Top Chef Las Vegas - Ep. 4 - 09/09/09 (spoilers)
Daniel Boulud as guest judge - talk about quaking in your boots!
Escargot as the ingredient to use for the QF and there are some who are cocky (Mike I.) and some that are concerned (Jennifer). And as a high-stakes QF, it's not that the winner gets $15K - it's that the loser goes home! Yikes.
Amazing dishes were Mike I., Kevin, and Jennifer and Kevin wins it! I was thinking when Mike I. was shown mouthing off in the confessional early on, I thought the Elves might be telling us something.
Bad dishes - Jessie, Ashley, and Robin - rut-roh! BUT - they get a chance to save themselves - they have 20 minutes to make an amuse bouche out of anything in the kitchen. They all seemed pretty good - but it's bye-bye, Jessie!
Elimination Challenge - classic French sauce, or classic French protein...and Mike I. doesn't know what a lot of them are!
ETA - to fix the 5th guest chef judge Keller, Tourandel, Boulud, Robuchon, and Joho (I haven't heard of him) - are eating at the table for the EC dinners! Holy smokes! And even MORE Holy Smokes is that Kevin won't be cooking AND will be joining them at the dining table!
Pairing up of sauce and protein begins...Jennifer and Mike V. are paired - VERY good pairing! And Brian and Mike I. are paired. And they're off!
-
What I liked about Ash is that he took the comments at JT to heart and said it was painful but dead on vs Mike I. who still refuses to believe his dish wasn't good. If you're not there to learn and get better then you should leave. As Tom Colicchio often says when someone is told to PYKaG that they need to know where they went wrong. Even TCM seemed to appreciate the feedback.
›2 Replies -
-
Jesse's amuse bouche looked insipid, a pretty boring dish. She barely put any tuna in it, plus the quail egg was fried to a crisp with a crunchy brown ring. Seeing terribly cooked eggs is a big pet peeve of mine. However, she was the only one to follow the "one bite" rule of amuse bouche.
The top 3 snail dishes were all cooked very simply, just seasoned correctly. Really had no clue what Jesse was doing w/ the fried green tomato + snail ELT contraption. It just made no sense.
Hector had talent but again they're judging solely on one meal. He could've started cooking much earlier as a roast of that size can rest for at least 20 mins. Total failure in time management. I would've switched to another oven if it was misbehaving. There must've been a combi oven there that could've been used to speed things up.
›1 Reply -
My top five ( the brothers, jen, kevin, and Michael I) did well this episode.As others have stated in this thread Michael I is not as annoying as before and is even starting to grow on me.
I don't see anyone possibly threatening this top 5. The next best chef is probably Eli but the rest will inevitably be going home.
It's also nice to see Jen owning with different proteins for a change, she ain't just a seafood gal. -
i just realized that no one has addressed the PRIZE Bryan won. how amazing is that?! he seemed truly humbled and awed by the idea. did anyone notice the expression on Mike I's face? he really didn't seem to care that he had missed out on it. i find it a bit odd that a chef of his [supposed] caliber has so little interest in (or knowledge about) classical French cuisine. Joel Robuchon is a living legend in his field - even if his expertise is in a style other than yours, how could you NOT want the opportunity to learn from him?
›3 Replies-
-
re: thew
that wasn't my point. maybe it's just because i'm so familiar with guys like Mike and i'm reading too much into it, but i got the feeling from his expression that he sort of "shrugged" internally when they announced the prize, as if to say "eh, i don't think i'd really want to spend a week in that guy's kitchen." yes, Bryan's brother was clearly irked, and not just because he didn't win, but because his brother did. (and for the record, i find the whole sibling rivalry thing awfully tiresome.) but Jen appeared to be genuinely disappointed when she heard what the prize was.
-
-
-
-
What was Robuchon wearing? He looked like a monk.
I'm glad I won't have to see Jesse's steel zits any more. Great exit line: "The thing I want people to know is that I don't suck this bad."
›69 Replies-
re: Robert Lauriston
That's exactly the thought I had--he looks like a monk! I must say the high point of the show for me was hearing him say the word "grenouille." He definitely had a yoda-like presence and seemed to put Padma in some kind of trance. Another high point: Mattin's Frenchy underpants in the outtake birthday scene.
-
re: newhavener07
The random throw in of Mattin's birthday party made me realize (again) how much better this reality show is in comparsion to all the others. The rest of them would of manufactured some sort of drama or focused completely on it. I like that it was just a funny little snippet of the chefs in their down time.
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I don't know - I don't think they dwelled too much on the "affair"...true they showed a personal scene , and then a few comments on it from each person - but I think we as fans were the ones who blew it out of proportion- it's not like last years season revoled around that drama.
IMO
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: jujuthomas
Marcel was held down by Cliff in Season 2, Ep. 11, and there was a "play threat" to shave his head. Cliff was ousted from the show by Tom, who showed up at their house to discuss it after the producers told him about it. Tom wanted to throw EVERYONE out of the house (as no one really tried to help Marcel, although several didn't participate in the prank) and give Marcel the win, but the producers wouldn't allow that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_chef...
The eventual winner was Ilan. Probably the worst winner on TC.
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
In terms of personality, Ilan and Hosea are a dead tie for the biggest douchebag, as far as I am concerned. In terms of skill, I actually think Hosea is probably a little worse than Ilan. Ilan, at least, seemed to be able to cook his specialty (spanish) well. Hosea couldn't EVEN cook his specialty (seafood). He lost every freaking challenge that included it, and IIRC, was even in the bottom for some of them.
Seriously though? They both suck. I like to pretend those seasons didn't happen.
-
-
-
re: dmd_kc
"played the judges like a violin at the end..."
I felt that Ilan played the judges and his fellow teammates superbly. He played the game really well.
How I rate the winners...
1. Harold.
2. Hung
3. Stephanie
4. Hosea
5. IlanHowever, this season's has many very talented chefs that can easily take the #1 spot.
-
re: dave_c
Except that it shouldn't be considered a "game" like Survivor - who can cheat, lie and steal - a lot of which Ilan did and no one called him on it. It's a cooking competition - who has the best chops in the kitchen. Unfortunately, Ilan's game-playing led him to the winner's circle.
