Top Chef -Season 6 - Episode 7 - 10-7-09 (spoiler)
A so-so challege starts the competition.
Can we please get rid of scallops and ceviche?
I'm thinking Kevin will win the entire thing! Glad he didn't take immunity!
The main challenge looks interesting and I like some of the odder team pairings...
-
http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/seaso...
If you get a chance, you should watch the videos at Bravo re: the cheftestants being stir crazy....they start out with the most recent, and work backwards, so you get to see Ron, Preeti, Jesse, Mattin, Hector, and Jennifer Z. Pretty funny stuff!
Until the last video (actually I think the first filmed - "Don't Record Us") - Mean Mike Isabella remains a jerk, including being pretty damn nasty about Robin in several of the videos. But it does seem like he's on good terms with Jennifer N. in the first video, so perhaps his initial remark about "being beat by a girl" is just his enormous male ego talking.
AND Bryan and Michael Voltaggio are both a lot more relaxed, as well as Jennifer...they definitely are much more relaxed and personable than what we see during competitions. Makes me like them even more. Kevin? Well, he's just a big ol' teddy bear - his personality shines even more in these relaxed settings.
›47 Replies-
-
-
-
-
re: KTinNYC
i think JeanMarie means that it would be funny-ironic; if they were eliminated before robin, because of their respective attitudes toward her-- mike i's comments (robin's being an "old lady" etc.) and eli's comments (cancer "sob story" blah blah). . . it would be kind of humorous if she outlasted her detractors in the competition, i think. i certainly don't think any of these three has a prayer to win, but i would be entertained if robin manages to outperform either or both of these snide dudes long enough to have the last laugh on them. i agree that they all perform at about the same level, but mike's ignorance about the basics (eggs florentine, huh?) and eli's playing-it-safe could trip them up as the competition intensifies-- robin could conceivably edge them out-- but it's all a competition for fifth place, so who really cares, i agree w you on that point too!
-
re: soupkitten
I'm suspicious of how much the producers are setting Robin up as the underperformer/annoyance. She may go a lot farther that we all suspect. Remember that the producers know who the finalists are when they edit the show and they may be trying to set up an underdog going into the finals to gin up drama since the top few have been dominating so thoroughly this season.
Or perhaps I just spend far too much time thinking about this show! -
re: soupkitten
I'd take a perverse pleasure in seeing Robin manage to outlast either Eli or Mike Isabella. :-) It does look like Robin and Eli get into it this coming episode being snippy with each other...Eli being a little PITA in the preview on the Bravo site but Robin being a PITA as well.
-
-
re: KTinNYC
LMAO. i think the top 3 (or 4) have been so solid. . . that we're all just searching for something to speculate about while we're all twiddling our thumbs waiting for the final episodes. barring any major upsets, my prediction for the final 3 hasn't changed from the first episode: brian, jen, kevin, with kevin to win. assuming mike v comes in 4th. . . 5th place is the best any of these other folks can hope for-- so they're playing to last at this point, not to win. even though it's predictable or who cares or whatever, i'm still entertained! :)
-
re: soupkitten
I think we can all agree on the top four..
After that i really do think Anyone can win.
I am really thinking Jen, will win (as Tom really loves her) and she has the chops. Then I think about Bryan - and how great some of his food has been.... and then I think about Kevin and think he could win too -
And even the younger brother has the chops.So i really think the final episodes are going to be very exciting, and I am hoping none of the above chefs screws up enough to allow any of the other chefs into the top four. (no disrespect to any of them)
-
re: NellyNel
In case anyone was interested, I was at Tom Colicchio's demo this weekend at the NYC Wine and Food Festival. Gail did his intro, which was really cute, they seem like they genuinely like each other. Some interesting moments overall, but, relevant to this thread, at the end Tom opened it up to Q&A. He specifically said the only thing he couldn't talk about was who won this season's Top Chef because he didn't know yet. He said that he knew who the finalists were, but that they didn't compete for another several weeks. So it's kinda funny that we can examine the editing to try to figure out the finalists, but it's not going to tell us who wins! Not yet, at least.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: jeanmarieok
The hatefest on Robin really makes me uncomfortable. It seems way over the top. I don't know that she's done anything to deserve it but it seems to be less about her abilities with food and more about personality conflicts.
I finally had some time this past weekend to go to the Bravo site and watch some of the extra videos, particularly the "Stir Crazy in Sin City" ones that show a lot of the behind the scenes/after the producers leave action. The other chefs were being nasty about her almost from the beginning (before any of them had really had the chance to prove their ability in the kitchen).
There were some snide comments about her being in the guys' bathroom hot tub (the outside one was broken) just waiting to pounce on anyone, male or female, who happened to walk in the room. It wasn't clear if she'd made an unwelcome pass at someone or if she's just comfortable and confident in her own sexuality and that rubs some people (Mike I.) the wrong way.
I may be hypersensitive to it but over-40 women who enjoy sex seem to skeeve some younger folks (exceptions for those coo-coo-ka-choo people). Maybe Mike I. has deep-seated fears about cougars...
-
-
re: Ima Wurdibitsch
Basic group dynamics says that when you bring a group of people together, as the group coalesces least one person is going to be scapegoated and ostracized. In reality shows in general, although not always (Marcel) on Top Chef, that person is usually an older woman. Even when they are accepted, it's usually in sort of a condescending way. For example, Ariane was labeled a "cougar" (and was supposed to take that as a compliment) and a Jersey housewife. Despite the fact that she's a CIA graduate with her own successful restaurant, the fact that she was woman, over 40 and working outside a big city caused the chefs who saw themselves as younger and hipper to treat her patronizingly and dismissively.
And yes, there is a certain segment of the population (mostly, but not exclusively, men), who seem to find dealing with any woman they don't consider attractive to be a personal affront.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Wow - I think you are really hyper-analyizing things.
