657919 Wed Oct 07 19:14:58 -0700 2009 223 33 Food Media and News 0 5087190 A so-so challege starts the competition. Can we please get rid of scallops and ceviche? I'm thinking Kevin will win the entire thing! Glad he didn't take immunity! The main challenge looks interesting and I like some of the odder team pairings... Wed Oct 07 19:14:58 -0700 2009 251260 vinhotinto75 1 5087215 Mean Mike and Robin are paired off. Should be interesting. He's already coming off like a jerk.... Wed Oct 07 19:23:56 -0700 2009 5087190 124908 jeanmarieok 2 5087228 Yes - classic Reality TV villain and cliché - "my way or the highway" How many times have we heard that Jennifer is not feeling well... The editing this season has been sloppy and lackluster compared to past seasons. Wed Oct 07 19:26:07 -0700 2009 5087215 251260 vinhotinto75 3 5087246 if you think about it, feeling well usually affects your taste of smell and taste pretty strongly, so thats a big factor in her cooking abilities..... not to defend bad editing, but it is kind of a big deal Wed Oct 07 19:32:10 -0700 2009 5087228 264146 kubasd 4 5087267 That is a valid point indeed. Still, I think she would have to fail miserably to be sent home since she is always in the top. In any case, her dish with Kevin was a hit... Wed Oct 07 19:39:05 -0700 2009 5087246 251260 vinhotinto75 3 5087818 "How many times have we heard that Jennifer is not feeling well..." ~~~~~~ Per Tom's blog on Bravo, she *only* mentioned it on camera because she was asked point blank by the camera crew. http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs/tom-colicchio/on-prawns-and-power-outages Interesting comments re: Ash and how he looks at food vs. Michael. Reiterating that Ash essentially is saying he won't last in the competition. Also, looks like the judges didn't realize that Eli had re-salted the gnocchi, and Ashley did *not* say anything about it at JT. I'm thinking if they had known that, Eli might have been the one to go home. Eli *seriously* dodged a bullet! Thu Oct 08 06:15:17 -0700 2009 5087228 10532 LindaWhit 4 5088000 Tom said at JT that Eli was responsible for the saltiness of the gnocchi, but that Ashley screwed up even more. Thu Oct 08 07:32:53 -0700 2009 5087818 180506 Ericandblueboy 5 5088037 I'd have to re-watch last night's episode to know what he said at JT. From Tom's blog: "Most of the questions we ask don’t make it into the final version of the program, but we really do try to ascertain who was responsible for what. We didn’t know, as you did from watching the program, that when Ashley gave the gnocchi to Eli they were fine, and he then oversalted them. We knew only that Ashley had made the gnocchi. Ashley made a personal point throughout this competition to treat the team as a team and never ascribe blame to her partners, even when it was merited. She did so both with Mattin and, now, with Eli. This is admirable, but it would have benefitted her to say to us, “Eli oversalted the gnocci I’d made. I knew it the moment I tasted them.” " Thu Oct 08 07:48:30 -0700 2009 5088000 10532 LindaWhit 6 5088046 At one point, Tom says that Eli is the one responsible for the saltiness. Could that have happened at a later time and then edited to make it look like it was during JT? I dunno. I just remember Tom saying that. Thu Oct 08 07:51:57 -0700 2009 5088037 180506 Ericandblueboy 6 5088394 Adding insult to injury for Ashley fans and Eli haters, Toby blog says that it was a close decision whether to eliminate Eli or Ashley. Sounds to me if Ashley had pinned the gnocci salt problems on Eli, it could have made all the difference in the judging. Tom knows Ashley knows how to make a proper gnocci from previous challenges. Thu Oct 08 09:35:03 -0700 2009 5088037 323958 dach 7 5088492 Crap. Haven't read Toby's blog yet (wasn't up earlier this a.m.), but I'm bummed. I would have much preferred Ashley staying. Eli's in my permanent dog house with Mike Isabella, the one who can't cook Asian and yet wouldn't listen to his teammate and said in confessional that he'd throw out whatever she had prepped anyway. Thu Oct 08 10:00:41 -0700 2009 5088394 10532 LindaWhit 8 5088499 Gosh I missed that too! (I tivo'ed it an was watching it this morning while I was getting ready for work!) Thu Oct 08 10:02:50 -0700 2009 5088492 174753 NellyNel 1 5087275 I had started another thread just around the same time....my thoughts (a little bit more info here about the first 20 minutes)... Jennifer is REALLY sick - rut-roh! Tyler Florence is Guest Judge, and the Quickfire is sponsored by Cookster.com - a Top Chef slot machine where you pull the arm and get 3 keywords - Mood, Taste, and Cuisine. Seemed like Umami and Asian came up a LOT. It's also a high stakes QF. On the Low end? Robin, Eli and Jennifer. Ouch. Those who were in the Top 3 were Mike I., Kevin, and Michael. Kevin wins, and gets to choose his high stakes win - either $15,000 or Immunity....and he chooses the money! The Elimination Challenge? Padma shows up at their house to tell the chefs that in THREE HOURS they are going to be throwing their own home dinner party. They're working in teams - and Mike I. and Robin are a team....now THIS ought to be interesting! ETA: There's a LOT of confessional talk with Mike I. Hmmmmm.... And Robin's right - there's a lot of "I" talk when Mike I. is speaking - even when he was talking to Tom Colicchio about what their team was cooking - it was all "I'm going to be doing...." - while Robin stayed off to the side, head down, and a wry grin on her face. He just proved her right. :-) Sounds like Jennifer/Kevin team did the best; I'm thinking Michael and Ash might be in the bottom. Rut-roh. Is this going to take out one of the favorites? Wed Oct 07 19:43:08 -0700 2009 5087190 10532 LindaWhit 2 5087283 Laurene/Brian and Kevin/Jennifer were the Top 2 teams! Winning dish is Kevin & Jennifer's - and JENNIFER WINS for her sauce! Yay!!! Michael/Ash, and Eli/Ashley are in the bottom. Mike I. is saved. Wed Oct 07 19:45:58 -0700 2009 5087275 10532 LindaWhit 3 5087288 No Surprise! Kevin and Jennifer will be in the final 3 with one of the brothers! And Jennifer wins! Wed Oct 07 19:47:12 -0700 2009 5087283 251260 vinhotinto75 4 5087294 ugh, stupid me, i knew there would be spoilers, but i forgot to look at what time it was when i read these.... and i got started late watching the episode on tivo...... (hits herself in the side of the head... doh!) Wed Oct 07 19:50:34 -0700 2009 5087288 264146 kubasd 4 5087296 OK, did Ash just throw Michael under the bus? And interestingly, they (judges) came down hard on Eli and Ashley. Wed Oct 07 19:50:45 -0700 2009 5087288 10532 LindaWhit 5 5087300 This is one of the most awkward JT ever. Any of the four could go, but I think Ashley is safe and Michael is too good. Yet - it was Ashley! I thought it would be Eli and the salted Gnocchi. Wed Oct 07 19:52:30 -0700 2009 5087296 251260 vinhotinto75 6 5087315 I think that was the most awkward stew room ever! The whole Keven/Bryan interaction was really uncomfortable! Wed Oct 07 19:58:36 -0700 2009 5087300 108820 QSheba 2 5087515 Good for Kevin in the QF - gets a nice chunk of cash rather than the frying pan he won for his last win! Plus his team wins. Doing great for having no Asian experience. Wed Oct 07 22:32:09 -0700 2009 5087275 15036 tastyjon 2 5088402 Was Jennifer sick because of a virus, hungover or pregnant with Michael V's love child? Also, she gave Tyler Florence a peck when she won the $10K Macy's shopping spree. Now we know the true origin of Swine Flu! :-) Thu Oct 08 09:37:21 -0700 2009 5087275 56054 dave_c 3 5088670 >Was Jennifer sick because of a virus, hungover or pregnant with Michael V's love child?< Thanks for the mid afternoon spit take all over my monitor. Thu Oct 08 10:57:07 -0700 2009 5088402 11826 Phaedrus 3 5089625 I didn't catch the episode, but love catching up here. Laugh of the day goes to you re: Michael V's love child. LMAO. Thu Oct 08 16:53:05 -0700 2009 5088402 255446 Gigi007 1 5087311 I signed on just to say that I KNEW it! I knew the brothers weren't as competitive as the editors tried to make them seem. Good for Brian getting all protective and defensive for his brother. I loved it. Wed Oct 07 19:57:46 -0700 2009 5087190 23389 charmedgirl 2 5088042 I gotta admit that was pretty touching. Even after being in the top you could see he was not at all happy. He can't help but protect his little bro. Thu Oct 08 07:50:46 -0700 2009 5087311 241661 gastrotect 2 5094109 I think he crossed the line from protective to hostile; I didn't get the vibe from Kevin that he was trying to bash the dish, but had been busy with his own dish and didn't know specifics about the other dishes, and Bryan jumped down his throat. Sat Oct 10 17:33:13 -0700 2009 5087311 92324 Foodie in Friedberg 3 5094197 Well, we're all entitled to our opinions. :-) I don't think he was overly hostile or "jumped down" Kevin's throat. He got a bit snippy and shut down the conversation, yeah. He just didn't want to engage in a post mortem about the dish that might send his brother home. I thought it was a perfectly understandable reaction, and showed some loyalty to his brother. Sat Oct 10 18:34:07 -0700 2009 5094109 23389 charmedgirl 3 5096686 I don't think anyone ever said Kevin was bashing the dish. It seemed Kevin was just trying to figure out what the dish was and why there might have been a problem. But Bryan was protecting his brother in the sense that he didn't want anyone projecting or dissecting the dish without actually knowing how it tasted. He abruptly ended the conversation and was probably more terse than he should have been, but Kevin clearly understood. I watched the pre-game show for the Colts-Titans game last night and there was an interesting parallel there. Bob Costas interviewed Peyton Manning and asked Peyton about watching Eli play football. Peyton said that if he wins and Eli loses on any given Sunday, he (Peyton) doesn't feel completely happy. This is someone who is arguably the best, and most competitive, quarterback in football who competes for a living and even he can't shake the brotherly need to protect. Mon Oct 12 07:39:34 -0700 2009 5094109 241661 gastrotect 1 5087317 And Ashley is gone. Looks like the judges were looking at her and Michael as the responsible ones. I don't think Ash is long for the show. Wed Oct 07 19:59:37 -0700 2009 5087190 10532 LindaWhit 2 5087331 Especially after he admitted that he isn't as creative or innovative. Even if that is the case, he should never have even have put that in the judges thinking for this episode or the future. Wed Oct 07 20:04:54 -0700 2009 5087317 251260 vinhotinto75 3 5087334 There are still a couple of weaker chefs than Ash, at least in my opinion. But I agree, he has drawn unwanted attention to himself with his comments. Wed Oct 07 20:07:41 -0700 2009 5087331 124908 jeanmarieok 4 