-
re: dave_c
I really like this season for the lack of "hanging out" scenes. That The Elves are sticking pretty much to the cooking means to me that there is just too much great cooking to capture. Based on that alone, this has to be the best bunch ever.
In MaryLand (not Maryland but rather my murky headspace), here is my ranking:
1. Stephanie (remember she had Richard to contend with)
2. Harold
3. Hung
4. Ilan (may have used his restos recipes but apparently very well)
5 Hosea (nobody from that season deserved the title)-
-
re: thew
Speaking of the hanging out scenes -
Last week we saw that it was Martines (sp) bd - I wonder if he got drunk before or after the challenge -
If it was before - maybe he was awfully hung-over and that's why he did so poorly
Also after re-watching - I honestly don't think he understood Toms question - so i don't think he actually meant to lie
-
-
-
-
re: Buckethead
I've gotten to the point where I just skip through those bits because they're worthless. Usually you can recognize the timing is off within about 2 seconds and keep on going. I think it would be more effective if they didn't put something that clearly happened in the first 10 minutes of the EC after people start plating.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: chicgail
Isn't that because the judges are only "allowed" to look at "their last meal" and aren't supposed to take into account their performance over the entire season or at least their overall talent? In some ways it's a flaw of the system...on the other hand, the whole game is changed if the elimination criteria are significantly altered.
-
-
-
-
-
re: MplsM ary
The difference is which winners are able to make a mark beyond a local level. For that criteria I would say only Hung would qualify.
Don't 'get me wrong, Harold and Stephanie both have successful mid range restaurants going. However, they're not exactly destination joints doing innovative cuisine. They do solid cooking for affordable prices.
-
-
re: chicgail
And what has Hung done on his own that warrants "a mark beyond a local level" or "destination joints doing innovative cuisine"? He hasn't. At least Harold and Stephanie have opened or are opening restaurants (as did Richard, although Flip was in the works before he went on the show, I believe). But while Hung said back in 2007 he'd like to open a restaurant in NYC or LV, he hasn't yet done so. Maybe he qualifies - but if he did, wouldn't he have already done *something*?
-
-
re: KTinNYC
I'm fully aware that opening a restaurant doesn't warrant a top chef, nor that $100K (before taxes) is going to be enough to open a restaurant.
However, based on your earlier statement, at least they've *done* something of note or are in the very close proximity of having done something within a pretty short time frame of having won their TC season.
* Harold won in 2006; opened Perilla in 2007 - reviews were pretty good, and it's had steady business
* Ilan won in 2007; opened The Gorbals in Aug. 2009 (and it was closed a week later for health violations, I understand) - Reviews have been very mixed
* Hung won in 2007 and has been a guest chef at various places.
* Stephanie won in 2008 - she was a chef owner of her own restaurant, Scylla, before selling it in 2007. She working on opening The Drunken Goat in Chicago, IIRC.
Hosea won in early 2009 - and is still head chef at Jax in Boulder.
My comment was specifically directed to aser, who seems to think that Hung is the only one capable of making a mark beyond the local level or doing innovative cuisine, where he hasn't yet done so after several years.
-
re: LindaWhit
I don't think there is any shame in doing good honest food. That was a compliment for them, not a diss as you seem to have interpreted.
Hung seems to reach more for his dishes, incorporating higher levels of technique gleamed from working at Michelin starred restaurants. I could be wrong but I don't think Stephanie or Harold have that type of experience. It also shows in their food, from what they've cooked on the show to the menus of their restaurants. They still make great food, but more down to earth, less glitzy.
At the end of the day you have your opinion and I have mine, formed by my observations.
-
re: aser
Yes, but Hung hasn't made a mark beyond a local level. So until he actually does that on his own in his own restaurant (vs. doing what another chef asks of him), it's a moot point, right?
And keep in mind that Stephanie had a finale dish with braised pistachios, which none of the judges had thought of and were amazed by.
-
re: LindaWhit
None of the TC contestants have made a mark beyond a local level. Harold's restaurant, no matter how well liked, isn't really particularly original or much of a destination. It is a very solid neighborhood place. but it follows a formula used many times over.
If we are going to go by judges comments I believe one of the Hung's dishes garnered praise like, "three star Michelin".
-
re: KTinNYC
True re: none of the winners having gone beyond the local level. That one dish does not make Hung qualified to go beyond the local level, IMO. It's *one dish*. Quite frankly, I don't think that any of them will. But Hung has also not attempted to open his own place yet either, whereas two others of the winners have. So they've at least accomplished more than Hung has after their wins.
Until Hung does open his own place, and until he does go beyond the local level, I can't agree with the statement that he's qualified to doing so.
-
re: KTinNYC
Stepping back a bit. Is it actually realistic to have these very high expectations of the contestants? Are the knowledge and skills of the winners so well formed to warrant this kind of expectations?
Let us not forget that there is a certain serendipity in hitting it big a la Mario, Ripert, Emeril etc. Most of the winners are relatively young.
Granted Harold's restaurant is small and quaint, which is what I think he wanted. he certainly wanted to have long lasting success, rather than crashing and burning spectacularly a la Rocco. I think all of the winners as well a a lot of the top competitors are still feeling their way through their own road to whatever success that they seek. I think this puts a microscope on their development cycle and it should be very interesting to watch. Now, if we came back in say 10 years and Ilan is still bumming around trading on the notoriety and Hosea is cooking at the IHOP, then I think we have a story.
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
i read last night that Hung is in the kitchen at the new incarnation of what was Buddha Bar in NYC...
http://ny.eater.com/archives/2009/09/...
sort of an odd move. my guess is he just needed a job!
-
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
yes, & i was chiming in. lots of folks don't understand 1) that opening a restaurant takes a grip of cash 2) that banks don't actually generally loan to chefs to open restaurants. they loan to investors. the investors open the restaurant. if a chef can't get an investor on board, s/he has a very hard time opening a restaurant on a working chef's salary, even with a cash shot in the arm like the top chef prize money.
p.s. the investors typically don't care whether a chef's cooking is sublime or not-- they care about their investment, so they generally want to follow a business model which they are comfortable with. a chef that seems too "out there" can have a really hard time convincing investors to gamble on her/his concept.