I agree with you to at certain extent - certainly, - but In Robins case, they have shown her to be super annoying only because she talks incessantly when the other chefs are trying to focus and concentrate.
Someone who jibber-jabbers is going to becaome annoying its as simple as that.The "cougar" lable being given to Ariane was all in good fun. To a married woman of 40odd with kids who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time - yes this would be a compliment - and why shouldn't it be?
She was labled a Jessey housewife because - she was!
She has the Jersey accent for sure which is a dead give-away.
It doesn't take away any of her sucess.
And for me, it doesnt cause me to respect her any less.We all have labled Mike I as a dumb Jersey guy - but he too is sucessful.
I can respect his sucess no matter what "lable" he or anyone else has been given --
re: NellyNel
She's not a "housewife" -- she's a successful restaurant owner. To call a woman a housewife implies that her primary role is to be a wife and take care of a home. If that's your choice, fine, but to apply that label to a woman simply because she's married and lives in the suburbs is a deliberate attempt to belittle her professional status, especially when it's applied to her by other members of her profession: they're chefs, she's a "housewife." And not all women find the label "cougar" flattering (nor should they). It doesn't just mean an attractive older woman. Again, it's belittling: at the very most positive, it means you're attractive ... for an old lady. In its true meaning, it carries the connotation of being predatory and somewhat desperate. In this case, again, it was an attempt (subconscious, I'll concede) to label her with her in a way that detracts from her professional status by concentrating on her age and sexuality and not her skills and accomplishments.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I wonder if some of the negativity toward Robin is cultural: She's from Seattle, which has a good restaurant scene but is very provincial compared to SF and other big cities. She also has the West Coast airhead thing down without the edge of the SF chefs. So she's not only older than the other chefs but from outside the major U.S. food centers and from a city reknowned for its PC smugness. Add in a hefty dollop of misogyny and that could explain the hostility. Just a thought...
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Honestly, I think of any woman who is married with kids as a housewife - regardless of what her professional title is - because let's face it - that is our primary role - no matter what.
You certainly may disagree with that -
But to me - thinking of someone as a housewife is not an insult when it is such an important role.
You comments seem to imply that to think of her as a housewife is insulting. Which in actual fact is very insulting to all of us housewives.Arriane, herself was not insulted, so why should you come along and tell everyone that she should have been?
You imply that she is stupid for not being insulted.
I don't think this is the case. In Ariannes case it was a light-hearted thing and she treated it as such.-
re: NellyNel
There's nothing wrong with being a housewife. But there's something wrong with being identified as a housewife when she's in a professional setting acting in her professional capacity.
Just because you enjoy being treated that way doesn't mean other women do. According to what she said in her interview she was taken aback by being labeled a cougar, but decided to not make a big deal out of it.
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I think she talked about her kids and hubby allot so she portrayed herself that way...I don't think anyone on the show referred to her as a housewife as oppsed to a chef (not that i remember anyway)
She herself said she was complimented - I distinctly remember that -
Perhaps someone with your point of view had a chat with her and she later changed her mind!If someone referred to yourself as a cougar and you were insulted by it, I would not try to convince you that you shouldn't be.And just because you would be insulted doesnt mean every woman should be. We all think differently. and we all see things differently.
-
re: NellyNel
I didn't see Ariane as being any different from any of the other mothers we've seen on reality programs. Even mothers with full-time careers don't typically leave their families for a month+ at a time with almost no contact with family members. It's understandable that they'd be missing their families a few weeks into the competition.
I don't have kids, but I feel like most of my female friends who have careers and children would be insulted by being called a housewife. Some of them make far more than their husbands and they split the housework evenly. Do they still talk about their children a lot? Certainly, and I see no problem with that.
-
re: queencru
She wasn't any different from any working mom.
She got the Jesrey Housewife lable because it fit.
(to a certain extent)
Just like Stefan had the "arrogant European" lable and Faboi got the "Charming Italian" lable" and Carla got the "Kooky new age woman" lable.
They are all chefs yes, but their peronas got them labled.And on a personal note - I for one am saddened that I live in a society that considers one who chooses to devote herself to the happiness of her family - a failure.
An "insult" to be called a housewife.....indeed.-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
From queencru: "don't have kids, but I feel like most of my female friends who have careers and children would be insulted by being called a housewife."
Oye Vey - Maybe I am sensitive to it because I am not a professional woman (although I do work in an office full time) - but I do have professional friends who still proudly refer to themselves as a "housewife"!
-
-
re: NellyNel
I don't think that to be called a housewife, per se, should be considered an insult. In my opinion, one of the most important jobs, period, is raising children. I am currently a lawyer who hasn't worked for over a year, and has no children. I think that makes me a housewife - a wife who is at home. I cook, and, fortunately for me, don't clean because I pay someone to do that. Or, to be more accurate, my husband pays for someone to do that. I never expected to be a "housewife" with no children.
All of this said, if I were still a lawyer at a major Wall Street firm, even if I did have children at home, I would object to being called a housewife, because I would have a role in society that is different (not more or less) than being a house wife. So, I can see how using the term "housewife" in reference to a woman who has a career/job outside of the home is interpreted as denigrating her role as a professional/working woman, as it implicitly ignores that role.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Well said, Ruth! (Lafler and MM)
The point is not to question what she is or isn't, but to think about the choices of terms that are used and thus preferred. (And in a general, not personal sense. Nelly may think of Mike I as a 'dumb Jersey guy' but no one is naming teams 'Dumb Jersey Guy' or dismissing his cooking based on that assessment.)
One does not obsess on the domestic status of the men here (except for maybe Eli, who has now outed himself as a bit of a little prince who has yet to move out of his parent's house).
I hate the term cougar-- especially as it seems to be trying to be 'nice' in telling older women that they might still have value if they wax and workout and manage to be attractive to younger men...