5089912 I thought it Michael V's comments about Ash were sweet- when he said Ash's a good #2 and will be a great chef after he learns a bit more. It seemed sincere, not arrogant. Thu Oct 08 19:15:54 -0700 2009 5087334 95577 yamalam 1 5087330 Toby is channeling James Carville w/those glasses. Padma is drinking water. Toby alludes to a dish as Monet, better from afar than close up. Ash is bromancing Picasso. Wed Oct 07 20:04:44 -0700 2009 5087190 195694 edible complex 2 5087336 Then I'm guessing she was pregnant when they were filming or trying to conceive- I don't recall the media saying when she's due so.... Wed Oct 07 20:08:51 -0700 2009 5087330 108820 QSheba 3 5087341 IIRC, I think I read that she's only 4 months along? The baby bump at the Emmys was still pretty small and unnoticeable. And I *think* this part of the season was filmed in early summer. So I'm not sure the two tie together. Wed Oct 07 20:11:17 -0700 2009 5087336 10532 LindaWhit 4 5087372 That's why I said she could have been trying to conceive and therefore avoiding alcohol. A lot of women who are actively trying to conceive will take prenatal vitamins and avoid alcohol "just in case" they get pregnant that cycle. Due to her infertility issues, that wouldn't be surprising. Or she could have been taking a medication that is contraindicated that day, something as simple as advil shouldn't be mixed w/ alcohol. Who knows....As far as having a big "bump"... it totally depends on the woman- I am 7 months and can still wear "normal" clothes - a "L" fitted shirt from Banana Republic instead of the usual "M", nomal yoga pants... The taller you are the longer it takes to show. (And my little one is measuring 1 week ahead, so I'm not starving him:)) Wed Oct 07 20:32:11 -0700 2009 5087341 108820 QSheba 2 5087529 Toby's analogy is idiotic. The closer you examine a great painting, the more you appreciate the brilliance of the artist to create a masterpiece from thousands of individual brush strokes. The true art is in the details. Not even sure why he's on the show, other than to be a snark. How about Jonathan Gold if they want a newspaper critic on the panel? Wed Oct 07 22:51:44 -0700 2009 5087330 15036 tastyjon 3 5088013 Ever heard of pointillism? If you examine it up close, it's just dots of color. You have to stand back to see the picture. Thu Oct 08 07:35:47 -0700 2009 5087529 180506 Ericandblueboy 3 5088069 I understand his point. Monets, like most Impressionist works, are meant to be viewed from a relative distance. Up close they are nothing. Sure, talented artists and art lovers will appreciate the care, the strokes and the color mixing, but it's still a valid analogy I think. Thu Oct 08 07:56:44 -0700 2009 5087529 241661 gastrotect 4 5088550 The first time I heard something other than a painting being referred to as a "Monet" was in the movie Clueless. Alicia Silverstone says it of one of her classmates. Something to the effect of "from far away she's fine but up close she's just a mess." Thu Oct 08 10:22:36 -0700 2009 5088069 76025 mojoeater 5 5088671 Yea. "Monet" and "Butterface" are popular frat-boyish terms for girls that aren't as good looking as they may at first seem. I would imagine Monet could be just as easily applied to guys however. Thu Oct 08 10:57:16 -0700 2009 5088550 241661 gastrotect 6 5090955 And food apparently. Fri Oct 09 08:45:48 -0700 2009 5088671 76025 mojoeater 1 5087380 Were you surprised by Ashley's departure? I have to say I was disappointed. I think she's a better chef than Ash (or Robin, or Laurine) so it's too bad she made such an early exit. She's the only one I thought didn't really deserve to go home. Ahh well. I guess we see again, you are only as good as your last dish. Wed Oct 07 20:36:27 -0700 2009 5087190 108820 QSheba 2 5087423 Wildly disappointed. I thought she had a lot left to give in this show. _sigh_ Wed Oct 07 21:07:04 -0700 2009 5087380 59258 smtucker 2 5087447 I think the fact that she didn't throw Eli under the bus reflects well on her character, but is probably the reason she went home. If she made the gnocchi and grilled the prawns, what the hell did Eli do? Wed Oct 07 21:23:01 -0700 2009 5087380 76025 mojoeater 3 5087771 Good point. He re-seasoned (and over-seasoned, it seems!) the gnocchi. I think both Eli and Ash skated last night. Thu Oct 08 05:47:35 -0700 2009 5087447 10532 LindaWhit 4 5089917 Plus, as Ashley pointed out during cooking, Eli actively avoided taking responsibility to grill the prawns, as if he knew they were easy to mess up and would rather leave that to Ashley. Weak! Thu Oct 08 19:17:31 -0700 2009 5087771 95577 yamalam 2 5087518 At this point, I'm very attached to a lot of them, and Ashley was definitely among those I liked most. I will actively seek out her restaurant on a vacation some day. I'm confident she'll put out food I'd be happy to eat. Wed Oct 07 22:41:08 -0700 2009 5087380 130151 dmd_kc 2 5087777 I'm so sad Ashley's gone. She was one of the more interesting chefs to watch and her dishes were always a surprise--either good or bad. I'm not sure I get the reasoning behind the judges decision. This was a team challenge, but it didn't have an "executive chef" role clearly defined so one person should not have to take the fall for the entire team. I guess the raw prawns did her in, but doesn't Eli's oversalting and bad concept trump that? If she gets booted for undercooking, why didn't Mike get booted for overcooking? Which is a worse sin, in the age of sushi and "rare" seafood? I want Ashley back! There's no one left to get in the face of jerks like Isabella and Eli. Waaaa! Thu Oct 08 05:49:12 -0700 2009 5087380 100412 newhavener07 3 5087918 Mike at least recognized that he had overcooked the halibut. Ashely thought she had cooked the prawns correctly. Unfortunately, she didn't speak up, so the judges had no way to know it was Eli who oversalted the gnocchi. Thu Oct 08 07:01:02 -0700 2009 5087777 11634 saeyedoc 4 5088273 " the judges had no way to know it was Eli who oversalted the gnocchi" IIR Tom realized that Eli was responsible for the salt and said some thing to the effect of the gnocchi didn't get salty by themselves after Ashely made them. While Ashly made some errors I have no idea WTH either Eli or Ash did for their team. I'll put Eli, Ash and Robbin in the bottom three. Thu Oct 08 08:59:40 -0700 2009 5087918 253154 Fritter 3 5088025 Cooking prawns is something Ashley claimed she's done before, and has done well. But she failed at that, something that IMO any of those chefs should be able to do correctly. I liked Ashley, I wish she was still there, but she was solely responsible for the prawns. Mike's problem with over-cooking was due in part to the electrical problems, and having to re-start the cooking process. So some of that was not under his control. I strongly disagree with the judges at the JT. They were comparing this to something happening in your restaurant. There's a big difference. A restaurant owner would be aware of any equipment/electric problems as they arise and have them corrected. Plus the chef could start over with other food to correct the problem. Here in their house, Mike had no control or foreknowledge of the heavy load from all the electric woks. He should not have been penalized for that. Given the proper stove to cook on, the outcome could have been much different. Thu Oct 08 07:40:34 -0700 2009 5087777 243273 pacheeseguy 4 5088648 But Mike chose to cook where he did -- he could have cooked in the kitchen, but decided to use the other stuff provided to them. Now, sure, the kitchen was crowded, but he could have done his best to work in there, or he could have done a better job to monitor what was going on with the unfamiliar equipment that he was cooking on. A good chef doesn't blame his tools, he tries well to work with what he's got. Thu Oct 08 10:50:37 -0700 2009 5088025 13525 JasmineG 4 5089220 I think the main difference between a chef in a restaurant and a Top Chef challenge is that they don't have the time or, as Mike mentioned, the product to do it over. In a restaurant, if you misfire a dish you can dump it, get another piece of fish from the walk-in and start over, and the customer will be none the wiser. On Top Chef, that's not an option -- you have to serve the "first pancake." Thu Oct 08 14:07:20 -0700 2009 5088025 10159 Ruth Lafler 2 5087886 shades of Tre in season 3...... Thu Oct 08 06:49:07 -0700 2009 5087380 52499 ChefJune 2 5087900 I totally agree - I thought Ashley had a lot more to give - than say Ash, Robin and Laurine.......... ...but it is clear who the top 3 or 4 will be, so I think the last few episodes will be quite exciting! Thu Oct 08 06:54:11 -0700 2009 5087380 174753 NellyNel 2 5089130 I hated to see Ashley go, too. Remember, it just wasn't a matter of underdone shrimp and oversalted gnocchi. They also questioned why she would even serve something heavy like gnocchi for a late evening summertime outdoor dinner. Thu Oct 08 13:39:09 -0700 2009 5087380 189144 dmjordan 3 5090573 I missed that (was having a hard time staying awake the other night) but I am not sure I agree. Really good gnocchi should be light and delicate. My sense is that the dish would have been perfectly appropriate had it been executed correctly. Fri Oct 09 06:28:42 -0700 2009 5089130 10158 susancinsf 3 5090717 I don't think gnocchi--when prepared correctly--is heavy at all. When it's good, gnocchi should be like light pillows. Oversalting ruins the dish, and even though I'm no pro, but even the worst gnocchi I've ever made hasn't been over-salted. Sometimes over cooked, but never over salted. Fri Oct 09 07:24:05 -0700 2009 5089130 255446 Gigi007 4 5092836 I've had some very light gnocchi during the summer that worked very well. But Eli and Ashley were frying their gnocchi, which would certainly make them heavier. Fri Oct 09 23:25:34 -0700 2009 5090717 13306 Nettie 5 5104189 I actually didn't see the episode. Anyway, to me, fried gnocchi is odd (although I understand it may be popular in some regions of Italy). I learned to make gnocchi from scratch in Italy, and the Italian cooks (one from Rome and the other from a town near Florence) who taught me prepared it in boiling water with the light quality of the pasta emphasized. So, I can only think of gnocchi as light. Wed Oct 14 20:33:10 -0700 2009 5092836 255446 Gigi007 3 5103626 I get so sick of the seasonal comments. As others have said, correctly made gnocchi really isn't that heavy. Those of us who live in warm climates year round don't plan on rearranging our lives to eat light/cool dishes just because something is too heavy. I have a feeling if the chefs did follow that philosophy in that show, they'd get chastised for being one note. Wed Oct 14 16:28:23 -0700 2009 5089130 107671 queencru 4 5104150 I agree. Howie tried to make that point when he was criticized for making a braised