-
-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
Hung doesn't have the creativity or especially the personality to make a splash.
He's a very good technician. I admire his knife skills greatly. He could outcook me in any cooking-school task, hands down.
But he serves things like salmon mousse on cucumber slices and gets angry when people tell him it's a cliché. It was a cliché in 1988.
He will never be a star chef. I'd bet my mortgage on that.
-
-
re: KTinNYC
To me, a star chef has two things: An appealing, media-friendly personality and an approach to food that's identifiable and quantifiable.
I found Hung's personality very off-putting, and his food extremely competent, but not inventive. He made a molten-center chocolate cake with raspberry as the dessert to his finale meal. Give. Me. A. Break.
He was up against Casey, a mostly-strong cook who choked, and the better-than-most but clearly not top chef quality Dale.
Hung won on great execution among a weak field of cheftestants.
-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
oh, to be clear, i was never a Hung fan. he's got impressive technical skills, but he never struck me as a *passionate* chef. his cooking seems to come from is head, but never his heart...and IMHO, truly great chefs need to do both. he finally gave us a glimpse of something "more" at the finale, but it was too little, too late.
i wasn't voicing surprise that he hasn't "blown up" into some star chef - i don't think that's in the cards for him...and i'm quite aware of how little $100K can do these days. i just figured that with his technical skills and experience he might land somewhere more impressive than Buddha Bar. then again, the restaurant biz is suffering so badly in this economy that i imagine he was just happy to land a gig that doesn't require him to wear a red & yellow polyester uniform with a paper hat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Actually, all the guys participated in that prank, because they planned it. In fact, Cliff wasn't really involved until he turned out to be the only one who went through with their plans. All the others backed out. I could see Tom's logic for getting rid of all of them if he was informed of the whole thing.
-
re: ChefJune
Well, I wouldn't have called it "participating" by just talking about it. The rules were clear: they could not touch another cheftestant in a harmful way. Talking about it wasn't against the rules.
So they didn't participate - only Cliff forcibly removed Marcel from his bed and held him down.
But this was hashed out ad infinitum here on CH during that season.
-
re: LindaWhit
I hate to beat a dead horse...but I wasnt around CH for that debate...
My question to you is - How the heck did Elia get by with her reputation unscathed???
She was evil and yet people so loved her - up until the very end!
The way she used to sceme and whisper and giggle with Ilan was nauseating!
Classic passive agressive behavior and yet I feel like I am the only soul who noticed it!
I also hated how she never admitted that if that other chick wouldn't have quit - she was going to be sent home ..and she never seemed grateful for that...which also irked me...
Eww I just couldnt stand her!(Sorry I had to get that out!!)
-
-
-
-
re: jujuthomas
Marcel may have been irritating, but Ilan (who won) was the worst.
Ilan was the type of person that would instigate and blend back in with the crowd. He didn't man-up. Also, Ilan was trash talking (to Marcel) about his skills and presenting Spanish inspired dishes to the judges which people (on the chowhound and chefs) claim Ilan essentially cooked dishes/recipes "stolen" from his job at Casa Mono.
I fully agree that Season 2 was the worst season of the TC series. The lack of professionalism, maturity and human decency were key for me.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<Joho (I haven't heard of him) > LInda, Jean Joho is an Alsatian who owns one of the top tables in Chicago, Everest (on the 44th floor of the Board of Trade building). He also owns several casual brasseries called Brasserie Jo. I believe there is one in Las Vegas.
I have dined at Everest several times for special occasions. I'd much prefer to go there than Charlie Trotters... just my taste. and the food I've had at Brasserie Jo has been delicious and very reminiscent of delicious brasserie meals in France.
I was kind of sad to see Hector go. I hadn't pegged him among the top five, but I liked him ;( As for Jessie, I think she finally ran out of luck.
›3 Replies-
re: ChefJune
Thanks June...Interesting that there is a Brasserie JO in Boston and I never realized what chef was connected to it in various discussions about it. I had read the Chef de Cuisine's name of the Boston location, but didn't realize it was one of several restaurants of the same name. Thanks for the info.
As for Hector, my feelings exactly. I did like him, but I'm wondering if he just wasn't suited to this style of competition. Jessie most definitely was not.
-
re: LindaWhit
I'm so glad that some of you got that impression of Hector. I absolutely love his restaurant, Pura Vida, in Atlanta, but I was so disappointed to see what he made on the show. I didn't feel like it reflected the wonderful food I've eaten at Pura Vida at all! I think the competition just wasn't the right fit for him. But I will go back to Pura Vida soon for some delicious new tapas!
-
-
-
-
I didn't realize that only women were eliminated up to this show.
Mike I is riding the coattails of the strong chefs.... which is a legitimate strategy. However, he's so full of himself where he doesn't realize he's a weak link.
I'm starting to think the chefs are relying on bacon too much.
Sad to see Hector go... He had good ideas and gave the cast personality. Also, he prepped those tenderloins beautifully... unlike the "chefs" on that HK show.
-
Did anyone else notice that Mike seems to have accepted the fact that Jen is in fact a very good chef and at, or above (in reality), his level? While they were going about their grocery store business his interview was voiced over it and he mentioned the four of them as the class of this season. He even said something like "Us four guys are definitely going to be at the top for this challenge." Lumping her with the boys is probably a sign of respect coming from him. I don't think he's dropped his sexism, but perhaps for Jen he has made an exception at this point.
›7 Replies-
-
-
-
re: saeyedoc
I grew up there too, and I would agree, but given Mike's previous comments I don't think he deserves the benefit of the doubt on this. And it's not like he's called women 'guys' before this, at least that we've seen. So far it's been "No girl should beat me" and "That's one less old lady I have to worry about".
-
re: Buckethead
every week I have had to say this:
Mike NEVER said "No girl should beat me"He said "A girl shouldnt be at my level" which does sound obnoxious, but after several viewings - it is obvious he was speaking in termes of her physical strength - and if you watch closely - he was saying it as if to hand it to her - in other words he was impressed by her....It was definitely edited to make him seem more obnoxious.
Though not too crazy about the old lady comment!
