegheads want a substantial and filling as well as tasty meal, something lost on one of the pouting Volts. Thu Oct 29 04:53:34 -0700 2009 5139480 38807 RC51Mike 3 5139714 What was going on with the "protein" comments? Most of the dishes had no protein to speak of, including Kevin's. I was surprised we didn't see more beans, grains and pulses. Thu Oct 29 06:26:04 -0700 2009 5139480 100412 newhavener07 3 5139890 Mary, in my many years of vegetarianism, I knew only one lacto-ovo vegetarian who eschewed animal-rennet cheese. Maybe that's changed in recent years among vegetarians (I gave it up around five years ago). I did find it interesting that cheese wasn't a component of anyone's dish in this challenge, at least that I can recall. Thu Oct 29 07:32:09 -0700 2009 5139480 130151 dmd_kc 4 5140431 I am one of the many hypocritical, cheese eating vegetarians. Right now in Minnesota and in neighboring Wisconsin and Iowa we have some stellar cheese making going on and I turn a blind eye on the rennet. As you say, many do. Not all. I read an interview with Natalie Portman and she is more adherent than I, or as you say, many others. And since I saw no eggs, I'm guessing she doesn't eat those, either. Edit - Just read Gail's blog and they were encouraged to use eggs. Now I am really confused. Thu Oct 29 10:17:36 -0700 2009 5139890 10516 MplsM ary 5 5140453 From Tom and Gail's blog it's clear that eggs were allowed, it's just that no one used them, which is crazy to me! As Ruth L. said above, I think she's vegan now, but was not when the challenge occurred. Thu Oct 29 10:24:43 -0700 2009 5140431 13525 JasmineG 6 5140967 The failure to use eggs is particularly mystifying since doing fancy things with eggs is so hot right now in high-end cuisine. All I can think is that the difficulty of preparing and plating 12 servings of eggs to be served at the same time and not having some of them become cold and/or overcooked was too daunting. Someone used lentils. Robin used garbonzos. Did anyone else include a protein? Thu Oct 29 13:12:40 -0700 2009 5140453 10159 Ruth Lafler 7 5140987 I don't think anyone used a protein -( I'm sure someone will correct me if that's not the case) - which is why I couldnt understand why the judges kept asking Mike I where his protein was. Thu Oct 29 13:21:07 -0700 2009 5140967 174753 NellyNel 8 5140993 I am surprised that Mike I didn't come out with something crude and rude. Thu Oct 29 13:24:16 -0700 2009 5140987 11826 Phaedrus 8 5141001 He kept saying he wanted to make it have the feel of a seared scallop and was treating it like the protein, when in fact he had no proteins on the plate. I don't think anyone else really mentioned proteins, so it wasn't quite as much of an issue. Thu Oct 29 13:27:10 -0700 2009 5140987 107671 queencru 9 5141136 Right. These chefs often use the word "protein" as a generic word for the central element of their dish (they "pick their protein"), and I think that's how Mike I was thinking about it. But of course, it was a stupid way to describe it, especially since he didn't manage to execute his original faux-scallop idea. Thu Oct 29 14:11:41 -0700 2009 5141001 10159 Ruth Lafler 8 5142275 The judges kept probing because of Mike's comments in his description of his dish. First, he began by stating that they were the protein. Then, he modified his comments to say the slices of the leek were visually duplicating the look of scallops, a bona fide protein. Since vegetable protein does exist, but it is most emphatically not leeks, Mike created a legitimate question in the judges' mind about his food knowledge. They should have questioned him. Fri Oct 30 04:44:21 -0700 2009 5140987 61567 Indy 67 5 5140799 I don't think you're hypocritical. In 17 years, I went through many degrees of observance, including two (unhealthy) vegan years. For a small portion of that, I avoided rennet, cochineal, and everything else I could think of. It was no fun, because it meant I ate almost nothing I didn't prepare myself. Going to a party or a restaurant was misery. Most of the time, I simply didn't let myself think about the oil in the fryer or the broth the potatoes were cooked in. Thu Oct 29 12:07:07 -0700 2009 5140431 130151 dmd_kc 6 5141022 Indeed. 35 years as a vegetarian (and maybe a fish dish once a year). In the 70s eating out meant a dinner salad for me. No fun. These days the dining out world is my 'Tofoyster' by comparison. If I call ahead and ask for a vegetarian option when going to a meat heavy restaurant, I'm usually very pleased with what I'm served. Sometimes my dining companions are a little jealous. Like you, I don't sweat the small stuff. I'm certain I've had a lot of beef and chicken broth based dishes served to me over the years but I choose not to think about it. Thu Oct 29 13:34:10 -0700 2009 5140799 10516 MplsM ary 3 5140340 Not blaming her for the challenge...blaming her for her vegetarian tastes. Still all that lovely meat and not one ounce of it used...so sad. Thu Oct 29 09:52:00 -0700 2009 5139480 142682 attran99 1 5139647 Please tell me who had to "pack their knives and leave" Jen or Robyn????? Thu Oct 29 05:52:05 -0700 2009 5139094 237148 bermudagourmetgoddess 2 5139659 It's a bit further upthread, bgg...it was Mike I. And Tom C's blog at Bravo was rather revealing: http://tinyurl.com/yjbz2hx Last paragraph says: "Mike I. knew his dish was bad — he even acknowledged as much to while we were shooting the reunion episode — but seemed to count on Robin’s dish being worse, so he never seemed to actually consider that he might be packing his knives. I really think he believed that as long as Robin was still there, he was safe, that there was no chance she’d outlast him." Why does this *not* surprise me about Mike I? Thu Oct 29 06:04:15 -0700 2009 5139647 10532 LindaWhit 3 5139671 Thanks, I missed it ...Iwas reading too fast...I won't be able to see this eposide until a rerun this weekend...It shows at 2 am in Bermuda, not staying up for that! Nope does not surprise me at all about Mike I...Loved the blog from Tom C... Never under estimate anyone! Thu Oct 29 06:08:25 -0700 2009 5139659 237148 bermudagourmetgoddess 4 5140042 Hey BGG, They keep showing it all night, I usually catch it at 7am when it shows again. Thu Oct 29 08:24:32 -0700 2009 5139671 190037 bdachow 5 5140337 I used to watch at 7 am but now I work out at 7-8 and I think it is oxymoron to watch a food show and work out...like to use to do...hahaha Thu Oct 29 09:51:20 -0700 2009 5140042 237148 bermudagourmetgoddess 6 5143415 Lol, totally agree but I can never find anything else compelling to watch that will hold my attention long enough to make me forget that I'm actually working out. Is it 5 pm yet, back to the usual haunt for Friday. Fri Oct 30 11:39:52 -0700 2009 5140337 190037 bdachow 3 5139908 It seems to me like Karma in action. We all “know” that Robyn is a bit out of her league, but it’s pretty sweet that she outlasted Mike I.! Justice will be served if she slides past Eli. Thu Oct 29 07:38:43 -0700 2009 5139659 234695 StewieBoy 4 5139971 Go Robin! Yes, she's annoying, but she's showing some staying power. Thu Oct 29 08:01:24 -0700 2009 5139908 100412 newhavener07 5 5140995 I'm with you. I don't think she's a "top chef," but the nastiness of the other competitors have had me rooting for her. They've been totally inappropriate. She's not a kid. She's dealt with serious illness and I give her points for life experience and staying power. Thu Oct 29 13:24:51 -0700 2009 5139971 24468 chicgail 4 5146654 "Justice will be served if she slides past Eli." I agree completely! Sun Nov 01 08:07:23 -0800 2009 5139908 88544 Ima Wurdibitsch 1 5139662 Did anyone else feel like the chefs in this challenge just seemed to completely miss the mark? I mean, no pasta, rice, bean or poatao-based dishes? And the lack of protein was offensive. Or were they just all trying to be so inventive that they couldn't come up with a single dish that looked like it could be an entree? Or was it that Craftsteak had such a limited pantry? I kept scratching my head the entire time...It also seemed like none of the food had any kind of texture. Just a bunch of sautteed/simmered vegetables. I was hoping for something fried or breaded. But maybe that's just my