dish in Top Chef Miami. Although he didn't express himself well, he tried to point out that he lives in Florida, and if he only ate braised dishes in cold weather, he'd never eat them. Wed Oct 14 20:12:31 -0700 2009 5103626 10159 Ruth Lafler 4 5104259 not to take anything away from your (good) point, but i think maybe the judges kinda tend to put the smack-down on chefs who show signs of being "one-trick." not that ashley can't make lots of stuff, but someone commented in the episode that she makes gnocci daily in her restaurant, and hasn't she make gnocci many times already in the show? maybe the negative "heavy" comments were really the judges trying to say they didn't like to see this menu item repeated by this contestant. i wish the judges would put the smack-down on ceviche for the season. gawd i am sick of looking at ceviche on this show. Wed Oct 14 21:08:03 -0700 2009 5103626 46030 soupkitten 5 5104309 She had made gnocchi once before, I believe. Wed Oct 14 21:38:08 -0700 2009 5104259 10074 Caitlin McGrath 5 5104616 She made it once before. I think in this case where the cheftestants are handed a set of ingredients, it's not so egregious. I don't remember what her ingredients were, but perhaps gnocchi was what made sense with what they were provided. At least she's not like Mike I who seems to complain whenever he can't recreate a dish from his own restaurant. Thu Oct 15 04:52:17 -0700 2009 5104259 107671 queencru 6 5105250 my bad. i thought she'd done it 2x, not just once. never mind in that case. Thu Oct 15 09:19:56 -0700 2009 5104616 46030 soupkitten 1 5087588 Agreed... Scallop and ceviche are overused this season. Kevin is my pick for front runner. He's a cooking savant. Interesting that Ashley goes home, but Eli didn't want to cook the prawns. Like Mike I, Eli's been a lot of talk but really hasn't done anything to prove his abilities, other than pick the right partners. Thu Oct 08 00:22:30 -0700 2009 5087190 56054 dave_c 2 5087784 Interesting when you look at the progress on Wikipedia; Ash has definitely not been as good as others: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Chef_6#Contestant_progress The closest he's come to a win is being on a team win, but was not picked as a judge favorite. Whereas Ashley was at least in the High side several times. Robin and Mike I. also seem to be skaters, although Mike I. did win one QF. Jennifer, Kevin and Bryan are the three who have *never* been in the bottom during the Elimination Challenges. I'm thinking those are the Top 3 unless something drastic happens. Thu Oct 08 05:53:17 -0700 2009 5087588 10532 LindaWhit 3 5087929 I hope Kevin wins the whole shebang. He is so talented, not to mention humble unlike some of his other competitors--hello, brothers. The brother who has less personality than the other, I forget his name, sorry to say as I know it's a cooking competition, is an ass and needs to take a class in cooking up a sunnier disposition. He is way too intense and it bugs t he crap out of me. When he snapped at Eli in the waiting room while his brother was before judges' panel, I was so annoyed. Calm down, kid. It's ok. Ugh. Go Kevin! Thu Oct 08 07:04:51 -0700 2009 5087784 108629 HabaneroJane 4 5087942 Oh I missed that bit! (about the bro snapping at Eli) I agree I really like Kevin - I would love to hang out with the guy and watch him cook a meal for me!! Thu Oct 08 07:11:24 -0700 2009 5087929 174753 NellyNel 5 5087953 I'm trying to recall that part as well - Jane, are you talking about Bryan snapping at Eli? Wouldn't Eli have been in the Bottom group with Bryan's brother, Michael? Or am I mixing up the brothers in my mind again? LOL ETA: Oh wait - you're talking about Michael snapping at Eli when Bryan was in front of the judges for the winning dish. Thu Oct 08 07:13:52 -0700 2009 5087942 10532 LindaWhit 6 5087975 yes yes! That's it. Michael is his name and all Eli was asking was how the dish was made. It wasn't like Eli was asking Michael what he thought of the dish. He needs to chill. Meanwhile how about next week's preview when Eli gets into it with Robin? "You're not my mother," Eli shouts. "I don't want to be your mother," snaps Robin. PS: Ash's effusive deferral to the brother (again I cant seem to remember their names) was pathetic and stupid. He dodged a big bullet there, too. Thu Oct 08 07:23:25 -0700 2009 5087953 108629 HabaneroJane 6 5087990 I don't remember Michael snapping at Eli while Brian was in fron of the judges for the winning dish -- what did he say? Thu Oct 08 07:29:20 -0700 2009 5087953 23389 charmedgirl 7 5088003 he was asking michael about what was in brian's dish. how the asparagus and something else were utlized. to which michael nastily snapped something to the effect of 'did you taste it?' i would have snapped right back at him . it was just a question! Thu Oct 08 07:33:34 -0700 2009 5087990 108629 HabaneroJane 8 5088033 A slight mix-up I think- Kevin was asking Bryan about what was in Michael's dish, and Bryan was the one that snapped at Kevin, defending Michael. I for one thought it was a) nice of Bryan to stick up for his brother, with a valid point that no one had tried the dish in question; and b) considering the amount of time they spend in the stew room waiting, I'm not particularly surprised that even the usually quiet Bryan would snap at some point. Thu Oct 08 07:47:12 -0700 2009 5088003 105444 gyozagirl 9 5088043 I didn't see it as sticking up. Based on what we saw, Kevin merely asked a question about the dish, he didn't criticize it. No need for V the Elder to turn into the conversation police. Thu Oct 08 07:51:11 -0700 2009 5088033 163246 tofuburrito 9 5088054 ah, EVEN WORSE that he snapped at Kevin! The nerve! I don't know why I thought it was Eli. Bryan and his brother are tools. Talented tools, but tools. :) Thu Oct 08 07:53:33 -0700 2009 5088033 108629 HabaneroJane 8 5088041 No, that was Brian snapping at Kevin when Michael was at JT for being in the bottom. I posted about it above -- I actually liked seeing that. Yeah, he was a little out of line (Kevin probably didn't deserve the attitude), but I liked seeing Brian get all defensive and protective of his little brother. He was just worried for Michael and he (admittedly, unfairly) took it out on Kevin. But I liked seeing it because, to me, it is an indication that all the petty "rivalry" we've been seeing largely is a creation of the editors. I had suspected, and hoped, that all along, since the brothers seemed too mature, focused and level headed for such childishness. And for the record, I don't think they're boring or lacking in personality. I think they're like Harold: they're there to cook. Thu Oct 08 07:50:42 -0700 2009 5088003 23389 charmedgirl 8 5088052 Yes, but how would Michael know what was in Bryan's dish or how it was made? He was busy cooking his own food! I don't fault Michael for snapping back at Eli - it was kind of a dumb question on Eli's part. I'm going to have rewatch this episode. The whole stew room part was confusing. Thu Oct 08 07:52:53 -0700 2009 5088003 10532 LindaWhit 8 5088091 Ah, no. It was Kevin and Brian. Kevin was obviously trying to figure why Michael of all people would be on the bottom, but Brian was too stressed to hear it. He probably didn't need to snap, but he was protecting his little brother by squashing any talk of him. Perfectly acceptable IMO. I actually thought it was sweet to see that the brothers aren't all sibling rivalry. They obviously care about each other a great deal, otherwise Brian wouldn't have been so sullen after a good finish. Thu Oct 08 08:04:44 -0700 2009 5088003 241661 gastrotect 9 5089976 I think we should stop referring to them as Michael and Bryan. Monotone Boring and Monotone Boring with Tattooes would make it much clearer. But I really like both of them! And their food isn't boring at all Thu Oct 08 19:42:38 -0700 2009 5088091 95577 yamalam 6 5088022 Wasn't it Bryan snapping at Kevin when he was asking what his brother's dish was? It seemed to me that he was stressed out about his brother being in the bottom and took it out on Kevin. Kevin reminds me of my son and for that reason alone I adore him. Thu Oct 08 07:39:42 -0700 2009 5087953 124435 sharonlouk 5 5087960 Yes - it was certainly an uncomfortable moment and I also agree that Bryan might be a great chef, but he is not a fan fave because of his lack of personality and color. I still think he will be in the final four with Kevin, Jen, and his brother. What is odd this season is that most of them already have high level positions or own their own place unlike most of the past winners. Even Jen has a position with one of the most famous chefs in the US. I'm wondering if Mike Isabella or Robin will stay around longer in order to provide more drama... Thu Oct 08 07:17:22 -0700 2009 5087942 251260 vinhotinto75 6 5088018 I actually like Bryan more than his brother. I just think he's one of those people who take things seriously, and doesn't talk unless he has something to say. Thu Oct 08 07:37:12 -0700 2009 5087960 124908 jeanmarieok 7 5089641 I have the exact same impression. He does come off rather serious, but as others have commented previously, he likely has a dry, wry sense of humor. And I've heard from people who have dined at the Chef's Table of his restaurant (Volt) that he's actually quite personable. Thu Oct 08 16:57:54 -0700 2009 5088018 255446 Gigi007 8 5090761 I think they both are focused on the goal they've set for themselves, and so they come across as "serious." Fri Oct 09 07:37:27 -0700 2009 5089641 52499 ChefJune 4 5088020 Bryan snapped at Kevin, not Eli. Bryan said he was sick of dissecting other people's food and if you didn't taste it, you can't pass judgement. Thu Oct 08 07:38:47 -0700 2009 5087929 180506 Ericandblueboy 5 5088057 But was Kevin passing judgment or just asking about how a dish was made? (I still thought it was Eli who asked the question of Bryan. I'm so confoozled! LOL) Thu Oct 08 07:54:00 -0700 2009 5088020 10532 LindaWhit 6 5088093 mea culpa for confusing everyone but Kevin, yes, Kevin, was just asking how the dish was made. That was it. harmless. And then uptight brother snapped. Thu Oct 08 08:05:33 -0700 2009 5088057 108629 HabaneroJane 7 5088111 You have to understand where Brian was coming from. His point was that none of them had the dish, so no one could really say what went wrong. He didn't want to play a guessing game, least of all about his brother. He was worried about his brother and he felt the need to protect him. He obviously didn't want to hash it out. No matter how old you get that feeling for a sibling never leaves you. Did he have to snap? Of course not. But I don't hold it against him really and I'm guessing Kevin didn't either. Afterward he apologized realizing where Brian's head was. Thu Oct 08 08:11:46 -0700 2009 5088093 241661 gastrotect 8 5088122 