-
-
-
-
Interesting article about and interview with Jennifer Carroll: http://tinyurl.com/lonhp9 Including a brief comment about Mike Isabella at the very bottom.
›6 Replies-
re: LindaWhit
The thing that is interesting about Jen is that she talks about cooking in a blue collar, tom boyish manner but then her plates look extremely refined. She doesn't express artistic creativity, she executes.
I didn't like Michael I. at first but I think he's okay now. He is going to eventually sink or swim on his own as his strategy seems to be to latch on to the stronger chefs.
It seems Jesse's Colicchio-on-the-brain syndrome has been passed on to Ashley. -
-
re: gastrotect
"I love how she basically said: He isn't a jerk, he's just from Jersey. He can't help it. "
That is so funny because that is exactly what I meant in my earlier post:
"And he seems to get along with the chefs so I think he is less a "villian" and more just a "regular guy" type..
"
-
-
re: LindaWhit
In this interview with Ashley, she basically says she really likes Mike I., thinks he was playing for the camera with his sexist remarks, and he ended up looking a fool.
-
-
For some reason Mike seemed alright in this episode - no stupid comments that I can remember...
And he seems to get along with the chefs so I think he is less a "villian" and more just a "regular guy" type..Sorry to see Hector go...I liked him.....couldn't help but think of the Star Trek comment made here a few episodes ago!
Also sorry we didn't hear from Keller too much...
Bacon Jam sounds amazing...
Anyone notice Tom tell the winning chefs they could smile!
They certainly are an intense bunch - especially the brothers - whoa.›8 Replies-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
There is also a bit of reality fatigue going on too. The first season of any reality show gave the people on the shows a chance to make thing up because there were no rules. This is wI liekd the first season of the Real World, kind of the grandaddy of this type of reality show. But by this point, most of the contestants are pretty good about their deportment and will only project what they feel they need to project in order get rhough the show successfully.
-
re: goodhealthgourmet
The show is still about entertainment and sponsor revenue. If it doesn't make money it will go off the air. A good Top Chef season will strike a balance between great cooking and great drama so that it's not just us Chowhounds tuning in. That's the reality of it. That said, I think this season has enough personality to balance the wonderful culinary talent.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fun, fun fun! I'm new to this TC thing, but totally enjoying it. I like Jen more and more, loved how playful she seemed during shopping, but so serious when the chips are down. that is one focused chica!
I totally felt it was Jess' time to go, she just totally seemed off her game.›51 Replies-
re: jujuthomas
Jen is less grating on my nerves, too. Plus she has come out on top every time thus far, so girl can cook!
Kevin rocks. Bacon jam? Guy has serious talent underneath that bushy beard! Love him.
Still not warming to the less personable brother, I don't know his name. The one who won this time. But again, he's a talent though I prefer his brother (name?).
Loved the quickfire. I thought it seemed like they all did a stellar job but Jesse was totally doomed from the first episode, so no shock there.
Kinda surprised they booted Hector...I thought they'd just throw out Ashley since she was in the bottom of the QF
Loved Joel Roubuchon's comments and thought Mattin was such a kiss ass when he introduced his plate in French. I know he's French but whatever.
Did they forget to wind Padma up this episode? she was barely on and when she was I thought she was about to take a nap.
-
-
re: Phaedrus
Ick, what is "purging snails"? The QF didn't make me want to run out to my garden and harvest some snails of my own, that's for sure. I enjoy them in France, but perhaps they just don't translate anywhere else.
This was an interesting (non-political--yay!) episode in its focus on dishes and sauces that you don't see much of anymore. Loved the subtitled French from Joel--but did anyone else wonder how he manages to supervise a restaurant in Las Vegas without speaking any Engilsh?-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
The snails you buy are already prepared for cooking. If you harvest your own, it's necessary to cleanse them by putting them in a container with something they can eat so they will purge the unknowns inside them. When we did this, we put them in a big box with cornmeal for 5 days.
You do have to pull them out of the shells, but that is to clean the shells. Usually you'll put them back in after they're cooked, for serving, and fill with the escargot butter.
I like to toss them and the Escargot butter with pasta, and not bother with the shells. Snails are ugly little buggers, but they taste wonderful. ;)
-
re: ChefJune
I guess I just assumed they wouldn't have used snails that had just been harvested, but maybe the pre-cooked comment should have read pre-purged? I still think it would make sense for the snails to come prepped for a QF though, since cleaning them would eat into precious time.
I've had them over pasta before, but I did enjoy using the shells the few times I did it that way. Especially since my roommate and I had fun grossing out our other roommates by chowing down in front of them.
-
re: ChefJune
What kind of stuff would you need to purge out of their systems? The snails and slugs in my backyard gravitate toward only the finest organic vegetables, ignoring the weeds. A regular bunch of Chowhounders.
I can't think of the last time I've seen escargot on a menu in these parts--are they still being served regularly at any restaurant out there?-
re: newhavener07
http://www.heliciculture.co.uk/purgin... Grit and potentially plants they eat that are poisonous to humans.
Starving the snails - PETA will be all over this one if they get wind of it.
-
-
-
re: ChefJune
Chef June - what do snails taste like? I've eaten many dozens, both in restaurants and private homes, but they all tasted only of the sauces they were cooked with - I couldn't detect any "real" snaily flavor, even when eaten unsauced ("chewy mushrooms" is about as close as I get - at least they didn't taste like chicken!)
-
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
I was really wondering about the origin of the snails after seeing them in that bowl, because it would be impossible to cook them from live within the constraints of this show. Bourdain's said that every restaurant he knows uses the canned ones.
I've heard of people cooking them quickly. From the one time I've made them starting from raw, that sounds absolutely disgusting.
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
"Did they forget to wind Padma up this episode? she was barely on and when she was I thought she was about to take a nap."
~~~~~
so it wasn't just me! she was totally moving and speaking in slo-mo. she sounded either drowsy or drugged, i couldn't decide which one. i almost expected her to nod off at the table...-
-
-
-
-
re: newhavener07
As much as I'd prefer him on the show, Jay unfortunately, won't be on.
But that was one thing I had forgotten to note - Toby hasn't been around yet, and we're 4 episodes in! Haven't seen anything about when he's supposed to be showing up.....can't have been visa problems again, can it?