-
-
re: NellyNel
"To a married woman of 40odd with kids who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time - yes this would be a compliment - and why shouldn't it be?"
Ow, what a slam to all women over 40. Dried up old prunes who've been sitting on the shelf desperate for sexual attention.
-
re: chowser
Gosh!!- I didn't mean anything like that!!
I myself am a 43 year old woman - far from being a dried up old prune!
And far from being someone desperate for sexual attention -
Yet I still smile if someone winks at me - or notices me in flirty way.
There is nothing wrong with that and I refused to be embarrassed to admit that. If someone did call me a cougar - I'd laugh!
The fact that you interpereted my comments in such a way is far more of a slam to woman of my age then my actual comments!-
re: NellyNel
Would you feel the same in a professional setting with someone winking or flirting? I didn't appreciate it when I was younger or now. It's a personal thing but I never, whether it was happening frequently or infrequently, appreciated being referred to sexually by co-workers/peers. I was commenting on the "who has not been seen as a sexual figure in quite some time," that 1) it's irrelevant to being hit on and 2) that it's very possibly not true. And, I think it's the same for women and men on treatment. Jeff said he was taken aback by the number of shots of him w/out a shirt, even though he was behind the door for a good number of them. He said his wife noticed and was the one to tell him. I think it would have been wrong for them to call him a gigolo.
-
re: chowser
I'm sorry Chowser -
I know allot of folks think any sexual references are not appropriate in the work place - I totally get that.
They were in a different situation. Sitting around smoking, drinking and joking around.
Regarding the second part of your post - I lost you - I am not really sure what you mean!! lolI don't know - I kind of though Jeff was amused by the shirt-less situation and really - if he had been called a gigolo - it would have been kind of funny!
I mean - where's everyones humor gone?!?!-
re: NellyNel
They weren't in a social situation when they named the team Ariane was on "Team Cougar" -- without asking her if it was okay. That was work. It was part of the competition. They made her sound like a mascot instead of a member of the team.
Apparently you don't work outside the home. Perhaps you aren't aware of all the subtle ways that woman have their professional stature diminished in the workplace.
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I've become lost in all of the "reply nesting." I have two children (now grown and with children and homes of their own). I was married (now, thankfully, I'm not). If I were called a housewife while I was at work, I would be livid. If I'm doing contract negotiations or crawling under a radar, it would be very dismissive of me and and attempt to diminish my importance in the workplace.
As for "cougar," the most popular definition at Urban Dictionary includes, "The cougar can be anyone from an overly surgically altered wind tunnel victim, to an absolute sad and bloated old horn-meister, to a real hottie or milf." I don't think the folks on Top Chef are being complimentary when they use that term for one of their competitors, especially when they very distinctly put her down every chance they get.
Am I flattered when someone calls me a milf (or even a gmilf)? Sure - but only if the setting isn't work. If someone tells me that my house is lovely or a meal I prepared was fantastic, I love that, too.
Housewife? Nope. Not for me. Being a wife can be wonderful, as can being a mother. To me, the term "housewife" implies that one is wed to the house and the chores associated with it with very few outside interests and is used to describe what one does.
"What do you do?"
"I'm a logistician.""What do you do?"
"I'm a teacher.""What do you do?"
"I'm a chef.""What do you do?"
"I'm a housewife."Being a housewife, if that's what you've decided to do, is admirable. Having a different career and being described as a housewife would be incredibly insulting. Another example: I work on cars in my spare time. I built the engine in the sports car I have now. That's not really that common and several of my co-workers know about it. However, I'm a logistics analyst and I would also be insulted if some (in my workplace) called me a mechanic. It would be disrespectful and not give me the proper credit for my contributions and abilities at work.
As for the other nicknames associated with other chefs - those nicknames were not about "what they do" but about other things.
-
re: Ima Wurdibitsch
Great response. It's wonderful that some women (and men) decide to stay at home and watch their children, but it's not for everyone. Calling someone else a housewife or giving her a nickname based on her sexuality is quite simply insulting and disregards her ability in the workplace. It's very hard for women to earn respect in a workplace once they've been labeled a cougar, housewife, workplace hottie, or other gender-based stereotype.
Unfortunately, many careers are still very sexist. I know from having experience in one of those career fields that it isn't cute or entertaining after about the first second. I've worked in places in this decade that were no better than the environment at Mad Men, and it's ridiculously difficult for women to succeed.
-
re: Ima Wurdibitsch
I work part time at home while my kids are young, and I interact in the community/at school with other moms who have full-time, part-time, and, shall we say, on-hold professions. In my suburb, I never, ever, hear the term "housewife." Stay-home mom is a much more common term. "Housewife" sounds dated and, to me, has a load of unappealing connotations. Apparently, YMMV ;-)
-
-
-
-
re: Ruth Lafler
Ariane is no more a housewife than Tom Colicchio is a househusband, just because he has a baby at home now. Although they share the same network as the Housewives of various cities, there's no comparison. LOL, the "Housewives" are also not valued for how shiny their kitchen floors are but how shiny their jewelry is--is that a step down or step up?
-
re: Ruth Lafler
I know housewives and househusbands, and I don't think they personally take offense to that label, especially since that's what they use when they refer to themselves. If they have kids, they refer to l themselves as either a stay-at-home mom or stay-at-home dad.
I know today isn't like the 1950s where the majority of women weren't working outside of the home. But these days there are those women (and men) without kids who do stay at home. Not everybody has desires of having children and working outside of the home -- note that this isn't a value judgment; it's merely an assertion. I think some people tend to place value judgments if somebody decides not to have kids or not work outside of the home.
So if a married woman with no kids and who isn't working appears on The Price is Right, and Drew Carey asks her what she does for a living, what would the appropriate answer these days be? Is today's answer, "I don't define myself by one word."? I don't watch The Price is Right anymore, and would really like to know what the proper term is these days. Any morning game show watchers out there?