Gastrotect, you are too kind. i just found it par for his uptight course and somewhat offensive. but kevin was a class act and backed off whereas Mike I. would probably have gotten in his face. Now that woulda been something, huh?! Thu Oct 08 08:13:51 -0700 2009 5088111 108629 HabaneroJane 9 5088159 Haha. I think MIke I would back down too, but for a different reason: he probably only picks fights he can win. As for Brian, I think he would have responded a bit differently had the convo not been about his brother. He probably would have been uptight still, but most likely brushed it off by saying he didn't really know about the dish rather than snapping. I think the emotion came from protecting his brother. That was my immediate thought anyway. Thu Oct 08 08:25:04 -0700 2009 5088122 241661 gastrotect 10 5088191 Gastro--had the convo not been about his bro, he woulda remained mute, which is what he usually does. So wait what's the general consensus here? Which brother is the better cook? Michael, yes? Thu Oct 08 08:31:16 -0700 2009 5088159 108629 HabaneroJane 11 5088214 I think Michael is more innovative, but I'm sure I could say either one is "better" per se. In fact, between Kevin, Jen and the bro's I think there is barely a sliver of difference in terms of talent. I'm not sure there is enough space between them all for light to pass through. Thu Oct 08 08:41:56 -0700 2009 5088191 241661 gastrotect 10 5088216 I think SOME (not all) of Brian's reaction was from the fact that he didn't win. He seems pretty competitive and it was a close decision. I don't doubt that he was defending his brother also. Thu Oct 08 08:42:29 -0700 2009 5088159 158403 jcattles 9 5089692 I'll have to agree with you that Bryan's got a stick up his butt. I've known quite a few people like him -- fiercely loyal but incredibly rigid. Overall, I think he's a good guy but I wouldn't want to get on his bad side. I really do like Kevin. He seems really talented but has such a nice disposition (at least from what the editors decide to show us). I thought he was really diplomatic when they asked him about the contestants' beef with Robin. He's the one I'm rooting for. Thu Oct 08 17:18:03 -0700 2009 5088122 10763 Miss Needle 10 5089762 He was also very diplomatic when they tried to quiz him about which foods the chefs at the table liked and didn't for the French meal. I also think that it's so cute that the crew went out and bought him the suit that he wore to that dinner that day (as per Gail's blog). Thu Oct 08 17:47:00 -0700 2009 5089692 13525 JasmineG 11 5090722 Oh yes! I forgot about them quizzing him! He did handle himself very well. Not sure if he will win the whole thing as there are so many talented contestants this year, but I he's getting my vote for Fan Favorite. Fri Oct 09 07:24:53 -0700 2009 5089762 10763 Miss Needle 8 5088503 I don't hold it against him - whether it had been Eli or Kevin asking the question of Bryan, my original point upthread (although it was about Michael, not Bryan) still stands. HOW could Bryan know what Michael's dish tasted like, putting him in the Bottom group? Bryan was busy cooking his own dish! I still think the way the question was put was idiotic. But as you said - Kevin didn't seem to hold it against him, and did apologize. Thu Oct 08 10:03:50 -0700 2009 5088111 10532 LindaWhit 9 5088888 my original point upthread (although it was about Michael, not Bryan) still stands. HOW could Bryan know what Michael's dish tasted like, putting him in the Bottom group? ********** I thought that was Bryan's point - that none of the contestants tasted each other's food so there's no basis for critcism. Thu Oct 08 12:13:00 -0700 2009 5088503 180506 Ericandblueboy 10 5089729 Most of you are missing an important point, Brian knew why his brother was in the bottom group but refused to share the info and instead snapped at Kevin. After the food was served, still at the house and before JT, Brian went over to Mike and asked what was wrong. Mike told him he had overcooked the fish and made another comment about the raviolo on top of it. Kevin did not ask how the dish tasted, he asked about the elements of the dish, that is why Brian said he didn't want to dissect the dish. I wouldn't be surprised if next week we see an apology from Brian to Kevin. No reason to think Brian is a jerk, just an intense talented guy focused on winning. Thu Oct 08 17:32:26 -0700 2009 5088888 14555 stuartlafonda 5 5088061 yes yes I stand corrected but I still think Bryan is a tool. Bad TV. Bad, bad TV. good cook, sure, but bad for TV. Or not, because I am irked enough to talk about it today. hehehe. Thu Oct 08 07:54:46 -0700 2009 5088020 108629 HabaneroJane 5 5089363 Part of me thinks Bryan overreacted, I don't think Kevin was passing judgement, but I can see Kevin as a info nerd. Wasn't Kevin the engineering geek that passed on a full scholarship to MIT to become a chef? Those type of folks are analyzers using every little it of info to not make the same mistake. However, Bryan's bro was up on the chopping block so emotions were probably running high. Thu Oct 08 14:59:24 -0700 2009 5088020 56054 dave_c 6 5089955 I think that was the Bryan V equivalent of Dale's wall punching. I bet that's about as explosive as "Iceman" gets. Thu Oct 08 19:33:54 -0700 2009 5089363 95577 yamalam 6 5090150 Part of me thinks Bryan overreacted **** I agree with that. I think Bryan could have declined to discuss Michael's failure without being snappy. Thu Oct 08 21:21:31 -0700 2009 5089363 180506 Ericandblueboy 7 5090574 While I agree he could have been less snappish, we also don't get to experience the stress they're under. Long days/nights in a hot kitchen or elsewhere, filming the entire season in 30 days or so, cameras constantly in our faces, producers asking inane questions trying to get sound bites....yeah, I think most of us would have snapped as well. Fri Oct 09 06:29:23 -0700 2009 5090150 10532 LindaWhit 1 5088253 I was just reading through Tom's blogs and boy you can really tell he is very excited by Jennifer. I think he admires her and respects her allot. I'd agree I think she is really really good, and she is confident without being arrogant. I'd love to try her food Oh and read Jamies most recent blog too - MAN her language is pretty disgusting!! Wow - Zero class!! Thu Oct 08 08:51:20 -0700 2009 5087190 174753 NellyNel 2 5088523 Not sure what you mean by the zero class, but I do have to agree with her re: Mike Isabella. He's a complete a$$hat. Thu Oct 08 10:11:29 -0700 2009 5088253 10532 LindaWhit 3 5088544 ew i just don't think "douche-bag" is a word I'd associate with class Thu Oct 08 10:20:59 -0700 2009 5088523 174753 NellyNel 4 5088608 OK, fair enough. But Jamie has always said it as she sees it. I can look past how she writes to determine if I agree with what she's writing. Her observations are spot-on, IMO. "Class distinction" isn't one I'd draw here. Thu Oct 08 10:40:08 -0700 2009 5088544 10532 LindaWhit 5 5088743 Believe my I can curse like a truckdriver sometimes - but there is a difference between the heat of the moment cursing and actually writing the words "dick head" and "douche"! Yikes! And I am sorry - he may be a dick but he's not a douche - to me a douche is someone knowingly evil - and poor Mike I isnt really. He is just a dumb, simple guy. Thu Oct 08 11:23:08 -0700 2009 5088608 174753 NellyNel 6 5088791 Hah, to me a douche is someone exactly like Mike I -- he doesn't seem dumb or simple at all, or anyone to call "poor." I'm really so tired of him, his whole thing isn't entertaining, it just makes me roll my eyes. Thu Oct 08 11:38:12 -0700 2009 5088743 13525 JasmineG 6 5088801 Well, that kind of *is* the definition of a douche: "a word to describe an individual who has shown themself to be very brainless in one way or another". Thu Oct 08 11:41:25 -0700 2009 5088743 10532 LindaWhit 7 5088869 HA HA!! Is there really a definition of "douche"????!! Thu Oct 08 12:07:27 -0700 2009 5088801 174753 NellyNel 7 5088876 douche - 6 dictionary results douche  /duʃ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [doosh] Show IPA noun, verb, douched, douch⋅ing. Use douche in a Sentence See web results for douche See images of douche –noun 1. a jet or current of water, sometimes with a dissolved medicating or cleansing agent, applied to a body part, organ, or cavity for medicinal or hygienic purposes. 2. the application of such a jet. 3. an instrument, as a syringe, for administering it. 4. a bath administered by such a jet. –verb (used with object) 5. to apply a douche to. –verb (used without object) 6. to use a douche or douches; undergo douching. NAh!! Thu Oct 08 12:09:10 -0700 2009 5088801 174753 NellyNel 8 5089018 Urban Dictionary has a definition you might like to read: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=douche or is he a douchebag? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=douchebag Thu Oct 08 12:59:31 -0700 2009 5088876 158403 jcattles 9 5089044 LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok I guess you are all correct then - Mike I IS a douche! Thu Oct 08 13:06:20 -0700 2009 5089018 174753 NellyNel 10 5089647 N-i-c-e. Thu Oct 08 17:00:15 -0700 2009 5089044 255446 Gigi007 9 5089099 Bingo - it was an Urban Dictionary definition. :-) But now that I've read the alternative definition, I do believe the "bag" can be added! LOL Thu Oct 08 13:27:20 -0700 2009 5089018 10532 LindaWhit 10 5089132 ha ha! I swear I laughed so hard I nearly fell off my chair! Thu Oct 08 13:39:54 -0700 2009 5089099 174753 NellyNel 10 5091889 And we can extend that definition in ways that still apply: heavily marketed but ultimately bad for women.... Fri Oct 09 14:05:35 -0700 2009 5089099 16734 Lizard 4 5088687 Haha. I don't know that I'd associate it with class either, but I also think it's the perfect description for guys like Mike I. Truth be told, very few people (if any at all) are all class, all the time. Jamie has always been outspoken though, so certainly no surprises here. Thu Oct 08 11:05:38 -0700 2009 5088544 241661 gastrotect 2 5088613 She used the words jackass and dickhead, but other than that it was pretty clean. And she used the words appropriately! Thu Oct 08 10:41:07 -0700 2009 5088253 76025 mojoeater 3 5088651 Well, she did call Mike I. a douche in the title of her blog as well. :-) I still think Jamie's observations are spot-on, as I said above. ;-) Thu Oct 08 10:51:28 -0700 2009 5088613 10532 LindaWhit 1 5088894 2 brothers, Kevin and Jenn. The rest can GTFO. Michael V is my favorite to win it all. Thu Oct 08 12:14:57 -0700 2009 5087190 146613 Evilbanana11 2 5088992 I don't think anyone who has been watching the show carefully will argue with your top 4. Thu Oct 08 12:52:21 -0700 2009 5088894 10195 KTinNYC 3 5088996 I agree Thu Oct 08 12:54:03 -0700 2009 5088992 174753 NellyNel 3 5089048 I don't think anyone who has