-
-
-
-
-
re: NellyNel
Yeah, Blais's weird photo is back - wish they'd get rid of that one! Jamie's is a little strange, but not as bad as Richard's.
And Marcel is "guest blogging"!
http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/blogs...
He's got all of the "buzz phrases" down: Speaking of entering the Robuchon kitchen for the first time: "I remember the first time I donned my whites and entered that brand new kitchen, with my knives sharper than the devil himself, and my nerves more shaken than a fresh Polaroid."
But it looks like he didn't get a copy of the show with the winner of the challenge. He did pick the correct winner, however, but he picked a team vs. an individual....he also named the person in the bottom in his 3 worst as well.
-
-
re: newhavener07
Actually, we had this discussion before. In the case of Emeril and Mario, don't forget about how long they have been in the public eye. With the repeats that shows up on FN etc you are seeing them as they appeared over a period of many years. they are actually aging quite well. Now, with Tom, that is kind of a different deal because this happened over a period of less than a year.
-
-
-
re: dmd_kc
i think Rocco got into a whole fitness & nutrition groove - he looked pretty buff the last time i saw him, and if i'm not mistaken he's done some appearances on The Biggest Loser to teach them about healthy cooking.
didn't Bourdain quit smoking within the past couple of years? the pot belly may have something to do with that.
Tyler Florence is the other one who's been looking pretty bloated for quite some time...
-
-
-
-
-
re: NellyNel
I think he's both - he's obviously thrilled with the caliber of most cheftestants. As Gail said on Wednesday night, the meal they had at Robuchon could *not* have been done by previous seasons' cheftestants - and Tom nodded his head in agreement.
But he gets downright P.O.'d at the stupid mistakes by those who have been told to PYKAG already.
-
-
-
re: thew
Interesting thought. So you think she is saying that the average talent is up this year but the upper 10% are the same. I can see the interpretation . But I also think that the top 10% in this show is much more together as chefs than some of the others from previous seasons.
So far, 7 have not been in the low end. Five have either won or were in the top. Robin has been "IN" for akk four eliminations. Ron has been in but was in the high end for the first elimination.
Bryan is the alpha at two wins. Jennifer is the queen of the quickfire at 2 wins.
So I see a real quick early stratification.
I think there are more better chefs this season and even the ones that are eliminated aren't all that bad this season.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: HabaneroJane
I didn't think that, just that she was probably very nervous with all those French fantabulous chefs. She was veru carefully choosing her words and nodded in agreement mostly. I give credit to Gail, she says what's on her mind. I do like her better since she's married, she seems a bit kinder with her comments and funny.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Loved this show. Random thoughts:
I knew Jessie was a goner, even though I thought all three did a magnificent job with the amuse bouche. Why couldn't they do this well in the initial QF?
Did anyone else catch Ron talking about Robin? I thought the camera work was hilarious. One moment we had Ron talking about how he just does his thing and then comically they show Ron cooking and Robin just jabbering away saying nothing. I also thought it was interesting the Robin accused Ron with running off with her escargot and they end up working together.
I liked Jennifer's comment about the first person to eat a snail and what motivated him to think that snails would be good to eat.
Did anyone else notice Mike I at WF? Mike V and Jenn were rushing about and he was doing the school boy bit with getting in their way playfully and punching them as they went by. That goes to reinforce my assertion that Mike I is still stuck in his adolescent years.
Anyone else thing that Kevin's suit looked incredibly ill fitting, as if they bought it for him that day? And how awkward was it for him to sit in the stew room whilepeople were trying to pump him for info on which ones they liked and which ones they didn't like.
A chuckwagon challenge. Oh really? I guess no Bearnaise sauce in this one. I hope no one tries to have a raw bar a la Anita Lo in TCM.
›15 Replies-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
They *did* buy the suit for him that day according to Gail's blog. (Or maybe the day before during shopping/prep.)
And I too, thought he showed class by not repeating everything he saw. (But that pause could have meant he was toying with them, or he was really tempted to find something he could say without giving anything away ;-) I would have said something like, "How should I know? It was all in French."
I loved how Kevin really appreciated the opportunity to sit at Mount Olympus with the gods. "I have all of Robuchon's cookbooks, even the ones in French that I can't read." I could see how some competitors might not fully appreciate the opportunity, or even sneer at French classics. I'm not thinking of anyone specific, but it was great that he was duly in awe, but still able to make some cogent comments that they listened to.
-
-
-
re: thew
you know, I wondered about that too. On one hand the reward seemed cool to be able to sit and dine w/ those great chefs. On the other hand, it was a bit of a missed opportunity for Kevin and I would imagine he might have sat there thinking about what he would have done in the contestants' places.
I would have liked to hear a few more of his judgements about the other contestants. Maybe an unexpected benefit of the reward was the ability to taste everyone's work to get the measure of his competition?
-
-
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
I actually didn't really see anything wrong with the grocery store antics. The brothers were doing the same thing (as my own brother and I do) and Jen was acting silly herself. I think it points towards that group's general comfort with everything than anything else. Jen and the brothers because they know they are good enough to make it all the way and Mike I because he was cooking with one of the brothers (and therefore in a good situation).
-
re: Phaedrus
i was so uncomfortable for Kevin in the stew room. that was totally uncool of people to put him on the spot like that and expect him to dish. i thought he handled himself really well. i, on the other hand, probably would have looked [whomever asked] straight in the eye and said, "Umm, sorry, but they actually weren't too crazy about your dish. In fact, a couple of the judges spit it out."
but that's just me ;)
-
-
Did anyone else think, that if they were doing a challnege to cook for that many great chefs, that they might give the contestants like a wee bit more time to get their plates together? The two teams that were up for elimination, in particular the beef team, were there because they ran out of time. The tenderloin didn't get to set, and they had to spoon sauce on in the final seconds, to the detriment of the final dish. I know this is a competition, and they have to put boundaries on it, but jeez, I can only imagine how much it sucked for the cheftestants to have to hurry their dishes at the end of the ONE hour they had to cook! My dream is that one day, they will have a challenge with like a 1 day time limit, to finish, so as not to force them to cut corners to get things done. ONE TIME, I'd like to see them get at least a 24 hour timeframe to cook. They do get to prep one day and serve the next, so I guess if they want to brine or the like, they can do it, but there are certain sauces that take more than one hour to make. One time, I'd love to see what they could do un-timeconstrained.