P.S. I'd like to add that I feel Ariane being called a housewife wasn't very accurate as she had a career outside of the home and had children. But I don't find anything intrinsically wrong about the word "housewife" if that's what one person is. If there's a more PC term these days, I'd like to know.
-
re: Miss Needle
P.S. I'd like to add that I feel Ariane being called a housewife wasn't very accurate as she had a career outside of the home and had children. But I don't find anything intrinsically wrong about the word "housewife" if that's what one person is.
~~~~~~
And I think that's the issue at hand here - most of us didn't see Ariane as a "housewife" because she has a career *outside the home*, whereas a few people did. Her sole job is not just to take care of children; it's one of them (part and parcel of being a mother).But in the context of the situation she was in on TC, she was *not* a housewife - she was a chef/owner.
-
re: LindaWhit
Interesting how the older women chefs have been marginalized in several seasons of TC--Ariane, Robin, Betty. Carla was older but had a very youthful vibe so she seems to have escaped "biddyfication." Does anyone remember any older male chefs getting the same treatment? As a 40s woman I find it very disturbing to watch the real contempt the younger chefs have for the older women. But having read Bourdain et. al. on the machismo of most kitchens, I'm not terribly surprised. As diners, MANY of us older women, we just don't see this ugly side of kitchen culture. In all, unappetizing. I'm going to seek out women-run restaurants in the future.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All I can say about this episode is that I actually cried when they eliminated Ashley. I like her approach to food and found her to be a great competitor.
I am sorry but that fact that Robin is still there is insane. INSANE!!! I am sure she's a lovely lady but she just does not have "it". . whatever "it" is, she's got none.
I think Kevin or Jen will win. Jen leaves me cold as far as her personality goes but I think she's a solid cook. Kevin has "it" and so he will go far no matter what.
›6 Replies-
re: pastryqueen
I don't know if by winning this show people from far and wide will come eat your food, but the free advertisement is worth much more than $100k, which is abut $60k after taxes. I think the bros, Kevin and Jen have already done wonders for themselves at this point. The next time I visit Atlanta, I'll be checking him out and Blais' joint. And when I next go to Philly, I'll be checking out Jen. I've already been to Bryan's restaurant. Too bad Mike works in LA - not going there any time soon.
-
-
re: Gigi007
I ate at Michael V.'s restaurant at the Greenbrier- Hemisphere a couple years ago. All tasting menus. It was really good and very creative. Lots of molecular Gastronomy even then. I can't remember each dish now, but right away you knew that it was going to be a good evening because the quality of food from the beginning of the meal was really up there. I do remember the sugar sphere that Hubby's dessert was encased the whole thing was very interesting.
-
re: ktmoomau
Thanks, ktmoomau. I'm trying to get my brother who lives in California to check out Michael V.'s current restaurant. I know a few people who ate at Bazaar when he was there, and they said their meals were out of this world. Closer to home, we have Bryan V.'s Volt. I've only been once, but it made a real impression on me. Very innovative and well presented, delicious food.
-
-
-
-
The grouping seems obvious, but I've been trying to find a way to describe their qualities.
Top Chef Final Four - imaginative, self-sufficient, takes risk and gets the job done.
Kevin
Mike V
Bryan V
JennTop Sous Chef - Not as imaginative, rides coattails, but has some skills.
Mike I
Eli
Both Mike I and Eli think their the bomb but so far have not really put up.
Ash - intimidated by the "learned chefs". He keeps emphasizing his lack of culinary degree.Top Bistro/Cafe Chef - These are the loners or the chefs outside of the clique. They'd do great in a one chef kitchen.
Robin
Laurine
I believe Robin and Laurine are the older chefs of the group. Maybe they're beyond cliques and dealing with the younger pups.›1 Reply -
Jen impressed me--with cooking while sick, to sharing her prize with Kevin, to being teary when Ashley was leaving. I think she showed a lot more humanity this episode.
I was sad to see Ashley leave. I know, to beat others to the punch, that this isn't Top Integrity but I was impressed that she didn't throw her teammates under the bus, even if it meant she left. When they picked her and Michael as the ones who lost for their teams, she must have known she'd be the one leaving. I think she's far better than Ell and the fact is that he oversalted the gnocchi and left her to cook the prawns because he couldn't. He was lucky she was a team player and not looking out for herself.
I also liked Bryan more this episode--the whole brother rivalry disappeared when one of them was in danger. That was nice to see. Yeah, Bryan was snappy but aren't they in the stew room for hours, with way too much to drink? Kevin seemed to forgive him. I think the final four are obvious but I want to see Kevin in the final two. Consistent, innovative great food, plus who could root against Kris Kringle?
›8 Replies-
-
re: chowser
"I also liked Bryan more this episode--the whole brother rivalry disappeared when one of them was in danger."
As some have commented previously, I personally feel that the whole rivalry angle was a fabrication of the shows' editors and producers. I think Bryan is a low-drama kind of guy and is serious about cooking and isn't much interested in becoming a character on a reality TV show.
-
re: Gigi007
I agree. I know I give my husband a hard time and we pretend to be competitive. It we had cut and paste lives, people would think we were in serious trouble. I really like that most of the contestants this season seem to be into cooking their best, not the Spike like drama of trying to beat the game. As Ashley put it when Kevin chose money over immunity, they want to be there because they deserve to be there, not because they won the immunity card (or playing games).
-
re: chowser
I like it--"cut and paste lives"! And I agree that most contestants--certainly the top 4--are giving it their best. Although I want Bryan or his brother Michael to win, I'm becoming increasingy impressed by Kevin and Jen. It reminds me of some seasons of American Idol (which I definitely don't watch regularly) when there are so many talented runner ups. I just hope the TC judges don't pull a Taylor Hicks. That would suck.