been watching the show (carefully or not) will argue with your top 4 ;-) Thu Oct 08 13:07:55 -0700 2009 5088992 53971 momjamin 4 5089136 I think those are the four strongest chefs but I'm pretty sure at least one will screw up enough to allow a dark horse into the top 4. Perhaps Laurine or Mike I. Talent doesn't guarantee survival in TC. Remember Ilan... Thu Oct 08 13:41:01 -0700 2009 5089048 100412 newhavener07 5 5089164 I think those are the four strongest chefs but I'm pretty sure at least one will screw up enough to allow a dark horse into the top 4. **** What is enough? I think the top chefs get to make at least 1 mistake. Mike V made his last night so he might get the heave-ho next time he screws up. Thu Oct 08 13:49:17 -0700 2009 5089136 180506 Ericandblueboy 6 5089178 True, the chefs with a lot of wins get a few strikes before they're out. But if there's a big team challenge a strong chef will likely take a leadership role and could be out if his/her team screws up. I'll be very surprised if there aren't a least a few surprises in the final group--Robin, anyone? Thu Oct 08 13:52:38 -0700 2009 5089164 100412 newhavener07 5 5089189 Ilan was on a season with pretty weak cheftestants compared to this year. IMO, none of the top 4 from season 2, Ilan, Sam, Marcel, nor Elia would crack the top 4 of this season. Thu Oct 08 13:57:42 -0700 2009 5089136 10195 KTinNYC 6 5089961 During the first episodes I felt like the producers cherry picked Jen because they wanted to ensure a female winner this year. Thu Oct 08 19:36:33 -0700 2009 5089189 95577 yamalam 2 5090299 Definitely the strongest 4, but i'm guessing one will not make it to the final four. My guess is that one of the four will be the executive chef on the losing team of restaurant wars or some equivalant challenge. Fri Oct 09 00:02:15 -0700 2009 5088894 49556 s0memale 3 5103011 I'm just hoping they skip Restaurant Wars this season. Mix things up a bit. Wed Oct 14 12:40:26 -0700 2009 5090299 168446 LJBTampa 4 5104014 Restaurant wars is coming up soon, they're def. not skipping it. Wed Oct 14 19:13:14 -0700 2009 5103011 10074 Caitlin McGrath 5 5104044 Next week, after the Charlie Palmer episode, I believe. Wed Oct 14 19:26:44 -0700 2009 5104014 10532 LindaWhit 4 5104286 why don't you like RW? i think it seems much more "real" than some of the silly challenges that get thrown at the cheftestants because it actually involves creating a menu and a dining experience, rather than (william shatner voiceover): "one. plate of food. using these, 3. unfamiliar to you, ingredients. in just 30 minutes. . . with a circus animal theme, prepared in this. little. room. with no electricity, just this butane torch." i know it's a contest but who works like that? RW is one of the only times we actually get to see any type of cohesive menu-vision, wrt theme and overall dining experience, from these folks-- and chefs absolutely need to be able to put together a cohesive, executable menu that's also exciting and enjoyable for the diners, these are real essential skills for the real world. btw the above is just the reason *i* like RW-- and i am curious about why others don't like it, not trying to shut anybody down, or anything. is RW boring to watch? very curious about this, thanks for any responses. Wed Oct 14 21:20:35 -0700 2009 5103011 46030 soupkitten 5 5104757 I enjoy the whole show, but RW is a particular favorite. As you said, they've got to work together - planning, creating and executing a menu; planning a cohesive look for their restaurant (which often, chef-owners have to do as well in the real world), making sure the entire restaurant runs smoothly. Whoever is chosen as leader of each team needs to ensure that they pick the right person for each job. Thu Oct 15 06:18:03 -0700 2009 5104286 10532 LindaWhit 5 5105567 I think I might like it more if each contestant were to run their own restaurant -- executive chef and supervising all aspects. I don't think it is the best representation of a person's ability if they only run the front of the house, for example. Thu Oct 15 11:01:38 -0700 2009 5104286 168446 LJBTampa 2 5090710 I completely agree on the final 4. However, I'm still torn between the brothers as the winner. I feel that Michael V. might be more creative than Bryan, but I'm not entirely sure about this given the creative, delicious food I experienced at Bryan V.'s restaurant. If I exclude my impressions of my firsthand experience, then I'd probably go with Michael. Fri Oct 09 07:21:10 -0700 2009 5088894 255446 Gigi007 1 5089249 A so-so challege starts the competition. ******************** I will say, though, that I like the fact that the challenges seem to be more general this season: more thematic and less "cook with this weird ingredient." It may be less interesting, but it gives the chefs a better chance to show off their individual style of cooking. Thu Oct 08 14:16:20 -0700 2009 5087190 10159 Ruth Lafler 1 5089649 So I learned something new...Indian food isn't considered middle-eastern cuisine. I feel like a total idiot. Ergh. Thu Oct 08 17:00:50 -0700 2009 5087190 56183 soypower 2 5089738 she so needs to go home. i will miss ashley. Thu Oct 08 17:37:56 -0700 2009 5089649 99136 AMFM 1 5089735 I was sorry to see Ashley go. I never read the bios but after she left I read Ashley's. I was really surprised that she's 32. Heck, I'd card her at a bar. Yeah, I realize they flash the cheftestant's ages on screen when they ID them, but that's a detail that apparently I've been ignoring. My big question (I always have questions) this week is, why didn't Eli taste the gnocchi before he wrecked them? When will TC contestants learn to taste their own food? Thu Oct 08 17:36:11 -0700 2009 5087190 10516 MplsM ary 1 5089753 So there is an Iron Chef rerun on right now.... Blais vs Batali. And who is sous chef no 2 on the Challenger's team? Why it is Eli! He has put on a few pounds in the intervening years, but it is clearly this year's Top Chef Eli. Thu Oct 08 17:43:15 -0700 2009 5087190 59258 smtucker 2 5089898 IIRC, Blais had said in one of his blogs that he had worked with Eli in the past and respects his cooking. I can't recall if he said he's worked with Kevin or not (same city). Thu Oct 08 19:08:44 -0700 2009 5089753 10532 LindaWhit 3 5089923 Yes, Eli was his best man for his wedding, they are both in Atlanta. The sous thing was just a surprise. Thu Oct 08 19:19:36 -0700 2009 5089898 59258 smtucker 3 5089940 I know he said he knew Kevin well from working in the same city and really respected his food. Not sure if they worked together though. Thu Oct 08 19:27:45 -0700 2009 5089898 95577 yamalam 2 5093381 FYI, the Batali v. Blais/Eli Iron Chef repeats today (10/10/09) at 5:00 p.m. Eastern. And Harold has three new blogs up on the Bravo site (catching up on recent episodes). Sat Oct 10 09:38:33 -0700 2009 5089753 52642 intuitive eggplant 3 5093643 Blais's viewpoint on this week's show (Halftime) is up as well. Gives high marks to Kevin and Jennifer and Bryan. Sat Oct 10 12:45:18 -0700 2009 5093381 10532 LindaWhit 1 5089979 I wonder if Kevin and Jen would've won if Kevin took the immunity rather that the $15k. Hmmm..... Thu Oct 08 19:43:44 -0700 2009 5087190 95577 yamalam 1 5090361 I like Ash seems like a decent guy but he is coming across like Hossea did last season. Constantly in the lower half of the field but some how managing to get by. Like Kevin from day one. He is being portrayed as the one to beat. But you never know if your being set up because of the editing. Fri Oct 09 03:14:15 -0700 2009 5087190 23758 Withnail42 2 5090413 it can't be a total set up if you win as much as he does. :) Fri Oct 09 04:34:33 -0700 2009 5090361 99136 AMFM 2 5090471 Hosea was a cocky guy, probably in the top 7 but not a winner that slipped in with the right confluence of events - other chef's screwing up, etc. Ash is basically admitting he shouldn't be there much longer. The difference is Hosea believed he was the best.. Fri Oct 09 05:30:35 -0700 2009 5090361 176367 grant.cook 1 5090474 Jen impressed me--with cooking while sick, to sharing her prize with Kevin, to being teary when Ashley was leaving. I think she showed a lot more humanity this episode. I was sad to see Ashley leave. I know, to beat others to the punch, that this isn't Top Integrity but I was impressed that she didn't throw her teammates under the bus, even if it meant she left. When they picked her and Michael as the ones who lost for their teams, she must have known she'd be the one leaving. I think she's far better than Ell and the fact is that he oversalted the gnocchi and left her to cook the prawns because he couldn't. He was lucky she was a team player and not looking out for herself. I also liked Bryan more this episode--the whole brother rivalry disappeared when one of them was in danger. That was nice to see. Yeah, Bryan was snappy but aren't they in the stew room for hours, with way too much to drink? Kevin seemed to forgive him. I think the final four are obvious but I want to see Kevin in the final two. Consistent, innovative great food, plus who could root against Kris Kringle? Fri Oct 09 05:32:36 -0700 2009 5087190 39874 chowser 2 5090489 i agree with all of the above. :) Fri Oct 09 05:41:41 -0700 2009 5090474 99136 AMFM 2 5090734 "I also liked Bryan more this episode--the whole brother rivalry disappeared when one of them was in danger." As some have commented previously, I personally feel that the whole rivalry angle was a fabrication of the shows' editors and producers. I think Bryan is a low-drama kind of guy and is serious about cooking and isn't much interested in becoming a character on a reality TV show. Fri Oct 09 07:28:29 -0700 2009 5090474 255446 Gigi007 3 5090867 I agree. I know I give my husband a hard time and we pretend to be competitive. It we had cut and paste lives, people would think we were in serious trouble. I really like that most of the contestants this season seem to be into cooking their best, not the Spike like drama of trying to beat the game. As Ashley put it when Kevin chose money over immunity, they want to be there because they deserve to be there, not because they won the immunity card (or playing games). Fri Oct 09 08:14:39 -0700 2009 5090734 39874 chowser 4 5090874 I like it--"cut and paste lives"! And I agree that most contestants--certainly the top 4--are giving it their best. Although I want Bryan or his brother Michael to win, I'm becoming increasingy impressed by Kevin and Jen. It reminds me of some seasons of American Idol (which I definitely don't watch regularly) when there are so many talented runner ups. I just hope the TC judges don't pull a Taylor Hicks. That would suck. Fri Oct 09 08:20:12 -0700 2009 5090867 255446 Gigi007 5 5090950 Hosea was the Taylor Hicks of TC! Fri Oct 09 08:44:34 -0700 2009 5090874 174753 NellyNel 6 5092002 At least Taylor Hicks