›6 Replies-
-
re: DanaB
I don't disagree in general, but in Hector's and Ash's case, one of the judges indicated that there was plenty of time for them to have cooked the beef. The problem was apparently timing. It is possible that there was a problem with the oven because Hector seemed surprised that the meat was not ready earlier. You don't have to be a chef to know that beef has to rest. Ash's problem was that the plate could not be sauced until the meat was plated. .
-
-
I cannot believe that there are this many replies without someone mentioning that bacon jam that Kevin made. Oh my god, that sounded amazing, and I hope that there is a recipe for it soon.
I'm liking Jen more and more. She just seems focused and together and a good cook. Both of the top teams worked really well together, and it showed in their dishes.
›2 Replies-
re: JasmineG
Oh yes, I was surprised no one else (IIRC) used bacon w/their snails, and I definitely want a look at that bacon jam recipe. Wow. And Tom agrees -- from his blog, "Kevin’s bacon jam was so good that while I have never before used any of the dishes that have come out of these challenges, I went home after shooting the season and immediately began working on a bacon jam."
Great line from Eli about thinking Joel Robuchon was a myth, that he didn't really exist, like a unicorn. ;-)
-
re: momjamin
i, too, was surprised that no one else used bacon. when they announced that snails were the challenge, i said "Bacon for the win. no question." my friend who was watching with me looked at me like i was nuts...but i'm not sounding so crazy now, am i? ;)
and yes, i loved that unicorn line from Eli!
-
-
-
And Brian wins - and gets to stage for a week at Robuchon's restaurant - WOW. But did I hear Mike I. say that he and Brian shot the idea for the deconstructed bernaise back and forth? Wasn't that Brian's idea?
Hector/Ash and Mattin/Ashley are in the bottom. Mattin saying he didn't shoot down the suggested asparagus veloute that Ashley suggested? Wow.
›64 Replies-
-
-
re: chicgail
Funny respnses - I thought it was a collaborative effort, Mike wanted to deconstruct - Brian knew how....also, to advocate for the devil, I think its amusing how everyone thinks Mike's continued presence is purely ratings-based because of their dislike of him. Brian didn't have anything to do with him being near the top of several of the challenges so far....having Daniel Boulud pick his escargot as one of his favorites is an indication that the man can cook.
On a weekly basis, I'd a hundred times rather watch what a talented 'villain' can turn out of the kitchen than a likable hack. He's probably high-middle of the remaining pack, but he definitely still belongs there, i'm just saying....-
re: rawdog
Well, I see your point but is he as talented as Stefan? Or Tiffany? Or Stephen? I don't know, but I don't think so. The thing that made those "villains" so much fun is that they had a confidence about them that grated on people. I think Mike I can execute, but I think he is far inferior to the V brothers, Kevin, and Jenn.
-
re: rawdog
Well, as has been stated in the past, by both Colicchio and many others, keeping someone on TC for ratings does *not* happen. The judges only know the food and what they see at JT - they don't see the hijinks behind the scenes until they themselves watch the show, so they're judging solely on the food that gets put in front of them and what they see when that food it being given to them.
I shouldn't have said above my comment about keeping someone around for the drama - I know it's not. Editing is kind of funny that way, though, to make you think that. :-)
Agree - so far, his food shows that he still should be there. I just dislike him, his childish pouting attitude, etc.
-
re: LindaWhit
I agree with both you guys in terms of him not being up to the caliber of the top four; maybe a notch below - along the same lines of Eli or so.
Terrible disclosure upon being the devil's advocate - I kind of like Mike I., in a skin-crawling, inexplicable way. While I generally can't stand the whole "I'll act like an ass to stand out" mentality, or the past chefs like Stefan, Lisa, Ilan, etc..., watching Mike painfully/awkwardly try to flirt to w/ Jenn and act like a 12 year-old dipshit who can cook is somehow highly entertaining to me. That said, I apparently need to now reassess my life...Also, was it just me or was the Mike V. and Jenn reciprocal compliment-fest at the judge's table bordering on sparks-a-flying or what?
-
re: rawdog
Rawdog: Agree on the inexplicable Mike I like. I don't know why either. I think he is an ass but at the same time I think he can cook pretty well. Will he be in the final three? No. But he is like the kid at camp who is at the fringes of being in the cool clique and it is entertaining. And to bring the camp analogy along, Mike V and Jen are totally going to sneak off to the counseler cabin and make out.
-
-
re: LindaWhit
You two make me laugh. Hey, maybe your right after all.My grandmother could kill a chicken for dinner, and grandpa was a butcher, so I guess they were a perfect match.Oh, and she could milk cows and even made a lace tablecloth with peacocks in the design my dad said. Don't find gals like that anymore.
By the way,I figured Hector would be going sooner or later. I noticed he mentioned about latin and carribean food alot,seems he just couldn't get the hang of french food. And shame on Mattin.
He's french so he sound know this stuff blindfolded.
-
-
-
re: rawdog
I totally see the sparks-a-flying between Mike V. and Jenn. IIRC, when they were in the stew room they were sitting next to each other and Jenn had her arms crossed over her lap. I think I saw her finger hooked into the cuff of his chef's jacket. Hmmmmm, a love triangle between Jenn and the Mikes?
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
I thought Brian had done an eggless Bernaise at his steakhouse, but that it was Mike I.'s idea to do a deconstructed Bernaise. I thought he would crash and burn on that!
I was sorry to see Hector go- it can be hard cooking something like a roast in a foreign oven- just knowing when to put it in if the oven isn't calibrated like the ovens you're accustomed to. Ahh well. I know that if we can roast a great beef tenderloin at home a pro should be able to cook it and plate it for 12. If they can do it for weddings....
Mattin instantly went from flying below my radar to coming across as a total jerk who is relying on his accent and bandana to get him through. A French chef should be able to pull off a perfect Veloute.. And the way he threw Ashley under the bus and COMPLETELY denied that he had completely rejected her idea of an asparagus veloute in front of the judges...and his "I'm from France, escargot was like my whole life"... YUCK. I was shouting at the television tonight!