-
-
-
re: Ericandblueboy
So true, although most of the tools I know (LOL) have big mouths. Actually, on another web site some time ago, I had an interesting discussion with someone about the technical difference between tools and douchebags. For all practical purposes, I don't see much of a difference, but then again I never use the term "douchebag" . I now remember that omewhere in this thread or an earlier one there's a discussion about a certain "douche".
-
-
-
-
I like Ash seems like a decent guy but he is coming across like Hossea did last season. Constantly in the lower half of the field but some how managing to get by.
Like Kevin from day one. He is being portrayed as the one to beat. But you never know if your being set up because of the editing.
›2 Replies -
-
So there is an Iron Chef rerun on right now.... Blais vs Batali. And who is sous chef no 2 on the Challenger's team? Why it is Eli! He has put on a few pounds in the intervening years, but it is clearly this year's Top Chef Eli.
›5 Replies -
I was sorry to see Ashley go.
I never read the bios but after she left I read Ashley's. I was really surprised that she's 32. Heck, I'd card her at a bar. Yeah, I realize they flash the cheftestant's ages on screen when they ID them, but that's a detail that apparently I've been ignoring.
My big question (I always have questions) this week is, why didn't Eli taste the gnocchi before he wrecked them? When will TC contestants learn to taste their own food?
-
-
A so-so challege starts the competition.
********************I will say, though, that I like the fact that the challenges seem to be more general this season: more thematic and less "cook with this weird ingredient." It may be less interesting, but it gives the chefs a better chance to show off their individual style of cooking.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: newhavener07
I think those are the four strongest chefs but I'm pretty sure at least one will screw up enough to allow a dark horse into the top 4.
****
What is enough? I think the top chefs get to make at least 1 mistake. Mike V made his last night so he might get the heave-ho next time he screws up.-
re: Ericandblueboy
True, the chefs with a lot of wins get a few strikes before they're out. But if there's a big team challenge a strong chef will likely take a leadership role and could be out if his/her team screws up. I'll be very surprised if there aren't a least a few surprises in the final group--Robin, anyone?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LJBTampa
why don't you like RW? i think it seems much more "real" than some of the silly challenges that get thrown at the cheftestants because it actually involves creating a menu and a dining experience, rather than (william shatner voiceover): "one. plate of food. using these, 3. unfamiliar to you, ingredients. in just 30 minutes. . . with a circus animal theme, prepared in this. little. room. with no electricity, just this butane torch." i know it's a contest but who works like that? RW is one of the only times we actually get to see any type of cohesive menu-vision, wrt theme and overall dining experience, from these folks-- and chefs absolutely need to be able to put together a cohesive, executable menu that's also exciting and enjoyable for the diners, these are real essential skills for the real world.
btw the above is just the reason *i* like RW-- and i am curious about why others don't like it, not trying to shut anybody down, or anything. is RW boring to watch? very curious about this, thanks for any responses.
-
re: soupkitten
I enjoy the whole show, but RW is a particular favorite. As you said, they've got to work together - planning, creating and executing a menu; planning a cohesive look for their restaurant (which often, chef-owners have to do as well in the real world), making sure the entire restaurant runs smoothly. Whoever is chosen as leader of each team needs to ensure that they pick the right person for each job.
-
-
-
-
re: Evilbanana11
I completely agree on the final 4. However, I'm still torn between the brothers as the winner. I feel that Michael V. might be more creative than Bryan, but I'm not entirely sure about this given the creative, delicious food I experienced at Bryan V.'s restaurant. If I exclude my impressions of my firsthand experience, then I'd probably go with Michael.
-
-
I was just reading through Tom's blogs and boy you can really tell he is very excited by Jennifer. I think he admires her and respects her allot.
I'd agree I think she is really really good, and she is confident without being arrogant.
I'd love to try her foodOh and read Jamies most recent blog too -
MAN her language is pretty disgusting!!
Wow - Zero class!!›17 Replies-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Believe my I can curse like a truckdriver sometimes - but there is a difference between the heat of the moment cursing and actually writing the words "dick head" and "douche"!
Yikes!
And I am sorry - he may be a dick but he's not a douche - to me a douche is someone knowingly evil - and poor Mike I isnt really.
He is just a dumb, simple guy.-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
douche - 6 dictionary results
douche /duʃ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [doosh] Show IPA noun, verb, douched, douch⋅ing.
Use douche in a Sentence
See web results for douche
See images of douche
–noun 1. a jet or current of water, sometimes with a dissolved medicating or cleansing agent, applied to a body part, organ, or cavity for medicinal or hygienic purposes.
2. the application of such a jet.
3. an instrument, as a syringe, for administering it.
4. a bath administered by such a jet.–verb (used with object) 5. to apply a douche to.
–verb (used without object) 6. to use a douche or douches; undergo douching.
NAh!!
-
re: NellyNel
Urban Dictionary has a definition you might like to read:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=douche
or is he a douchebag?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Agreed... Scallop and ceviche are overused this season.
Kevin is my pick for front runner. He's a cooking savant.Interesting that Ashley goes home, but Eli didn't want to cook the prawns.
Like Mike I, Eli's been a lot of talk but really hasn't done anything to prove his abilities, other than pick the right partners.›39 Replies-
re: dave_c
Interesting when you look at the progress on Wikipedia; Ash has definitely not been as good as others:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Chef...
The closest he's come to a win is being on a team win, but was not picked as a judge favorite. Whereas Ashley was at least in the High side several times.
Robin and Mike I. also seem to be skaters, although Mike I. did win one QF. Jennifer, Kevin and Bryan are the three who have *never* been in the bottom during the Elimination Challenges. I'm thinking those are the Top 3 unless something drastic happens.