was likeable! Can't say the same for Hosea... Fri Oct 09 14:46:19 -0700 2009 5090950 56183 soypower 3 5092561 Reality TV contestants can't win. If you speak up, you're a douchebag. If you keep your mouth shut, you're a tool. If I was on TV, I would not say much since everything you say can be used against you. Even if don't say a thing, it can still be used against you. Fri Oct 09 19:10:16 -0700 2009 5090734 180506 Ericandblueboy 4 5092617 So true, although most of the tools I know (LOL) have big mouths. Actually, on another web site some time ago, I had an interesting discussion with someone about the technical difference between tools and douchebags. For all practical purposes, I don't see much of a difference, but then again I never use the term "douchebag" . I now remember that omewhere in this thread or an earlier one there's a discussion about a certain "douche". Fri Oct 09 19:49:40 -0700 2009 5092561 255446 Gigi007 1 5090904 The grouping seems obvious, but I've been trying to find a way to describe their qualities. Top Chef Final Four - imaginative, self-sufficient, takes risk and gets the job done. Kevin Mike V Bryan V Jenn Top Sous Chef - Not as imaginative, rides coattails, but has some skills. Mike I Eli Both Mike I and Eli think their the bomb but so far have not really put up. Ash - intimidated by the "learned chefs". He keeps emphasizing his lack of culinary degree. Top Bistro/Cafe Chef - These are the loners or the chefs outside of the clique. They'd do great in a one chef kitchen. Robin Laurine I believe Robin and Laurine are the older chefs of the group. Maybe they're beyond cliques and dealing with the younger pups. Fri Oct 09 08:31:07 -0700 2009 5087190 56054 dave_c 2 5091147 I would slip Ash into your TopBistro category, otherwise, concur completely. Fri Oct 09 09:54:38 -0700 2009 5090904 59258 smtucker 1 5092025 All I can say about this episode is that I actually cried when they eliminated Ashley. I like her approach to food and found her to be a great competitor. I am sorry but that fact that Robin is still there is insane. INSANE!!! I am sure she's a lovely lady but she just does not have "it". . whatever "it" is, she's got none. I think Kevin or Jen will win. Jen leaves me cold as far as her personality goes but I think she's a solid cook. Kevin has "it" and so he will go far no matter what. Fri Oct 09 14:54:50 -0700 2009 5087190 169526 pastryqueen 2 5092566 I don't know if by winning this show people from far and wide will come eat your food, but the free advertisement is worth much more than $100k, which is abut $60k after taxes. I think the bros, Kevin and Jen have already done wonders for themselves at this point. The next time I visit Atlanta, I'll be checking him out and Blais' joint. And when I next go to Philly, I'll be checking out Jen. I've already been to Bryan's restaurant. Too bad Mike works in LA - not going there any time soon. Fri Oct 09 19:15:20 -0700 2009 5092025 180506 Ericandblueboy 3 5092621 You're right. I've also been to Bryan's restaurant and really liked it. I would SO like to try the restaurant where Mike V. works. Has anyone been to the current one or to Bazaar when he was working there? Fri Oct 09 19:51:37 -0700 2009 5092566 255446 Gigi007 4 5095329 My friend, who does not watch the show, ate at Mike V's new restaurant last week and said it was the best meal of his life. Sun Oct 11 13:30:09 -0700 2009 5092621 168798 JonDough 5 5095381 Ooh, I'm jealous! Tell your friend to post about it ! Inquiring minds want to know! :) Sun Oct 11 13:58:26 -0700 2009 5095329 255446 Gigi007 4 5097211 I ate at Michael V.'s restaurant at the Greenbrier- Hemisphere a couple years ago. All tasting menus. It was really good and very creative. Lots of molecular Gastronomy even then. I can't remember each dish now, but right away you knew that it was going to be a good evening because the quality of food from the beginning of the meal was really up there. I do remember the sugar sphere that Hubby's dessert was encased the whole thing was very interesting. Mon Oct 12 10:42:08 -0700 2009 5092621 92426 ktmoomau 5 5097406 Thanks, ktmoomau. I'm trying to get my brother who lives in California to check out Michael V.'s current restaurant. I know a few people who ate at Bazaar when he was there, and they said their meals were out of this world. Closer to home, we have Bryan V.'s Volt. I've only been once, but it made a real impression on me. Very innovative and well presented, delicious food. Mon Oct 12 11:53:16 -0700 2009 5097211 255446 Gigi007 1 5092616 Do you think Bryan will quit his job, move to Canada, adopt a vegetarian lifestyle and marry me? I am holding my breath. Fri Oct 09 19:48:39 -0700 2009 5087190 131149 Jetgirly 2 5096811 you forgot...divorce his wife after adopting a vegetarian lifestyle. i'm pretty sure he's married. Mon Oct 12 08:25:26 -0700 2009 5092616 91772 liveloveat34 1 5093688 http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/season-6/videos?collection=Stir+Crazy+in+Sin+City If you get a chance, you should watch the videos at Bravo re: the cheftestants being stir crazy....they start out with the most recent, and work backwards, so you get to see Ron, Preeti, Jesse, Mattin, Hector, and Jennifer Z. Pretty funny stuff! Until the last video (actually I think the first filmed - "Don't Record Us") - Mean Mike Isabella remains a jerk, including being pretty damn nasty about Robin in several of the videos. But it does seem like he's on good terms with Jennifer N. in the first video, so perhaps his initial remark about "being beat by a girl" is just his enormous male ego talking. AND Bryan and Michael Voltaggio are both a lot more relaxed, as well as Jennifer...they definitely are much more relaxed and personable than what we see during competitions. Makes me like them even more. Kevin? Well, he's just a big ol' teddy bear - his personality shines even more in these relaxed settings. Sat Oct 10 13:15:58 -0700 2009 5087190 10532 LindaWhit 2 5095199 I dunno...Mike I seems to be doing a lot more talking than Robin. Maybe that's the real female competition he's afraid of ;-) Sun Oct 11 12:08:03 -0700 2009 5093688 53971 momjamin 3 5095569 ROFL! Oh, I can only imagine the number of F-bombs Mike Isabella would drop if that was ever suggested to him! Sun Oct 11 15:25:56 -0700 2009 5095199 10532 LindaWhit 4 5096717 It would be funny if Eli or Mike I were eliminated before Robin, wouldn't it? Mon Oct 12 07:49:24 -0700 2009 5095569 124908 jeanmarieok 5 5097076 To me it really wouldn't matter when any of those three were eliminated. The fact is none of them have a real chance of winning the whole thing but IMO Robin isn't more talented then either Eli or Mike. Mon Oct 12 09:51:22 -0700 2009 5096717 10195 KTinNYC 6 5097454 i think JeanMarie means that it would be funny-ironic; if they were eliminated before robin, because of their respective attitudes toward her-- mike i's comments (robin's being an "old lady" etc.) and eli's comments (cancer "sob story" blah blah). . . it would be kind of humorous if she outlasted her detractors in the competition, i think. i certainly don't think any of these three has a prayer to win, but i would be entertained if robin manages to outperform either or both of these snide dudes long enough to have the last laugh on them. i agree that they all perform at about the same level, but mike's ignorance about the basics (eggs florentine, huh?) and eli's playing-it-safe could trip them up as the competition intensifies-- robin could conceivably edge them out-- but it's all a competition for fifth place, so who really cares, i agree w you on that point too! Mon Oct 12 12:11:44 -0700 2009 5097076 46030 soupkitten 7 5097480 I'm suspicious of how much the producers are setting Robin up as the underperformer/annoyance. She may go a lot farther that we all suspect. Remember that the producers know who the finalists are when they edit the show and they may be trying to set up an underdog going into the finals to gin up drama since the top few have been dominating so thoroughly this season. Or perhaps I just spend far too much time thinking about this show! Mon Oct 12 12:21:11 -0700 2009 5097454 100412 newhavener07 8 5097517 I think I'd be REALLY upset if Robin's in the Final 3. No more so than 2 seasons ago with Lisa making it to the finale...or last season when Hosea made it and won it. Ugh. Mon Oct 12 12:34:50 -0700 2009 5097480 10532 LindaWhit 7 5097511 I'd take a perverse pleasure in seeing Robin manage to outlast either Eli or Mike Isabella. :-) It does look like Robin and Eli get into it this coming episode being snippy with each other...Eli being a little PITA in the preview on the Bravo site but Robin being a PITA as well. Mon Oct 12 12:32:39 -0700 2009 5097454 10532 LindaWhit 7 5097512 "but it's all a competition for fifth place, so who really cares, i agree w you on that point too!" Exactly, who remembers any of the other 5th place cheftestants from the previous seasons? Mon Oct 12 12:32:59 -0700 2009 5097454 10195 KTinNYC 8 5097568 LMAO. i think the top 3 (or 4) have been so solid. . . that we're all just searching for something to speculate about while we're all twiddling our thumbs waiting for the final episodes. barring any major upsets, my prediction for the final 3 hasn't changed from the first episode: brian, jen, kevin, with kevin to win. assuming mike v comes in 4th. . . 