Definitely one of my favorite TC episodes though! :)
-
re: LindaWhit
Wow - Tom called Mattin out in his blog about lying re: the asparagus veloute! "I will note that I respect Ashley for not throwing Mattin under the bus when he lied about this at the Judge’s Table … and I think viewers will lose respect for Mattin for lying."
And a note about Mike I. in Tom's blog - it was Mike Isabella's idea to deconstruct the bernaise; he just didn't know how to do it and Brian told him how. The judges seemed to *know* that it was a Brian dish in the end based on the style of cooking.
-
re: LindaWhit
Ohh, thanks for quoting the blog and showing that Mattin's lie was noted by Tom. Watching the episode I wasn't quite sure if it really occurred like the editing made it out to be- ie that Mattin totally denied shooting down the asparagus idea. But it looks like that's exactly what happened. He's absolutely right- definitely lost respect for him.
-
re: LindaWhit
I was totally floored when Mattin threw Ashley under the bus. Her stock went up a few points in my book for he way she handled it. IMO Mattin should have been the one to go.
As much as I don't care for Mike this really was a collaborative effort.
Jenn is losing ground for me. All of her plate presentations look very similar.-
re: Fritter
Re: Mike I. and "collaborative effort" - while it might have been Mike's idea to deconstruct the bernaise, he couldn't figure it out - even during a test plating Mike I. commented that he didn't think it was going to work...whereas Brian was able to make it work. So I still see it more as Brian's dish.
-
re: LindaWhit
Not to totally jump on the "I hate Mike I." bus but has anyone noticed whenever an opportunity to pair up has come up, Mike I. jumps to Brian? I know they've worked together in the past but Brian's kind of a doormat allowing Mike I. to continue piggy backing off him. Time for Brian to cut the umbilical cord and let Mike I. become a man......yup.....I said it!
I've pegged Kevin and Jen as the top two from day one, with Kevin my favorite. Mike V. and Brian V. would round out the top four unless some dark horse comes along. I just don't think the other contestants are stronger than these four.
-
-
-
re: Phaedrus
in a sense i think you're both right. smarter and safer to pair with someone whose skills you trust than with some hack who could land you both at the losers' JT...*and* i think Bryan isn't concerned that Mike will outshine him because he's probably confident (and seemingly rightly so) that he's a better chef.
-
-
-
re: Dee S
You're actually confusing the brothers. Isabella worked w/ Michael V before, not Brian. He has also been trying to team up w/ Michael V as often as possible.
Even if he is an asshat at times, he makes for interesting tv and can deliver quality dishes. Don't think he'll win but I would like to see him stick around. For entertainment and also food.
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
The Mattin/Ashley incident at Judge's Table is truly a case of da*!ed if you do and da*!ed if you don't.
In real time, Ashley got hammered for not saying Mattin was a liar. Tom interpreted her silence as indifference and had negative feelings about Ashley based on that perception. What if her perceived indifference had been enough to send her home? Certainly, lack of passion has been a factor in sending Eve and Preeti home. Now, after watching the show and learning the truth about Mattin, Tom claims he admires admires Ashley's silence.
Frankly, I'm think Tom failed to be a fair and responsible judge. Ashley's body language clearly communicated that she had something to say about Mattin's lie. Why didn't Tom follow up with a question to Ashley? Why did he automatically decide that contradicting someone is the same as throwing someone under the bus? He owes it to the cheftestants to clarify remarks and body language at Judge's Table. He might ignore the information he learns as mere throwing-someone-under-the-bus, but at least he has heard both sides of a story. (The usual remark about the editors not showing everything that gets said doesn't seem to apply here since Tom's blog indicates surprise.)
-
-
re: Fritter
I think it depends on how well it was done. I think there's a good chance the judges would have appreciated the creativity if the team had pulled it off.
I'd never heard of Mattin's stated rule about not doing green vegetables with veloute. Maybe one exists in classic French cooking (gotta go find my Larousse) -- goodness knows there are all sorts of rules in French and Italian cuisine that are lost on me.
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
"Asparagus Veloute" vs. "Spring Asparagus Soup"?
IIR the classical proportions for making veloute into soup are 50% Veloute, 25% consume and 25% of the product that you are featuring. I guess I need to watch again but wasn't the challenge to use a classic sauce? I wonder how much artistic license Mr. Coq au Vin MUST be made with a Coq would have given the Chef's.
-
re: Fritter
That's how I understood the challenge to be as well, Fritter. But if Mike I. and Brian were able to deconstruct a bernaise and still have it be accepted because it tasted like a bernaise after it all went into the mouth, I would think that an asparagus veloute would also be acceptable. After all, Mattin added bacon (too much!) to his veloute sauce.
-
-
-
re: Fritter
Well, it wasn't a strict commandment to do only the classic preparation -- don't forget the deconstructed sauce Bernaise helped create the winning dish. I'm sure they would have been open to it, had it been done well.
All in all one of my favorite TC episodes, certainly of this season, if not all time.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
re: Indy 67
I'm not sure where you're seeing surprise from Tom at Mattin lying. He just expressed respect for Ashley for not tossing Mattin under the bus. And how do we know that Tom and the other judges didn't follow up with additional questions? JT is far longer than we'll ever see - often the questions, responses from the cheftestants, and deliberations by the judges goes on for hours.
Perhaps there were other questions asked that satisfied Tom and the other judges about Ashley. We see one teeny-tiny bit of JT, remember. Editing takes it down to the 60 minutes, more or less, of the actual viewed show. Unless we get to see a separate video of the entire JT, we have no idea what else is discussed or asked or the responses.
-
re: LindaWhit
Of course, you're right that there's plenty more that we don't see. We'll never know whether Tom said something to soften his criticism of Ashley for her seeming lack of passion.
I'm making the point that the editors did Tom a big disservice by their editing choices if they left out some mitigating remarks. They made the head judge look bad. They made the head judge seem less-than-completely interested in understanding the truth of the dish/team.
If the editors want to ramp up the drama over Mike I's villainy, the credibility of TOP CHEF itself certainly doesn't suffer. However, if the editors cast Tom as someone who doesn't get the best information, that's a counter-productive approach.