-
re: LindaWhit
I hope Kevin wins the whole shebang. He is so talented, not to mention humble unlike some of his other competitors--hello, brothers. The brother who has less personality than the other, I forget his name, sorry to say as I know it's a cooking competition, is an ass and needs to take a class in cooking up a sunnier disposition. He is way too intense and it bugs t he crap out of me. When he snapped at Eli in the waiting room while his brother was before judges' panel, I was so annoyed. Calm down, kid. It's ok. Ugh. Go Kevin!
-
-
re: NellyNel
I'm trying to recall that part as well - Jane, are you talking about Bryan snapping at Eli? Wouldn't Eli have been in the Bottom group with Bryan's brother, Michael? Or am I mixing up the brothers in my mind again? LOL
ETA: Oh wait - you're talking about Michael snapping at Eli when Bryan was in front of the judges for the winning dish.
-
re: LindaWhit
yes yes! That's it. Michael is his name and all Eli was asking was how the dish was made. It wasn't like Eli was asking Michael what he thought of the dish. He needs to chill. Meanwhile how about next week's preview when Eli gets into it with Robin? "You're not my mother," Eli shouts. "I don't want to be your mother," snaps Robin.
PS: Ash's effusive deferral to the brother (again I cant seem to remember their names) was pathetic and stupid. He dodged a big bullet there, too.
-
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
A slight mix-up I think- Kevin was asking Bryan about what was in Michael's dish, and Bryan was the one that snapped at Kevin, defending Michael.
I for one thought it was a) nice of Bryan to stick up for his brother, with a valid point that no one had tried the dish in question; and b) considering the amount of time they spend in the stew room waiting, I'm not particularly surprised that even the usually quiet Bryan would snap at some point.
-
re: HabaneroJane
No, that was Brian snapping at Kevin when Michael was at JT for being in the bottom. I posted about it above -- I actually liked seeing that. Yeah, he was a little out of line (Kevin probably didn't deserve the attitude), but I liked seeing Brian get all defensive and protective of his little brother. He was just worried for Michael and he (admittedly, unfairly) took it out on Kevin. But I liked seeing it because, to me, it is an indication that all the petty "rivalry" we've been seeing largely is a creation of the editors. I had suspected, and hoped, that all along, since the brothers seemed too mature, focused and level headed for such childishness.
And for the record, I don't think they're boring or lacking in personality. I think they're like Harold: they're there to cook.
-
re: HabaneroJane
Yes, but how would Michael know what was in Bryan's dish or how it was made? He was busy cooking his own food! I don't fault Michael for snapping back at Eli - it was kind of a dumb question on Eli's part.
I'm going to have rewatch this episode. The whole stew room part was confusing.
-
re: HabaneroJane
Ah, no. It was Kevin and Brian. Kevin was obviously trying to figure why Michael of all people would be on the bottom, but Brian was too stressed to hear it. He probably didn't need to snap, but he was protecting his little brother by squashing any talk of him. Perfectly acceptable IMO. I actually thought it was sweet to see that the brothers aren't all sibling rivalry. They obviously care about each other a great deal, otherwise Brian wouldn't have been so sullen after a good finish.
-
-
-
-
-
re: NellyNel
Yes - it was certainly an uncomfortable moment and I also agree that Bryan might be a great chef, but he is not a fan fave because of his lack of personality and color. I still think he will be in the final four with Kevin, Jen, and his brother.
What is odd this season is that most of them already have high level positions or own their own place unlike most of the past winners. Even Jen has a position with one of the most famous chefs in the US.
I'm wondering if Mike Isabella or Robin will stay around longer in order to provide more drama...
-
-
-
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
You have to understand where Brian was coming from. His point was that none of them had the dish, so no one could really say what went wrong. He didn't want to play a guessing game, least of all about his brother. He was worried about his brother and he felt the need to protect him. He obviously didn't want to hash it out. No matter how old you get that feeling for a sibling never leaves you. Did he have to snap? Of course not. But I don't hold it against him really and I'm guessing Kevin didn't either. Afterward he apologized realizing where Brian's head was.
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
Haha. I think MIke I would back down too, but for a different reason: he probably only picks fights he can win.
As for Brian, I think he would have responded a bit differently had the convo not been about his brother. He probably would have been uptight still, but most likely brushed it off by saying he didn't really know about the dish rather than snapping. I think the emotion came from protecting his brother. That was my immediate thought anyway.
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
I think Michael is more innovative, but I'm sure I could say either one is "better" per se. In fact, between Kevin, Jen and the bro's I think there is barely a sliver of difference in terms of talent. I'm not sure there is enough space between them all for light to pass through.
-
-
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
I'll have to agree with you that Bryan's got a stick up his butt. I've known quite a few people like him -- fiercely loyal but incredibly rigid. Overall, I think he's a good guy but I wouldn't want to get on his bad side.
I really do like Kevin. He seems really talented but has such a nice disposition (at least from what the editors decide to show us). I thought he was really diplomatic when they asked him about the contestants' beef with Robin. He's the one I'm rooting for.
-
-
re: gastrotect
I don't hold it against him - whether it had been Eli or Kevin asking the question of Bryan, my original point upthread (although it was about Michael, not Bryan) still stands. HOW could Bryan know what Michael's dish tasted like, putting him in the Bottom group? Bryan was busy cooking his own dish! I still think the way the question was put was idiotic. But as you said - Kevin didn't seem to hold it against him, and did apologize.
-
re: LindaWhit
my original point upthread (although it was about Michael, not Bryan) still stands. HOW could Bryan know what Michael's dish tasted like, putting him in the Bottom group?