5th place is the best any of these other folks can hope for-- so they're playing to last at this point, not to win. even though it's predictable or who cares or whatever, i'm still entertained! :) Mon Oct 12 12:56:26 -0700 2009 5097512 46030 soupkitten 9 5097676 I think we can all agree on the top four.. After that i really do think Anyone can win. I am really thinking Jen, will win (as Tom really loves her) and she has the chops. Then I think about Bryan - and how great some of his food has been.... and then I think about Kevin and think he could win too - And even the younger brother has the chops. So i really think the final episodes are going to be very exciting, and I am hoping none of the above chefs screws up enough to allow any of the other chefs into the top four. (no disrespect to any of them) Mon Oct 12 13:40:25 -0700 2009 5097568 174753 NellyNel 10 5097708 In case anyone was interested, I was at Tom Colicchio's demo this weekend at the NYC Wine and Food Festival. Gail did his intro, which was really cute, they seem like they genuinely like each other. Some interesting moments overall, but, relevant to this thread, at the end Tom opened it up to Q&A. He specifically said the only thing he couldn't talk about was who won this season's Top Chef because he didn't know yet. He said that he knew who the finalists were, but that they didn't compete for another several weeks. So it's kinda funny that we can examine the editing to try to figure out the finalists, but it's not going to tell us who wins! Not yet, at least. Mon Oct 12 13:49:43 -0700 2009 5097676 23389 charmedgirl 11 5099412 Did Tom say anything abuot TC? How did he look in person? Tue Oct 13 08:20:50 -0700 2009 5097708 100412 newhavener07 5 5103092 The hatefest on Robin really makes me uncomfortable. It seems way over the top. I don't know that she's done anything to deserve it but it seems to be less about her abilities with food and more about personality conflicts. I finally had some time this past weekend to go to the Bravo site and watch some of the extra videos, particularly the "Stir Crazy in Sin City" ones that show a lot of the behind the scenes/after the producers leave action. The other chefs were being nasty about her almost from the beginning (before any of them had really had the chance to prove their ability in the kitchen). There were some snide comments about her being in the guys' bathroom hot tub (the outside one was broken) just waiting to pounce on anyone, male or female, who happened to walk in the room. It wasn't clear if she'd made an unwelcome pass at someone or if she's just comfortable and confident in her own sexuality and that rubs some people (Mike I.) the wrong way. I may be hypersensitive to it but over-40 women who enjoy sex seem to skeeve some younger folks (exceptions for those coo-coo-ka-choo people). Maybe Mike I. has deep-seated fears about cougars... Wed Oct 14 13:08:14 -0700 2009 5096717 88544 Ima Wurdibitsch 6 5103565 It's not just the men that dislike Robin it seems all the remaining women dislike her as well. Maybe she is just annoying. Wed Oct 14 16:01:53 -0700 2009 5103092 10195 KTinNYC 6 5103595 Basic group dynamics says that when you bring a group of people together, as the group coalesces least one person is going to be scapegoated and ostracized. In reality shows in general, although not always (Marcel) on Top Chef, that person is usually an older woman. Even when they are accepted, it's usually in sort of a condescending way. For example, Ariane was labeled a "cougar" (and was supposed to take that as a compliment) and a Jersey housewife. Despite the fact that she's a CIA graduate with her own successful restaurant, the fact that she was woman, over 40 and working outside a big city caused the chefs who saw themselves as younger and hipper to treat her patronizingly and dismissively. And yes, there is a certain segment of the population (mostly, but not exclusively, men), who seem to find dealing with any woman they don't consider attractive to be a personal affront. Wed Oct 14 16:14:29 -0700 2009 5103092 10159 Ruth Lafler 7 5104849 Wow - I think you are really hyper-analyizing things. I agree with you to at certain extent - certainly, - but In Robins case, they have shown her to be super annoying only because she talks incessantly when the other chefs are trying to focus and concentrate. Someone who jibber-jabbers is going to becaome annoying its as simple as that. The "cougar" lable being given to Ariane was all in good fun. To a married woman of 40odd with kids who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time - yes this would be a compliment - and why shouldn't it be? She was labled a Jessey housewife because - she was! She has the Jersey accent for sure which is a dead give-away. It doesn't take away any of her sucess. And for me, it doesnt cause me to respect her any less. We all have labled Mike I as a dumb Jersey guy - but he too is sucessful. I can respect his sucess no matter what "lable" he or anyone else has been given - Thu Oct 15 06:50:49 -0700 2009 5103595 174753 NellyNel 8 5105380 She's not a "housewife" -- she's a successful restaurant owner. To call a woman a housewife implies that her primary role is to be a wife and take care of a home. If that's your choice, fine, but to apply that label to a woman simply because she's married and lives in the suburbs is a deliberate attempt to belittle her professional status, especially when it's applied to her by other members of her profession: they're chefs, she's a "housewife." And not all women find the label "cougar" flattering (nor should they). It doesn't just mean an attractive older woman. Again, it's belittling: at the very most positive, it means you're attractive ... for an old lady. In its true meaning, it carries the connotation of being predatory and somewhat desperate. In this case, again, it was an attempt (subconscious, I'll concede) to label her with her in a way that detracts from her professional status by concentrating on her age and sexuality and not her skills and accomplishments. Thu Oct 15 10:04:21 -0700 2009 5104849 10159 Ruth Lafler 9 5105419 I wonder if some of the negativity toward Robin is cultural: She's from Seattle, which has a good restaurant scene but is very provincial compared to SF and other big cities. She also has the West Coast airhead thing down without the edge of the SF chefs. So she's not only older than the other chefs but from outside the major U.S. food centers and from a city reknowned for its PC smugness. Add in a hefty dollop of misogyny and that could explain the hostility. Just a thought... Thu Oct 15 10:15:47 -0700 2009 5105380 100412 newhavener07 10 5105521 Maybe if she got a tattoo..? Thu Oct 15 10:46:12 -0700 2009 5105419 66281 ginnyhw 11 5107034 She does have a tattoo! When they showed Robin doing pilates at the start of last night's episode I noticed that she had one on her back at the base of her neck. I had a little fantasy that she and Mike I could bond over their tattoos. Thu Oct 15 20:23:37 -0700 2009 5105521 13306 Nettie 9 5105623 Honestly, I think of any woman who is married with kids as a housewife - regardless of what her professional title is - because let's face it - that is our primary role - no matter what. You certainly may disagree with that - But to me - thinking of someone as a housewife is not an insult when it is such an important role. You comments seem to imply that to think of her as a housewife is insulting. Which in actual fact is very insulting to all of us housewives. Arriane, herself was not insulted, so why should you come along and tell everyone that she should have been? You imply that she is stupid for not being insulted. I don't think this is the case. In Ariannes case it was a light-hearted thing and she treated it as such. Thu Oct 15 11:17:49 -0700 2009 5105380 174753 NellyNel 10 5105732 There's nothing wrong with being a housewife. But there's something wrong with being identified as a housewife when she's in a professional setting acting in her professional capacity. Just because you enjoy being treated that way doesn't mean other women do. According to what she said in her interview she was taken aback by being labeled a cougar, but decided to not make a big deal out of it. Thu Oct 15 11:47:51 -0700 2009 5105623 10159 Ruth Lafler 11 5105763 I think she talked about her kids and hubby allot so she portrayed herself that way...I don't think anyone on the show referred to her as a housewife as oppsed to a chef (not that i remember anyway) She herself said she was complimented - I distinctly remember that - Perhaps someone with your point of view had a chat with her and she later changed her mind! If someone referred to yourself as a cougar and you were insulted by it, I would not try to convince you that you shouldn't be.And just because you would be insulted doesnt mean every woman should be. We all think differently. and we all see things differently. Thu Oct 15 11:57:16 -0700 2009 5105732 174753 NellyNel 12 5105923 I didn't see Ariane as being any different from any of the other mothers we've seen on reality programs. Even mothers with full-time careers don't typically leave their families for a month+ at a time with almost no contact with family members. It's understandable that they'd be missing their families a few weeks into the competition. I don't have kids, but I feel like most of my female friends who have careers and children would be insulted by being called a housewife. Some of them make far more than their husbands and they split the housework evenly. Do they still talk about their children a lot? Certainly, and I see no problem with that. Thu Oct 15 12:42:50 -0700 2009 5105763 107671 queencru 13 5106049 She wasn't any different from any working mom. She got the Jesrey Housewife lable because it fit. (to a certain extent) Just like Stefan had the "arrogant European" lable and Faboi got the "Charming Italian" lable" and Carla got the "Kooky new age woman" lable. They are all chefs yes, but their peronas got them labled. And on a personal note - I for one am saddened that I live in a society that considers one who chooses to devote herself to the happiness of her family - a failure. An "insult" to be called a housewife.....indeed. Thu Oct 15 13:22:02 -0700 2009 5105923 174753 NellyNel 14 5106124 Nobody said "failure" or "insult" but you. Apparently, despite the fact that you don't think it's an insult, you are overly defensive about how the term is used. Thu Oct 15 13:48:09 -0700 2009 5106049 10159 Ruth Lafler 15 5106153 From queencru: "don't have kids, but I feel like most of my female friends who have careers and children would be insulted by being called a housewife." Oye Vey - Maybe I am sensitive to it because I am not a professional woman (although I do work in an office full time) - but I do have professional friends who still proudly refer to themselves as a "housewife"! Thu Oct 15 13:54:59 -0700 2009 5106124 174753 NellyNel 14 5106663 I don't think that to be called a housewife, per se, should be considered an insult. In my opinion, one of the most important jobs, period, is raising children. I am currently a lawyer who hasn't worked for over a year, and has no children. I think that makes me a housewife - a wife who is at home. I cook, and, fortunately for me, don't clean because I pay someone to do that. Or, to be more accurate, my husband pays for someone to do that. I never expected to be a "housewife" with no children. All of this said, if I were still a lawyer at a major Wall Street firm, even if I did have children at home, I would object to being called a housewife, because I would have a role in society that is different (not more or less) than being a house wife. So, I can see how using the term "housewife" in reference to a woman who has a career/job outside of the home is interpreted as denigrating her role as a professional/working woman, as it implicitly ignores that role. Thu Oct 15 17:01:11 -0700 2009 5106049 10985 MMRuth 9 5107268 Well said, Ruth! (Lafler and MM) The point is not to question what she is or isn't, but to think about the choices of terms that are used and thus preferred. (And in a general, not personal sense. Nelly may think of Mike I as a 'dumb Jersey guy' but no one is naming teams 'Dumb Jersey Guy' or dismissing his cooking based on that assessment.) One does not obsess on the domestic status of the men here (except for maybe Eli, who has now outed himself as a bit of a little prince who has yet to move out of his parent's house). I hate the term cougar-- especially as it seems to be trying to be 'nice' in telling older women that they might still have value if they wax and workout and manage to be attractive to younger men... Fri Oct 16 02:16:04 -0700 2009 5105380 16734 Lizard 8 5105525 "To a married woman of 40odd with kids who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time - yes this would be a compliment - and why shouldn't it be?" Ow, what a slam to all women over 40. Dried up old prunes who've been sitting on the shelf desperate for sexual attention. Thu Oct 15 10:46:50 -0700 2009 5104849 39874 chowser 9 5105586 Gosh!!