unrefined palate talking. Thu Oct 29 06:05:26 -0700 2009 5139094 56183 soypower 2 5139675 Read Gail's blog - she said the same thing: http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs/gail-simmons/shes-a-vegetarian And Tom's blog said they had trucked in a full truckload of veggies from the Santa Monica Farmer's Market the night before, so maybe that's what caught their eye vs. thinking about something that would be more like an entree...other than Kevin, of course. Thu Oct 29 06:10:32 -0700 2009 5139662 10532 LindaWhit 3 5139702 Incredible. Thanks for the link. That's got me scratching my head even more now... Thu Oct 29 06:22:36 -0700 2009 5139675 56183 soypower 4 5139764 EXACTLY. Sheesh, how often do you read or hear vegetarians say they're tired of pasta for the only vegetarian dish in a restaurant? But that doesn't mean that pasta couldn't have been used inventively. Thu Oct 29 06:46:39 -0700 2009 5139702 10532 LindaWhit 5 5139875 Count me as another surprised at how un-main-course-like every single offering was. And as delicious as I'm sure Kevin's was, those of us who've spent years in the vegetarian trenches know that while mushrooms have a great hearty mouthfeel, they're actually among the lowest-calorie ingredients out there. Unless you load them up with fat, you're going to be hungry shortly after a mushroom feast. I've always wondered if the cheftestants consider how many other dishes the judges will be tasting, particularly earlier in the season when they're plowing through a dozen or more plates. Would that make you think lighter if you were in their shoes? Seems like it might give an unintentional edge sometimes, especially if your dish is being tasted further down the line. Thu Oct 29 07:27:37 -0700 2009 5139764 130151 dmd_kc 6 5139987 I'm pretty sure they don't know the order in which the dishes will be tasted. I remember Jennifer saying a few QFs back that she was hoping Padma and the guest judge would come her way first, as her dish would not "hold" if they came later. Sure enough, her dish was one of the last they tasted, and it was overcooked. Thu Oct 29 08:09:14 -0700 2009 5139875 10532 LindaWhit 7 5140217 That was for a quickfire, though -- they definitely know what order they're going in for a situation like this where they're serving in order, because each of them is scheduled to serve at a particular time. All of their time buzzers don't go off at the same time, they're staggered (with staggered start times as well), so that the food is hot and just plated when it's time to serve the judges. Thu Oct 29 09:19:21 -0700 2009 5139987 13525 JasmineG 8 5140230 Good point. Had forgotten that was discussed earlier. Then in response to dmd_kc, I think the chefs are busy thinking about their *own* dish vs. what everyone else is making around them - or at least they should be thinking about their own dish. So going "lighter" if you're towards the end of dishes served, while it might be a good idea, could also backfire if there isn't enough oomph in their dish to make it stand out. Thu Oct 29 09:22:15 -0700 2009 5140217 10532 LindaWhit 9 5140256 Yeah, and they may not know when they're planning the execution of their dish where they're going to be in the procession, it's probably better for them to focus on what they know that they can do well. Thu Oct 29 09:29:50 -0700 2009 5140230 13525 JasmineG 3 5139807 As a side note, I'd love to know the name of the Japanese restaurant chef Bartolotta introduced the group to after the judging! (Gail mentions it in her blog) Thu Oct 29 07:04:27 -0700 2009 5139675 11434 FlyerFan 4 5139829 Someone in the comments section said they thought it was a place called "Raku". Thu Oct 29 07:12:01 -0700 2009 5139807 10532 LindaWhit 5 5139848 Thanks! Off to the Southwest board to see if there are any posts about it...... Thu Oct 29 07:19:09 -0700 2009 5139829 11434 FlyerFan 6 5140238 lots of stuff on the web about it: http://www.google.com/search?q=raku+restaurant+las+vegas&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Thu Oct 29 09:25:48 -0700 2009 5139848 103920 goodhealthgourmet 7 5141353 lots of posts about Raku on CH.... Thu Oct 29 15:30:14 -0700 2009 5140238 10158 susancinsf 2 5139887 Hey soypowder - I was thinking the same thing. I was blown away with the lack of grains, beans, or dairy. It didn't make any sense to me. And where was the protein???? Thu Oct 29 07:31:26 -0700 2009 5139662 222511 croissantkelly 2 5140000 I was also wondering why no one seemed to incorporate many grains, cheese, or beans in their dishes last night and I actually came to see if others on this board were wondering that too. I thought I may have missed something Tom or Natalie said when they were explaining the challenge. Thu Oct 29 08:11:19 -0700 2009 5139662 135105 Grainiac 2 5140837 I wondered about that too. I make a mean veggie risotto with faro and wild mushrooms. . no one did anything substantial like that . . .Hey! I can be on the next TopChef veggie challenge! Seriously though, I looked at all those pretty little plates of food and --except for Kevins, of course--and thought, Dang! I'd be starving if tha twas the main course1 Thu Oct 29 12:18:58 -0700 2009 5139662 10505 jenn 2 5141000 Grains and legumes are healthy, hearty, vegetarian, versatile and provide protein. Not sure what the contestants were thinking by by-passing all of those. I think the only exception were the handful of fresh garbanzos that Robin used. Oh, and someone (Eli?) included some lentils. Thu Oct 29 13:27:07 -0700 2009 5139662 24468 chicgail 3 5141104 I think they got distracted by the array of farmer's market goodies and went into default mode of designing side dishes around seasonal produce. They weren't thinking like vegetarians in terms of a variety of items with some protein-rich beans or grains in there to balance out the vegetables. No so surprising since they are all mainly meat-oriented chefs. Surrounded by all the meat, they went into side-dish mode. Thu Oct 29 14:00:25 -0700 2009 5141000 100412 newhavener07 4 5141261 Except Mike I. I thought it was interesting that this should have been a breeze for him based on the fact that about 1/3 of the dishes on his menu are vegetarian/vegan, yet he didn't do anything remotely resembling them. I was expecting a falafel, hummus, or something else a little more filling/fatty than what we got. Thu Oct 29 14:54:40 -0700 2009 5141104 107671 queencru 5 5141274 He said he had no yogurt to work with *shrug* Thu Oct 29 14:57:49 -0700 2009 5141261 323958 dach 6 5141290 Yogurt isn't a key ingredient in many of the vegetarian/vegan dishes on his menu. I don't think that's a valid excuse. Thu Oct 29 15:00:19 -0700 2009 5141274 107671 queencru 5 5141281 Good point, queencru. I too thought Mike I. would've had an advantage. He has had a ton of practice making vegetarian dishes at Zaytinya. In the live chat w/ him earlier, he said that if he had to do the challenge again, he would have make a rice or risotto dish. Why he went with leeks is beyond me. Thu Oct 29 14:59:20 -0700 2009 5141261 255446 Gigi007 6 5142519 I think he may have been too fixated on the fake "scallops" of past seasons--chefs won several challenges with bananas seared to look like scallops as part of a dessert. His thinking was likely "fake scallops equals win" and then he saw the leeks and half-baked idea was born. Fri Oct 30 07:03:24 -0700 2009 5141281 100412 newhavener07 7 5142627 Or in this case, badly cooked idea. Fri Oct 30 07:40:31 -0700 2009 5142519 11826 Phaedrus 1 5139686 Catching up here. I thought the elimination challenge was going to be dismal, and I was right except for maybe Kevin's dish. For some reason western vegetarian cuisine doesn't do it for me. I think it was Tom who was commenting on Jen's dish, but it can apply to all of the dishes: you're supposed to serve an entree not a side dish, that to me is the greatest failing here, that all of these chefs treated vegetarian dishes as a side dish in their minds and the results looked that way. Did anyone else catch the lip smack that jen put on Mike I after he was eliminated? Gail's expression was : "WHOA!". For head fakes I guess. Doing my Tim Gunn imitation here, did anyone else find Gail's outfit...odd? Never thought of fiddlehead ferns as a