**********
I thought that was Bryan's point - that none of the contestants tasted each other's food so there's no basis for critcism.-
re: Ericandblueboy
Most of you are missing an important point, Brian knew why his brother was in the bottom group but refused to share the info and instead snapped at Kevin. After the food was served, still at the house and before JT, Brian went over to Mike and asked what was wrong. Mike told him he had overcooked the fish and made another comment about the raviolo on top of it. Kevin did not ask how the dish tasted, he asked about the elements of the dish, that is why Brian said he didn't want to dissect the dish. I wouldn't be surprised if next week we see an apology from Brian to Kevin. No reason to think Brian is a jerk, just an intense talented guy focused on winning.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Ericandblueboy
Part of me thinks Bryan overreacted, I don't think Kevin was passing judgement, but I can see Kevin as a info nerd. Wasn't Kevin the engineering geek that passed on a full scholarship to MIT to become a chef? Those type of folks are analyzers using every little it of info to not make the same mistake. However, Bryan's bro was up on the chopping block so emotions were probably running high.
-
-
-
re: Ericandblueboy
While I agree he could have been less snappish, we also don't get to experience the stress they're under. Long days/nights in a hot kitchen or elsewhere, filming the entire season in 30 days or so, cameras constantly in our faces, producers asking inane questions trying to get sound bites....yeah, I think most of us would have snapped as well.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Were you surprised by Ashley's departure? I have to say I was disappointed. I think she's a better chef than Ash (or Robin, or Laurine) so it's too bad she made such an early exit. She's the only one I thought didn't really deserve to go home. Ahh well. I guess we see again, you are only as good as your last dish.
›24 Replies-
-
-
re: QSheba
I'm so sad Ashley's gone. She was one of the more interesting chefs to watch and her dishes were always a surprise--either good or bad. I'm not sure I get the reasoning behind the judges decision. This was a team challenge, but it didn't have an "executive chef" role clearly defined so one person should not have to take the fall for the entire team. I guess the raw prawns did her in, but doesn't Eli's oversalting and bad concept trump that? If she gets booted for undercooking, why didn't Mike get booted for overcooking? Which is a worse sin, in the age of sushi and "rare" seafood?
I want Ashley back! There's no one left to get in the face of jerks like Isabella and Eli.
Waaaa!-
-
re: saeyedoc
" the judges had no way to know it was Eli who oversalted the gnocchi"
IIR Tom realized that Eli was responsible for the salt and said some thing to the effect of the gnocchi didn't get salty by themselves after Ashely made them. While Ashly made some errors I have no idea WTH either Eli or Ash did for their team.
I'll put Eli, Ash and Robbin in the bottom three.
-
-
re: newhavener07
Cooking prawns is something Ashley claimed she's done before, and has done well.
But she failed at that, something that IMO any of those chefs should be able to do correctly.
I liked Ashley, I wish she was still there, but she was solely responsible for the prawns.Mike's problem with over-cooking was due in part to the electrical problems, and having to
re-start the cooking process. So some of that was not under his control. I strongly disagree with
the judges at the JT. They were comparing this to something happening in your restaurant.There's a big difference. A restaurant owner would be aware of any equipment/electric problems as they arise and have them corrected. Plus the chef could start over with other food to correct the problem. Here in their house, Mike had no control or foreknowledge of the heavy load from all the electric woks. He should not have been penalized for that. Given the proper stove to cook on, the outcome could have been much different.
-
re: pacheeseguy
But Mike chose to cook where he did -- he could have cooked in the kitchen, but decided to use the other stuff provided to them. Now, sure, the kitchen was crowded, but he could have done his best to work in there, or he could have done a better job to monitor what was going on with the unfamiliar equipment that he was cooking on. A good chef doesn't blame his tools, he tries well to work with what he's got.
-
re: pacheeseguy
I think the main difference between a chef in a restaurant and a Top Chef challenge is that they don't have the time or, as Mike mentioned, the product to do it over. In a restaurant, if you misfire a dish you can dump it, get another piece of fish from the walk-in and start over, and the customer will be none the wiser. On Top Chef, that's not an option -- you have to serve the "first pancake."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: dmjordan
I don't think gnocchi--when prepared correctly--is heavy at all. When it's good, gnocchi should be like light pillows. Oversalting ruins the dish, and even though I'm no pro, but even the worst gnocchi I've ever made hasn't been over-salted. Sometimes over cooked, but never over salted.
-
-
re: Nettie
I actually didn't see the episode. Anyway, to me, fried gnocchi is odd (although I understand it may be popular in some regions of Italy). I learned to make gnocchi from scratch in Italy, and the Italian cooks (one from Rome and the other from a town near Florence) who taught me prepared it in boiling water with the light quality of the pasta emphasized. So, I can only think of gnocchi as light.
-
-
-
re: dmjordan
I get so sick of the seasonal comments. As others have said, correctly made gnocchi really isn't that heavy. Those of us who live in warm climates year round don't plan on rearranging our lives to eat light/cool dishes just because something is too heavy. I have a feeling if the chefs did follow that philosophy in that show, they'd get chastised for being one note.
-
-
re: queencru
not to take anything away from your (good) point, but i think maybe the judges kinda tend to put the smack-down on chefs who show signs of being "one-trick." not that ashley can't make lots of stuff, but someone commented in the episode that she makes gnocci daily in her restaurant, and hasn't she make gnocci many times already in the show? maybe the negative "heavy" comments were really the judges trying to say they didn't like to see this menu item repeated by this contestant.
i wish the judges would put the smack-down on ceviche for the season. gawd i am sick of looking at ceviche on this show.
-
-
re: soupkitten
She made it once before. I think in this case where the cheftestants are handed a set of ingredients, it's not so egregious. I don't remember what her ingredients were, but perhaps gnocchi was what made sense with what they were provided. At least she's not like Mike I who seems to complain whenever he can't recreate a dish from his own restaurant.
-
-
-
-
-
Toby is channeling James Carville w/those glasses. Padma is drinking water. Toby alludes to a dish as Monet, better from afar than close up. Ash is bromancing Picasso.