- I didn't mean anything like that!! I myself am a 43 year old woman - far from being a dried up old prune! And far from being someone desperate for sexual attention - Yet I still smile if someone winks at me - or notices me in flirty way. There is nothing wrong with that and I refused to be embarrassed to admit that. If someone did call me a cougar - I'd laugh! The fact that you interpereted my comments in such a way is far more of a slam to woman of my age then my actual comments! Thu Oct 15 11:08:00 -0700 2009 5105525 174753 NellyNel 10 5105805 Would you feel the same in a professional setting with someone winking or flirting? I didn't appreciate it when I was younger or now. It's a personal thing but I never, whether it was happening frequently or infrequently, appreciated being referred to sexually by co-workers/peers. I was commenting on the "who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time," that 1) it's irrelevant to being hit on and 2) that it's very possibly not true. And, I think it's the same for women and men on treatment. Jeff said he was taken aback by the number of shots of him w/out a shirt, even though he was behind the door for a good number of them. He said his wife noticed and was the one to tell him. I think it would have been wrong for them to call him a gigolo. Thu Oct 15 12:05:15 -0700 2009 5105586 39874 chowser 11 5105864 I'm sorry Chowser - I know allot of folks think any sexual references are not appropriate in the work place - I totally get that. They were in a different situation. Sitting around smoking, drinking and joking around. Regarding the second part of your post - I lost you - I am not really sure what you mean!! lol I don't know - I kind of though Jeff was amused by the shirt-less situation and really - if he had been called a gigolo - it would have been kind of funny! I mean - where's everyones humor gone?!?! Thu Oct 15 12:22:19 -0700 2009 5105805 174753 NellyNel 12 5106134 They weren't in a social situation when they named the team Ariane was on "Team Cougar" -- without asking her if it was okay. That was work. It was part of the competition. They made her sound like a mascot instead of a member of the team. Apparently you don't work outside the home. Perhaps you aren't aware of all the subtle ways that woman have their professional stature diminished in the workplace. Thu Oct 15 13:50:05 -0700 2009 5105864 10159 Ruth Lafler 13 5106156 Oh forgive me - I don't remember that bit.... Thu Oct 15 13:55:53 -0700 2009 5106134 174753 NellyNel 13 5106470 I've become lost in all of the "reply nesting." I have two children (now grown and with children and homes of their own). I was married (now, thankfully, I'm not). If I were called a housewife while I was at work, I would be livid. If I'm doing contract negotiations or crawling under a radar, it would be very dismissive of me and and attempt to diminish my importance in the workplace. As for "cougar," the most popular definition at Urban Dictionary includes, "The cougar can be anyone from an overly surgically altered wind tunnel victim, to an absolute sad and bloated old horn-meister, to a real hottie or milf." I don't think the folks on Top Chef are being complimentary when they use that term for one of their competitors, especially when they very distinctly put her down every chance they get. Am I flattered when someone calls me a milf (or even a gmilf)? Sure - but only if the setting isn't work. If someone tells me that my house is lovely or a meal I prepared was fantastic, I love that, too. Housewife? Nope. Not for me. Being a wife can be wonderful, as can being a mother. To me, the term "housewife" implies that one is wed to the house and the chores associated with it with very few outside interests and is used to describe what one does. "What do you do?" "I'm a logistician." "What do you do?" "I'm a teacher." "What do you do?" "I'm a chef." "What do you do?" "I'm a housewife." Being a housewife, if that's what you've decided to do, is admirable. Having a different career and being described as a housewife would be incredibly insulting. Another example: I work on cars in my spare time. I built the engine in the sports car I have now. That's not really that common and several of my co-workers know about it. However, I'm a logistics analyst and I would also be insulted if some (in my workplace) called me a mechanic. It would be disrespectful and not give me the proper credit for my contributions and abilities at work. As for the other nicknames associated with other chefs - those nicknames were not about "what they do" but about other things. Thu Oct 15 15:44:42 -0700 2009 5106134 88544 Ima Wurdibitsch 14 5106639 Great response. It's wonderful that some women (and men) decide to stay at home and watch their children, but it's not for everyone. Calling someone else a housewife or giving her a nickname based on her sexuality is quite simply insulting and disregards her ability in the workplace. It's very hard for women to earn respect in a workplace once they've been labeled a cougar, housewife, workplace hottie, or other gender-based stereotype. Unfortunately, many careers are still very sexist. I know from having experience in one of those career fields that it isn't cute or entertaining after about the first second. I've worked in places in this decade that were no better than the environment at Mad Men, and it's ridiculously difficult for women to succeed. Thu Oct 15 16:52:55 -0700 2009 5106470 107671 queencru 14 5107344 I work part time at home while my kids are young, and I interact in the community/at school with other moms who have full-time, part-time, and, shall we say, on-hold professions. In my suburb, I never, ever, hear the term "housewife." Stay-home mom is a much more common term. "Housewife" sounds dated and, to me, has a load of unappealing connotations. Apparently, YMMV ;-) Fri Oct 16 04:51:13 -0700 2009 5106470 53971 momjamin 15 5107571 What if the woman doesn't have kids? I really can't think of any other term than housewife. I remember when I was a kid and watched those morning game shows (over 30 years ago) where "homemaker" was the appropriate term. Fri Oct 16 06:59:46 -0700 2009 5107344 10763 Miss Needle 16 5108111 As someone said, the term "housewife" makes it sound like she's married to her house! Which, in the '50s, may have been true. I hope that even women who don't work outside the home these days are being valued for more than how sparkly their kitchen floors are! Fri Oct 16 09:57:00 -0700 2009 5107571 10159 Ruth Lafler 17 5108130 My sister is a stay at home mom and if I ever called her a housewife she'd slug me! Fri Oct 16 10:00:43 -0700 2009 5108111 76025 mojoeater 17 5108179 Ariane is no more a housewife than Tom Colicchio is a househusband, just because he has a baby at home now. Although they share the same network as the Housewives of various cities, there's no comparison. LOL, the "Housewives" are also not valued for how shiny their kitchen floors are but how shiny their jewelry is--is that a step down or step up? Fri Oct 16 10:15:37 -0700 2009 5108111 39874 chowser 17 5108224 I know housewives and househusbands, and I don't think they personally take offense to that label, especially since that's what they use when they refer to themselves. If they have kids, they refer to l themselves as either a stay-at-home mom or stay-at-home dad. I know today isn't like the 1950s where the majority of women weren't working outside of the home. But these days there are those women (and men) without kids who do stay at home. Not everybody has desires of having children and working outside of the home -- note that this isn't a value judgment; it's merely an assertion. I think some people tend to place value judgments if somebody decides not to have kids or not work outside of the home. So if a married woman with no kids and who isn't working appears on The Price is Right, and Drew Carey asks her what she does for a living, what would the appropriate answer these days be? Is today's answer, "I don't define myself by one word."? I don't watch The Price is Right anymore, and would really like to know what the proper term is these days. Any morning game show watchers out there? P.S. I'd like to add that I feel Ariane being called a housewife wasn't very accurate as she had a career outside of the home and had children. But I don't find anything intrinsically wrong about the word "housewife" if that's what one person is. If there's a more PC term these days, I'd like to know. Fri Oct 16 10:29:11 -0700 2009 5108111 10763 Miss Needle 18 5108236 P.S. I'd like to add that I feel Ariane being called a housewife wasn't very accurate as she had a career outside of the home and had children. But I don't find anything intrinsically wrong about the word "housewife" if that's what one person is. ~~~~~~ And I think that's the issue at hand here - most of us didn't see Ariane as a "housewife" because she has a career *outside the home*, whereas a few people did. Her sole job is not just to take care of children; it's one of them (part and parcel of being a mother). But in the context of the situation she was in on TC, she was *not* a housewife - she was a chef/owner. Fri Oct 16 10:32:26 -0700 2009 5108224 10532 LindaWhit 19 5108270 Interesting how the older women chefs have been marginalized in several seasons of TC--Ariane, Robin, Betty. Carla was older but had a very youthful vibe so she seems to have escaped "biddyfication." Does anyone remember any older male chefs getting the same treatment? As a 40s woman I find it very disturbing to watch the real contempt the younger chefs have for the older women. But having read Bourdain et. al. on the machismo of most kitchens, I'm not terribly surprised. As diners, MANY of us older women, we just don't see this ugly side of kitchen culture. In all, unappetizing. I'm going to seek out women-run restaurants in the future. Fri Oct 16 10:40:11 -0700 2009 5108236 100412 newhavener07 20 5110272 Otto, maybe? Sat Oct 17 09:35:01 -0700 2009 5108270 56183 soypower