fashion inspiration. Gail is getting better, especially compared to Toby. I really enjoyed the bit where they were all eating together, that looked like fun. I didn't think I would like to see Natalie Portman but her sense of humor was great, especially with her hilarious comments on drug dealer etc. Very much looking forward to Fabio pounding the crap out of Marcel. Thu Oct 29 06:16:53 -0700 2009 5139094 11826 Phaedrus 2 5139706 I'm still amazing that no one used more pastas, grains, legumes. Other than Eli's lentils, they really were just garnish or non-existent. LOL on Gail's fashion choice - I did notice it; a bit odd. But a great comparison to fiddleheads. :-) And it does look like Fabio gets ticked off at *someone* next week in that he wants the cameras to stop filming. I think the Elves are leading us to believe it's Marcel. Not a hard thing to consider, however. Thu Oct 29 06:24:37 -0700 2009 5139686 10532 LindaWhit 3 5140489 To her credit, and she really annoys me, Robin tried to use chick peas. Thu Oct 29 10:37:32 -0700 2009 5139706 99136 AMFM 4 5140573 Three of them on a plate (and actually, she didn't get them on 3 of the plates). That's a garnish, not a meal. :-) Thu Oct 29 11:04:55 -0700 2009 5140489 10532 LindaWhit 5 5140830 fair enough. i was falling asleep a bit this week. they were a good thought though! Thu Oct 29 12:16:10 -0700 2009 5140573 99136 AMFM 2 5139852 Gail's dress was designed to serve as both a prom dress and a bridesmaid's dress. It was nice to see Portman and her friends seeming to have such a good time. I like it when the guests have fun while still giving good feedback to the permanent judges. Thu Oct 29 07:19:34 -0700 2009 5139686 11781 beachmouse 2 5140693 I agree completely about western vegetarian cuisine. I was surprised the cheftestants didn't draw more from other cultures- using lentils, making hearty curries, or focusing on other dishes that are more than just some vegetable garnish on a plate that you'd normally see adjacent to meat or fish. Kevin was the only one I thought actually produced a meal. I liked Natalie as a judge. I was surprised that no one knew she was vegetarian and that Eli said her only notable work to date was Star Wars. Haha. Thu Oct 29 11:32:40 -0700 2009 5139686 107671 queencru 1 5139703 I'm still scratching my head about why there was virtually no use of proteins or starches...Was it because the pantry at Craftsteak doesn't have a lot of those things or because they were just focused on the produce? Pasta, beans, lentils, eggs, dairy, breads...not to mention dishes inspired by non-Euro/American cuisine. While I couldn't give up seafood or meat, there are a lot of vegetarian dishes that are delicious and filling. Anyone else surprised to hear that Kevin and his wife abstain from meat for the entire season of Lent? Wow! Thu Oct 29 06:22:50 -0700 2009 5139094 108820 QSheba 1 5139721 I agree that Jen has lost her edge and in fact seems lost in general. Couldn't have been upset if she was sent home after yet another bad performance. Glad Mike I is gone. Michael V is a jerk. He didn't taste everyone else's dishes so how could he know that he could make it in 20 minutes? And the way he treated people in the last episode when he ran the kitchen was unacceptable. His brother is right - Michael has probably been rewarded for bad behavior his entire life. Go home already. Thu Oct 29 06:29:36 -0700 2009 5139094 76025 mojoeater 2 5139758 Jen is burnt and I will say it again, what I said from episode one, I CANT STAND THOSE BROTHERS. Arrogant, cocky and frankly, not that creative. Deconstructing food is so five (or whatever) years ago. Kevin is a class act. Talented, humble and, seriously, not just talented, I think he may be a culinary genius! This whole cooking for celebrity thing is annoying. It takes away from the competition if you ask me. Thu Oct 29 06:44:46 -0700 2009 5139721 108629 HabaneroJane 3 5139779 I think the producers may be 1) Running out of celebrity chefs 2) Feeling under pressure to up the celebrity quotient because they are in Vegas. Thu Oct 29 06:52:27 -0700 2009 5139758 11826 Phaedrus 4 5140323 or 3) want more people to watch their program el linus Thu Oct 29 09:48:33 -0700 2009 5139779 16004 linus 5 5140352 Oh yeah that. Goes without saying... Thu Oct 29 09:55:42 -0700 2009 5140323 11826 Phaedrus 1 5139902 WOW -- I just read Tom's blog. He delivers a rather stern lecture to both Voltaggios, particularly Michael, for thinking their "advanced" techniques are necessarily superior to more time-tested ones. "In general, please do not be snowed by the techniques employed by the Voltaggio brothers " is one of the most direct things I've ever read by one of the judges. http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs/tom-colicchio/if-you-can-mock-a-leek-you-can-eat-a-leek-william-shakespeare-henry-v Thu Oct 29 07:36:55 -0700 2009 5139094 130151 dmd_kc 2 5139923 best thing Tom's said (or written) ever! Amen to that. Brothers turn my stomach whenever i see them on TV. Thu Oct 29 07:43:26 -0700 2009 5139902 108629 HabaneroJane 3 5139981 Kevin is way out ahead as a fan/viewer favorite and he's one of my favorite TC chefs ever in his combination of humility, skill and creativity. The story about his entire family living the same street and eating together weekly was almost too much--if he loses to a Voltaggio punk, there may be rioting in the streets or at least several thousand heirloom squashes hurled at TV screens. Thu Oct 29 08:06:35 -0700 2009 5139923 100412 newhavener07 4 5140499 How cute that his grandma still makes them all breakfast! Although it does show a bit of bias that we think that's lovely and think Eli's closeness to his family must be pathological. Thu Oct 29 10:40:07 -0700 2009 5139981 99136 AMFM 5 5142268 Good point altho I assume the various members of the families are paying their own rent, etc. Fri Oct 30 04:40:33 -0700 2009 5140499 14253 Joanie 6 5142348 And Kevin said something along the lines that everyone goes over to his grandmother's house on Sunday morning for breakfast...so everyone's out on their own. Not still living with mommy and daddy. Fri Oct 30 05:40:22 -0700 2009 5142268 10532 LindaWhit 7 5142526 I still can't get over how warm and fuzzy that whole scenario is. I'm amazed that people in the U.S. still live like that, and a little saddened that it's such an exotic concept--eating regularly with extended family members. What has our society come to? Fri Oct 30 07:05:34 -0700 2009 5142348 100412 newhavener07 8 5142735 The ease of moving across country (and a BIG country at that) for another job makes us become a much more fractured society as it relates to living near family members. I would have loved to have lived near my mother's mother before she passed away - but she lived in central PA where she had retired to a family home. And we lived in northern NJ - Dad's business needed him near NYC. Now - my sister lives 40 minutes from me towards the south, my mother lives 40 minutes north of me. My brother, OTOH, lives in L.A. with his family. So we remain fractured. Fri Oct 30 08:16:21 -0700 2009 5142526 10532 LindaWhit 8 5142786 I think it's rare for an entire family to stay in the same city for several generations. Many people move when they retire, others move because work opportunities dry up in a certain city or aren't available there at all. I live in a city that has few good opportunities for young professionals, so most people who don't settle down before their late 20s end up leaving to find something a little better. Fri Oct 30 08:29:50 -0700 2009 5142526 107671 queencru 7 5143131 He also said that he and his wife give up meat for Lent, which makes me think that he comes from a very traditional Irish Catholic background, which is consistent with the family sticking together in the neighborhood. Fri Oct 30 10:20:25 -0700 2009 5142348 10159 Ruth Lafler 5 5142568 The big difference is Eli lives at home. Kevin is married and his family lives in the same neighborhood, but I'm assuming he and his wife live in their own house. Fri Oct 30 07:20:46 -0700 2009 5140499 56054 dave_c 3 5141007 Arrogance is no substitute for good people skills. Maybe Michael V (and Brother Brian) should spend some time with Rick Bayless. Thu