-
re: LindaWhit
"And how do we know that Tom and the other judges didn't follow up with additional questions?"
When have the editors of a TV-reality show ever ever ever passed up the opportunity to add "drama" to a sequence? Of course, I haven't seen what's on the cutting-room floor but I'm sure "accentuate drama and product placement" is high on their list of job responsibilities.
-
re: jbw
I don't disagree with you re: the drama. But that doesn't answer the question about follow-up questions. Based on the fact that several judges have said JT can go on for hours, I'm going to believe that follow-up questions were asked, but just not shown. Drama over details, I guess.
-
re: jbw
Drama over details even when one of those details is the reputation of the head judge? Yikes!
Perhaps our community dissects the shows more the average viewer. (Perhaps? Nah! Definitely!) Perhaps the average viewer does want drama over details. I'm just reluctant to think Andy Cohen really wants to emphasize drama over protecting his franchise and that means protecting Tom's reputation on the show.
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Not to stand up for Mike I. because I don't care much, but he trains and works under the same chef as Mike V. so I can see why they would want to work together, as he has said they have in the past- known is so much easier than unknown.
And since Brian works in the same geographical area and has gotten a lot of accolades for his restaurant in the DC area he probably earned a lot of respect from Mike I., also they are very guys guys so it works.
-
-
-
re: araknd
Yes, I recall that as well. But did Mattin mean "in the veloute" or "with the veloute"? If it's with the veloute, then the asparagus shouldn't have been part of the dish in any way shape or form, right?
You wrote "you don't want anything green in the veloute". Based on everything I've quickly looked up about veloute and its daughter sauces, it does look like asparagus would not have been a standard....however, IIRC we did hear that an asparagus-based veloute would have been acceptable to the judges (I'm sure provided it was well made).
-
re: LindaWhit
I'm not sure what the context of Mattin's comment was. Like others on this thread, I was surprised when I saw it on the plate, but it was not the asparagus that killed it, but his overuse of bacon. Was it about the veloute that Colicchio said that everything tastes better with bacon . . . except this sauce or something to that effect?
-
re: LindaWhit
"we did hear that an asparagus-based veloute would have been acceptable to the judges (I'm sure provided it was well made)."
In the end this excludes Mattin either way as he over used bacon. Ultimately there should not be any bacon in an asparagus Veloute unless you used a tiny bit of bacon fat for just a hint of smoke. That would still not be a classic sauce.
BTW I don't believe we heard that asparagus Veloute would have been acceptable.
Tom simply asked Mattin why he didn't incorporate the aspargus into the sauce if he was going to use it.-
-
re: LindaWhit
yes I thought that I heard that too. But what's interesting is that it's not "traditional"and I heard more than once, Joel R for one, and possibly another chef, make comments about some of the others sauces not being a true sauce. The sauce Americaine was one they discussed. I wonder now that if even if they'd used asparagus how the French chefs would reacted. When Tom C said that about the asparagus, I did wonder what the French chefs were thinking. Perhaps there was discussion we didn't see.
-
-
-
-
-
re: LindaWhit
Mattin is not my favorite cheftestant, but I don't think he understood Tom's statement about shooting down Ashley's idea.
Maybe I am being naive, but he doesn't speak English that well, and he responds that this was their first shot. So he used the word "shot" in a different way than Tom did. Tom used "shot down" as in killing an idea, and Mattin used it as "first attempt".
I dunno.
-
Tom C needs to work on his poker face. did you notice his expressions after tasting some of the QF dishes? they were priceless! unfortunately they were also spoilers for some of the bottom dishes.
i'm glad Jesse went home. she was in the bottom every week, and clearly felt out of her element.
Ron & Robyn is a pretty underwhelming pairing, but i almost think the elves are setting us up to *believe* they'll tank, when, in fact, someone else will end up going home...
›1 Reply-
re: goodhealthgourmet
Missed those spoilers...but one thing I noticed in the previews for the dinner - what a bonus for Kevin to sit and listen to how they discuss the dishes the cheftestants are preparing for the guests. AND he gets to comment as well!
Looks like Mike I. and Brian kicked butt in their course, but Eli and Laurine didn't do that well....Mattin is up with Ashley - rut-roh. The Frenchie doesn't do well!
And Jennifer and Mike V. are next....and THEY kicked butt! And here come Hector and Ash...And I'm thinking Hector and Ash will be in the bottom along with Eli/Laurine or Mattin/Ashley.
-
-
Probable and Almost Certain: Mike I will hang on a long time. He's a good villain for this season. They need him for ratings.
It was also predictable that Jessie would be eliminated. I don't know if she can cook, but she sure psyched herself out of the running.
›3 Replies-
re: chicgail
Put your prejudice aside for a moment. Mike I's not the best but he's still one of the better chefs. He's not there just because he's a good "villain." It's annoying that no one gives him any credit because he's sexist. Good cooking isn't related to one's propensity to be sexist.
-
Extremely difficult challenge! Who normally knows how to cook snails. Looking over my book don't know if I even have a recipe.
Sadly it was time for Jess to go.
And MIke I. is still talking down to the viewers.
Got a bad feeling about Ron.
›6 Replies-
re: Withnail42
Agree with the challenge being one of the most difficult QFs I've ever seen. And yes - even Jessie said she just seemed out of place since she got there.
I'm thinking more bad feeling about Robin. And Mike I. doesn't want to make a traditional Bernaise? WTH? Think about who you're cooking for! But Brian may have a good idea with his eggless Bernaise he's used in the steakhouse...we'll see.
BTW, just checked the time frame of the show - yet another 75 minute episode. Love when they do this...I think this particular episode should have been at least 90 minutes! LOL
-
-
-
-
re: momjamin
Nah, sorry to be a spoiler within a spoiler, but I think I remember a promo w/ her getting into a bit of a fight/tiff w/ Eli. But you're right- I don't have a good feeling at all about that team. The editing did a great job of highlighting it, but yikes, those two just didn't really mix well. Kind of uncomfortable to watch.
-
-
-
-


