›9 Replies-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
That's why I said she could have been trying to conceive and therefore avoiding alcohol. A lot of women who are actively trying to conceive will take prenatal vitamins and avoid alcohol "just in case" they get pregnant that cycle. Due to her infertility issues, that wouldn't be surprising. Or she could have been taking a medication that is contraindicated that day, something as simple as advil shouldn't be mixed w/ alcohol. Who knows....As far as having a big "bump"... it totally depends on the woman- I am 7 months and can still wear "normal" clothes - a "L" fitted shirt from Banana Republic instead of the usual "M", nomal yoga pants... The taller you are the longer it takes to show. (And my little one is measuring 1 week ahead, so I'm not starving him:))
-
-
-
re: edible complex
Toby's analogy is idiotic. The closer you examine a great painting, the more you appreciate the brilliance of the artist to create a masterpiece from thousands of individual brush strokes. The true art is in the details. Not even sure why he's on the show, other than to be a snark. How about Jonathan Gold if they want a newspaper critic on the panel?
-
-
And Ashley is gone. Looks like the judges were looking at her and Michael as the responsible ones.
I don't think Ash is long for the show.
›3 Replies -
I signed on just to say that I KNEW it! I knew the brothers weren't as competitive as the editors tried to make them seem. Good for Brian getting all protective and defensive for his brother. I loved it.
›4 Replies-
-
-
re: Foodie in Friedberg
Well, we're all entitled to our opinions. :-) I don't think he was overly hostile or "jumped down" Kevin's throat. He got a bit snippy and shut down the conversation, yeah. He just didn't want to engage in a post mortem about the dish that might send his brother home. I thought it was a perfectly understandable reaction, and showed some loyalty to his brother.
-
re: Foodie in Friedberg
I don't think anyone ever said Kevin was bashing the dish. It seemed Kevin was just trying to figure out what the dish was and why there might have been a problem. But Bryan was protecting his brother in the sense that he didn't want anyone projecting or dissecting the dish without actually knowing how it tasted. He abruptly ended the conversation and was probably more terse than he should have been, but Kevin clearly understood.
I watched the pre-game show for the Colts-Titans game last night and there was an interesting parallel there. Bob Costas interviewed Peyton Manning and asked Peyton about watching Eli play football. Peyton said that if he wins and Eli loses on any given Sunday, he (Peyton) doesn't feel completely happy. This is someone who is arguably the best, and most competitive, quarterback in football who competes for a living and even he can't shake the brotherly need to protect.
-
-
-
I had started another thread just around the same time....my thoughts (a little bit more info here about the first 20 minutes)...
Jennifer is REALLY sick - rut-roh!
Tyler Florence is Guest Judge, and the Quickfire is sponsored by Cookster.com - a Top Chef slot machine where you pull the arm and get 3 keywords - Mood, Taste, and Cuisine. Seemed like Umami and Asian came up a LOT. It's also a high stakes QF.
On the Low end? Robin, Eli and Jennifer. Ouch.
Those who were in the Top 3 were Mike I., Kevin, and Michael. Kevin wins, and gets to choose his high stakes win - either $15,000 or Immunity....and he chooses the money!
The Elimination Challenge? Padma shows up at their house to tell the chefs that in THREE HOURS they are going to be throwing their own home dinner party. They're working in teams - and Mike I. and Robin are a team....now THIS ought to be interesting!
ETA: There's a LOT of confessional talk with Mike I. Hmmmmm....
And Robin's right - there's a lot of "I" talk when Mike I. is speaking - even when he was talking to Tom Colicchio about what their team was cooking - it was all "I'm going to be doing...." - while Robin stayed off to the side, head down, and a wry grin on her face. He just proved her right. :-)
Sounds like Jennifer/Kevin team did the best; I'm thinking Michael and Ash might be in the bottom. Rut-roh. Is this going to take out one of the favorites?
›10 Replies -
Mean Mike and Robin are paired off. Should be interesting. He's already coming off like a jerk....
›10 Replies-
-
re: vinhotinto75
"How many times have we heard that Jennifer is not feeling well..."
~~~~~~Per Tom's blog on Bravo, she *only* mentioned it on camera because she was asked point blank by the camera crew.
http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs...
Interesting comments re: Ash and how he looks at food vs. Michael. Reiterating that Ash essentially is saying he won't last in the competition.
Also, looks like the judges didn't realize that Eli had re-salted the gnocchi, and Ashley did *not* say anything about it at JT. I'm thinking if they had known that, Eli might have been the one to go home. Eli *seriously* dodged a bullet!
-
-
re: Ericandblueboy
I'd have to re-watch last night's episode to know what he said at JT. From Tom's blog:
"Most of the questions we ask don’t make it into the final version of the program, but we really do try to ascertain who was responsible for what. We didn’t know, as you did from watching the program, that when Ashley gave the gnocchi to Eli they were fine, and he then oversalted them. We knew only that Ashley had made the gnocchi. Ashley made a personal point throughout this competition to treat the team as a team and never ascribe blame to her partners, even when it was merited. She did so both with Mattin and, now, with Eli. This is admirable, but it would have benefitted her to say to us, “Eli oversalted the gnocci I’d made. I knew it the moment I tasted them.” "
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Adding insult to injury for Ashley fans and Eli haters, Toby blog says that it was a close decision whether to eliminate Eli or Ashley. Sounds to me if Ashley had pinned the gnocci salt problems on Eli, it could have made all the difference in the judging. Tom knows Ashley knows how to make a proper gnocci from previous challenges.
-
re: dach
Crap. Haven't read Toby's blog yet (wasn't up earlier this a.m.), but I'm bummed. I would have much preferred Ashley staying. Eli's in my permanent dog house with Mike Isabella, the one who can't cook Asian and yet wouldn't listen to his teammate and said in confessional that he'd throw out whatever she had prepped anyway.
-
-
-
-
-

