Oct 29 13:30:06 -0700 2009 5139923 24468 chicgail 4 5141184 Thank you, Chicgail. Nastiness does not make you a good chef. Its unfortunate that it's accepted. It's pretty immature, actually. And I don't care how good of a chef you (thinK) are. Rick and Hubert are prime examples of that. Thu Oct 29 14:27:50 -0700 2009 5141007 193813 rocks67 2 5139939 "This was a challenge about vegetables and was an opportunity to honor them, rather than turn them into faux-finishes of proteins." Tom C Great, first honor the protein, now honor the vegetable. When are we going to honor the GE Monogram ovens, oh wait, thats what product placement is for.... Thu Oct 29 07:49:55 -0700 2009 5139902 11826 Phaedrus 2 5140133 Someone needs to point the Voltaggio brothers to Tom's Coke commercial. Thu Oct 29 08:54:03 -0700 2009 5139902 10059 ChinoWayne 2 5140248 i guess Tom is as bored with Bryan's foams as i am ;) Thu Oct 29 09:28:09 -0700 2009 5139902 103920 goodhealthgourmet 2 5140261 I too was impressed by Tom's blog. It seems like in his mind, Kevin is the clear front runner although he does give credit to Michael V. for taking a risk with his dish. Very telling. Thu Oct 29 09:30:21 -0700 2009 5139902 255446 Gigi007 3 5140288 Speaking of taking risks - Do we dare think that during the previews for the next episode when Toby says something to the extent 'He was in Vegas, took a gamble and lost' he was talking about Mike V.? Thu Oct 29 09:38:28 -0700 2009 5140261 11548 Alex318 4 5140348 Hmm, interesting observation. I didn't catch that. You may be right because the judges clearly perceive Mike V. as a risk taker. Plus he may be trying their patience with his antics. Thu Oct 29 09:53:54 -0700 2009 5140288 255446 Gigi007 4 5140365 I, for one, don't trust the promos anymore after they heavily emphasized the "disgusting" comment by Natalie Portman when it never made it into the actual show. I'm still grumpy about it. Thu Oct 29 09:58:19 -0700 2009 5140288 220645 mjhals 2 5140825 Rant about novel technique as Tom did, Mike V still came in a close second. The judging wasn't unanimous -- Tom initially wanted to give the win to Mike V. Thu Oct 29 12:15:16 -0700 2009 5139902 323958 dach 1 5140013 Robin outlast Mike I. One more to go, Eli. After she's done with Eli, she can take Mike I's advice and bow out gracefully leaving Jen, V Bro's and Kevin. Looks like Michael V can't accept the fact that he was outcooked by someone using classic techniques vs his modern cooking style. Jen... Makes great sauces and ceviche, but her cooking has been hit or miss. She would have been great compared to other seasons, but this season is really tough. However, if she does win this, I would NOT be disappointed. Eli or Robin winning would be very disappointing. Thu Oct 29 08:14:48 -0700 2009 5139094 56054 dave_c 2 5140505 I can certainly see where/how he hasn't won many fans but Eli's cooking hasn't been that bad. Far better than many contestants who have slipped through other years. Thu Oct 29 10:42:56 -0700 2009 5140013 99136 AMFM 1 5140057 Natalie seemed like a good night out - funny, well-spoken. I loved Kevin's reaction to winning the GE wares - it was some mixture between sarcasm and bewilderment - "lucky me." As for his dish, it was a brown monochrome thing, but it was the only one of the bunch that actually had me hungry looking at it. Leave it to Kevin to bring the "substance." Additionally, the dude is a savant. He has had to go outside his Southern/meat roots and consistently does well. I've had smoked kale before. It is better than I imagined it would be. Fantastic, in fact. Thu Oct 29 08:28:04 -0700 2009 5139094 149033 fame da lupo 2 5140366 >>I've had smoked kale before. It is better than I imagined it would be. Fantastic, in fact.<< If you are using it for medicinal purposes, they won't prosecute you now. Thu Oct 29 09:58:51 -0700 2009 5140057 11826 Phaedrus 1 5140143 I know Mike I is an ass, but really - Isn't anyone else sick of Robin constantly squeaking by?? It's getting really annoying now. This has to be a new record for TC. She's been in the bottom 3 how many times?? UGHH I was bored by this one - I guess last weeks was so exciting to me, and then this one - a veggie challenge - for me wasa dud. No ones dish looked exciting in the least.(not even Kevins IMO) Mike I seemed to be really well liked by the other chefs. Both last week and this week one of the brothers said "come back Mike" when he was in the bottom group. Did anyone catch that? And also the big ole bear hug that Jen gave him and seemed to really shock Gail. Jen also said "Love you" to him later... Gails dress was bad.. Loved the "prick" comments!! LOL Thu Oct 29 08:56:49 -0700 2009 5139094 174753 NellyNel 2 5140208 I may have to watch it again, but it seemed to me that Jen & Mike's hug was full of emotion and it surprised Gail, she looked like she was going to cry watching them. Thu Oct 29 09:17:55 -0700 2009 5140143 158403 jcattles 2 5140214 I agree that Robin's been squeaking by, but she's been in the Low group 3x (same as Laurine and Ash), while Mike I. had two Lows, so not that far off: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Chef_6#Contestant_progress And I just read who the guest judge is for the next episode, 2 weeks from now. Nigella Lawson. I will say it's a safe bet that several more male viewers will be present (Padma, Nigella, AND Gail in one show? I can only imagine the drool from the guys. Or maybe Toby will be replacing Gail again. <g>) Thu Oct 29 09:18:28 -0700 2009 5140143 10532 LindaWhit 3 5140361 Oooh, cat fight at JT!!! Thu Oct 29 09:58:00 -0700 2009 5140214 11826 Phaedrus 4 5148281 'cat fight'? Why? Is there a long-running feud between the women, or is this some kind of 'joke' predicated on the idea that women can't get along with one another? Or, is it a joke at your expense that you want to see them fight in the hopes that they will start to make out with one another? In which case, why not suggest that the JT be replaced by glitter oil or jelly? And the winners and losers determined through the outcome of a wrestling match? If you're going to make a joke, Phaedrus, take it all the way! Sun Nov 01 23:44:06 -0800 2009 5140361 16734 Lizard 3 5140417 Not to rain on the parade, but speaking as one of your men, Gail doesn't do it for me. Thu Oct 29 10:14:28 -0700 2009 5140214 149033 fame da lupo 4 5140592 I'm aware that she's not everyone's cuppa tea, but she does have her fans - including those who prefer her over Padma. Thu Oct 29 11:08:33 -0700 2009 5140417 10532 LindaWhit 2 5140358 I picked up on that in my initial post. It wasn't so much the hug but Gail's reaction that was interesting. Thu Oct 29 09:57:14 -0700 2009 5140143 11826 Phaedrus 3 5140428 Yes. I thought she looked shocked more than anything! (shocked that Mike was well liked perhaps??) Thu Oct 29 10:16:21 -0700 2009 5140358 174753 NellyNel 3 5140491 I was actually wondering if Gail was reacting to Jen/Mike's hug or to some opposite interaction between Robin and Mike. Thu Oct 29 10:37:50 -0700 2009 5140358 53971 momjamin 2 5140411 I couldn't believe that at JT when they turned their attention to her dish, she started blathering on about how bad it was before the judges said anything (at least on camera). She just kept talking and talking. At that point I was thinking "she just eliminated herself". Thu Oct 29 10:12:51 -0700 2009 5140143 47289 araknd 2 5140445 Re: the prick, I immediately about fell out of my chair laughing, with the simultaneous thought that no one at the table was going to pick up on that, or if they did, not play the pun. It was awesome that Portman caught it in stride and "went there." Thu Oct 29 10:21:30 -0700 2009 5140143 149033 fame da lupo 1 5140194 It now seems right that Kevin should go all the way. Aside from having the passion and skills (and palate) he let the audience know that his family all live on the same street, and grandma still cooks breakfast for the clan every morning. Who can beat that mojo? Thu Oct 29 09:13:09 -0700 2009 5139094 140436 fresnohotspot 1 5140426 A little suprised Mike did as poorly as he did and was the one to go. But what ever, what ever, it is what it is. Agreed, best lines ever Tom C: "We went from little prick to big in my mouth." Friend of Natalie's: "Yes, that's what usually happens!" Racks up there with "culinary boner" Thu Oct 29 10:15:57 -0700 2009 5139094 89493 scubadoo97 2 5140447 Alert: Mike Isabella is live now (1 p.m. Thursday) at Washingtonpost.com: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/10/29/DI2009102902002.html Thu Oct 29 10:22:00 -0700 2009 5140426 100412 newhavener07 3 5140656 Interesting - his comment about Final 3 being a given "now that I'm not there". Wow. :::::Insert @@::::: And did he actually let something slip? "Final 3, it's a given now that I'm not there. Looks like it's gonna be Mike, Brian and Kevin. Jen's starting to fall apart it looks like. " And still bashing Robin, I see. ::::shaking my head::::: Thu Oct 29 11:25:28 -0700 2009 5140447 10532 LindaWhit 4 5140861 I noted his comments on RW that Jen did much worse than my take. Mike I (paraphrase): Jen screwed up the line and didn't successfully pre-prep her dishes messing everyone else up. I read into his take that Jen should have ppykag. And he's friends with jen... so I have to flip my take on RW judging , and say Laurine should still be here over Jen. Maybe her teammates (mike i, laurine, kevin) didn't tell the whole disaster story that was Jen in RW to JT. They all seem to like her/feel sorry for her. And I wonder if she still is sick. Thu Oct 29 12:27:55 -0700 2009 5140656 323958 dach 4 5141156 POSSIBLE MAJOR SPOILER Did anyone else think the following exchange during the interview was weird? "Silver Spring, Md.: What are your favorite places to eat in D.C.? Have you been to Volt since the show finished (and has Brian been to Zaytinya)? Mike Isabella: Yes and yes. I've been to Volt and Brian has been to Zaytinya." Why single out Brian? Thu Oct 29 14:17:19 -0700 2009 5140656 78662 uptownlibrarian 5 5141198 I think just because Brian's restaurant is in closest proximity to Zaytinya, and the questioner asked about him. Thu Oct 29 14:31:13 -0700 2009 5141156 124435 sharonlouk 6 5141209 I did mean why did the questioner single out Brian. I guess proximity is an explanation, but it seems a bit thin. Thu Oct 29 14:33:40 -0700 2009 5141198 78662 uptownlibrarian 7 5141667 There is a lot of talk locally here about the 2 chefs/restaurants, so it made sense to me. :) Thu Oct 29 17:50:43 -0700 2009 5141209 124435 sharonlouk 5 5141213 It's not weird at all nor is it a spoiler. The restaurant where Mike I. works is in downtown Washington, DC and Bryan V.'s restaurant is in Frederick, Maryland, about 45 minutes-1 hr north of DC. I think it's only natural for someone to be curious about that. And it wasn't exactly an interview; it was actually a live chat. A lot of the questions were taken from people online. I submitted a few myself, and Mike answered it. Thu Oct 29 14:35:10 -0700 2009 5141156 255446 Gigi007 5 5141221 I don't see why that would be a spoiler. Earlier in the Q & A, Mike said he had known them for years. Why wouldn't they eat at each others restaurants if they had the chance? I'm not trying to be rude, I just don't understand what you're questioning. Thu Oct 29 14:39:14 -0700 2009 5141156 158403 jcattles 6 5142534 It can't be much of a spoiler because the finale hasn't been filmed yet, right? Even so, I think Mike's knowledge of the results stops with this week's show because he's out of the house. Might have heard some scoop from his buddies Mike and Brian, though. Fri Oct 30 07:07:39 -0700 2009 5141221 100412 newhavener07 7 5143208 He is very close to Mike V., less so with Bryan and my sense is that Bryan wouldn't spill. Fri Oct 30 10:41:40 -0700 2009 5142534 255446 Gigi007 7 5143237 "Mike's knowledge of the results stops with this week's show because he's out of the house" Not so, the cheftestants who have been told to PPYKAG are sequestered until filming is finished. Many times the last few who were kicked off, return to be sous for the remaining final 3. Mike doesn't know who wins, but I'm sure he knows who the final 3 are. Of course, he can't say anything because of the contractual obligations. Fri Oct 30 10:49:45 -0700 2009 5142534 158403 jcattles 3 5140707 Yeah, I caught that and even had one of my questions answered by Mike I. Here are some of his comments that I found interesting: 1) on being portrayed as “cocky and sexist”: Mike Isabella: Cocky? I can deal with that. Sexist? Not one bit. Not oooone bit. 2) on the Laurine vs. Jen going home controvery (RW episode): Mike Isabella: I think they both had very poor performances. Jen crumbled. She couldn't execute, wasn't set up. She brought the rest of the line down. She brought Kevin down, expo down. It is what it is. Was Laurine the right one to go home? I don't know about that. I'm not going to say who should or shouldn't go home. 3) on theVoltaggio brothers’ sibling rivalry: Washington, D.C.: How much is the Michael/Bryan rivalry played up by producers? Did this go on when the camera's weren't rolling? Mike Isabella: It was played up by producers. They're brothers. They love each other. There's some rivalry, but of course they're going to produce it because it's marketable. 4) on the judges: Stone Ridge, Va.: Who would you rather have dinner with - Padma or Tom? Mike Isabella: Tom without a doubt. Tom's a chef. We relate. Padma --- pbbbbtt -- I wouldn't go out to dinner if she was buying. Just joking! Washington, D.C.: Is Toby really as mean as they make him out to be? Mike Isabella: I don't know. He wasn't there a lot and when he was there I wasn't in the loser circle. The harshest judge there is Padma. It's her demeanor as a person. It's who she is! It's TV. She's harsh and rude. I don't agree with certain things that they say, but that's not my decision 5) on Robin (just a few of his comments): Washington, D.C.: You mean to tell me Robin is still there? That woman could not cook her way out of a paper bag. Mike Isabella: That's totally true. She can't cook. Washington, D.C.: Did you like doing the challenges in pairs? I felt that some chefs were able to slide to the next round based on their partner's work. Especially when the chefs were teamed up w/ the Voltaggio bros. Mike Isabella: Yeah, I don't like team challenges at all. I'd rather it be individual challenges every single time. It was fun sometimes with the groups, but definitely people skated along aka Robin. Yeah, that's Mike I... Thu Oct 29 11:36:31 -0700 2009 5140447 255446 Gigi007 4 5140754 Thanks for posting that Gigi. I find his comments about Padma most interesting Thu Oct 29 11:51:39 -0700 2009 5140707 174753 NellyNel 5 5140773 You're welcome, Nelly. I too found his comments about Padma interesting, and gather that not every cheftestant would be as frank. In the chat he also talks about being close to Mike V. and hanging with the V. brothers and Jen. I'll admit that I'm not a fan of Mike I's, but I found some of his comments in this chat helpful and somewhat insightful. Thu Oct 29 11:57:04 -0700 2009 5140754 255446 Gigi007 5 5140863 <I find his comments about Padma most interesting> Wonder whether she put him down??? Thu Oct 29 12:28:42 -0700 2009 5140754 52499 ChefJune 6 5140882 Ash didn't have anything great to say about Padma either. It seems like she's just incredibly unpopular this season. Thu Oct 29 12:35:08 -0700 2009 5140863 107671 queencru 7 5140892 plus there was that now deleted from net interview from an anonymous TC crew confirmed padma is the picky diva and high maintenance prima-donna off the set as well. Thu Oct 29 12:40:19 -0700 2009 5140882 323958 dach 7 5140903 Based on Mike I.'s comments, I perceived that he: (1) doesn't see Padma as fully qualified to be a judge (he makes the distinction with Tom C. emphasizing that Tom is a chef) and (2) finds her communication style harsh. I can't say that if I were in his shoes, I'd disagree. And I tend to think the two things go hand and hand. For a cheftestant being judged, Tom as a chef himself, most of the time (I can't speak for all of the episodes or past seasons), can deliver criticism backed up by substantive points, which while critical, doesn't come across as necessarily harsh. Thu Oct 29 12:43:06 -0700 2009 5140882 255446 Gigi007 8 5141064 When did Padma cross over from being "the host" to being "a judge?" In the beginning, anyway, she was just the facilitator. Thu Oct 29 13:45:56 -0700 2009 5140903 52499 ChefJune 9 5141105 I haven't seen past seasons, so I don't know what Padma was doing before. Just based on Mike I.'s comments earlier today, he definitely saw her in the role of judge. It also seems that at JT, her comments often emphasized "we" as in "we found that the dish was x...," so she was including herself as a judge. I distinctly recall Padma saying something along those lines at the JT of the RW episode when she questioned and responded to Mike I. about his arctic char dish. Here's what Mike I. said about Padma earlier today when asked about the judges (specifically, Toby as a judge):: "The harshest judge there is Padma. It's her demeanor as a person. It's who she is! It's TV. She's harsh and rude. I don't agree with certain things that they say, but that's not my decision." P.S. In any number of articles on the net, Padma is referred to as any one of these three: "Top Chef judge," "Top Chef Host" "Top Chef Host and Judge." EDIT: Even Bravo's own website mentions Padma having a role at JT: "Once again returning to the kitchen, cookbook author, actress and host Padma Lakshmi presides over the judge's table alongside head judge Tom Colicchio..." Thu Oct 29 14:00:38 -0700 2009 5141064 255446 Gigi007 10 5142540 I think Mike's reaction may have more to do with his issues with women, as seen with his response to Robin and Jen. Why does he single out Padma as harsh and not Tom, who makes most of the very critical comments. He seems to be responding more to her tone than specific criticisms. Mommy issues, anyone? Fri Oct 30 07:10:09 -0700 2009 5141105 100412 newhavener07 11 5142744 <Why does he single out Padma as harsh and not Tom, who makes most of the very critical comments. He seems to be responding more to her tone than specific criticisms.> Maybe it's because Tom has chops to be critical and Padma just has a body. Fri Oct 30 08:18:12 -0700 2009 5142540 24468 chicgail 12 5142764 If being a chef at one time is the sole criteria for being able to judge, then NONE of the people that are judges qualify. Gail wasn't a chef, not was Toby, or Gael Green, or Jay Raynor, or James Osland. Fri Oct 30 08:23:27 -0700 2009 5142744 11826 Phaedrus 12 5143225 I agree. Anyway, we are speculating on how Mike I.sees this. Given what he said during the live chat (and emphasizing that Tom, unlike Padma, is a chef--it could be like saying a "chef's chef'), that's how I interpret it. Fri Oct 30 10:45:20 -0700 2009 5142744 255446 Gigi007 11 5144515 Mike is far from the first person to imply that Padma is cold or harsh. Love watching the woman, but none of us has the first idea of what she's really like as a person. She may be lovely, but she has a generally difficult reputation. Fri Oct 30 21:28:14 -0700 2009 5142540 130151 dmd_kc 9 5141128 IIRC, unlike Kelly Choi for TCM, Padma has always had a vote at judges' table. Thu Oct 29 14:07:48 -0700 2009 5141064 10159 Ruth Lafler 8 5141586 Unfortunately Tom C lost complete credibility with me the episode [past seasont] where he went off on someone for making a dish that combined tomato and peanut butter and crucified the chef with all these comments about how ridiculous/awful the combination was. . . . thereby effectively displaying his complete ignorence about many great dishes in West African cuisine, variations of which can be found in Marcus Samuelson's [sp] cookbooks..... It brought me flashbacks about the Frugal Gourmet pontificating about something where he was so flatly baldly WRONG that I could never listen to him again. Thu Oct 29 17:07:28 -0700 2009 5140903 10505 jenn 9 5141606 Oh yeah. You know, no one is an expert on everything, and maybe Tom could admit that more often. I mean, in between running his restaurants, Top Chef, and other media/celebrity activities, when does he have time to be a serious student of world cuisines. For that matter, aren't his restaurants sort of New American? What does he really know about non-Western cuisines? Thu Oct 29 17:16:25 -0700 2009 5141586 10159 Ruth Lafler 9 5144967 marcus samuelsSon :) yeah ditto on the "wtf tom c?" in that episode. Sat Oct 31 08:43:25 -0700 2009 5141586 46030 soupkitten 7 5140944 Padma's got a big diva reputation throughout the land, not just in Bravoville. Thu Oct 29 13:03:39 -0700 2009 5140882 130151 dmd_kc 5 5141012 I have to admit that I have felt this season that Padma has either been more direct (forceful?) with comments at the JT, or the producers are showing/editing her to appear harsher than she has been shown in previous series. Thu Oct 29 13:31:12 -0700 2009 5140754 259475 blackoak 6 5141021 Me too. It seems like every challenge we're hearing her say "Did you taste this?" with a really snide tone. When the others ask, it's usually because something was dangerously raw or had gone off, while she just seems to ask to be antagonistic. I don't remember this in prior episodes either. Thu Oct 29 13:34:07 -0700 2009 5141012 107671 queencru 4 5140782 It was interesting: seemed like Mike was battling his urge to snipe at the judges and Robin. The ugly side of his personality crops up, then he seems to pull back in order to plug his restaurant and his pals. But overall the chat made me feel a bit sorry for him--must be tiring to put out that attitude all the time. If I lived in D.C., I'd probably still check out his restaurant. Thu Oct 29 11:59:30 -0700 2009 5140707 100412 newhavener07 5 5140814 I think his comments about the judges weren't too bad. About Robin, it does get old, yet to be fair, the Washington Post editors also had a hand in selecting the specific questions Mike I. answered. Zaytinya, the Jose Andres restaurant where Mike I. works has been around for a while now. When it first opened, I ate there pretty often. But nowadays with so many other restaurant options (and other good Mediterranean restaurants), I don't go as often as I used to. The food at Zaytinya is good, but not outstanding IMHO (not as impressive as Bryan V.'s restaurant, Volt).. Plus I've found that you have to order quite a few small plates to be satisfied. I've actually gone there and had another dinner afterwards.But I should also mention that Zaytinya's decor (blue and white Greek Santorini-look) is gorgeous and is something to see. Food-wise, of the Jose Andres restaurants in DC, my favorite is Jaleo (Spanish tapas). Thu Oct 29 12:11:33 -0700 2009 5140782 255446 Gigi007 4 5141325 Nice summary! Good that your question got posted. Mine didn't. It was something on the lines of -- how do you feel that Robin outlasted you, especially since you said that she was another old lady that that you didn't have to worry about when she kept immunity in Episode 1. Maybe my question was too mean. : ) Thu Oct 29 15:17:07 -0700 2009 5140707 10763 Miss Needle 5 5141343 Oh, I LOVE it! Now that would have been a priceless response. ;-) Thu Oct 29 15:25:12 -0700 2009 5141325 10532 LindaWhit 6 5141402 Too bad they didn't post it. But I think it would have been more fun to see Mike field that question in person in a live interview. I don't think Chow does those interviews anymore with eliminated cheftestants. Thu Oct 29 15:48:28 -0700 2009 5141343 10763 Miss Needle 5 5141358 Thanks. I asked about the V. brothers' rivalry. I don't think your question was too mean. Mike was taking advantage of every opportunity to diss Robin. But all in all, he did better in the live chat than I would have expected. I actually learned a few things that I didn't know and he reinforced my earlier impression of his team mates in the RW episode. Thu Oct 29 15:31:48 -0700 2009 5141325 255446 Gigi007 6 5141405 Yeah, I got that same impression. Mike didn't seem like he was holding back with a lot of his responses. But he kind of evaded that one. Thu Oct 29 15:49:34 -0700 2009 5141358 10763 Miss Needle 1 5141112 It almost seemed they were overwhelmed by how MUCH produce was in that walk-in and didn't go looking for non-produce items. I kept thinking surely there was a selection of cheeses available, along with pastas, etc. I wondered why Kevin didn't do good ol' hearty Southern veggie plate with cornbread. Maybe he thinks you can't do that without adding pork for flavor? Honestly, I think my typical Sunday brunch fritatta and a nice salad would've been better than most of those dishes. Sure, it would've been pedestrian and a little tough to plate attractively, but still, lots of opportunities for flavor! Perhaps it was so warm there at the time they didn't think about soups, pastas, etc. I was just stunned by how flummoxed they were. Typically, I am astounded by their creativity under pressure, but this one was a total flop. Thu Oct 29 14:03:46 -0700 2009 5139094 14457 onrushpam 2 5141140 I didn't get home from TJMAXX last night till 12:30PM, so only saw a little of the show later. I was in a way surprised Mike I.went home, since Robin hasn't done that well, and from listening to what she was saying to the judges felt like she eliminated herself. Listening to Mike V's comments about Kevin's food, it sounded like he was very jealous of Kevin's win and was putting down his food. Didn't care for Gail's dress.It wasn't the color so much as the rosettes or whatever on the dress, bad choice. I rarely watch what the judges wear, and I wish Tom would shave that beard,goatee or whatever he has going on. Kevin's beard doesn't bother me at all. Tom's just looks like hair hanging there. Kind of hard to explain to someone that's all. Thu Oct 29 14:12:25 -0700 2009 5141112 28392 HollyDolly 1 5141283 Seemed like the buzzword yesterday was "confit"... How are veggies confit'd? Sounds like fancy talk that's meant to elevate the price of vegetable dish. Thu Oct 29 14:59:30 -0700 2009 5139094 56054 dave_c 2 5141330 It just means cooked in oil. In fact, Tom Colicchio (who can be a pedant when it comes to cooking -- anyone remember his whole coq spiel in coq au vin?) actually has a recipe for red onion "confit" in one of his cookbooks. Thu Oct 29 15:19:51 -0700 2009 5141283 10763 Miss Needle 3 5141381 Tom can be a pedant about a lot of things, but I don't think he would have made an issue about the "coq" if the master French chef hadn't brought the subject up first. Actually, I think part of the pickiness comes from the fact that they have to have some basis for saying one dish had more faults than another. Saying "they were all pretty good but yours was the least good" isn't going to cut it. So especially toward the end, when only the stronger chefs are left and they have to pick at least two dishes to be in the bottom, they tend to fixate on tiny details to justify their criticism. Thu Oct 29 15:40:07 -0700 2009 5141330 10159 Ruth Lafler 4 5141395 From my recollection, Tom was the one who brought up the coq part. The French chef was saying it was hard to do coq au vin in the time allotted. Then Tom brought it up by saying, "... or with a chicken," to which the French chef agreed. Can't you tell I watch a little too much Top Chef? ; ) Yup, I agree that they have to nitpick, especially when it gets down to the finals. I believe I read somewhere that a lot of nitpicking went on this season because most of the people here were really talented. Thu Oct 29 15:44:44 -0700 2009 5141381 10763 Miss Needle 1 5141794 Interesting possibility floating around about the finale. Seems the cheftestants, Padma and Tom were spotted this last week here in the wine country north of San Francisco. http://www.biteclubeats.com/2009/10/top-chef-finalists-close-cyrus.html Thu Oct 29 18:54:53 -0700 2009 5139094 97804 cmvan 2 5142542 Wow, the French Laundry? Now that would be amazing to see. Fri Oct 30 07:11:57 -0700 2009 5141794 100412 newhavener07 3 5142620 <Wow, the French Laundry? Now that would be amazing to see.> Lots of other places in "wine country North of San Francisco." Would seem to make more sense if the finals were at Chiarello's or Charlie Palmer's places, based upon their previous connections with the Top Chef family. Fri Oct 30 07:38:48 -0700 2009 5142542 52499 ChefJune 4 5142632 Mike V: That Chiarello guy shows no originality and is too old fashinoned. I can do all of his menu two weeks into my apprenticeship. Michael Chiarello: I eat punks like Milke V for breakfast. Yeah, I'd like to see that. Fri Oct 30 07:43:41 -0700 2009 5142620 11826 Phaedrus 4 5142758 The article specifically cites Cyrus and Brix as two places that cheftestants, et al, were seen. Fri Oct 30 08:21:18 -0700 2009 5142620 10532 LindaWhit 4 5142803 Planning the finale can be tricky - wherever they do it has to basically go offline for a day/evening - the kitchen used solely for the "final dinner" - for a restaurant like the FL, which isn't exactly starving for publicity or lacking reservations, how many covers would they lose? Not to mention the fact that they probably have to run a sh**load of power lines, lights, camera rigs, etc. into the site for the filming... I think Tom and some of the other owners were gracious to lend their kitchens out... perhaps in Vegas, some of the mid-week nights, in the recession of last fall, were more willing to do it.. Fri Oct 30 08:35:28 -0700 2009 5142620 176367 grant.cook 5 5143204 Could they film at 2am? We never see outside. Fri Oct 30 10:40:12 -0700 2009 5142803 39874 chowser 5 5143314 Top Chef can afford to buy-out the restaurant. One reason "reality" shows have become so popular with television networks is that they are very profitable. I was reading the other day that the average scripted drama costs $3 million *per episode* to produce. At the end, they were paying the cast of Friends millions of dollars per half-hour episode, and that's not even counting writers, directors, production costs, etc. "Unscripted" shows are cheap. The "cast" is working for free (actually, I read somewhere that participants get paid the SAG daily minimum, but I haven't seen that confirmed). No writers. No costumes, minimal hair and make-up. Minimal sets, except for the Top Chef kitchen (which is furnished by sponsors, as are a lot of other things) and the Top Chef house (or houses, if you include sequester). They could spend $100,000 buying out a restaurant and it would still be "cheap" compared to the costs of scripted shows. Fri Oct 30 11:12:32 -0700 2009 5142803 10159 Ruth Lafler 6 5143856 In addition to that, the restaurant gets a ton of free publicity if Top Chef films there, so I'm sure restaurants would be delighted to sell out a night of their place to a popular reality show. Fri Oct 30 14:42:21 -0700 2009 5143314 13525 JasmineG 7 5144066 Perhaps, but then you aren't counterpointing that with ad revenue... you are mixing macro with micro issues- networks may prefer reality shows because they are cheaper, but they are cheaper because they don't spend $100,000 to rent out the FL for a night.. Friends sold more in ads than Top Chef.. even when Rachel had a bad hairstyle.. But more to the point - no venture will incur costs "just because." Would it be nice to hold a finale at the French Laundry? Sure.. but a finale held in a nice place a few miles west in Sonoma is still going to draw the ratings. And the restaurant the NEEDS publicity is going to bid/comp higher than a restaurant that already has it. The FL doesn't need publicity.. they could announce a "monkey ass in a clam shell night" and still fill the place.. Fri Oct 30 16:30:24 -0700 2009 5143856 176367 grant.cook 8 5144099 Well, but that's why the finale won't be held at The French Laundry. I don't quite understand what you're arguing, that they won't be able to find restaurants to host them? It hasn't been a problem for the six seasons of the show so far, and I can only imagine that restaurants will want to do more self promotion, not less, in this economy where it's hard to fill seats anyway. Fri Oct 30 16:47:51 -0700 2009 5144066 13525 JasmineG 9 5144727 Oh, I would never imply that they WON'T be able to find restaurants to host them - they DO get publicity from it, for example...I think the Commanders place in NOLA is a nice example - a good place, but not on the absolute cutting edge of style or cuisine, a lot of history, able to handle 3 chefs going crazy in the kitchen, and interested in drawing TC fans visiting New Orleans. The place probably draws a larger chunk of its business during weekends, so a midweek disruption was worth it.. Just that its not a cut and dry decision for any restaurant - there is a downside in the inconvenience, lost night of service, etc.. So super high-end restaurant might think twice.. so I suspect the show and its restaurants find a happy medium - good places that can use a bit of publicity that can accept the tradeoff of having their kitchens take over for a day or two.. Sat Oct 31 05:44:27 -0700 2009 5144099 176367 grant.cook 5 5144059 They were filming at Cyrus last weekend,big trucks around.I didnt know what it was till read today in local news. Kevin and Eli at Murphy Goode winery, few miles from Healdsburg , on Sunday. Fri Oct 30 16:28:20 -0700 2009 5142803 171209 celeryroot 5 5144068 I was actually wondering when (time of day, day of week) they filmed at Craftsteak, because you see the cheftestants entering the restaurant from the Studio Walk area of the MGM and there's no one else there. Usually that area's pretty crowded. I'm sure the production folks would clear people away but still it seemed strangely empty. Fri Oct 30 16:32:05 -0700 2009 5142803 10274 Debbie W 6 5144128 IIRC, we saw a clock when they came in and it was around 9am. I'm sure it's not that crowded before 9am and they probably chose a Monday/Tuesday to make it the easiest. Fri Oct 30 17:06:05 -0700 2009 5144068 107671 queencru 7 5144418 The touristy parts of Vegas are practically deserted at 9 a.m. I've driven down the Strip at that hour on a weekday (after dropping the friend I was visiting off at work) and you could shoot a cannon down it and not hit anyone. Anyway, my point wasn't that they were going to rent out the French Laundry (as far as I know Thomas Keller has never had any contact with Top Chef, nor has anyone who currently works for him), only that they could afford to buy out a restaurant and don't, as someone suggested, have to depend on finding some weird time when the restaurant won't be busy. Fri Oct 30 20:04:08 -0700 2009 5144128 10159 Ruth Lafler 4 5142806 I was just fantasizing. Keller is so fascinating--the recent article about him in the NYT just added to his mystery, in my view. I pull out the FL Cookbook when I feel like imaging what it would be like to have the whole day to cook and a mammoth stockpot full of boiling brine in which to blanch random items. Per Se is only a few hours away but unattainable at my present paycheck level, sadly. Fri Oct 30 08:36:41 -0700 2009 5142620 100412 newhavener07 3 5142712 They were supposedly filming at a restaurant called Cyrus, which is considered by mnay to be the "French Laundry: of Sonoma County (FL is in Napa County, other side of the mountain). Doug Keane, the chef/co-owner has built an excellent reputation in the few short years Cyrus has been open. Fri Oct 30 08:09:07 -0700 2009 5142542 97804 cmvan 1 5141873 I was wondering why there were no pastas, rices, or veggie risotto offerings. Eli used some lentils, but for the most part the dishes were all veggie sides or apps made up to look like entrees. Thu Oct 29 19:20:11 -0700 2009 5139094 1102205 brooklynkoshereater 2 5142772 I do agree, and I think the challenge caught them off guard (and it wasn't just lentils - one of the V-bros used polenta... BUT, depending on how strict a vegetarian NP was.. 1) Cheese made with animal rennet would be out - and you need that cheese for the risotto! C'mon 2) Chicken or any other stock/broth would be out (making risotto a bit tougher, although perhaps a veggie broth would work) 3) This may be nitpicking, but would Egg-based pasta's be allowed? They were using butter, so perhaps NP wasn't down with the egg thing.. Fri Oct 30 08:25:11 -0700 2009 5141873 176367 grant.cook 3 5142910 all the blogs and in mike post-ppyag interviews say there where no such super-vegetarian restriction. And they had tofu, cheese, veggie proteins, carbs available, they just happen to all make vegetable appetizers and sides, and no one made a vegetarian entree. Maybe it was groupthink and hyponotized and tunnel visioned by all the beautiful vegetables. Or it was the shock.brain-freeze of making big craft meat plans but then getting big blindsided with NP dazzling staritude. :D Fri Oct 30 09:09:53 -0700 2009 5142772 323958 dach 4 5148284 I'm still trying to figure out what exactly they had available. This was craftsteak, and their menu suggests incredibly limited (and standard) vegetarian fare, with rice as the grain (oooh, mushroom risotto, how bold), with blue cheese and mozzarella as the cheeses. But even if they started to broaden grains, would there have been quinoa? Or would there have been the sorts of spices available to make something vegetarian according to cuisines that specialise in that sort of thing. For example, I was thinking about dosa and such, but reckoned that chickpea flour was out, and yes, without yoghurt, other problems come up. The chefs may have been dazzled by the farmers market in the walk-in, but I also wonder how much the craftsteak pantry may have limited their potential (something TC would not talk about in his blog entry). Sun Nov 01 23:50:08 -0800 2009 5142910 16734 Lizard 1 5141947 I have a question that will show my ignorance (and may be just plain ridiculous/stupid) but has to do with the time limits imposed on the chefs for preparing their meals. Just used as example - this episode Robin ran out of time and didn't add all the (I think it was) garbonza beans to all the plates but had to serve the dishes as they were, unfinished, Jen plated everything, but then added a sauce while serving the judges and guests. It looked to me than Jen gained extra time by doing this. I guess my question is why is a chef allowed to add anything to the plate after the timer has gone off? Shouldn't the plate be presented as it was (in a timed competition) when the timer goes off? [edit] forgot to add that I'm just using Jen and Robin as examples - I don't think Jen gained anything (based on some comments made at the JT) - or meant to gain anything - by saucing at the table. Now if Fabio had done it that would be a different story... Thu Oct 29 20:13:10 -0700 2009 5139094 259475 blackoak 2 5141953 I thought the same thing - I didn't think Jen should have been allowed to sauce her dish - because she was out of time. Thu Oct 29 20:21:08 -0700 2009 5141947 124908 jeanmarieok 3 5142790 I don't think she sauced at the table because she was out of time.. she had it nicely there ready to go. She may have just wanted to keep the sauce at temp or from filming over, or saucing early would ruin some textual aspect of the dish. Its probably sort of a rule judgement call - if its part of a normal culinary practice, clearly is planned for versus just being an out-of-time thing, then they could do it. I mean, I've never had a chef spooning garbanzo beans onto my plate after its was served. Fri Oct 30 08:30:29 -0700 2009 5141953 176367 grant.cook 4 5143081 Right. Sometimes liquid elements are added at the table because otherwise some other part of the dish would get soggy. I love it when they bring a soup bowl with a crouton (or some similar element) in it and then pour the soup around it at the table. Fri Oct 30 10:06:19 -0700 2009 5142790 10159 Ruth Lafler 5 5146139 Sauce can also be difficult because they can "break" or de-emulsify, which is what happened to Jen in the previous challenge. She may have been particularly careful not to let this happen again. Adding an element like sauce or shavings (truffle, Himalayan salt, etc) at the judges' table has been routinely allowed in Iron Chef America in the past, if I recall correctly. Sat Oct 31 21:31:55 -0700 2009 5143081 18368 youngho 2 5141954 I had wondered that too. One of the Voltaggios also carried sauce out. It must be allowed by the rules. Perhaps its because some fine dishes are customarily sauced at the table? I don't know. Thu Oct 29 20:22:46 -0700 2009 5141947 323958 dach 2 5141969 I'd guess that anything that might typically be done tableside is still allowed in this type of competition. You wouldn't expect to see someone bringing out chickpeas or a fried item, but it's not uncommon for the server to add the sauce and other seasonings tableside. Whatever the reason was, it seemed like the plating time was separate from the actual prep time and that the cheftestants didn't get nearly enough time. Thu Oct 29 20:39:17 -0700 2009 5141947 107671 queencru 1 5145445 Just watched last night (Phillies have been on!!!) SOOOOOOOOO glad Mike is gone (doing a jig!) Sat Oct 31 13:30:45 -0700 2009 5139094 228447 threebears